The 1600: Is Trump Losing a Step?
Good morning,
🎶Thursday Listening: Gordon Lightfoot - Sundown
Let's start this disgustingly hot and humid day off with a little thought experiment. The 79-year-old president of the United States is asked in the Oval Office if he has plans to fire the chairman of the Federal Reserve. He responds, "I was surprised he was appointed" and then goes on to blame his predecessor for something he did in his first term. Would you be asking questions about the president's mental acuity after that exchange?
Because that exact sequence of events happened yesterday—on camera—and nobody in the room corrected Trump or gently reminded him that it was he who appointed Jerome Powell in 2017, and that Biden merely reappointed him in the middle of Covid in the name of stability. Trump's misremembering of this relatively important piece of information didn't really get picked up in the press. Would that have been the case if it was anyone else? If Joe Biden threatened to fire someone he appointed, and then when asked about it blamed Trump for appointing him, people would rightly be asking questions about whether ol' Joe was still with the ballgame.
One of the many contradictions of the Trump era is that he is both pilloried in the media, but also given a pass and graded on a curve at the same time. He gets away with 10 things a day that would have sunk other presidencies. It's always been his political superpower.
That back-and-forth in the Oval yesterday didn't happen in isolation. There's a handful of recent examples that raise the legitimate question of whether Trump is losing a bit of his fastball. His messaging on the Smeffrey Smepstein saga has been nothing short of a disaster. Like, I've never actually seen him so ill-equipped to spin a story that's bad for him. He is the king of that! Literally nobody on earth is better at shifting the national conversation by sheer force of their own personality. But look at how he's been handling this growing crisis, which has now jumped containment from the world of politics to pop culture with Shane Gillis' (very funny) monologue at the ESPYs last night.
It started with the lame attempt to change the conversation by attacking Rosie O'Donnell. That didn't work and now he can't seem to stop tweeting about it, yesterday referring to his own supporters who have questions about the case... questions members of his own administration have been fanning... as "weaklings" and disowning their support. That came after he said he didn't "understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody. It's pretty boring stuff. I think really only pretty bad people, including fake news, want to keep something like that going."
This is new for him. I've covered this man for a decade now, and he has never been so dismissive toward his own base before. It's worth asking why this story has taken him so off kilter. And I haven't even mentioned Trump's recent bizarre off-hand remark about how his uncle taught the Unabomber at MIT, which did not happen, or that Obama and Hillary "made up" the Epstein files, despite the fact that Epstein "killed himself" while in the custody of Trump's DOJ!
There have also been a number of instances lately of Trump just appearing to be completely out of the loop with major aspects of his own admin. Not once, but three times this year the Pentagon has paused military aid to Ukraine, only to have to restart it once Trump got wind. A couple weeks ago, the president seemed to have no idea what a reporter was talking about when they asked him whether the new tariff deadline was July 9 or August 1. On the Big, Beautiful Bill negotiations, Trump was by all accounts unaware of the extent of the Medicaid cuts, which came after he told GOP lawmakers they could not cut Medicaid, Medicare or Social Security if they wanted to win their next election.
Look, Trump has always governed in a chaotic way and he's never been known to be a micro-manager. No POTUS can be abreast of everything happening in the federal government in realtime, and to Trump's credit he is 100x more available than Biden ever was, so that creates more opportunities for him to misspeak or appear out of the loop. And he also has this crazy lifeforce that, combined with the costume makeup, makes him seem younger than his 79 years. But the president is old, and he's getting older. Not even Donald J. Trump can win a battle against Father Time.
My suggestion is that we pass a constitutional amendment so Trump can run again in 2028, and then convince the Dems to run Biden against him. I just want to see that debate rematch with both of these guys well into their 80s. The matchup America deserves.
The Rundown
It was Donald Trump who, back in 2017, stood in the White House Rose Garden and introduced his pick for Federal Reserve chair as a "wise steward of the economy." But the relationship between Trump and Jerome Powell quickly soured, culminating this week with Trump floating the idea of firing Powell—before saying on Wednesday that he was unlikely to do so. Read more.
Also happening:
Senate vote: The Senate has approved a Trump administration request to cut $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting funding in a victory for the president. The vote, early Thursday morning, was passed 51 to 48 following 12 hours of amendment votes, despite two Republicans objecting to the surrender of congressional control over federal funding. Here's the latest.
The Senate has approved a Trump administration request to cut $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting funding in a victory for the president. The vote, early Thursday morning, was passed 51 to 48 following 12 hours of amendment votes, despite two Republicans objecting to the surrender of congressional control over federal funding. Trump allies split over Epstein: A number of President Donald Trump's biggest allies in the House of Representatives have split with him and called for the complete release of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert co-sponsored a discharge petition announced by Republican Rep. Thomas Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna to force a vote in the House to release the complete files. Read more.
This is a preview of The 1600—Tap here to get this newsletter delivered straight to your inbox.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Trump doesn't have to quit UNESCO again because we never lawfully rejoined
President Trump recently announced that the United States was quitting the United Nations Economic, Social, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) for the third time. This is good news – UNESCO has championed gender ideology in education, discriminatory DEI policies, and the entire litany of woke doctrines. It has also worked to erase Jewish history in the Holy Land. But the administration did not need to bother with formally withdrawing from the treaty — from a constitutional perspective, the U.S. hasn't been a member at least since Trump first quit it in 2017. When Biden sought to rejoin the Paris-based agency in 2023, he neglected to seek authorization from Congress. No one made a big deal of it then, but it means that, for domestic law purposes, the U.S. never actually rejoined. This is an important point with implications for numerous international organizations, especially as the administration sets out on an agenda of U.N. reform. Membership in international organizations was not supposed to be a political revolving door. Congress authorizes membership at the outset. After the U.S. leaves, a whole new congressional authorization must be obtained by any president wishing to rejoin. Under the Constitution, the president can only bring the country into a treaty with the 'consent' of two-thirds of the Senate. That is a substantial hurdle, and deliberately so: Commitments to foreign countries can be harder to pull out of than domestic ones. They can become a way of imposing obligations on the country that are then out of reach of the democratic process. In the 20th century, presidents have often relied on the approval of a majority of both Houses instead, a dubious practice but now widely followed. When the U.S. first joined UNESCO in 1946 (and the World Health Organization in 1948), President Truman was acting pursuant a law passed by both Houses authorizing him to do so. But Congress did not reauthorize Biden's reentry to UNESCO. Instead, he treated the 1946 authorization as a lifetime membership, when in fact it was only a one-time pass. If the U.S. quit a treaty that the Senate had ratified — say the NATO treaty — then a decision to rejoin would be subject to a new requirement of advice and consent. Congressional authorization is a stand-in for Senate ratification and should be subject to the same rules. Consider a parallel case: If a president fires a senate-confirmed appointee, and he or a subsequent president wishes to return him to the same post, no one would argue that he could do so simply on the grounds that the Senate had previously confirmed him. Indeed, Andrew Jackson's Attorney General resigned from his position, and was then reappointed to it — only to be rejected by the Senate. As a statutory matter, the 1946 agreement on UNESCO allowed the president to 'accept membership' — not accept, and accept, and accept again. If a congressional authorization is good for infinite rounds of quitting and rejoining, it makes getting out of international agreements harder than getting in – exactly the opposite of what the Framers intended. The argument of perpetual authorization was invented by Jimmy Carter, who purported to rejoin the International Labor Organization in 1980 based on a 1934 authorization. President Bush neglected to seek congressional approval when he rejoined UNESCO in 2002, nearly two decades after Reagan quit. Neither instance attracted much attention, and two modern actions do not prove a constitutional rule. There is a good argument for the Trump administration having withdrawn from UNESCO as if it were a member — to avoid any doubt or subsequent quibbling. But the administration should clarify that it is 'quitting' only out of an excess of caution, and does not see the U.S. as properly joined, which is consistent with its nonpayment of any dues. To avoid abuse by future administrations, Congress should repeal the antiquated authorizations for UNESCO and WHO, which Trump also announced withdrawal from. If a subsequent president wants to rejoin, he should have to sell it to Congress on the organization's existing records, not the hopes and dreams of the 1940s.
The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Senate Democrats launch radio ad attacking GOP over cuts to rural radio funding
The Senate Democrats' campaign arm is launching a new radio ad Wednesday attacking Republicans for slashing funding for rural radio stations as a part of more than $1 billion Republicans made in cuts to public broadcasting in their recissions package. 'Thank you for listening to your local radio station. But stations like these might not be around for long,' a narrator says in the 30-second ad, which was first shared with The Hill. 'Last month in D.C., Republican Senators cut radio funding, voting to end weather alerts, community news and our way to stay connected,' the narrator continued. 'Rural America relies on radio. But Republican politicians left us behind.' They added, 'We can't trust them to fight for us.' The ads are being aired in recognition of National Radio Day, and they're expected to run in rural stations in Alaska, Iowa, Maine, North Carolina, Ohio and Texas, all of which Senate Democrats are eyeing as potential pick-up opportunities next year. 'Rural communities rely on local radio to stay connected on everything from local news to lifesaving alerts about severe weather — but Republican Senators left them behind,' Maeve Coyle, a spokeswoman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC), said in a statement. 'Republican senators will be forced to explain to their constituents why they're robbing the programs that support their communities in order to pay for a giveaway to billionaires,' she added. President Trump signed a recissions package last month, which rescinds around $9 billion Congress had previously approved for funding for the Corporation of Public Broadcasting (CPB), which helps fund NPR and PBS and its affiliates, and global aid programs. CPB is contending with more than $1 billion in cuts alone. Federal funding makes up a smaller percentage of the money NPR and PBS rely on, but rural stations have already warned it will impact them more severely since it makes up a higher proportion of their overall funding. Republicans have attacked NPR and PBS, arguing they're liberally biased and their programs push 'radical left positions,' which its leaders have pushed back on. Contending with the cuts, the CPB announced it would begin to shut down, with its president Patricia Harrison saying in a statement 'we now face the difficult reality of closing our operations.'
San Francisco Chronicle
a few seconds ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Recall of Supervisor Joel Engardio is a warning shot to other S.F. politicians
Regarding 'Endorsement: No on Joel Engardio recall. Yes on charter reform' (Editorials, Aug. 16): The editorial board disagrees with over 10,000 District 4 voters who signed the recall petition: San Francisco Supervisor Joel Engardio's offenses warrant an immediate vote rather than waiting until the 2026 election to remove him from office. The disconnect is not surprising: For months, the thrust of the Chronicle's news reporting and opinion writers has been that the reason for the recall is that Engardio championed Proposition K to turn the Great Highway into a park. He did not notify District 4 voters about plans to introduce Prop K. Months before submitting Prop K, he met with groups supporting the highway closure, but gave no opportunity to those opposed to lobby or argue through public meetings or other venues. He submitted Prop K at the last minute, so that no competing proposition could be placed on the ballot. He promised traffic issues would be addressed before the Great Highway was closed. Many District 4 voters disagree with the editorial board and view Engardio's 'insufficient outreach' not as a 'political misstep' but as a callous disregard for basic democratic processes. A successful recall sends a warning to politicians: They ignore and disrespect their constituents at their political peril. John Higgins, San Francisco Have hybrid elections Before the city first switched to district elections in 1977, supervisors were concentrated in a few wealthy neighborhoods. The first district elections corrected that, but without a high voter turnout, it resulted in more fringe candidates. Maybe now is the time to retain residency diversity for selecting the top two candidates per district, but make them accountable to all the city voters in a runoff. To me, this is better than adding new at-large supervisors Ann Carberry, Sacramento Trump's claims are baseless Regarding 'Oakland leaders should listen to what Trump's criticism gets right about city' (Letters to the Editor, Aug. 19): While Oakland has problems — like most cities — the headline for the letter in the print edition ('Trump's criticisms are based on reality') is wrong. For one thing, President Donald Trump did not mention and does not pretend to address the issues the letter raises — businesses closing and underfunding of schools — issues that the city government is addressing and that the president's policies are exacerbating. Trump just talks about crime, when the reality is that crime is down in Oakland. So his criticism is not based on reality at all; rather, it is based on his desire to sow fear and to establish what he hopes will be a police state through the deployment of military force in American cities. Trump doesn't care about Oakland; he cares about power. That is reality. Clyde Leland, Berkeley Penalize Sen. Schiff Regarding 'Trump's motivation for accusing Adam Schiff of fraud is clear. But the legal case is not' (Politics, Aug. 15): As the law states, you can have only one primary residence, it has zero exemptions, and the language is quite simple. You can have only one and meeting the requirements is clearly spelled out. Sen. Adam Schiff has zero special status, just like the other 534 members of the House and Senate, nor do the head of any corporation, legal firm, state, local or city government. The story's attempt to present Schiff's side on a clear violation of tax law falls on deaf ears. Schiff should pay all back taxes, penalties and be happy he's not expelled from the Senate. James Sandler, Pleasanton
