Spain pays drivers £8,500 to go electric... as Labour's £3,000 tax kicks in
New electric vehicle (EV) drivers in Britain now face paying up to £3,110 in tax bills during the first six years of ownership.
All electric cars are liable for vehicle excise duty (VED), while models worth more than £40,000 come with an added £425 charge payable annually between the second and sixth years of a car's lifespan.
Last week's hefty tax increase – which experts fear will hamper EV uptake – is in stark contrast to subsidies introduced in Spain.
Spaniards can now benefit from up to €7,000 in aid if they scrap a petrol or diesel-powered car older than 10 years.
The grant, which is capped at €5,500 if there is no car exchange, comes in addition to a €3,000 income tax deduction if the new car costs less than €45,000.
The maximum potential savings on buying a new EV stand at €10,000 (£8,500). A previous subsidy scheme came to an end in December, but it has now been brought back to life.
Britain, meanwhile, has not offered an electric car grant since 2022 when the Tories ended a £1,500 scheme nearly a year before the industry expected.
Standard annual car tax, which now costs £195 for zero-emission cars, is also cheaper in Spain. EVs also benefit from a 75pc discount in major cities such as Madrid, Barcelona and Valencia.
The Spanish government hopes its relaunched subsidy scheme, which will run until December at a cost of €400m, will boost EV uptake. Last year, 134,000 were sold in the country, accounting for 11.4pc of total car sales.
In Britain, 19.6pc of sales were EVs yet the numbers were heavily skewed by fleet sales, which comprised two thirds of the sales.
There are fears the new tax bills for electric cars will deter potential buyers. Fewer than one in four drivers intend to buy an EV in the next three years, according to the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders.
The £425-a-year expensive car supplement, which kicks in when a car has a list price of more than £40,000, will impact the majority of drivers thinking of going electric.
Vauxhall lowered the price of its Astra Sports Tourer and Grandland electric cars to come in below the threshold, but most new EVs top £40,000.
Chris Rosamond, of Auto Express, said: 'Levying what is basically a tax set on petrol cars eight years ago on to EVs today is unfair, especially when you consider the large sums involved.
'With private EV uptake already struggling and cost being one of the main deterrents for potential buyers, this change risks slowing adoption at a critical time. The Government should be supporting drivers in making the switch to EVs, not penalising them.'
John Cassidy, of Close Brothers Motor Finance, said: 'The Government's decision to apply VED to EVs only adds to cost concerns which are piling up for motorists, and adds further doubt over the proposed 2030 ban on new petrol and diesel vehicles – with 78pc of motor dealers already lacking confidence that this will go ahead.'
In the Budget, Labour conceded that the expensive car tax has 'disproportionate impact' on EVs and said it would 'consider raising the threshold for zero-emission cars only at a future fiscal event'.
Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, however, did not mention electric cars in her Spring Statement.
A Treasury spokesman said: 'We're investing over £2.3bn to help industry and consumers make a supported switch to EVs, helping deliver our Plan for Change by kickstarting growth and productivity across the UK while helping tackle climate change.
'Our approach ensures fiscal stability while providing incentives through the tax system, such as freezing VED first-year rates (£10) for EVs to encourage the transition to electric and zero-emission vehicles.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour's war on Middle England: Rural areas could foot the bill to pay for Rayner's reforms of council tax
Middle England will be hit by the highest possible increases in council taxes to pay for 's reforms to the system, town hall leaders have warned. Households in the countryside will reportedly be charged at unfairly high levels to pay for residents of cities under the Communities Secretary's 'fair funding' plans. Last night, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch branded it a 'spiteful' move that will push more cash into traditional Labour areas. Analysis by the County Councils Network (CNN) found rural and county local authorities will lose close to half a billion pounds in Government cash over the next three years thanks to Ms Rayner's attempt to level up the system. This will force them to cut vital services and hike bills for hard-pressed residents by the maximum 5 per cent allowed. The CCN demanded an urgent injection of cash from Whitehall to fill the gap, warning town halls on the brink would otherwise be unable to provide crucial care for the elderly and vulnerable children. It comes after almost all town halls raised bills by the maximum amount earlier this year to deal with soaring demand and costs, taking the average bill to £2,280. Chairman of the group, councillor Tim Oliver, said: 'Some 16 county and rural councils will see reductions in grant funding, while the Government's proposals place a disproportionate burden on taxpayers in county areas to fund local services and redistribute funding to urban areas. 'It's vital the Government makes more money available to mitigate the impact of these reforms.' Ms Badenoch said: 'Yet again the Labour Government is showing utter contempt for people living in rural Britain. 'The family farms tax has been devastating, and scrapping the rural services grant has put rural councils under enormous pressure. 'This latest change will steal more money out of the hands of county councils and send it straight into Labour-run urban areas.' Under Ms Rayner's Fair Funding Review 2.0, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) will make major changes to how English councils are funded. Her updated formula will allocate cash based on local areas' needs and their ability to raise council tax compared to others around the country. The Institute for Fiscal Studies think-tank has already warned it will create big winners and losers, with those in the home counties likely to suffer budget cuts unless council taxes rise. In its response to the MHCLG consultation, published last night, the CCN said it would mean 16 authorities – including some in the Midlands and North – losing £470million of funding over the next three years. In total, county and unitary councils' grant funding will rise by just £374million. Unless 33 of the 38 town halls impose the maximum 5 per cent council tax rises, they will see a real-terms cut in funding, according to the CCN. Metropolitan authorities will get £1.2billion, and a proposal to redistribute £1.6billion in council tax income will benefit urban areas at the expense of the countryside. An MHCLG spokesman said: 'We do not recognise this analysis. We are taking decisive action to reform the funding system.'
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Japan June machinery orders rise 3.0% month-on-month
TOKYO, Aug 20 (Reuters) - Japan's core machinery orders rose 3% in June from the previous month, government data showed on Wednesday. That compared with a 1.0% drop estimated by economists in a Reuters poll. On a year-on-year basis, core orders, a highly volatile data series regarded as a leading indicator of capital spending in the coming six to nine months, grew 7.6%, versus a forecast for a 5.0% rise, the data showed. For the full table, go to the website of the Cabinet Office: opens new tab
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Japan's exports fall more than expected in July on US tariff pressures
TOKYO, Aug 20 (Reuters) - Japan's exports dropped for a third straight month in July, government data showed on Wednesday, as U.S. tariffs continued to weigh on manufacturers, raising concerns about the outlook for the country's export-reliant economy. The outcome follows unexpectedly strong growth in gross domestic product (GDP) in the April-June quarter, separate data showed last week, fuelled by surprisingly resilient exports and capital expenditure. Total exports from the world's fourth-largest economy dropped 2.6% year-on-year in July in value terms, more than a median market forecast for a 2.1% decrease and following a 0.5% drop in June. Exports to the United States in July fell 10.1% from a year earlier, while those to China were down 3.5%, the data showed. Imports in July dropped 7.5% from a year earlier, compared with market forecasts for a 10.4% fall. As a result, Japan ran a deficit of 117.5 billion yen ($795.4 million) in July, compared with a forecast of a 196.2 billion yen surplus. The United States imposed 25% tariffs on automobiles and auto parts in April and threatened 25% levies on most of Japan's other goods. It later struck a trade deal on July 23 that lowered tariffs to 15% in exchange for a U.S.-bound $550 billion Japanese investment package. The agreed tariff rate on automobiles, Japan's largest export sector, is still far higher than the original 2.5%, exerting pressure on major automakers and parts suppliers. Japanese automakers have mostly absorbed additional tariff costs by cutting prices to protect shipment volumes. But economists expect them to eventually pass on costs to U.S. consumers, which could hamper their sales in the U.S. market. ($1 = 147.7200 yen)
