logo
Major safety warning on popular sunscreen: 'It doesn't do what it says', study finds

Major safety warning on popular sunscreen: 'It doesn't do what it says', study finds

Daily Mail​4 hours ago

A popular sunscreen does not work, potentially leaving consumers at risk of skin cancer, according to a report.
Consumer champion Which? tested 15 sun creams from Boots, Garnier and Nivea, as well as own-brand alternatives, and saw surprising results.
While a £2.99 supermarket-own sun protectant passed the stringent testing process, a £28 branded favourite failed to reach industry standards.
As a result, the consumer body warned, users may not be adequately protected from the sun's ultraviolet (UV) rays - putting them at risk of cancer.
Ultrasun Family SPF30, sold by some of the biggest high street retailers and costing £28, markets itself as being 'perfect for the whole family' and 'especially suitable for children with sensitive skin'.
But the cream failed two separate tests that measured both its sun protection factor -or SPF - and UV protection.
To trial the creams, scientists applied a small amount on volunteers' backs, before shining a lamp on the patch to simulate the sun's rays.
The time it takes for the skin to become red was then measured.
Ultrasun Family SPF30 (left), sold by some of the biggest high street retailers, markets itself as being 'perfect for the whole family' and 'especially suitable for children with sensitive skin'. Another sunscreen that made it on to the Don't Buy list was Morrisons Moisturising Sun Spray SPF30 - £3.75 per bottle
In another test, scientists took a sample of the cream and spread it onto a glass plate to measure the absorption of UV radiation directly.
To pass, the sunscreen needed to provide at least one third of the claimed SPF.
SPF is measurement of the length of time you can be in the sun before you get burnt.
For example, a sunscreen with an SPF of 30 will take 30 times longer to damage your skin compared to no protection at all.
If a product failed to demonstrate the level of SPF it claimed to have on its first test, Which? repeated the test. If it passed the second time around, a third test was done.
Any product that failed either test twice overall, was labelled a 'Don't Buy' by Which?.
Natalie Hitchins, Which?'s head of home products and services, warned shoppers to look out for these products, as they are not guaranteed to protect as expected.
'It's really concerning that widely available sunscreens could be putting families at risk by failing to offer the level of sun protection claimed on the packaging,' she said.
'Our results prove that there's no need to splash out to keep you and your loved ones safe in the sun as we've found other cheap and reliable options.'
A spokesman from Ultrasun told Which? the brand was fully confident in its testing protocols and that these surpass industry standards, adding: 'As an independent brand delivering very high UVB and UVA protection options for over 30 years, our detailed testing processes, independent and peer reviewed, continue to not only meet but surpass industry standards. Our chosen testing protocol is one of the strictest available.
'Further detail and clarification from Which? on their testing protocols would also be helpful, particularly on how these resulted in two different results from the same sample. We conclusively support the results of our independent tests which found the Ultrasun Family SPF30 reached a UVB-SPF in vivo of 31.4 and a UVA-PF in vitro of 13.1 which equates to a 92 per cent UVA absorbance. The UVA absorbance is calculated by the formula 1-(1/UVA-PF).'
Another sunscreen that made it on to this year's Don't Buy list was Morrisons Moisturising Sun Spray SPF30, priced at £3.75 per bottle.
Morrisons says it is looking closely at the data and working with its supplier to carry out additional independent testing.
Sunscreens that did pass the Which? test included Aldi's Lacura Sensitive Sun Lotion SPF50+, which costs just £2.99.
At just £1.50 per 100ml, it also earned a Which? Great Value badge.
Lidl's Cien Sun Spray 30SPF High (£3.79) Boot's Soltan Protect & Moisturise Suncare Spray SPF30 (£5.50) Nivea's Sun Protect and Moisture Lotion SPF30 (£7.90) and Sainsbury's Sun Protect Moisturising Lotion SPF30 (£5.50) all also passed the safety tests.
The damning report comes days after Kelsey Parker, 34, came under fire for admitting she doesn't put sunscreen on her children.
The podcast host claimed daughter Aurelia, five, and son Bodhi, four, 'don't burn' and that using sunscreen 'causes skin cancer'.
The children's father, The Wanted star Tom Parker, tragically died from brain cancer in 2022.
Speaking in the latest episode of her Mum's The Word! podcast about 'the secret world of parenting', Ms Parker confessed that she opts to keep her children out of the sun rather than using SPF to protect them.
She added that she makes 'organic' sunscreen out of beeswax for UV protection instead.
'It's bad for you–that sunscreen,' she said. 'My kids do not wear sun cream.
'The only thing that I may put on them is an organic sun cream.
'My kids, we went on holiday, I never put sun cream on them and they do not burn.
'I never used to wear sun cream, sun cream causes skin cancer.'
Since making the controversial remarks, the expectant mother has been blasted by listeners, who have accused her of spreading 'dangerous misinformation.
One listener wrote on social media: 'This is really dangerous spreading this information. Please research.'
'This is insane and so unsafe. It's so damaging, burning doesn't indicate sun damage, it can literally kill them. Wow,' a second said.
A third slammed the 'dangerous advice', while a fourth called the dismissal of conventional sun cream 'irresponsible'.
Experts say there is no evidence that sunscreen causes cancer in humans.
Dr Bav Shergill a consultant dermatologist at the Queen Victoria Hospital, London and spokesperson for the British Association of Dermatologists, previously told MailOnline: 'Sunscreens are a safe and effective way to protect your skin from burning and other forms of sun damage.
'Millions of people have used sunscreen over many decades so we can be confident about their safety profile.'
Studies have long shown sun creams can contain both mineral and chemical UV filters.
Mineral UV filters mainly remain on the skin's surface and form a physical barrier to deflect UV rays before they penetrate your skin.
Chemical UV filters, meanwhile, absorb UV light and convert it into heat energy.
As well as being used in sun creams, they may be added to other personal care products, such as moisturisers.
Some research on animals, mainly mice, has indicated many commonly used chemical UV filters in high quantities could be endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) — chemicals that interfere with hormones — such as mimicking natural oestrogen found in our bodies.
Lifetime exposure to oestrogen is an established risk factor for cancers, including breast.
But no research on humans has backed this up.
Going without sunscreen, meanwhile, has been shown to directly raise the risk of developing skin cancer.
Around 15,000 people in the UK are diagnosed with melanoma each year—the UK's fifth most common cancer—with the incidence rate rising faster than any other common cancer.
A recent study from Cancer Research UK warned found that an alarming 87 per cent of melanoma cases, the equivalent of 17,100 in the UK each year, are caused by overexposure to ultraviolet radiation, either directly from the sun or sun beds—meaning they could be avoided.
This is because increased UV exposure can damage the DNA in skin cells, triggering mutations that become cancerous.
From here, the cancer can spread to the blood vessels beneath the skin, getting into the bloodstream and spreading throughout the body.
Last year, rates of the cancer reached a record high in the UK, with new diagnoses increasing by almost a third in just a decade, according to the charity.
According to the NHS website, people should apply suncream to avoid burning and use 'at least factor 30'.
'Sunburn increases your risk of skin cancer. Sunburn does not just happen on holiday. You can burn in the UK, even when it's cloudy,' the site reads.
The health service also recommends avoiding the sun when it is at its strongest, between the hours of 11am and 3pm from March to November, and to cover up with suitable clothing and sunglasses.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Poll of the day: Should weight loss drugs like Mounjaro be widely available on the NHS?
Poll of the day: Should weight loss drugs like Mounjaro be widely available on the NHS?

The Independent

time44 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Poll of the day: Should weight loss drugs like Mounjaro be widely available on the NHS?

A major expansion of NHS weight loss treatment begins today, as GPs across England are now able to prescribe Mounjaro – an injectable drug also known as tirzepatide – for the first time. Once limited to specialist clinics or private prescriptions, Mounjaro will now be accessible through general practice for people with severe obesity, specifically, those with a BMI over 40 and at least four related health conditions, such as type 2 diabetes, heart disease, or sleep apnoea. The move is part of a wider rollout aimed at reaching around 220,000 people over the next three years. Supporters see it as a breakthrough in tackling obesity-related illness and easing long-term pressure on the NHS. But others, including leading GPs and pharmacy experts, have warned of potential downsides – from increasing workload and training demands to fears the drug will be seen as a quick fix without proper lifestyle support. 'There's no silver bullet,' said Professor Kamila Hawthorne, chair of the Royal College of GPs. 'We also need to see a focus on prevention, stopping people becoming overweight in the first place so they don't require a medical intervention later,' she added. As the NHS begins this major initiative, we want to know what you think: should weight loss drugs like Mounjaro be made widely available on the NHS? Or should they only be reserved for the most severe cases?

Scotland's 'unhealthiest high street' named and it is in major city
Scotland's 'unhealthiest high street' named and it is in major city

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

Scotland's 'unhealthiest high street' named and it is in major city

Two Scottish cities have been revealed as having the most "unhealthy" streets. Scotland's "unhealthiest high street" has been named in new research. The street was also revealed to be among the most unhealthy in the whole of the UK. Obesity experts at Chemist4U investigated which high streets are the unhealthiest by analysing the most populated cities to see where people are most likely to be affected. They noted the number of unhealthy stores and outlets within a 500-metre radius of each one, including fast food outlets and confectioneries. ‌ According to the results, Buchanan Street in Glasgow is the most unhealthy high street in Scotland. The iconic city street also placed at number seven on the UK-wide list. ‌ The experts found that 28.37 per cent of stores in a 500-metre radius of Buchanan Street are "unhealthy". According to Chemist4U, there are 99 stores with poor diet options and 349 food -related stores overall around the street. Meanwhile, the only other Scottish street to appear on the list is the Royal Mile in Edinburgh. The historic thoroughfare was named as the 16th most "unhealthy street" in the UK. Chemist4U found that, on the Royal Mile, there are 123 stores that it classed as unhealthy. With 546 food-related stores in total in a 500-metre radius, this equates to 22.53 per cent being non-healthy. Elsewhere, topping the overall list as the unhealthiest high street in the UK is St. Peter's Street in Derby. Within a 500-metre radius, it was found that 46.1 per cent of stores were classified as "unhealthy". Placing second on the list is Hales Street in Coventry, followed by High Street in Southend-on-Sea. Rounding out the top five are New Street in Birmingham and High Street in Newport, coming in at numbers four and five respectively. ‌ "While the occasional treat is fine, regularly relying on processed foods can have long-term effects on your weight, heart health, and energy levels. ‌ "Small, sustainable changes, such as swapping fizzy drinks for water or choosing grilled options over fried, can make a real difference. If you're unsure where to start, speak to your pharmacist." To put together their list, the experts narrowed down the results to focus on the most populated cities in the UK. They then counted the number of unhealthy points of interest such as fast food outlets, ice cream parlours, vending machines, confectioneries, bakeries, tortilla shops, and convenience stores. ‌ To determine the percentage of unhealthy stores surrounding each high street, they calculated the ratio of unhealthy points of interest to total food-related points of interest. This percentage allowed Chemist4U to identify the high streets with the highest concentration of unhealthy establishments. See below for the list of the UK's 19 unhealthiest high streets. Additional information can be found on the Chemist4U website. The UK's unhealthiest high streets St. Peter's Street, Derby Hales Street, Coventry High Street, Southend-on-Sea New Street, Birmingham High Street, Newport Fishergate, Preston Buchanan Street, Glasgow Market Street, Manchester Albion Street, Leeds Fargate, Sheffield High Street West, Sunderland Oxford Street, Swansea High Street, Belfast Queen Street, Cardiff Bridlesmith Gate, Nottingham The Royal Mile, Edinburgh Church Street, Liverpool High Street, Leicester Oxford Street, London

Wes Streeting announces investigation into NHS maternity services
Wes Streeting announces investigation into NHS maternity services

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Wes Streeting announces investigation into NHS maternity services

Wes Streeting has announced the launch of a national investigation into NHS maternity services. Speaking in east London, the health secretary said the new rapid review, which will report by Christmas, was intended to provide truth to families suffering harm, as well as drive urgent improvements to care and safety. He told the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) conference: 'For the past year, I have been meeting bereaved families from across the country who have lost babies or suffered serious harm during what should have been the most joyful time in their lives. • 'After my baby died, NHS colleagues mocked me' 'What they have experienced is devastating — deeply painful stories of trauma, loss, and a lack of basic compassion — caused by failures in NHS maternity care that should never have happened. Their bravery in speaking out has made it clear: we must act — and we must act now.' He pointed to 'appalling scandals' in the past 15 years in Shrewsbury, Telford, East Kent, and Nottingham. Officials at the Department of Health and Social Care said the investigation would examine the entire maternity system, including an urgent review into the worst-performing services. The department is also launching a 'national maternity and neonatal taskforce' to be chaired by the health secretary. Labour one year on: send us your voice notesWhat one Labour policy has affected you or your family most and why?Please share your response with us in a voice message on WhatsApp. You can reach us at +44 (0)7353096428. Streeting said giving birth carried risk but 'that risk is considerably higher than it should be because of the state of the crisis in our maternity and neonatal services'. Despite previous government initiatives, inequalities in maternal and neonatal outcomes have become 'more visible, not less', he said, adding that the rate of late maternal deaths has been consistently rising. He said: 'Babies of black ethnicity are twice as likely to be stillborn than babies of white ethnicity, and black women are still two to three times more likely to die during pregnancy or shortly after birth than white women. Tragically, that gap is closing slightly, but partly because more white women are dying in childbirth.' 'It's clear something is going wrong,' Streeting continued. 'Maternity care should be the litmus test by which this government is judged on patient safety, and I will do everything in my power to ensure no family has to suffer like this again.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store