
Catherine O'Brien claimed she was threatened by man in balaclava, court hears
Catherine O'Brien, aged 47, of An Grianan, Ballinroad, Dungarvan, Co Waterford, stands accused of three charges of making gain or causing loss by deception contrary to Section 6 of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001 against complainant John Blake.
Mr Blake transferred €20,000 to the accused for the purchase, transport and insurance of a French broodmare named Lingreville. The defence have alleged that the mare bought by Mr Blake was named Shamalana, not Lingreville, due to an error made in 'good faith'. Mr Blake rejects the claim.
No records of Lingreville's transport to Ireland
On Thursday, July 3, Liz Lynch of Five Star Bloodstock Transport gave evidence via video link about the transporting of a mare. She confirmed the transport of a mare named Shamalana, not Lingreville.
International movements administrator at Weatherbys Annette Doyle appeared in person to give testimony. She explained that Weatherbys would have been informed about any transport of a thoroughbred to another country and that there was no record of Lingreville being brought to Ireland after 2015.
Simon Donagh, defending, asked all three witnesses if gardaí had ever requested their phones as part of the investigation. They said no.
Two €20k transfers into bank account
At Waterford Circuit Court on Friday, Detective Garda Joe Wyse and Conor O'Doherty BL, prosecuting, went through a number of financial documents related to a closed bank account that was opened in 2012 by Catherine O'Brien for her daughter Katie in an Ulster Bank branch in Clonmel, Co Tipperary.
Catherine O'Brien, aged 47, of An Grianan, Ballinroad, Dungarvan, Co Waterford. Picture: Dan Linehan
Documents revealed two transfers of €20,000 made by the complainant John Blake — on February 21, 2018, and April 5, 2018 — via Swift.
The account was closed on May 29 2019. The jury was shown statements of lodgings and transactions.
Simon Donagh, defending, told Det Wyse the large sums of money taken out of the account were 'given to John Walsh', referring to the man Mr Blake met through the accused. Det Wyse confirmed that he was not aware of that.
Mr Donagh then asked the detective if he was aware that the account was closed following a request by gardaí. Det Wyse said: 'I have no evidence of that' and that he understood that the account holder was then based in Cork and closed the account for convenience.
Reports of threats to Ms O'Brien
Det Garda Martin Keohane gave evidence via video link about an alleged incident that occurred on September 21, 2019. The accused claimed several men had come to her house in Dungarvan, threatened her and demanded €46,000 from her.
Mr Donagh asked Det Keohane if he was aware of any additional or video messages containing threats to Ms O'Brien and her home.
Det Keohane confirmed he had seen a video of a man wearing a balaclava sitting in the back seat of a car, purportedly outside of O'Briens' home, asking for 'money owed, stating that the 'problem wasn't going anywhere' and threatening to damage the house.
Det Keohane confirmed that there was no prosecution in the matter.
Ms O'Brien 'never came to court'
Mr O'Doherty noted that two people had been sent forward for trial in Circuit Court but a nolle prosequi verdict had to be given. Det Keohane stated that Ms O'Brien 'never came to court' over the case. He further stated that Ms O'Brien 'couldn't be located' in Waterford for a 'number of years'.
Mr O'Doherty asked Det Wyse if there was any indication that a relative of Mr Blake was present at the alleged incident to which he said no.
Det Wyse told the court that he had analysed Mr Blake's phone on foot of his official statement.
He confirmed that he had photographed the messages between the accused and the complainant from the latter's phone, an iPhone and a Samsung.
According to the detective, in recent months attempts were made to forensically analyse the iPhone but there was a risk of deleting all evidence.
When asked by the defence why the Samsung phone wasn't taken away for analysis, Det Wyse said:
Mr Blake is suffering from cancer, he lives alone and that was the only phone he has.
Mr Donagh queried why Mr Blake's phones were analysed by the detective but not the phones of witnesses Annette Doyle and Liz Lynch.
Det. Walsh said the witnesses were 'cooperative and compliant' and had signed a declaration that their statements were based in fact.
Mr Donagh stated: 'The jury can't be told to take this at face value,' to which Det Wyse replied: 'I don't accept that, Annette Doyle was here.' Mr Donagh said: 'Well, Ms O'Brien says she's not guilty, should we just take that at face value?
Det Wyse retorted: 'The evidence is different though, isn't it?'
Mr Donagh referenced an earlier claim that John Walsh offered to pay Mr Blake back €45,000 in three instalments of €15,000.
Det Wyse confirmed that Mr Blake told him that was a 'possibility of getting his money back.' Jury were presented with a document that pertained to be a settlement dating from October 2021 between the accused, the complainant and John Walsh.
Defence counsel informed the court that they have called John Walsh as a witness and he is due to appear on Tuesday.
The trial continues.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Irish Sun
11 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
‘She thinks about her every day' – Sophie Toscan du Plantier mum in fresh DNA test hope for end of 29-yr murder mystery
THE heartbroken mum of murdered Sophie Toscan du Plantier is hoping new DNA testing methods can solve the 29-year mystery. Marguerite Bouniol, who is in her 90s, is battling 5 The murder of Sophie Toscan du Plantier has been a mystery for 29 years 5 Marguerite Bouniol, mother of murdered French woman Sophie Toscan du Plantier is battling Parkinson's disease Credit: PA:Press Association 5 The murder took place on December 23, 1996, at this house near Schull in Cork Credit: AFP - Getty She lost her husband Georges, 98, who passed away in Newly advanced DNA testing methods may lead to answers as to who killed A team from the They are understood to have focused tests on a bloodstained flat rock and a concrete block used in the shocking READ MORE IN IRISH NEWS Sophie's uncle Jean-Pierre Gazeau told The Irish Sun on Sunday that not a day goes by without Sophie crossing her mother's mind. Jean Pierre said: 'Sophie's mother is now very old. She has Parkinson's and is fragile, but she is good mentally and she is still fighting. She thinks about Sophie every day, all the time, you know? 'She has a very close Sophie, a mum of one, was battered and left to die at the gateway to her holiday home on December 23, 1996, near Schull in Co Most read in Irish News Although self-proclaimed suspect Ian Bailey was arrested, he was never charged and always denied any involvement. Bailey died last year. It is understood Mr Bradley's team carried out extensive new testing with members of Forensic Science Ireland after travelling from its headquarters in Their new M-Vac system works using wet vacuum principles to release and capture cells. A substance is sprayed directly onto the surface while vacuum pressure is simultaneously applied around the pattern, to collect the buffer and suspended particles in a collection bottle. Before travelling over to 'If what I believe will happen actually does, it will be massive for us in a host of ways. 'Please pray for us.' VALUE OF THE EQUIPMENT They include the killing of teenager Krystal Beslanowitch in Utah 28 years ago which was similar in detail to that of the savage and brutal Both local gardai and the cold case unit have been working on the case since 2022. 5 They are understood to have focused tests on a bloodstained flat rock and a concrete block used in the attack 5 Self-proclaimed suspect Ian Bailey died last year Credit: AFP or licensors


Irish Independent
13 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Julia Molony: Why the Macrons' lawsuit against the far-right activist who calls Brigitte a man may backfire
Still, the cross-border legal clash between the far-right YouTuber Candace Owens and Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron definitely wasn't on my bingo card for 2025. And yet here we are. As a professional internet edge-lord, Owens is no stranger to a little litigation. 'The life of Candace Owens, it works like this,' she said on her podcast last week. 'I wake up, stretch, I have a cup of coffee, and then I am served with a lawsuit.' It must have been a surprise, nonetheless, on Wednesday, to see the lawsuit of the day bore the signature of Monsieur and Madame Le President de la Republique. The Macrons say they are seeking justice against the American commentator and conspiracy theorist. Owens is host of an eight-part documentary series, titled Becoming Brigitte and based on a French book of the same name, in which she claims, among other things, that Brigitte Macron was born male and is guilty of statutory rape of Macron while he was still a student at the school where she taught. These, say the Macrons, are 'verifiably false and devastating lies'. Owens' interest in the couple represents a sustained 'campaign of global humiliation'. She has repeatedly ignored requests to correct the record, they say, and so, in a fit of piqued Gallic pride, they have launched a legal battle. Should they have though? They have requested a jury trial, and even gone so far as to pledge to make an appearance in person in the court in Delaware, where the suit was filed. According to the standards of now-unfashionable concepts such as fairness and truth, they arguably have a case. That said, after the recent slapgate controversy in Vietnam, Brigitte and Emmanuel are not immune to accusations of peddling false narratives themselves. US courts grant broad discretion to individuals to comment on public officials But it is unusual, unprecedented, even — this cross-border case between a sitting head of state and their internet troll. It is folly, was the unspoken subtext behind comments given by legal expert Jane Kirtley. 'I think President Macron is going to have a really difficult time with this libel suit,' said the professor of media ethics and law at the University of Minnesota. 'And the reason for that is really simple. "Under US law, public officials are required to prove actual malice, knowledge of falsity and reckless disregard for the truth. In [Macron's] lengthy complaint, he has certainly alleged that on the part of this podcaster, but I think he's also probably not giving enough deference to the fact that courts in the United States grant broad discretion to individuals to comment on public officials.' It raises the question, do the Macrons understand what they are getting themselves into? Owens called it a 'disaster PR strategy' for the Macrons Even their legal submission, running to 218 pages, itemising in exhaustive detail their complaints and responding, point-by-point to the accusations, betrays a yawning cultural gap that will probably work against them. It exposes, too, the infinitely unshakable French faith in form-filling and paperwork. Owens, meanwhile, seems to be relishing all the attention. Dining out on the new international profile the case has brought her, she called it a 'disaster PR strategy' for the Macrons. For her, though, she said it represented an 'irresistible and delicious' opportunity to face France's 'First Lady Man' in the flesh. 'On behalf of the whole world, I will see you in court,' she declared, with gladiatorial flourish, addressing an online auditorium billions strong. It is tempting to suspect the Macrons simply couldn't resist this opportunity to seize the moral high ground. A battle to defend their reputation and their rights was too tantalising, even if participation in a trial risks tarnishing the dignified, statesmen-like image that centrist European leaders, Macron chief among them, are trying to reinforce as a silent rebuke to the vulgarities of populism. In their case against Owens, the Macrons seem to imagine themselves as standard bearers for European values Not least because it serves as a proxy for a broader, epoch-defining ideological clash between European liberalism and the anti-enlightenment neo-conservatism of Trump's America. Macron himself regularly postures as the poster-boy for the former on the international stage. He draws on a long tradition of French universalism, and a national self-image cherished in France, as the birthplace of modern liberal democracy. The country that authored the Declaration of the Rights of Man helped shape, in no small part, contemporary notions of civic rights and individual liberty in America. How affronting, then, for Macron to discover his personal dignity skewered and mounted on the implacable spike of the First Amendment. Thinking of Macron and his wife rocking up to court in the US, I am reminded of the speech by Francois Hollande at the 67th United Nations General Assembly: 'France wants to set an example, not to teach others a lesson but because it's our history, our message. Setting an example in promoting fundamental freedoms is our battle and a matter of honour for us.' In their case against Owens, the Macrons seem to imagine themselves as standard bearers for European values, hoping to jog memories in Delaware, America's first state, of a shared philosophical history. It's a nice idea, but I fear their mission is doomed.


Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
Man who illegally entered 88-year-old's home leaving him in fear has jail term doubled after failed appeal
The appeal court heard that Gerry Cash (33) with an address at Tombrack, Ferns, Co Wexford left the vulnerable pensioner, who has short term memory loss, in a distressed state after entering his Co Kildare house. Cash was convicted in the District Court of trespassing on a building in a manner that causes or is likely to cause fear in another person contrary to section 13 (1) of the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act, 1994. He was sentenced to nine months in custody with the final six months suspended and later lodged an appeal against his conviction. However his defence counsel, Asma Saleh BL, yesterday informed the court that the case would proceed by appealing the severity of sentence only and the prosecuting garda's evidence was not contested. Garda Padraig Murphy told the District Court Appeals Court that gardai got a report on February 22, 2023 from the daughter of the injured party. He said that a neighbour alerted her that they saw a white van outside her father's house and that a man knocked on the window and the door of the house. Garda Murphy said that the man was heard shouting 'I've got you that' before entering the house. He said that the neighbour saw the man in the sitting room and he later left the property in his van. Gda Murphy said that the victim was left 'very shaken and pale' after the incident. Garda Murphy said that the man was in the care of his daughters, who left him alone for one hour a day. He said this had never happened to the man before and he had no memory of the incident due to his memory loss difficulties. Garda Murphy said that CCTV was obtained and shared with gardai allowing Cash to be identified, arrested and detained. He said that in the interview, Cash admitted to being at the scene and leaving a calling card. He was charged with trespassing and was convicted in the District Court. Ms Saleh said that Cash is 'extremely remorseful' for his actions and that he is aware it was bad behaviour. ADVERTISEMENT She said that her client's doctor reports that he suffers from anxiety, depression and low mood swings. She also said that his wife is currently pregnant after a long time in IVF treatment. The daughter of the injured party gave a victim impact statement, telling the court that she is her father's full time carer and that he used to have one hour on his own. She said when she came into her father's house that day he didn't know what had happened and was very pale. She said that he shook as she showered him and he was very upset. She said: 'that man took every bit of independence from my father'. She said that her father worked all of his life and he 'didn't deserve for that to happen to him'. Judge Dara Hayes said that the court had the power to increase the appellant's jail sentence as well as decreasing it on appeal. He said that the original sentence of nine months in custody with the final six months suspended was 'lenient under the circumstances'. He said that it was clear from the injured party's reaction that he was put in a position of some distress. The judge said that whatever independence the man had was taken away and that the injured party was entitled to be unmolested in his own home. Judge Hayes decided to keep the sentence of the District Court of nine months in custody but only suspended the final three months. This represents an increase from an effective three months in custody in the original sentencing, to six months in custody after appeal. He said that he would suspend the final three months for the period of 12 months on the condition that Cash keeps the peace and does not contact the injured party or his family again. Funded by the Courts Reporting Scheme.