Spain pays drivers £8,500 to go electric... as Labour's £3,000 tax kicks in
Spain has reintroduced £8,500 electric car grants in the same week that Labour brought in 'unfair' tax increases on Britain's battery-powered vehicles.
New electric vehicle (EV) drivers in Britain now face paying up to £3,110 in tax bills during the first six years of ownership.
All electric cars are liable for vehicle excise duty (VED), while models worth more than £40,000 come with an added £425 charge payable annually between the second and sixth years of a car's lifespan.
Last week's hefty tax increase – which experts fear will hamper EV uptake – is in stark contrast to subsidies introduced in Spain.
Spaniards can now benefit from up to €7,000 in aid if they scrap a petrol or diesel-powered car older than 10 years.
The grant, which is capped at €5,500 if there is no car exchange, comes in addition to a €3,000 income tax deduction if the new car costs less than €45,000.
The maximum potential savings on buying a new EV stand at €10,000 (£8,500). A previous subsidy scheme came to an end in December, but it has now been brought back to life.
Britain, meanwhile, has not offered an electric car grant since 2022 when the Tories ended a £1,500 scheme nearly a year before the industry expected.
Standard annual car tax, which now costs £195 for zero-emission cars, is also cheaper in Spain. EVs also benefit from a 75pc discount in major cities such as Madrid, Barcelona and Valencia.
The Spanish government hopes its relaunched subsidy scheme, which will run until December at a cost of €400m, will boost EV uptake. Last year, 134,000 were sold in the country, accounting for 11.4pc of total car sales.
In Britain, 19.6pc of sales were EVs yet the numbers were heavily skewed by fleet sales, which comprised two thirds of the sales.
There are fears the new tax bills for electric cars will deter potential buyers. Fewer than one in four drivers intend to buy an EV in the next three years, according to the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders.
The £425-a-year expensive car supplement, which kicks in when a car has a list price of more than £40,000, will impact the majority of drivers thinking of going electric.
Vauxhall lowered the price of its Astra Sports Tourer and Grandland electric cars to come in below the threshold, but most new EVs top £40,000.
Chris Rosamond, of Auto Express, said: 'Levying what is basically a tax set on petrol cars eight years ago on to EVs today is unfair, especially when you consider the large sums involved.
'With private EV uptake already struggling and cost being one of the main deterrents for potential buyers, this change risks slowing adoption at a critical time. The Government should be supporting drivers in making the switch to EVs, not penalising them.'
John Cassidy, of Close Brothers Motor Finance, said: 'The Government's decision to apply VED to EVs only adds to cost concerns which are piling up for motorists, and adds further doubt over the proposed 2030 ban on new petrol and diesel vehicles – with 78pc of motor dealers already lacking confidence that this will go ahead.'
In the Budget, Labour conceded that the expensive car tax has 'disproportionate impact' on EVs and said it would 'consider raising the threshold for zero-emission cars only at a future fiscal event'.
Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, however, did not mention electric cars in her Spring Statement.
A Treasury spokesman said: 'We're investing over £2.3bn to help industry and consumers make a supported switch to EVs, helping deliver our Plan for Change by kickstarting growth and productivity across the UK while helping tackle climate change.
'Our approach ensures fiscal stability while providing incentives through the tax system, such as freezing VED first-year rates (£10) for EVs to encourage the transition to electric and zero-emission vehicles.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
14 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rayner rough sleeping plan ‘could lead to San Francisco-style tent cities'
Angela Rayner's plans to decriminalise rough sleeping could lead to San Francisco-style tent cities in Britain, the Tories have warned. The Deputy Prime Minister announced on Tuesday that the Vagrancy Act, introduced in 1824 to tackle a worsening homelessness crisis after the Industrial Revolution, will be repealed by next spring. However, the Tories claimed the plans would create a 'charter for chaos' if Labour failed to replace the repealed Act with new offences to tackle nuisance rough sleeping and begging. The Tories' proposals for repealing the Act when they were in government included two offences that would have given police powers to prosecute nuisance beggars and rough sleeping, which covered any damage they did to property and the environment including 'excessive' noise, litter and waste. Labour insists the police will be able to tackle nuisance begging and rough sleeping by using existing powers in the Crime and Policing Act of 2014, which were created to combat anti-social behaviour. Ms Rayner has also proposed new laws to target organised begging by gangs and trespassing with intention to commit a crime to replace powers in the Act which will be repealed. The row comes during a sharp rise in homelessness which has led to encampments sprouting up even in some of the most prosperous areas of cities. Last September, rough sleepers set up a camp of some 24 tents on Park Lane in central London. The number of people classed as living on the streets in London has risen by more than a third (38 per cent) year-on-year to 706 from 511, according to figures for April. The number recorded as sleeping rough in the capital has also increased by 8 per cent, to 4,427 in the three months to March this year, from 4,118 in the same quarter last year. 'Charter for chaos' Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'Ms Rayner's plans are a charter for chaos. The Government is repealing legislation without providing an adequate replacement. 'The police will not have the powers needed to ensure that high streets and town and city centres are kept clear of nuisance rough sleeping. 'Of course, people need to be helped and supported but the police also need the powers to take action when necessary to maintain order in city centres and maintain a pleasant environment for the majority. 'This move risks turning British cities into a version of San Francisco, which has become overrun by encampments of homeless people. 'We need to ensure support but there needs to be strong enforcement powers as well.' But in a letter to MPs Dame Diana Johnson, the policing minister, said the Government was 'satisfied that generally where nuisance begging meets the threshold of anti-social behaviour, it is open to the police and others to use the existing powers in the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014'. She said the Home Office would issue statutory guidance to police to 'make this clear' so officers could tackle nuisance begging that caused distress to the public and residents. Two new offences will replace powers which were in the Vagrancy Act, she added. An offence of arranging or facilitating begging for gain would target people who organised begging gangs or drove people to places for them to beg. It would carry a maximum sentence of six months in jail. An offence of trespassing with intent to commit a criminal offence would replicate the one already in the 1824 act with a maximum penalty of three months in jail. Ms Rayner has also secured an extra £233 million this financial year to provide a total of nearly £1 billion for support services to divert homeless people away from the street and rough sleeping and into accommodation.
The National
14 minutes ago
- The National
Scottish Government rules out reopening national park process
With ministers having decided not to proceed with plans to establish a national park in Galloway, Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon said she would not be 'reopening' the process. That was despite Galloway having been selected for consideration from a shortlist of five areas. As Gougeon appeared before Holyrood's Rural Affairs Committee, she was pressed on whether one of the other areas could now be considered for national park status. READ MORE: Secondary pupils to receive free school meals in eligibility expansion Noting that the plans for Galloway had been abandoned because of a lack of public support in the area, Green MSP Mark Ruskell said in one of the other shortlisted areas, Tay Forest, a consultation had found a 'large majority support for a national park in that area'. He told the Rural Affairs Secretary: 'You have one area which does have public support, does meet the criteria, what would be the future for a national park in Tay Forest at this point?' Gougeon told him: 'We set out a process to establish or to designate a new national park in Scotland, as far as I am concerned we have completed that process and we have come to a decision not to proceed with that designation. 'So, I wouldn't want you to now think we are going to reopen that or go back to consider other bids, because we have been through that process and that has been completed. 'So, I won't be going back to review those bids or to consider proceeding on that basis.' Gougeon added that ministers are 'open to considering establishing a national park, potentially in the future' but with the next Holyrood elections taking place in May 2026 she stressed that this would be for a future government to consider. Ruskell said: 'That sounds like no more national parks for the foreseeable future, at a time when there are lots of national park proposals being developed in England and elsewhere.' Scotland currently has two national parks, with one in the Cairngorms and one in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs. The Scottish Government's commitment to creating a new one came out of the powersharing agreement between the SNP and the Scottish Greens at Holyrood – a deal which came to an end last year when then first minister Humza Yousaf ejected the smaller party from his government. Gougeon appeared before Holyrood's Rural Affairs Committee some two weeks after she confirmed that the Government would not be proceeding with the proposed national park in Galloway. She told MSPs than that a consultation had found 54% of people were opposed to a national park in the area, with 42% in favour. Among local people, 57% were against the national park bid while 40% were supportive of it, Ms Gougeon added.
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Greta Thunberg's own statements accusing Israel of 'illegal acts'
Greta Thunberg said last night that she was not aware that some of those involved in the 'freedom flotilla' voyage had previously shown support for Hamas and Hezbollah. 'I haven't heard about it or what this person has said,' the 22-year-old activist told Swedish media as she landed back in her home country. When asked why she did not know about the views of people she was travelling with, she said: 'Because I haven't had a phone.' She was then challenged by reporters who asked why she had not looked into the issue before she set off on the ship bound for Gaza. 'Should I ask exactly everyone what exactly they have said about everything?' she then asked curtly. 'It would take some time.' Zaher Birawi, who organised the mission on the British-flagged ship, was accused of being a 'Hamas operative' by Labour MP Christian Wakefield in 2023. Birawi, who is based in London and describes himself as a 'founding member' of the Freedom Flotilla International Coalition, has also been labelled as such by Israel. He is the head of the Europal Forum, which Israel designated as a terrorist organisation in 2021, and has previously been pictured with Ismail Haniyeh, the former Hamas leader who was assassinated by Israel last year. Meanwhile an activist who travelled on the Madleen aid boat, Brazilian national Thiago Avila, reportedly attended Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah's funeral in Beirut last year, and wrote on social media that he was 'inspired' by the Lebanese terrorist chief. Thunberg's comments came as she landed in Sweden at around 10.30pm Tuesday night after a brief stop in France following her deportation from Israel. She was welcomed at Arlanda Airport in Stockholm by dozens of people waving Palestinian flags, who presented her with flowers and a keffiyeh scarf as they shouted 'free Palestine!' Of the 12 activists on board the Madleen, four including Thunberg agreed to be deported immediately, while all of them have been banned from Israel for 100 years, the rights group that legally represents some of them said in a statement. The remaining eight were taken into custody after they refused to leave Israel voluntarily, and brought before a detention review tribunal on Tuesday, rights group Adalah added. Thunberg yesterday vowed to return to the country despite the restrictions apparently placed on her. The group had set sail towards Gaza carrying what they called a symbolic amount of aid, before being intercepted by Israeli forces in international waters off the coast of Egypt early Monday. They were then taken to the port of Ashdod, where Thunberg was detained before being placed on a flight to France on Tuesday morning. Asked in Stockholm if she was scared when the security forces boarded the Madleen sailboat, Thunberg replied: 'What I'm afraid of is that people are silent during an ongoing genocide. What I feel most is concern for the continued violations of international law and war crimes that Israel is guilty of.' She accused Israel of carrying out a 'systematic genocide' and 'systematic starvation of over two million people' in Gaza. Several rights groups including Amnesty International have accused Israel of genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza but Israel vehemently rejects the term. 'We must act, we must demand that our government acts, and we must act ourselves when our complicit governments do not step up,' Thunberg said. She rose to fame as a schoolgirl activist against climate change and seeks to avoid flying because of its environmental impact, going so far as to cross the Atlantic by sailboat twice. Despite her swift deportation, Thunberg was unrepentant. The activist vowed that they 'would not stop' trying to help and promised that 'this is not the end.' Thunberg told journalists shortly after landing in Paris: 'What is certain is that we will not stop. We are going to continue try to do everything we can because that is the promise that we have given to to Palestinians. We are going to try every single day in every way that we can and keep trying to demand an end to the atrocities.' Earlier in the day, Thunberg accused Israel of 'kidnapping' her in international waters, a claim she made previously in a dramatic pre-recorded SOS message released shortly after her detention. But a picture of her smiling as a soldier offered her sandwich after her boat was intercepted quickly went viral. Thunberg accused Israel of orchestrating a PR stunt following the action. Speaking on Tuesday, she doubled down: 'People were not being treated well. I was not able to to say goodbye to people and I don't know what's happening. And there were many, many issues'. Pressed for details on her treatment, she described the experience as 'very dehumanising,' though she insisted: 'But of course, I have to stress nothing compared to what Palestinians are going through. I would prefer not to go into detail'. She added: 'I do know that there were major issues with people actually getting to talk to lawyers. 'When you look at the state of the world, everything feels meaningless. But unless you try to do everything you can, we lose our hope.' The activist, who has long eschewed air travel for environment reasons, was photographed on board an aircraft en route to France earlier on Tuesday - a moment that Israel's Foreign Ministry was quick to publicise, posting the image on social media platform X. Prior to her deportation, Defence Minister Israel Katz said he'd instructed IDF officials to show the activists the full, unedited footage of the October 7 attacks as recorded by Hamas terrorist body cameras. 'It is appropriate that the anti-Semitic Greta and her fellow Hamas supporters see exactly who the Hamas terrorist organization they came to support and for whom they work is, what atrocities they committed against women, the elderly, and children, and against whom Israel is fighting to defend itself,' he said. Late on Monday night, he told reporters: 'Greta and her flotilla companions were taken into a room upon their arrival to the screening of the horror film of the October 7 massacre... when they saw what it was about, they refused to continue watching.' 'The anti-Semitic flotilla members are turning a blind eye to the truth and have proven once again that they prefer the murderers to the murdered and continue to ignore the atrocities committed by Hamas against Jewish and Israeli women, adults, and children.' Katz and other Israeli officials have come under fire for branding Thunberg and her fellow activists 'anti-Semitic' for wanting to deliver aid to starving Gazans. But Israeli government spokesperson David Mencer said: 'This wasn't humanitarian aid. It's Instagram activism... Who's really feeding Gaza and who's really feeding their own ego? Greta was not bringing aid, she was bringing herself.' Meanwhile, the French government revealed that five of the six French citizens detained alongside Thunberg had refused to sign deportation orders, meaning they will now face judicial proceedings. US President Donald Trump did not miss the opportunity to wade in on the controversy. 'I think Israel has enough problems without kidnapping Greta Thunberg. She's a young, angry person... I think she has to go to an anger management class,' he said. Thunberg responded to his comments, saying: 'I think the world needs a lot of more young, angry women, to be honest, especially with everything going on right now'.
