Longest-serving person on Mississippi's death row executed
The longest-serving person on Mississippi's death row was executed Wednesday, nearly five decades after he kidnapped and killed a bank loan officer's wife in a violent ransom scheme.
Richard Gerald Jordan, a 79-year-old Vietnam veteran with post-traumatic stress disorder whose final appeals were denied without comment by the US supreme court, was sentenced to death in 1976 for killing and kidnapping Edwina Marter. He died by lethal injection at the Mississippi state penitentiary in Parchman.
The execution began at 6pm, according to prison officials. Jordan lay on the gurney with his mouth slightly ajar and took several deep breaths before becoming still. The time of death was given as 6:16pm.
Jordan was one of several on the state's death row who sued the state over its three-drug execution protocol, claiming it is inhumane.
When given an opportunity to make a final statement Wednesday, he said: 'First I would like to thank everyone for a humane way of doing this. I want to apologize to the victim's family.'
He also thanked his lawyers and his wife and asked for forgiveness. His last words were: 'I will see you on the other side, all of you.'
Jordan's wife, Marsha Jordan, witnessed the execution, along with his lawyer Krissy Nobile and a spiritual adviser, the Rev Tim Murphy. His wife and lawyer dabbed their eyes several times.
During a news conference after the execution, Keith Degruy, a spokesperson for Marter's family, read a statement on behalf of her two sons and husband, who were not present at the execution.
'Nothing will bring back our mom, sister and our friend. Nothing can ever change what Jordan took from us 49 years ago,' he said.
Jordan's execution was the third in the state in the last 10 years; previously the most recent one was carried out in December 2022. It came a day after a man was put to death in Florida, in what is shaping up to be a year with the most executions since 2015.
Mississippi supreme court records show that in January 1976, Jordan called the Gulf National Bank in Gulfport and asked to speak with a loan officer. After he was told that Charles Marter could speak to him, he hung up. He then looked up the Marters' home address in a telephone book and kidnapped Edwina Marter.
According to court records, Jordan took her to a forest and fatally shot her before calling her husband, claiming she was safe and demanding $25,000.
As of the beginning of the year, Jordan was one of 22 people sentenced in the 1970s who were still on death row, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.
His execution ended a decades-long court process that included four trials and numerous appeals. On Monday, the supreme court rejected a petition that argued he was denied due process rights.
'He was never given what for a long time the law has entitled him to, which is a mental health professional that is independent of the prosecution and can assist his defense,' said lawyer Krissy Nobile, director of Mississippi's Office of Capital Post-Conviction Counsel, who represented Jordan. 'Because of that his jury never got to hear about his Vietnam experiences.'
A recent petition asking the state's governor, Tate Reeves, for clemency echoed Nobile's claim. It said Jordan suffered severe PTSD after serving three back-to-back tours, which could have been a factor in his crime. Reeves denied the request.
Eric Marter said he does not buy that argument: 'I know what he did. He wanted money, and he couldn't take her with him. And he – so he did what he did.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
United Airlines supervisor allegedly told Black employee to ‘go fetch' a noose - and the company did nothing about it: lawsuit
United Airlines allowed racism and harassment of employees of color to fester unchecked at Denver International Airport, according to a Black employee who says he was fired for speaking up. Amir Brown, 31, says a white supervisor dubbed 'Fast Eddie' ordered a Black staffer to 'go fetch' a noose – but alleges United attempted to sweep the incident under the rug rather than investigate and take action, claims a federal lawsuit obtained by The Independent. After Fast Eddie was reported to higher-ups by a white manager, he was finally fired, along with another white employee who allegedly yelled the n-word while at work, Brown's complaint states. However, according to the complaint, in the period that followed, 'United concealed the incident instead of addressing the underlying cultural issues that had allowed the racist conduct to escalate'. From there, the complaint says Brown 'observed the workplace environment… become increasingly segregated and hostile for employees of color.' Brown, who was part of a team that moved aircraft around the tarmac at Denver International Airport (DIA), claims he was subjected to ongoing bigotry over the course of nearly two years, being ostracized, belittled, and undermined by white coworkers who eventually got him terminated. The harassment was 'frequent and notorious in nature,' and Brown brought his grievances to United on 'multiple occasions,' according to the complaint. Yet, it contends, the airline 'failed to take prompt or effective action to prevent, correct, or remedy the work environment that was hostile for Mr. Brown.' The others were apparently 'upset that [he] was working too much overtime and therefore earning more than them,' according to Brown's complaint. On Monday, attorney Genevieve Mesch, a member of Brown's legal team, accused United of 'turn[ing] a blind eye to anti-Black racism.' 'Black employees also face harsher discipline than their non-Black counterparts,' Mesch told The Independent. 'Despite United being made aware of these incidents, the company has not implemented effective measures to address the culture of discrimination. This case represents one of several similar complaints filed by Denver-based United employees, showing a broader pattern of unaddressed racial discrimination.' Brown's lawsuit, Mesch said, 'seeks accountability and meaningful change to ensure all United employees can work in an environment free from racial harassment and disparate treatment.' In an email, a United spokesperson said, 'United fosters an environment of inclusion and does not tolerate discrimination of any kind. We remain committed to protecting individuals who raise workplace concerns in good faith. As this is an ongoing legal matter, we have no further comment at this time.' Brown began working for United in March 2017 as a ramp service worker at Newark Liberty International Airport. In October 2020, he was promoted to ramp agent and transferred to Denver International Airport, and in January 2023, was selected for a 'speciality position' on the Aircraft Move Team, which repositions planes on the tarmac. 'Throughout his tenure with United, Mr. Brown was consistently recognized for his excellent performance and diligence,' Brown's complaint states. 'Mr. Brown was incredibly hardworking and dependable—frequently working between 70 to 100 hours a week, picking up overtime shifts, and often working 16-hour days back-to-back.' After hiring on in Denver, Brown began to experience a 'work environment and culture that enabled racism towards Black employees,' the complaint goes on. In the months following the November 2020 noose incident, it says things got steadily worse. In October 2022, Brown requested parental leave so he could bond with his newborn daughter, but, according to the complaint, he was told that 'only mothers or management were eligible for bonding time.' Instead, Brown would have to use his allotted 12 days of unpaid leave, and draw on his sick days if he wanted any additional time off, the complaint states. Brown soon discovered that a coworker who was not in management had been approved to take paid leave for bonding time with his baby daughter, according to the complaint. The 'discriminatory treatment that Mr. Brown was experiencing' only intensified when he was promoted to the Aircraft Move Team in January 2023, the complaint maintains. Brown was one of two people of color on the Aircraft Move Team at DIA, where, his complaint alleges, white colleagues refused to acknowledge him or say hello, and arranged things in the break room so Brown would be forced to sit by himself, away from the others. Brown claims the white Move Team members 'refused to partner with [him] on assignments,' and left him to work alone in the hangar, which was against United rules and a potential safety hazard, according to the complaint. 'Mr. Brown's supervisors observed this behavior and took no action to prevent his segregation and exclusion,' the complaint states. Meanwhile, a group of white Move Team employees started submitting 'false reports' to their supervisor about Brown's performance, claiming he was breaking the rules by using his cell phone while on the clock, according to the complaint. It says Brown's boss confronted him numerous times about the accusations, and Brown continually tried to explain that 'the reports were untrue and… that there was no evidence to support the claims.' After speaking with his union rep about the situation, Brown was informed that his Move Team coworkers were 'upset that [he] was working too much overtime and therefore earning more than them,' the complaint asserts. Conversely, it says, no one on the Move Team expressed similar feelings about non-Black employees who were high overtime earners. 'This situation was incredibly distressing and isolating for Mr. Brown and was calculated to make his working conditions so intolerable that he'd quit,' the complaint states. At a crossroads, Brown decided to start spending his off-time in the locker room rather than in the break room, according to the complaint. But, the complaint alleges, a white employee on the team told management he was 'uncomfortable' with Brown sitting near his locker, which the complaint claims was in fact 'based on having a Black man near their locker, not just having an employee near their locker.' From there, Brown found himself targeted by white colleagues in various other ways, being berated and sworn at on the airfield, getting criticized on the radio, and being set up to fail by way of bogus violations for minuscule offenses – such as not being in the break room when a supervisor went looking for him – that did not result in any penalties for non-Black workers who committed similar infractions, the complaint alleges. In addition, Brown says he was denied leave to tend to a broken nose, penalized for an 'unexcused absence' when he was sent to the hospital during his shift for issues related to his injuries, and written up for speeding while driving to the hangar, resulting in a verbal termination warning, according to the complaint. This, Brown's complaint says, was 'disproportionate compared to how other employees were disciplined by United.' Brown told management again and again that he was the victim of racism, but was met with complete inaction, according to the complaint. 'After this termination warning, United manufactured additional attendance violations in order to justify Mr. Brown's termination,' the complaint states. On November 28, 2024, Brown was fired for violating United's attendance policy, according to the complaint, which says the carrier 'manufactured additional attendance violations in order to justify Mr. Brown's termination.' 'As a result of his termination, Mr. Brown suffered and continues to suffer substantial injuries and damages, including lost wages and emotional distress and mental anguish,' his complaint states. In January, United agreed to pay $99,000 to a Mongolian-born employee based in Denver who was peppered with racial slurs and physically assaulted by a supervisor, who also threatened his job over bogus violations. In 2022, the airline settled a religious discrimination lawsuit, filed by a Buddhist pilot, for more than $300,000. In March, a Mexican-American United employee with more than 37 years of service sued the carrier over allegations she was subjected to 'relentless' . Brown is now seeking economic damages, compensatory damages, and punitive damages for 'intentional discrimination… done with malice or reckless indifference to [his] federally protected rights,' to be determined by a jury, as well as attorney's fees and court costs.
The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
Police's disposal of miners' strike documents ‘deeply worrying'
Northumbria Police's decision to dispose of documents relating to the miners' strike is 'deeply worrying', the Commons Leader has said. Information related to the so-called Battle of Orgreave is said to be among the two boxes which were disposed of by the force in April 2024. Lucy Powell said anyone involved in the strikes 'must retain the records' and come forward with information when asked to, after Labour MP Ian Lavery raised concerns in the Commons. In its manifesto, the Labour Party pledged to ensure, through an investigation or inquiry, 'that the truth about the events at Orgreave comes to light'. The violent confrontation in June 1984 outside a coking plant in Orgreave, South Yorkshire, led to many miners being injured and arrested, although their trials later collapsed. Speaking during business questions, Mr Lavery said it was 'extremely disturbing news that Northumbria Police has destroyed all documents relating to the miners' strike, including Orgreave'. The MP for Blyth and Ashington said: 'It is absolutely alarming. 'The Labour Government have pledged an inquiry through investigation into these events, yet the wanton destruction of this vital and critical evidence has been allowed to happen. 'Is this a sinister attempt to obscure justice? I'm not sure if anybody is prepared to answer that question. 'Who gave the permission to destroy these documents and what's behind it? 'Can we have an urgent debate into how the Government can instruct all police forces, all authorities, everyone that holds any detail on the miners' strike and on Orgreave (to) make sure that they retain and maintain that evidence, for when the Labour Government maintains its pledge for an inquiry into the events that happened in 1984. 'Because justice cannot be served if the evidence is systematically and deliberately destroyed.' Ms Powell replied: 'This sounds like a deeply, deeply worrying development in this case, and I am sure the whole House will be shocked to hear it. 'He has campaigned for justice and for answers in relation to what happened at Orgreave, 41 years ago, raised it with me last week. I will continue to raise that with ministers on his behalf. 'And I would join him in saying to people, anyone involved, that they must retain the records and they must come forward, as they would be expected to do when those questions are asked, with every bit of information they've got on what happened.' News of the destroyed boxes came to light following a freedom of information request from Joe Diviney, a PhD researcher at the University of Sheffield, the Guardian reports. A Northumbria Police spokesperson said: 'We can confirm two boxes containing data in relation to the miners' strike were disposed of in April 2024 following a formal review, retain or disposal process in line with force policy and the Data Protection Act 2018.'
The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
Prosecutor casts Sean 'Diddy' Combs as a criminal who abused others through power, violence and fear
Two days of closing arguments in Sean 'Diddy' Combs ' sex trafficking trial began on Thursday with a prosecutor telling the jury the hip-hop mogul used 'power, violence and fear' to rule a criminal enterprise that facilitated kidnapping, arson and brutal sex crimes that she said were at the heart of the case. Assistant U.S. Attorney Christy Slavik provided the jury with a road map for a closing argument expected to last several hours. She described Combs as someone 'who doesn't take no for an answer,' while he committed crimes of sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy for two decades. Combs 'counted on silence and shame' to enable and prolong his abuse, Slavik said. He used a 'small army' of employees — an inner circle that included personal assistants and bodyguards — to harm women and cover it up, she said. The theory of racketeering law is that 'when someone commits crime as part of a group, they're more powerful and dangerous,' Slavik said. 'The defendant was a powerful man, but he became more powerful and dangerous because of his inner circle, his businesses — the enterprise.' Prosecutors say Combs coerced and abused women for years as he used his 'power and prestige' as a music star to enlist a network of associates and employees to help him while he silenced victims through blackmail and violence, including kidnapping, arson and physical beatings. They say the Bad Boy Records founder induced female victims into drugged-up, elaborately produced sexual performances with male sex workers in events dubbed 'Freak Offs.' Defense lawyers have argued that Combs was involved in domestic violence but committed no federal crimes. They built their case for acquittal through lengthy cross-examinations of most of the government's 34 witnesses. Some witnesses testified only in response to subpoenas and made it clear to the jury that they didn't want to be there. Before Slavik began her closing, Judge Arun Subramanian told the jury they would hear a closing argument from a defense lawyer on Friday and a rebuttal by a prosecutor before he instructs them on the law and allows them to begin deliberating as early as late afternoon.
