This Syrian man stopped an attacker in Austria with his car
STORY: :: This Syrian man hit an attacker in Austria
with his car to prevent further harm
:: February 16, 2025
:: Villach, Austria
:: Alaaeddin al-Halabi, Food delivery driver and Austrian resident
"While I was driving on Villach Bridge, I noticed a commotion, something that seemed unnatural. I looked to the right and saw two people, first I saw someone on the ground, but I didn't pay much attention. I drove forward a bit and started driving very slowly because there were many people, some running, some scared, and some were shouting for help"
"I saw a person with a knife in front of me threatening people. I immediately understood what was happening - there were people on the ground bleeding, and this person was waving the knife in a threatening manner."
"I immediately drove toward him and hit him with my car. The good thing is that the impact wasn't too strong, thank God. I mean, the goal of hitting him with the car was just to neutralise him or stop what he was doing. The goal wasn't to harm anyone."
"People look at me as a hero, but I don't see it that way. I say to people, please, if something like this happens again, you have to do something. You can't just stand there, take photos and film videos.
Alaaeddin al-Halabi, a food delivery driver who left Syria in 2015 and moved to Austria, said he was making a delivery on Saturday when he drove past the attack in the centre of the town of Villach and quickly realised something was wrong.
A 14-year-old boy was killed and five others were wounded in the attack. Authorities said the suspect, an asylum seeker also from Syria, had sworn allegiance to Islamic State and was radicalized online.
More harm would have been done had it not been for for al-Halabi, authorities said.
Afterwards, Al-Halabi said he was shocked to see how those around him reacted: "People attacked me after the incident - people on the street thought I was carrying out an attack like what happened in Germany."
Al-Halabi said he then called the police, who arrived at the scene a few minutes later and arrested the suspect.
Al-Halabi, who has been living in Villach for the past eight years, said he didn't know the suspect was also from Syria. "I'm sorry that someone from Syria did something like that," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Barber says he will stay open after 'hate' attack
The Syrian owner of a County Londonderry barber shop has insisted he will not be put out of business after a weekend attack which police are treating as a hate crime. Mohamad Alaya, owner of Skin Fade Syrian Barber's in Drumahoe, said the shop its windows and front doors were smashed with stones just a week after it opened. "I have been living in Northern Ireland and working for 10 years, but this is the first time something like this has happened to us," Mr Alaya said. Police said the attack happened sometime after 23:00 BST on Saturday. Mr Alaya said the attack on his business would not deter him from working and serving the Waterside community. "We had just opened the shop recently, and we were surprised on Sunday morning when we got a text to say that the windows had been smashed. "Some stones smashed the windows and we phoned the police. "We can't do much about it." Mr Alaya said he had been overwhelmed by the "incredible support" from the Waterside community since the attack. He said local people had rallied around him and his team. "A lot of people from this area came and said they felt sorry for us and said they will support us and help us," he said. "They told us not to give in and people even offered to help clean the shop up and remove the glass. "We just have to continue, fix it now and keep going." Mr Alaya said he and his staff were determined to reopen as soon as possible. "We don't harm anyone; we help this area. We provide a service in this area by cutting people's hair. "Whatever religion, whatever colour of skin, it doesn't matter - everybody needs a haircut. "We will keep going. We will fix the shop. Whatever they did, we will continue."
USA Today
7 hours ago
- USA Today
On trial for sexual abuse, Rays' Wander Franco also facing gun charge
On trial for sexual abuse, Rays' Wander Franco also facing gun charge Show Caption Hide Caption Ex-MLB player Wander Franco arrested again in Dominican Republic Tampa Bay Rays shortstop Wander Franco, who is on the MLB's restricted list, has been arrested again in the Dominican Republic. unbranded - Sport Legal problems for Tampa Bay Rays shortstop Wander Franco continue to mount. Already on trial for alleged sexual abuse of a minor, the former American League All-Star was charged Sunday with illegal possession of a firearm, police said. Franco, 24, was arrested in November following an altercation in a parking lot in San Juan de la Maguana, about 115 miles northwest of Santo Domingo. During the arrest, police found a semiautomatic Glock 19 in his vehicle, according to a statement from the Dominican Public Prosecutor's Office obtained by the Associated Press. Prosecutors said the handgun was registered to Franco's uncle and requested Franco stand trial on the gun charge. In response, Franco's attorney said that since the gun was licensed, "there's nothing illegal about it." Franco is currently on MLB's restricted list as his trial on sex abuse charges continues. The 2023 AL All-Star – who signed an 11-year, $182 million contract with the Rays in 2021 – has not played since August 2023, when he was first accused of having an inappropriate relationship with a then 14-year-old girl in the Dominican Republic. He was placed on the restricted list after he was ordered to stand trial in the Dominican Republic on charges of sexual abuse, sexual exploitation of a minor and human trafficking. Franco faces up to 20 years in prison on those charges and also remains under MLB investigation for violations of its joint domestic violence, sexual assault and child abuse policy.
Time Business News
7 hours ago
- Time Business News
From Asylum to Airport Detention: A Journey Cut Short
VANCOUVER, B.C. — In an era of unprecedented global migration and heightened security protocols, stories of hope and fear often collide at international borders. For thousands seeking refuge, the airport is not a gateway to freedom—it's the final stop in a journey of desperation. Despite the promise of asylum protections under international law, many asylum seekers are detained upon arrival, held without charge, and sometimes deported back into danger. This press release examines the legal landscape, historical precedent, and recent high-profile cases that highlight the fragility of asylum rights when they conflict with national security interests. Amicus International Consulting, a firm specializing in legal identity transitions and global asylum advisory services, has seen a marked increase in clients facing 'airport limbo'—a state of uncertainty where neither asylum nor freedom is guaranteed. Asylum and the Airport: Where Law Meets Reality The 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol form the foundation of global asylum law, obligating signatory countries not to return individuals to territories where their life or freedom would be threatened. Known as the principle of non-refoulement, it is a central principle of international human rights law. But at international airports, these protections can fall apart. Travellers arriving without valid visas or documentation—even those declaring an intent to seek asylum—are often detained in secure transit areas or immigration holding centers. In many cases, they are denied entry before ever setting foot on sovereign soil, creating a legal gray area. Case Study: The Detention of Edward Snowden In 2013, former NSA contractor Edward Snowden found himself stranded in the transit zone of Moscow's Sheremetyevo Airport. After leaking classified documents about U.S. surveillance programs, Snowden attempted to seek asylum in multiple countries. Though he had applied for asylum, he had no valid passport. The U.S. had cancelled his travel document mid-flight. Trapped in legal limbo for over a month, Snowden's case demonstrated how state power and passport control can override humanitarian protections. It also spotlighted how modern airports can serve as detention facilities by another name. The Practice of 'Inadmissibility' Countries including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia commonly rely on inadmissibility determinations to prevent entry. In such cases, an arriving asylum seeker is denied access on the grounds of documentation failure, a criminal record, or security concerns—even before a refugee hearing can be held. In many of these jurisdictions, immigration officers have the authority to exercise discretion at the border. And while claimants can request a hearing or legal review, the process is often delayed or inaccessible from inside detention. Case Study: The Syrian Family in Malaysia In 2017, a Syrian family fleeing civil war arrived at Kuala Lumpur International Airport, seeking asylum. With no valid entry visa, they were denied access and spent over seven months in the transit area, surviving on airline food and sleeping in terminal chairs. Despite Malaysia not being a signatory to the Refugee Convention, human rights groups intervened, and eventually, Canada agreed to resettle them. Their case raised urgent questions about moral obligations beyond legal treaties and the role of non-signatory states in humanitarian crises. Statelessness and Detention One of the most vulnerable groups facing indefinite detention at airports is stateless individuals—those without nationality or recognized citizenship. With no travel documents, no issuing authority to accept them, and no country of return, stateless people can languish in holding areas for years. Notable Example: Mehran Karimi Nasseri The inspiration behind Steven Spielberg's The Terminal , Mehran Karimi Nasseri, lived in Paris' Charles de Gaulle Airport's Terminal 1 for 18 years. A complex web of lost documents, denied entry, and bureaucratic impasses left him in a perpetual state of limbo. Though dramatized in pop culture, his case remains a chilling example of bureaucratic abandonment in global mobility systems. When the System Backfires: Cases of Return to Danger While many countries promise legal due process for asylum seekers, expedited removals have led to tragic outcomes. In 2022, a Cameroonian journalist, fleeing political persecution, was deported back after being denied asylum at a U.S. airport. Within weeks, he was reportedly imprisoned and tortured by government forces. In 2024, an Iranian LGBTQ+ activist was detained upon arrival in Istanbul. Despite declaring intent to seek asylum, he was returned to Tehran under a bilateral deportation agreement. His fate remains unknown. These cases highlight the life-and-death consequences of ignoring asylum declarations made in transit. How Technology Is Weaponizing Borders Modern border surveillance technology—biometric scans, advanced passenger screening (APIS), and artificial intelligence—has made it easier for governments to pre-screen and flag travellers before they arrive. In 2025, over 120 countries are expected to participate in Passenger Name Record (PNR) data sharing, which tracks a wide range of details, including meal preferences and seat selections. When correlated with immigration risk profiles, this can result in pre-arrival denials or on-the-spot detentions. According to Amicus International's research, more than 4,000 travellers were denied boarding based on advanced biometric or risk analysis in 2024 alone. The Legal Loophole: 'Not Yet Admitted' A central problem lies in the legal status of individuals who arrive at an airport but are 'not yet admitted' into a country. In this state, they are often not considered to be under the country's jurisdiction, despite being physically present within its borders. This loophole allows countries to bypass due process by claiming that immigration laws don't apply until the individual is officially admitted. Critics argue that this destroys the intent of asylum law and creates a humanitarian vacuum in some of the world's most modern transportation hubs. Amicus International: Creating Legal Pathways Before the Journey Begins At Amicus International Consulting, clients are advised not to wait until they are at the airport to begin their asylum process. Instead, the firm helps at-risk individuals: Obtain second passports through legal citizenship-by-investment or ancestry programs through legal citizenship-by-investment or ancestry programs File pre-travel asylum or humanitarian visa requests Legally change names and identities when doing so provides enhanced security when doing so provides enhanced security Secure legal counsel in receiving countries before embarking on high-risk travel before embarking on high-risk travel Create documented case files that support asylum or protected status Amicus believes that the key to avoiding airport detention is preparation and proactivity, rather than post-arrival improvisation. Case Study: Asylum Success Through Strategic Planning In 2023, Amicus assisted a Rwandan political dissident targeted by government militias. Rather than risk detention in transit, the client was helped through a multi-jurisdictional citizenship program, securing Saint Lucia nationality via investment. With that passport, they entered Europe visa-free and applied for asylum once safely within a cooperative jurisdiction. The asylum case was approved within nine months, and the client is now a professor at a public university in the Netherlands. Legal Solutions, Not Smuggling Amicus stresses that its approach is rooted in legality and ethics. It rejects any association with smuggling networks or fraudulent document operations. Instead, it provides clients with diplomatic, legal, and administrative solutions to ensure safety, dignity, and compliance with international law. Policy Recommendations To address this growing global issue, Amicus calls on governments and institutions to: Create expedited humanitarian visa programs at embassies and consulates Ensure immediate access to legal counsel upon declaration of asylum Ban the detention of stateless individuals for more than 90 days Reform inadmissibility policies to include pre-screened protections Enhance accountability for returns that result in torture or death Conclusion: The Airport Is Not a Courtroom As migration pressures increase globally, airports have become unexpected battlegrounds for asylum rights. Between biometric profiling and bureaucratic indifference, genuine refugees risk being turned away—sometimes with fatal consequences. Amicus International Consulting believes that asylum is a right, not a privilege, and that systems must be redesigned to reflect this principle at every stage of the journey. Contact Information Phone: +1 (604) 200-5402Email: info@ Website:
