Barber says he will stay open after 'hate' attack
The Syrian owner of a County Londonderry barber shop has insisted he will not be put out of business after a weekend attack which police are treating as a hate crime.
Mohamad Alaya, owner of Skin Fade Syrian Barber's in Drumahoe, said the shop its windows and front doors were smashed with stones just a week after it opened.
"I have been living in Northern Ireland and working for 10 years, but this is the first time something like this has happened to us," Mr Alaya said.
Police said the attack happened sometime after 23:00 BST on Saturday.
Mr Alaya said the attack on his business would not deter him from working and serving the Waterside community.
"We had just opened the shop recently, and we were surprised on Sunday morning when we got a text to say that the windows had been smashed.
"Some stones smashed the windows and we phoned the police.
"We can't do much about it."
Mr Alaya said he had been overwhelmed by the "incredible support" from the Waterside community since the attack.
He said local people had rallied around him and his team.
"A lot of people from this area came and said they felt sorry for us and said they will support us and help us," he said.
"They told us not to give in and people even offered to help clean the shop up and remove the glass.
"We just have to continue, fix it now and keep going."
Mr Alaya said he and his staff were determined to reopen as soon as possible.
"We don't harm anyone; we help this area. We provide a service in this area by cutting people's hair.
"Whatever religion, whatever colour of skin, it doesn't matter - everybody needs a haircut.
"We will keep going. We will fix the shop. Whatever they did, we will continue."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Barber says he will stay open after 'hate' attack
The Syrian owner of a County Londonderry barber shop has insisted he will not be put out of business after a weekend attack which police are treating as a hate crime. Mohamad Alaya, owner of Skin Fade Syrian Barber's in Drumahoe, said the shop its windows and front doors were smashed with stones just a week after it opened. "I have been living in Northern Ireland and working for 10 years, but this is the first time something like this has happened to us," Mr Alaya said. Police said the attack happened sometime after 23:00 BST on Saturday. Mr Alaya said the attack on his business would not deter him from working and serving the Waterside community. "We had just opened the shop recently, and we were surprised on Sunday morning when we got a text to say that the windows had been smashed. "Some stones smashed the windows and we phoned the police. "We can't do much about it." Mr Alaya said he had been overwhelmed by the "incredible support" from the Waterside community since the attack. He said local people had rallied around him and his team. "A lot of people from this area came and said they felt sorry for us and said they will support us and help us," he said. "They told us not to give in and people even offered to help clean the shop up and remove the glass. "We just have to continue, fix it now and keep going." Mr Alaya said he and his staff were determined to reopen as soon as possible. "We don't harm anyone; we help this area. We provide a service in this area by cutting people's hair. "Whatever religion, whatever colour of skin, it doesn't matter - everybody needs a haircut. "We will keep going. We will fix the shop. Whatever they did, we will continue."
Time Business News
10 hours ago
- Time Business News
From Asylum to Airport Detention: A Journey Cut Short
VANCOUVER, B.C. — In an era of unprecedented global migration and heightened security protocols, stories of hope and fear often collide at international borders. For thousands seeking refuge, the airport is not a gateway to freedom—it's the final stop in a journey of desperation. Despite the promise of asylum protections under international law, many asylum seekers are detained upon arrival, held without charge, and sometimes deported back into danger. This press release examines the legal landscape, historical precedent, and recent high-profile cases that highlight the fragility of asylum rights when they conflict with national security interests. Amicus International Consulting, a firm specializing in legal identity transitions and global asylum advisory services, has seen a marked increase in clients facing 'airport limbo'—a state of uncertainty where neither asylum nor freedom is guaranteed. Asylum and the Airport: Where Law Meets Reality The 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol form the foundation of global asylum law, obligating signatory countries not to return individuals to territories where their life or freedom would be threatened. Known as the principle of non-refoulement, it is a central principle of international human rights law. But at international airports, these protections can fall apart. Travellers arriving without valid visas or documentation—even those declaring an intent to seek asylum—are often detained in secure transit areas or immigration holding centers. In many cases, they are denied entry before ever setting foot on sovereign soil, creating a legal gray area. Case Study: The Detention of Edward Snowden In 2013, former NSA contractor Edward Snowden found himself stranded in the transit zone of Moscow's Sheremetyevo Airport. After leaking classified documents about U.S. surveillance programs, Snowden attempted to seek asylum in multiple countries. Though he had applied for asylum, he had no valid passport. The U.S. had cancelled his travel document mid-flight. Trapped in legal limbo for over a month, Snowden's case demonstrated how state power and passport control can override humanitarian protections. It also spotlighted how modern airports can serve as detention facilities by another name. The Practice of 'Inadmissibility' Countries including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia commonly rely on inadmissibility determinations to prevent entry. In such cases, an arriving asylum seeker is denied access on the grounds of documentation failure, a criminal record, or security concerns—even before a refugee hearing can be held. In many of these jurisdictions, immigration officers have the authority to exercise discretion at the border. And while claimants can request a hearing or legal review, the process is often delayed or inaccessible from inside detention. Case Study: The Syrian Family in Malaysia In 2017, a Syrian family fleeing civil war arrived at Kuala Lumpur International Airport, seeking asylum. With no valid entry visa, they were denied access and spent over seven months in the transit area, surviving on airline food and sleeping in terminal chairs. Despite Malaysia not being a signatory to the Refugee Convention, human rights groups intervened, and eventually, Canada agreed to resettle them. Their case raised urgent questions about moral obligations beyond legal treaties and the role of non-signatory states in humanitarian crises. Statelessness and Detention One of the most vulnerable groups facing indefinite detention at airports is stateless individuals—those without nationality or recognized citizenship. With no travel documents, no issuing authority to accept them, and no country of return, stateless people can languish in holding areas for years. Notable Example: Mehran Karimi Nasseri The inspiration behind Steven Spielberg's The Terminal , Mehran Karimi Nasseri, lived in Paris' Charles de Gaulle Airport's Terminal 1 for 18 years. A complex web of lost documents, denied entry, and bureaucratic impasses left him in a perpetual state of limbo. Though dramatized in pop culture, his case remains a chilling example of bureaucratic abandonment in global mobility systems. When the System Backfires: Cases of Return to Danger While many countries promise legal due process for asylum seekers, expedited removals have led to tragic outcomes. In 2022, a Cameroonian journalist, fleeing political persecution, was deported back after being denied asylum at a U.S. airport. Within weeks, he was reportedly imprisoned and tortured by government forces. In 2024, an Iranian LGBTQ+ activist was detained upon arrival in Istanbul. Despite declaring intent to seek asylum, he was returned to Tehran under a bilateral deportation agreement. His fate remains unknown. These cases highlight the life-and-death consequences of ignoring asylum declarations made in transit. How Technology Is Weaponizing Borders Modern border surveillance technology—biometric scans, advanced passenger screening (APIS), and artificial intelligence—has made it easier for governments to pre-screen and flag travellers before they arrive. In 2025, over 120 countries are expected to participate in Passenger Name Record (PNR) data sharing, which tracks a wide range of details, including meal preferences and seat selections. When correlated with immigration risk profiles, this can result in pre-arrival denials or on-the-spot detentions. According to Amicus International's research, more than 4,000 travellers were denied boarding based on advanced biometric or risk analysis in 2024 alone. The Legal Loophole: 'Not Yet Admitted' A central problem lies in the legal status of individuals who arrive at an airport but are 'not yet admitted' into a country. In this state, they are often not considered to be under the country's jurisdiction, despite being physically present within its borders. This loophole allows countries to bypass due process by claiming that immigration laws don't apply until the individual is officially admitted. Critics argue that this destroys the intent of asylum law and creates a humanitarian vacuum in some of the world's most modern transportation hubs. Amicus International: Creating Legal Pathways Before the Journey Begins At Amicus International Consulting, clients are advised not to wait until they are at the airport to begin their asylum process. Instead, the firm helps at-risk individuals: Obtain second passports through legal citizenship-by-investment or ancestry programs through legal citizenship-by-investment or ancestry programs File pre-travel asylum or humanitarian visa requests Legally change names and identities when doing so provides enhanced security when doing so provides enhanced security Secure legal counsel in receiving countries before embarking on high-risk travel before embarking on high-risk travel Create documented case files that support asylum or protected status Amicus believes that the key to avoiding airport detention is preparation and proactivity, rather than post-arrival improvisation. Case Study: Asylum Success Through Strategic Planning In 2023, Amicus assisted a Rwandan political dissident targeted by government militias. Rather than risk detention in transit, the client was helped through a multi-jurisdictional citizenship program, securing Saint Lucia nationality via investment. With that passport, they entered Europe visa-free and applied for asylum once safely within a cooperative jurisdiction. The asylum case was approved within nine months, and the client is now a professor at a public university in the Netherlands. Legal Solutions, Not Smuggling Amicus stresses that its approach is rooted in legality and ethics. It rejects any association with smuggling networks or fraudulent document operations. Instead, it provides clients with diplomatic, legal, and administrative solutions to ensure safety, dignity, and compliance with international law. Policy Recommendations To address this growing global issue, Amicus calls on governments and institutions to: Create expedited humanitarian visa programs at embassies and consulates Ensure immediate access to legal counsel upon declaration of asylum Ban the detention of stateless individuals for more than 90 days Reform inadmissibility policies to include pre-screened protections Enhance accountability for returns that result in torture or death Conclusion: The Airport Is Not a Courtroom As migration pressures increase globally, airports have become unexpected battlegrounds for asylum rights. Between biometric profiling and bureaucratic indifference, genuine refugees risk being turned away—sometimes with fatal consequences. Amicus International Consulting believes that asylum is a right, not a privilege, and that systems must be redesigned to reflect this principle at every stage of the journey. Contact Information Phone: +1 (604) 200-5402Email: info@ Website:
Elle
11 hours ago
- Elle
Netflix's 'Dept Q' Ending, Explained — And How It Perfectly Sets The Scene For Season Two
Netflix's newest whodunnit, Dept. Q, tells the story of Detective Carl Morck (Downton Abbey's Matthew Goode), a reckless-but-ingenious investigator who has recently returned to work after being shot by an unknown assailant. The nine-episode series, which debuted on the platform on May 29, tells the story of Detective Morck in the wake of his attack being assigned to lead a newly-assembled cold case unit. With a Mötley Crüe of unlikely peers, Detective Morck is tasked with his unit's first investigation: the mysterious disappearance of prosecutor Merritt Lingard (Chloe Pirrie) several years earlier. FIND OUT MORE ON ELLE COLLECTIVE But what actually happened to Merritt Lingard? And what exactly does the ending of Dept. Q tell us about the potential for a second season? The first season of Dept. Q opens with Morck having been shot while investigating a crime, and while the series never directly answers the question of who shot Morck or why they did, he does begin to piece together a theory of his own as the series progresses. Morck believes that the shooting was committed by two criminals who were working to distract from the real crime, the killing of the young police officer. Morck hypotheses that the killer had no reason to return to the scene of the crime nor to flee while Morck and Hardy (Jamie Sives) were still alive — unless it was all a ruse to cloak their real motive. The police, per Morck's suspicions, were lured to the scene of the crime as a trap, acting on a report from a nonexistent daughter of the victim. When Morck poses this theory to his team, he finds it's not met with total disdain and instead, at the end of the series, we see Constable Jacobson (Kate Dickie) assign Hardy to run down the facts, paving the way perhaps for a potential second season. When we first learn of Merritt Lingard's disappearance, we learn that while on a ferry with her disabled brother William (Tom Bulpett), she went missing. What what remains unclear is whether she fell overboard or whether she was pushed. Lingard was spotted having some sort of disagreement with her brother before she vanished; is he somehow involved in her disappearance? Morck instructs his new assistant Akram (Alexej Manvelov) to investigate every possible eventuality. Akram is an IT expert assigned to Department Q to keep him out of Jacobson's hair, but he's also a Syrian expat with a mysterious past — one that makes him a serious asset to the newly formed department. Akram argues the facts from the beginning; that Lingard's body never washed up on any shore, and that she was a high-powered solicitor who could have easily made enemies. Morck then begins uncovering clues: the first being a man wearing a mysterious hat with a bird emblazoned on it, drawn by William Lingard. Through conversations with the Lingards' housekeeper, Claire (Shirley Henderson), and Merritt's boss, Lord Advocate Stephen Burns (Mark Bonnar), the Department Q team becomes convinced that Merritt Lingard was, in actual fact, kidnapped, not knocked overboard. In the hunt for Lingard, Morck and Dickson uncover a crucial clue — she was having a relationship with a now-deceased journalist, Sam Haig (Steven Miller), who approached her about corruption in her department. But the detectives quickly hit a snag, struggling to pin down Haig's movements in the days before his death. They then discover that Haig was having a separate affair at the same time as his dalliance with Lingard (with his friend's wife, no less), which leads them to conclude that he couldn't have been in two places at once, and therefore the 'Haig' that Lingard was seeing was a actually some sort of catfish. Yet all of this somehow manages to tie into the question of how Merritt's brother, William, suffered his life-changing injury. In flashbacks, throughout the series we see young Merritt's relationship with Harry Jennings (Fraser Saunders), the local teenager who would later be accused of beating William into a nonverbal state during a robbery gone wrong. But in the final episodes of Dept. Q, we learn that Harry's antisocial brother Lyle was actually the one who beat William after following him that night. Merritt had sewn the seed for Harry and Lyle's aborted robbery-turned-assault after telling her boyfriend about her mother's jewellery and how it could be the key to them escaping the island. Harry died trying to escape from the police — a death that Lyle and his mother blamed on Merritt. Department Q eventually discovers a relationship between Sam Haig and Lyle Jennings. The pair knew each other as children at an institution for troubled boys, and Jennings latched onto Haig, even calling him by his brother's name. The pair reconnected as adults — and Jennings killed Haig by throwing him from his favourite climbing spot. Jennings then assumed Haig's identity, started a relationship with Lingard and, ultimately, kidnapped her, holding her on the grounds of the Jennings' shipping company, Shorebird Ocean Systems. In a beautiful full-circle way, Department Q comes to the salvation of Merritt Lingard. Morck and Akram then run into a problem: after finding Lyle's mother's address, they realise that they don't know how to depressurise the chamber without killing Lingard. As Hardy explains over the phone how to use the controls, the pair are surprised by takes a bullet in the shoulder for Akram, who then dispatches Lyle Jennings with the help of his own mysterious combat training. Ailsa Jennings flees the scene and shoots herself after being confronted by a police cordon, before Lingard is safely removed from the chamber. We might close the series with Morck returning to work — case closed — but there's plenty more where that came from. We still don't know who shot Morck, and with his partner gaining in strength every day, the Department has a full team assembled and ready to solve more mysteries. Dept. Q was based on a book series by Danish crime fiction author Jussi Adler-Olsen. There are actually 10 books in the series, which follows former homicide detective Carl Mørck, who is put in charge of a cold case unit called Department Q, which suggests that there's plenty more where this came from... Dept. Q is now streaming on Netflix. ELLE Collective is a new community of fashion, beauty and culture lovers. For access to exclusive content, events, inspiring advice from our Editors and industry experts, as well the opportunity to meet designers, thought-leaders and stylists, become a member today HERE. Naomi May is a freelance writer and editor with an emphasis on popular culture, lifestyle and politics. After graduating with a First Class Honours from City University's prestigious Journalism course, Naomi joined the Evening Standard as its Fashion and Beauty Writer, working across both the newspaper and website. She is now the Acting News Editor at ELLE UK and has written features for the likes of The Guardian, Vogue, Vice and Refinery29, among many others.
