logo
New levies to raise fuel oil prices

New levies to raise fuel oil prices

Express Tribune03-07-2025
OCAC urged the Special Investment Facilitation Council to intervene and recommend the withdrawal of petroleum and climate support levies on furnace oil, which would help restore policy consistency and support critical sectors. PHOTO: FILE
Listen to article
The Oil Companies Advisory Council (OCAC) has cautioned the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) that the climate support and petroleum levies on furnace oil have become effective from July 1, 2025, which will raise its price by over 80%, making many industries, shipping services and independent power producers (IPPs) unviable.
In a letter sent to SIFC, OCAC Chairman Adil Khattak said that the advisory council and its member companies had expressed deep concern and protested over the imposition of petroleum levy of Rs82,077 per metric ton on furnace oil through the Finance Act 2025. "This levy, in addition to the Climate Support Levy of Rs2,665 per metric ton, poses a serious threat to the overall business environment," he said.
"While we acknowledge and appreciate the support extended by the Special Investment Facilitation Council in securing an interim relief from the government – through the recovery of inadmissible general sales tax (GST) on petroleum products via the inland freight equalisation margin (IFEM), this remains a temporary measure with limited scope," he said and demanded a sustainable solution by restoring the taxable status of currently exempt petroleum products, ie, motor spirit (petrol), high-speed diesel (HSD), kerosene oil and light diesel oil (LDO).
He called SIFC's continued support pivotal until full and permanent resolution of the matter. Khattak stated that the abrupt imposition of levies on furnace oil without prior consultation with the industry reflects a complete disconnect from the economic and operational challenges being faced by the sector.
Furnace oil is a deregulated product and its pricing is governed by market forces. It is mainly used to meet energy needs of the domestic industry. "The imposition of such a substantial fiscal burden will have widespread and adverse financial repercussions across multiple business sectors, threatening their viability and long-term sustainability," he remarked.
OCAC said that the new levies would increase furnace oil prices by approximately 80%, making its use economically unviable for key industries such as cement, shipping, textile, glass, tyre manufacturing, large-scale industrial units, foundries and other sectors reliant on boilers and furnaces (commonly referred to as general trade).
This drastic price increase would eliminate domestic furnace oil demand and cause a sharp decline in industrial activity, potentially resulting in partial or complete operational shutdowns, especially where no viable fuel alternatives exist, it warned.
In the letter, OCAC underscored that this measure was in direct contradiction to the government's stated commitment to promoting domestic manufacturing. Rather than enhancing revenues, it is likely to significantly reduce or eliminate furnace oil sales within the country, thereby slashing associated sales tax revenues and undermining industrial competitiveness.
"It will also defeat the objective of collecting the envisaged revenue through the imposition of petroleum and climate support levies."
In the absence of domestic demand, the advisory council said, local refineries would be forced to export furnace oil at a considerable financial loss. This will further strain the financial condition of Pakistan's refining sector and compromise its sustainability.
It pointed out that the government had recently renegotiated tariffs with furnace oil-based IPPs but the new levies would substantially increase fuel costs, pushing those plants lower on the merit order and rendering them inactive.
"This will nullify the gains from recent renegotiations while still obligating the government to make capacity payments, effectively increasing the burden on national finances."
In light of the above, OCAC urged SIFC to intervene and recommend the withdrawal of petroleum and climate support levies on furnace oil. It believes this will help restore policy consistency, support critical sectors of the economy and uphold the principles of fair and sustainable economic development.
"We remain committed to engaging in constructive dialogue and are available for an urgent meeting to further discuss this matter in the national interest," the OCAC chairman added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Auditor General of Pakistan asked to conduct IPPs' audit
Auditor General of Pakistan asked to conduct IPPs' audit

Business Recorder

time10 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Auditor General of Pakistan asked to conduct IPPs' audit

ISLAMABAD: Parliament's Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has launched a renewed push for accountability in Pakistan's power sector, directing the Auditor General of Pakistan to conduct a special audit of Independent Power Producers (IPPs). The move comes amid growing concerns over soaring capacity payments, questionable policy decisions, and the economic burden placed on citizens. Chaired by MNA Junaid Akbar, the PAC meeting scrutinized nearly a decade of data related to the country's private power generation sector. Despite a sharp rise in installed capacity—from 9,765 MW in 2015 to 26,642 MW in 2024 — and a doubling of electricity generation, members questioned whether these investments delivered value for money. More alarming was the escalation in capacity payments to IPPs, which ballooned from Rs 141.5 billion in 2015 to a staggering Rs 1.434 trillion in 2024. These payments are made regardless of actual electricity supplied and are now seen as a major contributor to the spiraling cost of electricity in Pakistan. Chinese CPEC IPPs press Pakistan govt for Rs475bn dues 'This is not just about numbers—it's about decisions that have economically burdened millions,' one PAC member remarked during the session. The Committee criticized the Power Division and its affiliated agencies for failing to provide comprehensive data on energy generation, usage, and cost-effectiveness. The establishment of the Sahiwal coal plant using imported coal came under heavy fire, with lawmakers questioning the rationale behind choosing expensive and environmentally harmful energy sources. 'When the world is exiting coal, why is Pakistan digging deeper into it—literally and financially?' asked one member. Environmental costs and transport inefficiencies only added to the scrutiny. Another major issue raised was the apparent misappropriation of Rs 45 billion from fuel payments to capital expenditures. The matter was referred to the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) for a full inquiry and potential recovery. Members also flagged the paradox of load-shedding continuing despite surplus generation capacity. The Committee demanded to know why the surplus power was not being directed toward industrial and agricultural growth. The Power Division Secretary said that limited surplus electricity was temporarily provided to industries during the winter with IMF consent—and a longer-term plan is under consideration. The Committee also targeted inconsistencies in energy policy, such as the continued reliance on imported LNG while cheaper domestic gas plants remain idle—yet still receive capacity payments. With millions living below the poverty line, members described this as 'an unacceptable failure of governance.' Concern was also raised about the complex criteria for 'protected consumers.' Lawmakers argued that the six-month condition for receiving subsidies unfairly excludes vulnerable households. Officials disclosed that protected consumers increased from 11 million in 2018–19 to 18.7 million in 2025, with subsidies now reaching Rs 389.9 billion annually. A shift to a targeted subsidy system via BISP data is planned by 2027. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

PAC asks AGP to conduct IPPs' audit
PAC asks AGP to conduct IPPs' audit

Business Recorder

time15 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

PAC asks AGP to conduct IPPs' audit

ISLAMABAD: Parliament's Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has launched a renewed push for accountability in Pakistan's power sector, directing the Auditor General to conduct a special audit of Independent Power Producers (IPPs). The move comes amid growing concerns over soaring capacity payments, questionable policy decisions, and the economic burden placed on citizens. Chaired by MNA Junaid Akbar, the PAC meeting scrutinized nearly a decade of data related to the country's private power generation sector. Despite a sharp rise in installed capacity—from 9,765 MW in 2015 to 26,642 MW in 2024 — and a doubling of electricity generation, members questioned whether these investments delivered value for money. More alarming was the escalation in capacity payments to IPPs, which ballooned from Rs 141.5 billion in 2015 to a staggering Rs 1.434 trillion in 2024. These payments are made regardless of actual electricity supplied and are now seen as a major contributor to the spiraling cost of electricity in Pakistan. Chinese CPEC IPPs press Pakistan govt for Rs475bn dues 'This is not just about numbers—it's about decisions that have economically burdened millions,' one PAC member remarked during the session. The Committee criticized the Power Division and its affiliated agencies for failing to provide comprehensive data on energy generation, usage, and cost-effectiveness. The establishment of the Sahiwal coal plant using imported coal came under heavy fire, with lawmakers questioning the rationale behind choosing expensive and environmentally harmful energy sources. 'When the world is exiting coal, why is Pakistan digging deeper into it—literally and financially?' asked one member. Environmental costs and transport inefficiencies only added to the scrutiny. Another major issue raised was the apparent misappropriation of Rs 45 billion from fuel payments to capital expenditures. The matter was referred to the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) for a full inquiry and potential recovery. Members also flagged the paradox of load-shedding continuing despite surplus generation capacity. The Committee demanded to know why the surplus power was not being directed toward industrial and agricultural growth. The Power Division Secretary said that limited surplus electricity was temporarily provided to industries during the winter with IMF consent—and a longer-term plan is under consideration. The Committee also targeted inconsistencies in energy policy, such as the continued reliance on imported LNG while cheaper domestic gas plants remain idle—yet still receive capacity payments. With millions living below the poverty line, members described this as 'an unacceptable failure of governance.' Concern was also raised about the complex criteria for 'protected consumers.' Lawmakers argued that the six-month condition for receiving subsidies unfairly excludes vulnerable households. Officials disclosed that protected consumers increased from 11 million in 2018–19 to 18.7 million in 2025, with subsidies now reaching Rs 389.9 billion annually. A shift to a targeted subsidy system via BISP data is planned by 2027. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

CPEC debt relief: No free pass
CPEC debt relief: No free pass

Business Recorder

time15 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

CPEC debt relief: No free pass

The fate of the Rs1,275 billion power sector circular debt settlement—through refinancing the amount by 18 banks to disburse to the companies in the power sector chain, including Chinese IPPs—is contingent upon Chinese government approval. Authorities are hoping the PM will get the green light during his upcoming visit to China. The plan has been approved by the IMF on the assumption that all Late Payment Surcharges (LPS) will be waived. One of the reasons the Fund approved the plan is that it includes a form of rescheduling (or reprofiling) of the power sector debt within CPEC. However, if the Chinese do not agree, chances are the IMF may not entertain any revised plan that excludes the waiving of Chinese LPS. The Chinese may be reluctant to accept this based on optics. If they allow CPEC loans to be altered, it could set a precedent for the 50-odd other countries under the BRI to ask for relief. Some people say the Chinese may do it for us, as they have done some reprofiling in the case of nuclear power plants (K2 and K3 loans). However, that is a different story, as K2 and K3 are not part of CPEC. Thus, the widespread view is that the Chinese may not accept the proposal, based on optics, to avoid setting the wrong precedent for other borrowing countries. However, if we get lucky and China agrees to waive full (or partial) LPS, this may come with new—and perhaps harsher—conditions, IMF-style, which will be non-negotiable in the future. The question is what type of conditions the Chinese may apply, and whether these will be acceptable for us. Sources close to the Chinese say that one requirement could be to open a revolving account for IPPs under CPEC. This would ensure timely payment of all capacity charges going forward, and in case of non-compliance, it might effectively be treated as a default on due payments. This would mean invoices generated for August 2025 payments must be released within October 2025 to avoid any further delay and prevent additional LPS going forward. In effect, no new circular debt would be created in the future. That would be a tough condition, and given history, it is difficult to commit to payments for the next 10–20 years. If that happens, the Chinese may start repatriating dividends in large chunks. That would be different from the current situation, where IPPs get unsecured credit against pending payments. There could also be a second condition on the upfront tariff, as well as requirements to ensure the security of Chinese nationals in Pakistan. Sources say that even with all these conditions, the Chinese may, at best, accept a 50 percent waiver—against the government's wish for 100 percent. And if the government delays any payment in the future, the waived LPS could become part of the due payments. That is a slippery slope, as China must keep the overall BRI in mind during negotiations. There will be no carte blanche. Fingers crossed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store