City council approves $117M bond request to assist Valparaiso University plan for financial rescue
Ordinance No. 9 2025 passed with a second reading during a special council meeting Friday. At the council's May meeting when the ordinance was first introduced, Valparaiso University officials emphasized the need for the city's support by the first week of June to allow time for the bonds to be purchased.
Council members Diana Reed, 1st District, Robert Cotton, 2nd District, Barbara Domer, D-3rd, Jack Pupillo, R-4th, and Council President Ellen Kapitan, D-At-large, attended Friday's meeting in person and voted in favor of the ordinance, as did Peter Anderson, R-5th, who joined the meeting remotely.
Council member Emilie Hunt, D-At-large, was not able to attend, and nor was Mayor Jon Costas or Clerk-Treasurer Holly Taylor.
City Attorney Patrick Lyp opened the special meeting by recapping the discussion and direction of Wednesday's Economic Development Commission.
'It's the recommendation of the Economic Development Commission that the City Council support and pass this ordinance in the best interest of the community,' Lyp said.
'And as I have continued to emphasize, the City Council is only serving as the needed conduit in order for VU to have access to these bonds in this timely manner. There is not any financial obligation or impact from the bonds being issued which would affect the city or taxpayers.'
Lyp and Valparaiso University officials have also emphasized it is likely that even though the window of funds can extend up to $117 million in general obligation bonds, the latest calculations indicate that it is around $55 million which will likely be used by the university for financial needs.
Mark Volpatti, the university's senior vice president for finance and chief financial officer, once again represented the university at Friday's council meeting and fielded what were only a few follow-up general questions.
When Volpatti attended the May meeting when the ordinance was first introduced, he announced the university has sold or is concluding the sale of the three paintings, a topic which has drawn much public debate and criticism about the fate of the valued works, including Georgia O'Keeffe's 'Rust Red Hills.'
He said the university is moving forward with its freshman village, noting the renovation work was being done without taking on debt and through 'the proceeds from the artwork.' The other artwork being sold are 'The Silver Veil and the Golden Gate' by Childe Hassam and Frederic E. Church's 'Mountain Landscape.'
Among those from the public to speak during the public hearing portion of Friday's meeting was Valparaiso University Senior Professor John Ruff, who has invested years caring for the collection of works at the Brauer Museum of Art at Valparaiso University. He presented the council with a letter with more than 50 signatures representing a stance against the sale of any artwork.
Ruff admonished the university for keeping the sale of the O'Keeffe painting 'secret' until it was reported by the media in mid-May.
Volpatti addressed Ruff's remarks.
'My thoughts do turn to Richard Brauer and John Ruff and I can't imagine the emotions they've had the past two years,' Volpatti said.
'I respect and admire them and their passion for their career. If more people had such passion for their careers the world would be a better place. We have two camps about whether the sale of artwork should be used for the purchase of new artwork or let's look at the university as a whole and use the sale's funds where they are needed at this time. This is a philosophical question and one that won't be answered today.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
New candidates enter Santa Fe City Council, mayoral races
This could be a historic moment for Santa Fe: For the first time, a City Council race other than District 1 appears headed toward a ranked-choice vote. The District 2 race now has four candidates with an announcement Tuesday that consultant and former state government employee Aurora Martinez is running. Incumbent Councilor Carol Romero-Wirth is not seeking a third term. Another mayoral candidate, Jeanne O'Dean, has also entered the race, bringing that field up to eight. Since the city first implemented ranked-choice voting in 2018, only mayoral and council District 1 races have had enough candidates for it to take effect. Unless a flurry of late-declaring candidates enter the race on the city's south side by the Aug. 26 filing deadline, the balance of candidates across the city is shaping up to be significantly lopsided. District 1 has three declared City Council candidates, and District 2 has four. But District 4 incumbent Amanda Chavez and District 3 incumbent Lee Garcia are both currently running uncontested, raising questions about whether residents in the area will be motivated to turn out. The south side has historically had the lowest voter participation in Santa Fe. A news release from Martinez states she believes Santa Fe 'can grow without losing its soul' and that her campaign will emphasize 'affordability, inclusive governance, and the protection of cultural heritage.' In a Thursday interview, she said she is running to advocate for her community and if elected would work to strengthen transparency and financial oversight at the city. 'I want to give that voice to people because there's so many complaints of 'Are you really listening?' ' she said. Martinez lives in the Hopewell Mann neighborhood with her 10-year-old son. A native Santa Fean, she moved away from New Mexico after high school, later returning to Albuquerque, where she earned a degree from the University of New Mexico and began working for the state Children, Youth and Families Department. Struggling to make ends meet as a single parent, she moved back to Santa Fe when her son was a baby into a home built by her grandfather in the 1950s. 'That neighborhood has always been a major part of my life because growing up, we knew everyone down the street,' Martinez said. But when she moved back, 'there were one or two people left.' She said gentrification in the area along with increased crime and homelessness helped her decide to run for City Council, and friends and neighbors encouraged her. 'I'm not a politician,' she said. 'I'm usually not in the forefront; I'm usually in the back, doing all the work.' Along with CYFD, Martinez has also worked for the state departments of Transportation and Finance and Administration. She struck out on her own several years ago, creating the project development firm Noonen-Martinez Consulting Inc. with business partner Sean Noonen. She said she believes her background in government work would serve her well on the council. 'I want to provide suggestions to my constituents and say, 'Here's a bunch of solutions, here's some models that we can do,' and in a way that they can interpret, because that's what I do,' she said. Martinez is using private funding (the deadline to qualify for public funding has passed) and said she has no campaign manager. This is her first foray into politics but she currently serves on the city's Public Safety Committee and served as a Resilient Community Advisory Council Member for United Way from 2023 to 2024, according to the release. Along with advocating for transparency, she said crime, affordable housing and homelessness will be pillars of her campaign. Martinez is joined by fellow District 2 candidates Paul Bustamante, Liz Barrett and Leroy Trujillo. In the mayoral race, new addition O'Dean declined to be interviewed until she has collected enough signatures to be certified as a candidate. O'Dean spoke several times in front of City Council last year on behalf of a developer named James Dugan. She said Dugan was interested in purchasing the entire 64-acre midtown campus from the city outright, a proposal she reiterated at Wednesday's City Council meeting. A written public comment O'Dean submitted to the council Dec. 11 identified her as living in District 3. Solve the daily Crossword
Los Angeles Times
9 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Monaco billionaire developer says he's bailing on Carmel-by-the-Sea, a ‘strange community'
Patrice Pastor spent big bucks on Carmel-by-the-Sea, in part because of cherished childhood memories, vacationing with his father in this charming, if quirky, coastal town. But after snapping up more than $100 million in properties in the area in recent years, the Monaco billionaire has grown increasingly infuriated by delays on his development projects, including a mid-sized retail and residential development that he has been trying to get approved. After six years of hold-ups and redesigns on that project — due, he said, to townsfolk endlessly nitpicking his plans — he has decided to bail on Carmel. 'It's time to leave this strange community, if you can call it a community,' Pastor said in a statement after the City Council this month delayed taking any action on the development, which he named the JB Pastor project in honor of his great-grandfather. City officials, he wrote, have used 'reasons that are akin to a schoolyard' to stand in his way, and it is time, he said, to 'reconsider my investment in Carmel.' In Carmel-by-the-Sea, development — including upgrades to private homes — is notoriously slow. This wealthy Monterey County enclave strictly regulates architecture to maintain the much-vaunted 'village character' of a place filled with cottages, courtyards and secret passageways. Residents in the one-square-mile town, population 3,200, have long sought to keep out the so-called trappings of city life. They have no street addresses, instead giving their homes whimsical nicknames like Almost Heaven and Faux Chateau. And they have no streetlights or sidewalks in residential areas. Over the last decade, Pastor has bought at least 18 properties, including The Hog's Breath Building, the site of the pub once owned by actor and former Carmel-by-the-Sea mayor Clint Eastwood; and the L'Auberge Carmel hotel, which houses a Michelin-star restaurant. In 2023, he paid $22 million for Cabin on the Rocks, the only oceanfront home ever designed by architect Frank Lloyd Wright. Last year, the California Coastal Commission approved his 'visionary plan' to restore public access at Rocky Point, a seaside property he bought for $8 million in nearby Big Sur with views of the picturesque Rocky Creek Bridge. In Carmel-by-the-Sea — where, according to Zillow, the average home price is $2.3 million — Pastor's purchases have become a source of intrigue, and, for some, downright suspicion. Pastor is the scion of a powerful real estate family that built much of mega-rich Monaco, a dense, one-square-mile nation on the French Riviera. His defenders in Carmel-by-the-Sea have questioned whether he has been discriminated against because he is too rich. 'We are not treated the same as everyone else,' Pastor wrote this month. 'I suppose we are now at the point where we need to accept we are not wanted and draw the necessary conclusions.' The city has rejected several of Pastor's design proposals, including multiple pitches for a mixed-use development on the site of what locals call The Pit. Pastor bought the massive, unsightly hole in the ground — the site of a downtown construction project whose previous owners ran out of money seven years ago — for $9 million in 2020 and is still trudging through the city's permitting process. Pastor, in his statement, called the delays with that project a 'grotesque situation.' The latest opposition to his JB Pastor development may have been the final straw. Pastor's most recent plans call for a 12,971-square-foot, two-story complex on Dolores Street that includes eight upstairs apartments, roughly 5,100 square feet of ground-level retail space, and a dozen parking spaces. Plans submitted to the city in 2021 called for the demolition of a former bank annex once used as a community room. Because it was less than 50 years old, it did not qualify as a historic structure — but after it turned 50 in October 2022, the Carmel Historic Resources Board voted to add it to the city's historic resources list. Pastor agreed to build around the annex. Then, another issue arose: The project would require the removal of a small concrete wall, decorated with exposed aggregate and inlaid rocks, built in 1972 by a man local historians dubbed the 'father of stamped concrete.' In the fall of 2023, the City Council said the wall was too important to be moved and sent Pastor's company back to the drawing board. This April, the city's Planning Commission approved the project, marking a major milestone. Two weeks later, 11 residents and business owners filed an appeal. They argued that the development, which includes three buildings, exceeds the city's limit of 10,000 square feet. Each building is smaller than that. But the opponents said that since two buildings are connected by a second-story exterior walkway they should be considered a single structure — one bigger than 10,000 square feet. They also argued that the site would not have enough parking and that planned rooftop gardens would not meet the city's landscaping requirements because they would not be on the ground floor. 'The plans that were submitted and approved in April are still outside of the guidelines and the rules of the city's codes,' Courtney Kramer, one of the appellants, said during a City Council meeting Aug. 4. She said it was frustrating to residents who have 'been through excruciating renovation projects and followed the rules' to see certain projects get a pass. City codes, she said, 'need to be applied consistently in order to preserve this village in the forest.' During the six-hour meeting, the City Council delayed making a decision on the appeal, putting everything on hold again. Ian Martin, one of the appellants, said in an interview Friday that the push-back against Pastor's projects is 'absolutely nothing personal at all' and that longtime locals also go through the same long process. 'Of course, Clint Eastwood was so frustrated with the planning process that he ran for mayor,' Martin said. 'Pastor is not being singled out.' Eastwood, who was mayor in the 1980s, ran for office after fighting with the City Council over what he said were unreasonable restrictions on the design of an office building he wanted to erect. Pastor now owns that building. Martin said that of the 11 appellants, two are former City Council members and three, including himself, are former planning commissioners. They are 'very well versed in the general plan and the municipal code and the design guidelines,' he added. The group, he added, is 'not opposed to the project.' They just believe it has to play by the rules. Chris Mitchell, managing director of Esperanza Carmel LLC, the local branch of Pastor's international real estate company, said in a statement that 'this process has made a mockery of the city's own rules.' 'Our project was reviewed for six years, redesigned five times, and approved by the Planning Commission and City staff,' he wrote. He called the appeal a 'last-minute' political maneuver and stall tactic. 'The message from City Council is clear: it doesn't matter how much you follow the rules, if your business is not wanted here, you won't be treated fairly,' Mitchell wrote. The city administrator, city clerk and members of the City Council did not respond to requests for comment. Karyl Hall, co-chair of the Carmel Preservation Assn., said Pastor has bent over backward to listen to the community and to design — and redesign — his projects with the town's traditional architectural styles in mind. Hall, a retired research psychologist, is an adamant supporter, albeit a surprising one. Hall believes modern architecture — which she describes as 'Anywhere, USA' buildings with sterile facades and box-like structures — poses an existential threat to Carmel-by-the-Sea. She co-founded the preservation association in response to the first proposal for The Pit: a contemporary design approved by the Planning Commission for the previous owners that she called 'the ice box.' Hall said she was heartened by Pastor, who proposed more traditional buildings. In an interview Thursday, she said some in town believe 'that one person who owns so many properties is kind of scary.' But the billionaire, she said, has been treated unfairly. 'The one thing we can always count on with him, which is why I've been supportive, is he's done quality work and he's done work that reflects Carmel's character,' Hall said. 'You can't say that about most of the developers who move in here. They just want to make big bucks.' It remains unclear what Pastor means by 'leave' Carmel. Will he halt his ongoing projects? Or sell his properties? Tim Allen, a real estate agent who has handled most of the billionaire's local purchases, said Thursday that Pastor is weighing his options. 'We need new infrastructure. We need new housing — it's mandated by the state. He's building these things,' Allen said. 'I hope this town rallies around Patrice, or he's gone.'
San Francisco Chronicle
18 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Former city manager sues Santa Clara, claims scrutiny of 49ers led to her firing
The former city manager of Santa Clara filed a lawsuit alleging a pro- San Francisco 49ers bloc on the City Council harassed, bullied and ultimately fired her because she insisted on scrutinizing the team's financial management of Levi's Stadium. In the lawsuit against the city filed Thursday, Deanna Santana accused the so-called '49ers Five' of orchestrating a campaign of intimidation to prevent her from 'blowing the whistle' on suspected legal violations involving the city and 49ers. At one point, the lawsuit claimed, the city even hired an unknown person to conduct surveillance on her and her family when they were on a weekend trip to their vacation home in Pacific Grove. Santana, who served as city manager from 2017 until her 2022 firing, reported the alleged surveillance to police, 'who said they feared for her safety,' according to the complaint. The incident caused her and her family to suffer 'extreme fear, stress, anxiety, insomnia and health consequences," she complained. Soon thereafter, Santana told the council 49ers President Al Guido had potentially illegal conflicts of interest in connection with the team's effort to bring World Cup soccer matches to publicly owned Levi's Stadium. Two days later, she was fired. The council's rationale for firing Santana was a 'lack of confidence' in her, according to actions passed on the day of her dismissal. Mayor Lisa Gillmor had said she believed the 49ers wanted Santana fired because of her suggestion Guido had conflicts of interest involving the World Cup bid. Guido and the 49ers have denied wrongdoing. Thursday's lawsuit, filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court, said her firing was orchestrated by council member Anthony Becker, leader of the 49ers' bloc. Becker was convicted of perjury last year and lost his council seat in connection with election improprieties involving a 49ers lobbyist. A Santa Clara spokesperson declined comment, beyond acknowledging the city has been 'engaged in ongoing settlement negotiations' with Santana and her attorneys. After she was fired, Santana contends the city failed to comply with her termination agreement, withholding promised severance pay and even meddling with her CalPERS pension to deprive her of benefits. The lawsuit doesn't specify how much money is at stake in the dispute. As city manager, Santana was paid about $469,000 per year, according to the Openpayrolls website. She is now acting city manager of Milpitas. Many of the lawsuit's allegations concerning the 49ers and the City Council were first contained in a 2022 civil grand jury investigative report called 'Unsportsmanlike Conduct.' The watchdog agency rebuked pro-49ers officials, saying they 'put the 49ers' interests ahead of the city's interests.' The report also praised Santana and Gillmor for raising 'financial, safety and ethical concerns' about the city's relationship with the team. Santana, a former Oakland city administrator, came to Santa Clara when the council was dominated by 49ers critics. She led a move to replace the 49ers with an independent stadium management company, saying she feared the city was being short-changed on revenue from concerts and other non-NFL events at the stadium. The effort infuriated the 49ers, and in 2020 then-CEO Jed York (now owner) spent $2.9 millionto elect a team-friendly council majority. The new council dropped efforts to replace the 49ers as stadium manager and fired city attorney Brian Doyle, who had defended the city in a series of lawsuits brought by the team. The new council members also began complaining Santana was overpaid and rebuked her, often in sharply personal terms. At one point, council member Kevin Park referred to her as a "dog," the suit says. The allegations about surveillance appear related to a Jan. 26, 2022 article posted on a news website called San Jose Inside. The story accused Santana of being overpaid and reported that she and her husband had just bought the Pacific Grove home. The post was illustrated with a photo of the home, with Santana's car in the driveway. Both the story and photo were attributed to a writer named Alexander Cicak. Days later, the website re-posted the story, replacing the photo of Santana's house with a photo (credited to Cicak)of a public beach. The website soon re-posted the story yet again, this time removing the writer's name from both the byline and photo credits.
