
US to pull out of Unesco over inclusion of Palestine and alleged anti-Israel bias
The State Department announced on Tuesday that Washington viewed Palestine's inclusion as "highly problematic", and a decision which had in turn led to the "proliferation of anti-Israel rhetoric".
The US was angered in 2011 when Unesco members granted Palestine full membership in the body, despite opposition from its ally Israel.
Washington opposes any move by UN bodies to recognise Palestine as a state, believing that this must wait until a negotiated Middle East peace deal.
"Unesco works to advance divisive social and cultural causes and maintains an outsized focus on the UN's sustainable development goals, a globalist, ideological agenda for international development at odds with our America First foreign policy," the State Department's spokesperson, Tammy Bruce, said.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"Unesco's decision to admit the 'State of Palestine' as a member state is highly problematic, contrary to US policy and contributed to the proliferation of anti-Israel rhetoric within the organisation," she added.
On Monday, the New York Post reported that US President Donald Trump had ordered a 90-day review of the US's membership in February, focusing on any "anti-Semitism or anti-Israel sentiment within the organisation".
Officials within his administration concluded that Unesco had a pro-Palestine and pro-China bias and was overly concerned with diversity, equity and inclusion policies, a White House official was quoted as telling The Post.
Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar welcomed Tuesday's announcement, claiming that Israel had been singled out by the agency.
However, Audrey Azoulay, Unesco's director-general, rejected the accusations and said that the claims "contradict the reality of Unesco's efforts, particularly in the field of Holocaust education and the fight against antisemitism".
Trump 2.0 will strip away the illusions of the 'rules-based order' Read More »
Azoulay also said that Unesco's work had been hailed by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington DC, the World Jewish Congress and its American Section, and the American Jewish Committee.
"I deeply regret President Donald Trump's decision to once again withdraw the United States of America from Unesco," she said.
"This decision contradicts the fundamental principles of multilateralism, and may affect first and foremost our many partners in the United States of America - communities seeking site inscription on the World Heritage List, Creative City status and University Chairs."
The US was a founding member of Unesco in 1945, but this latest departure marks the third time it has quit.
The US first withdrew in 1983 under Ronald Reagan, whose administration said the organisation had anti-western bias and "has extraneously politicised virtually every subject it deals with".
It rejoined in 2003 under George W. Bush, with the White House saying it was happy with Unesco's reforms.
The Trump administration then withdrew from Unesco in 2017, shortly after the body designated Hebron's Old City and the Tomb of the Patriarchs in the West Bank as a Palestinian World Heritage site.
His administration cited what it called "mounting arrears, the need for fundamental reform in the organisation and continuing anti-Israel bias".
It returned in 2023 under US President Joe Biden whose administration said it was crucial to rejoin in order to counter "Chinese influence".
As a condition of readmission, the US agreed to pay about $619m in unpaid dues.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
23 minutes ago
- The National
UK Jewish body calls for open Gaza aid amid Starmer row
The UK's largest Jewish body has called for across-the-board access for aid shipments into the Gaza Strip in a statement critical of Israeli restrictions. The message on the plight of Gazans came as the community group pushed back against UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's pledge to recognise Palestine. The Board of Deputies of British Jews said the Israeli pause in fighting to allow aid was 'essential if long overdue', after a special meeting on Tuesday was called following Mr Starmer's announcement. 'We need to see a rapid, uninhibited, and sustained increase in aid through all available channels, and we need to see all agencies co-operating in this endeavour,' said the board's president, Phil Rosenberg. It is the BoD's first statement on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, weeks after internal rifts over the organisation's position on the war deepened. However, it also challenged Mr Starmer's pledge that he would recognise a Palestinian state next month if Israel does not agree to a ceasefire. The board said the promise risked 'putting gestures ahead of substance', which could also 'empower or reward Hamas'. 'We are therefore seeking clarification that the UK Government will not recognise a Palestinian state while Hamas fails to meet UK demands, including accepting a ceasefire and releasing the hostages,' Mr Rosenberg said. 'Recognising a Palestinian state without a diplomatic agreement risks putting gestures ahead of substance. 'However, our primary concern regarding the government's announcement is to avoid empowering or rewarding Hamas, or giving it incentives to continue evading a ceasefire,' he added. The pushback is shared by former hostage Emily Damari, a British-Israeli who was held in Gaza by Hamas for more than a year. Ms Damari said Mr Starmer's pledge was not 'on the right side of history'. 'Prime Minister Starmer is not standing on the right side of history. Had he been in power during World War II, would he have advocated recognition for Nazi control of occupied countries like Holland, France, or Poland?' she wrote on social media. 'This is not diplomacy – it is a moral failure. Shame on you, Prime Minister.' The board has faced escalating internal tension in the past three months over its public stance on the Israel-Gaza war, which critics say failed to reflect the diversity of views among British Jews regarding the conflict. Last month, five members of the BoD who had written an open letter to the FT criticising Israel's renewed military campaign in Gaza from March this year were suspended for two years. The BoD said at the time that it did not take issue with members' criticism of the war, but with the fact that their letter had been presented as a statement from the organisation itself. Yet the rift has caused a small but growing number of British Jews to feel disillusioned with the organisation, which has historically been the community's representative to British officialdom. The campaign group Na'amod, a movement of British Jews seeking an end to the war and a solution to the Palestinian issue, organised a protest outside the Foreign Office earlier this week calling for 'forceful action' on Israel 'to stop Israel's starvation, displacement and bombing of Palestinians in Gaza'.


Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
UK High Court grants Palestine Action judicial review over terror proscription
A High Court Judge has ruled in favour of Palestine Action and granted the direct action group a judicial review to oppose the UK government's ban on the pro-Palestine group. Lord Justice Chamberlain ruled on Wednesday that he would grant Palestine Action's Co-founder, Huda Ammori, a judicial review after hearing submissions from her lawyer and the government. More soon...


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Trump announces 25% tariff on India 'for buying Russian weapons and energy'
US President Donald Trump said the United States will impose a 25% tariff on goods from India, plus an additional import tax, due to India's purchasing of Russian oil and military equipment. Mr Trump said on Truth Social that India 'is our friend' but its 'tariffs are far too high' on US goods. "While India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country," Mr Trump wrote. "They have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE — ALL THINGS NOT GOOD!" India and Russia have close relations, and New Delhi has not supported Western sanctions on Moscow over its war in Ukraine.