Embattled Thai PM reshuffles cabinet as crisis rages
BANGKOK - Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra began a cabinet reshuffle on Monday as a political and judicial crisis sparked by a leaked phone call threatens to sink her government.
The 38-year-old daughter of controversial former PM Thaksin Shinawatra began handing out ministerial posts vacated when her main coalition partner quit last week, a move that nearly took her government down.
Paetongtarn, in office for less than a year, is hanging on by a thread, and on top of the party horse trading she now faces a Constitutional Court case that could see her barred from office.
She faced calls to quit or call an election last week as critics accused her of undermining the country and insulting the army during the leaked call with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen, which focused on a festering border dispute.
The conservative Bhumjaithai party quit the governing coalition led by Paetongtarn's Pheu Thai party over the call, leaving it with a wafer-thin majority.
But the crisis stabilised as other coalition partners said they would stay, and Pheu Thai secretary general Sorawong Thienthong told AFP on Monday that all 10 remaining parties were sticking with the government.
"None of the other parties are pulling out, the remaining parties are staying united with the government," Sorawong said.
"The prime minister has discussed the reshuffle with other political leaders."
The new cabinet line-up will be finalised by Friday, but sources said changes are expected in key positions, including the defence ministry, as the border row with Cambodia rumbles on.
With the loss of Bhumjaithai, the government can command only a handful more than the 248 votes needed for a majority in parliament, making it deeply vulnerable.
Even if Paetongtarn rides out the parliamentary crisis, a potentially bigger threat is looming in the form of the Constitutional Court.
A group of conservative senators has submitted a petition asking the court to throw Paetongtarn out of office over her conduct in the call with Hun Sen.
The same court sacked Paetongtarn's predecessor, Srettha Thavisin, in an ethics case in August last year.
Srettha was the latest in a long line of Thai PMs from parties linked to Thaksin to be kicked out of office by court orders or military coups, including Thaksin himself and his sister Yingluck Shinawatra.
Thai politics has endured two decades of chronic instability fuelled by a long-running battle between the military, pro-royalist establishment and parties linked to Thaksin.
While Thaksin, 75, remains popular with his rural base, he is deeply disliked and distrusted by Thailand's powerful elite.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
8 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Thailand closes border crossings with Cambodia as dispute deepens
Thailand's military has closed border crossings into Cambodia to almost all travellers, including tourists and traders, citing security concerns as tensions between the two southeast Asian neighbours remain escalated over a simmering border dispute. The deterioration in ties was sparked by brief armed clashes in a border area that left one Cambodian soldier dead late last month. The two governments have since announced measures designed to punish the other, including Cambodia's recent suspension of all Thai fuel and gas imports. Thailand will restrict all vehicles, tourists and traders from crossing at all land border checkpoints in seven provinces bordering Cambodia, the military said late on Monday, citing security concerns. There are exemptions for humanitarian reasons, such as for those needing medical attention, students and other urgent matters at the discretion of security units at checkpoints, the military said. The restrictions 'matched the security situation, particularly in addressing the conflict in areas between Thailand and Cambodia that continue to intensify politically, diplomatically and militarily', it said. The military said the measures would also assist in a crackdown on illegal scam centres in Cambodia flagged by Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra on Monday. Paetongtarn said Thailand would stop cross border supplies of essentials, including electricity, to areas where illicit operations were taking place. The prime minister has been under fire for her handling of the border row, particularly after the leaking of a phone call between her and Hun Sen, Cambodia's former leader, that appeared to show her denigrating a senior Thai military commander.
Eyewitness News
10 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Embattled Thai PM reshuffles cabinet as crisis rages
BANGKOK - Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra began a cabinet reshuffle on Monday as a political and judicial crisis sparked by a leaked phone call threatens to sink her government. The 38-year-old daughter of controversial former PM Thaksin Shinawatra began handing out ministerial posts vacated when her main coalition partner quit last week, a move that nearly took her government down. Paetongtarn, in office for less than a year, is hanging on by a thread, and on top of the party horse trading she now faces a Constitutional Court case that could see her barred from office. She faced calls to quit or call an election last week as critics accused her of undermining the country and insulting the army during the leaked call with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen, which focused on a festering border dispute. The conservative Bhumjaithai party quit the governing coalition led by Paetongtarn's Pheu Thai party over the call, leaving it with a wafer-thin majority. But the crisis stabilised as other coalition partners said they would stay, and Pheu Thai secretary general Sorawong Thienthong told AFP on Monday that all 10 remaining parties were sticking with the government. "None of the other parties are pulling out, the remaining parties are staying united with the government," Sorawong said. "The prime minister has discussed the reshuffle with other political leaders." The new cabinet line-up will be finalised by Friday, but sources said changes are expected in key positions, including the defence ministry, as the border row with Cambodia rumbles on. With the loss of Bhumjaithai, the government can command only a handful more than the 248 votes needed for a majority in parliament, making it deeply vulnerable. Even if Paetongtarn rides out the parliamentary crisis, a potentially bigger threat is looming in the form of the Constitutional Court. A group of conservative senators has submitted a petition asking the court to throw Paetongtarn out of office over her conduct in the call with Hun Sen. The same court sacked Paetongtarn's predecessor, Srettha Thavisin, in an ethics case in August last year. Srettha was the latest in a long line of Thai PMs from parties linked to Thaksin to be kicked out of office by court orders or military coups, including Thaksin himself and his sister Yingluck Shinawatra. Thai politics has endured two decades of chronic instability fuelled by a long-running battle between the military, pro-royalist establishment and parties linked to Thaksin. While Thaksin, 75, remains popular with his rural base, he is deeply disliked and distrusted by Thailand's powerful elite.
Daily Maverick
19 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
ConCourt turns 30, facing a challenging future, but with much to celebrate
On Friday, 20 June, the Constitutional Court celebrated the 30th anniversary of its first hearing, S v Makwanyane, a case dealing with the constitutionality of the death penalty. The imposition of the death penalty was halted temporarily at the end of 1989 after a decade in which South Africa had annually executed more than 100 convicted prisoners. The decision of the newly established court to hear this as its first case was an important symbol that the court was intent on adjudicating on key apartheid policy as part of its mandate to transform the existing legal system. And what a court assembled to hear this case. Four of the 11 judges were appointed from the existing judiciary, the president of the court was appointed by President Nelson Mandela, and six members were appointed after interviews conducted by the newly created Judicial Service Commission (JSC). Among the 11 were great lawyers who had earned their reputations in the fight against apartheid laws — the president of the court, Arthur Chaskalson, judges Ismail Mohamed, John Didcott, Johann Kriegler, Laurie Ackermann and Pius Langa SC, and two women who would grace the court with the greatest of distinction, Yvonne Mokgoro and Kate O' Regan. Sitting as an acting judge in the absence of Judge Richard Goldstone was South Africa's greatest advocate, Sydney Kentridge QC. From that first judgment, the court set out to develop a viable constitutional jurisprudence that would contribute significantly to the transformation of South Africa from its racist, sexist, authoritarian past to a nonracial, non-sexist democracy. Judgments that protected the rights of same-sex couples, protected occupiers of property from arbitrary eviction, gave content to the social and economic rights in the Constitution and held the executive accountable to its constitutional duties represented the profound contribution of that first court to the building of South Africa's constitutional democracy. When judges of the first court retired, it was fortunate to have appointed a further set of distinguished jurists: Zak Yacoob, Dikgang Moseneke, Sandile Ngcobo, Edwin Cameron, Johan Froneman and Sisi Khampepe. It was only when Jacob Zuma became President that significant change took place that stultified the continued growth of the court. Instead of appointing the obvious leader of the court, Dikgang Moseneke, to be Chief Justice, Zuma chose the little-known Mogoeng Mogoeng to hold the highest office. Nkandla case By now, the pattern of the court's jurisprudence was more difficult to divine. Positives did continue. It most certainly sought to respond to Zuma's attempt to weaken the reaction to corruption by way of a majority judgment in the Glenister case. It held against Zuma when he sought to challenge the findings of the Public Protector in the Nkandla case, and in the case of Daniels v Scribante it endorsed an approach to property protection for the vulnerable that responded eloquently to the oppression of the past. But clear divisions were now evident in the court. In another in the sequence of Zuma cases, this one dealing with whether Parliament had put in place mechanisms to hold Zuma accountable for failing to implement the Public Protector's remedial action, Chief Justice Mogoeng described the majority judgment that held Parliament accountable as a textbook case of judicial overreach. Significant division was evident in the area of administrative law. Socioeconomic rights jurisprudence never recovered from the conservative finding of the court in the Mazibuko case dealing with the right of access to sufficient water. Private law, particularly the law of contract, remained in the substantive grip of the common law, which had been crafted in the pre-democratic era. And the court, with an extended jurisdiction to hear non-constitutional cases, struggled to deal coherently with tax, competition and other commercial disputes. The court was not helped by the appointment process. There can be little doubt that the JSC during the leadership of Mogoeng did not discharge its constitutional mandate as was required by the Constitution. Applicants were subjected to aggressive and offensive questioning, while judges who would have added greatly to the overall knowledge and expertise of the court were not recommended for no justifiable reason. The upshot was that talented, deserving potential members of the court refused to be subjected to this pattern of unfair treatment, and thus did not apply for appointment, much to the overall cost of the court. Today the court is under new management, being the leadership of Chief Justice Mandisa Maya, and her first 10 months have seen a significant positive change, building on the positives of her predecessor, Raymond Zondo. Over the next 18 months there will be a number of vacancies on the court which can provide an opportunity for it to attract new talent and thus ensure it remains central to the construction of a viable constitutional democracy. Early in its history, the court found against the ANC government led by Mandela. He reacted by stating that he respected the adverse outcome, emphasising the importance of the rule of law. In the 2024 elections, by contrast, some 27% of those who voted supported parties that wish to either abolish the Constitution or repeal significant parts thereof. The Constitutional Court faces a challenging future. And while some of the initial gloss has worn off from the record of the first court, there remains much to celebrate concerning the 30 years of the court's existence. A solid foundation has been built to continue to promote constitutional democracy and ward off the threat of the 27% parties. DM
