BlockAway vs. VPNs: Which One Should You Trust?
In today's digital world, privacy and internet freedom have become essential concerns for anyone who uses the internet. From bypassing geo-blocks to protecting personal data, more users are seeking tools that can shield their online activities from prying eyes. Two popular solutions have emerged in this space: BlockAway and traditional VPNs (Virtual Private Networks). While both aim to improve privacy and access, they operate quite differently — and choosing the right one can be a game-changer for your online experience.
In this article, we'll explore the differences, advantages, disadvantages, use cases, and trustworthiness of BlockAway vs. VPNs. By the end, you'll have a clearer picture of which tool suits your needs best.
BlockAway is a relatively new browser-based proxy tool that allows users to access blocked websites quickly and easily without the need to install software. It's designed for speed, simplicity, and unblocking rather than full-scale encryption.
Think of BlockAway like a lightweight web proxy. It works directly in your browser and reroutes your internet connection through one of its servers, helping you bypass censorship or restrictions on websites like YouTube, Reddit, or even school and workplace firewalls.
A VPN (Virtual Private Network) is a robust privacy tool that encrypts all your internet traffic and routes it through a secure server in another location. VPNs are known for offering full-device protection, meaning they safeguard not just your browser but all your internet-enabled apps and services.
Popular VPNs like NordVPN, ExpressVPN, and Surfshark are trusted by millions for tasks like streaming region-locked content, securing public Wi-Fi, torrenting, and hiding IP addresses.
If you're just trying to unblock Facebook, YouTube, or Instagram at school or work, BlockAway is a convenient option. Since it doesn't require installation, it's perfect for use on public or restricted computers where installing software might not be allowed.
However, a VPN offers a more reliable long-term solution if your school or workplace uses stronger firewalls like Deep Packet Inspection (DPI). VPNs can also encrypt your traffic, preventing administrators from monitoring your online activity.
Winner: VPNs (for strong firewalls), BlockAway (for quick access)
Love watching shows on Netflix, BBC iPlayer, or Hulu? You'll likely run into regional restrictions. BlockAway might unblock some sites, but streaming services are smart — they often block proxy IPs quickly.
VPNs, especially premium ones, are specifically designed to bypass geo-blocks, and some even have dedicated servers for streaming.
Winner: VPNs
When you're using public Wi-Fi at a café or airport, you're at risk. Cybercriminals can exploit unsecured networks to steal your data. BlockAway doesn't encrypt your traffic, leaving you exposed.
A VPN encrypts your data end-to-end, making it almost impossible for hackers to intercept your information. If privacy is your top concern, a VPN is the clear choice.
Winner: VPNs
Want to surf the web without being tracked? BlockAway hides your IP address temporarily, but it doesn't provide complete anonymity. Your ISP or network admin might still see your browsing activity.
VPNs, on the other hand, mask your IP, encrypt your traffic, and often come with a no-log policy, making your activity much harder to trace.
Winner: VPNs
BlockAway shines here. It's fast, easy-to-use, and requires no technical knowledge. Just open the tool in your browser, enter the URL, and boom — you're past the block.
VPNs, while more powerful, can occasionally suffer from slow connections, software bugs, or complicated settings, especially for beginners.
Winner: BlockAway
Most BlockAway-style proxy tools are free, with no subscriptions or hidden charges. VPNs, while offering advanced features, usually require a monthly or yearly fee. Some free VPNs exist, but they often come with limitations, ads, or privacy concerns.
If you're looking for a quick, free solution, BlockAway is great. But if you're willing to invest in privacy and long-term protection, a paid VPN is worth it.
Winner: Tie (Free = BlockAway, Premium = VPN)
While BlockAway offers a quick fix, its lack of encryption means your data is still vulnerable. Plus, since many proxies are free, they may log your activity or inject ads.
VPNs have the security edge, offering features like kill switches, leak protection, and DNS privacy. Reputable VPNs also undergo independent audits to verify their privacy claims.
Conclusion
Both BlockAway and VPNs serve a purpose in the digital privacy and access ecosystem, but they cater to different types of users. If your goal is fast, temporary access to restricted sites, BlockAway is your go-to. But if you're looking for comprehensive online security, anonymity, and flexibility, then a VPN is undoubtedly the smarter choice.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Engadget
22 minutes ago
- Engadget
Every WWDC should end with a song composed of app reviews
To view this content, you'll need to update your privacy settings. Please click here and view the "Content and social-media partners" setting to do so. Partway through WWDC 2025, I started tracking every time I heard the word "delightful." I might have missed a few, but there were at least eight times when some exec was insisting to me that an element of the upcoming iOS 26, macOS Tahoe and Apple's other platforms merited the adjective. And maybe some people truly do feel unfettered joy about UI design, but that's the sort of attitude in these events that makes me roll my eyes. Apple always tries very hard to inject levity and personality into its keynotes. Most of the time, that winds up leaning on cringe from Craig Federighi, who seems quite affable about being the punchline. Sometimes I smirk a little, but again, more often than not, it's another eye-roll. That was the case this year, as Apple bludgeoned us with a tie-in for its upcoming F1 movie , which already leans pretty hard on product placement. Then there's the developer devotion. Yes, Apple needs devs to use its tools and programs. Yes, the company can and should give them some kudos. But sometimes, the adulation that I've heard heaped on the WWDC audience in the past is so cheesy, so over-eager that it flies way past sincerity and into schlock. Just as I was ready to turn off the stream, the curtain rose on a grand piano. And to my surprise, the final three minutes of a full band performing real reviews of apps became the actual highlight of WWDC for me. This isn't an original idea. Reviews, good and bad, are well-mined fodder for comedians and social media content. Jimmy Fallon, James Corden and others have made musical gags a staple of recent late night talk shows. But the way Apple decided to do it this year was, in a word, delightful. Each review was heartfelt or dopey or both; see "saved my marriage" for Citymapper and "If this doesn't win best app of the year, I'll eat my shoe" for Lost in Play. It took the essential internet wisdom of "don't read the comments" and turned it into gold. This silly little song managed to do everything Apple wants to do at WWDC in a really amusing package. It's the dev props, it's the splashy production, it's legit entertainment. For anyone who, like me, was actually humming the tune even after the stream ended, the video is up as a standalone on YouTube and was performed by soul/R&B singer Allen Stone. And to whatever producer came up with this idea: you have my utmost appreciation. Six out of five stars indeed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Toyota, Subaru Hit with Class-Action Lawsuit Over Claims of 12-Volt Batteries in EVs That Keep Dying
A new lawsuit filed against Subaru and Toyota claims that the two automakers' jointly developed electric vehicles, the Solterra and bZ4X, suffers from an issue that causes the 12-volt battery used for accessories to repeatedly fail, with the plaintiff filing the suit claiming his vehicle has gone through multiple batteries in 5000 miles. The class-action lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. Eastern District Court of California, claims that Subaru and Toyota both knew about 12-volt battery problems before the the Bz4X or Solterra went on sale. Allegedly, these cars (from the 2023–2025 model years) drain and kill the 12-volt battery on a regular basis; despite that, the suit claims the two carmakers failed to warn customers or to fix the issues at hand. The filing mainly focuses on this single owner's account. "The 12-volt battery equipped in Plaintiff Wade's Class Vehicle has failed three times after only about 5000 miles of driving the vehicle. The 12-volt battery in Plaintiff Wade's vehicle has been replaced twice since March 2023,"says the filing, according to The owner claims that the first failure happened within weeks of ownership; then the battery died again when it had around 2000 miles on it, and yet again around the 5000-mile mark. Based on other accounts posted online, however, he's not alone when it comes to 12-volt battery issues. As one person with a 2024 example of the Solterra told the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration: "I have had the car since December of 2024, the car was a new lease. The battery has failed twice — once in January, and again last week. When I took it to the dealership, they said they replaced the battery, the new battery is now doing the same thing." On Reddit, customers have been complaining about similar situations since early 2023. "At 6 months had the 12 volt battery replaced, now after 3 weeks getting low battery again," said one commenter. Another made a post in January alleging that since picking up the car in April of 2024, they've had a dead 12-volt battery three different times. Interestingly, it doesn't appear as though the lawsuit in question defines what the central issue is between the 12-volt battery and the rest of the system. In other words, it doesn't define what the core defect, is aside from the 12-volt battery dying prematurely. Whether or not that factors into the suit's outcome is yet to be seen. The electric Toyobaru siblings are hardly the only EVs to suffer from issues and allegations of problems with their 12-volt batteries in recent years. Back in 2021, Ford issued a service bulletin regarding a software problem that caused the Mustang Mach-E's 12-volt to drain while the car's propulsion battery was being charged, while earlier this year, an owner took to Reddit to claim that his 2021 Mach-E's 12-volt lost power and trapped his child in the vehicle. Meanwhile, back in 2023, Hyundai found owners of the Ioniq 5 complaining about unexpected 12-volt battery death, eventually pinning the problem down as one related to third-party applications pinging the car too frequently via Bluetooth. You Might Also Like You Need a Torque Wrench in Your Toolbox Tested: Best Car Interior Cleaners The Man Who Signs Every Car Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Should You Buy the Dip on Reddit Stock?
Wall Street sees Google's move to AI-powered search summaries as a threat to Reddit's growth prospects. Reddit said revenue from advertising grew 61% year over year in the first quarter. Positive advertising metrics point to growing engagement from Reddit's 108 million daily active users. 10 stocks we like better than Reddit › After soaring in 2024, shares of Reddit (NYSE: RDDT) are down about 25% in 2025, as of this writing. Reddit has continued to report impressive revenue growth as proof of its appeal to brands in a growing digital advertising market. However, opinions on Wall Street have been mixed lately. This stems from Google's recent shift to artificial intelligence (AI) search summaries. Reddit wants as many visitors to its platform as possible to maximize its appeal to advertisers, but analysts believe Google's AI Overviews and other changes to its search algorithms will remove the need for people to go to Reddit. While investors should be mindful of this threat, there's still good reason to believe Reddit can deliver more growth for investors. Many Reddit users are looking for information on products they're thinking of buying. This is why advertisers continue to increase their spending on the platform -- ad revenue grew 61% year over year to $359 million in the first quarter. But there is a threat from AI models like ChatGPT, Grok, and Google's Gemini, which can summarize all of the information a user needs based on simple search queries. Perplexity already has a deal with Shopify to let users buy products they find using its AI search engine. Google's integration of AI in its search engine could pose a threat to Reddit's dependency on Google Search results to attract users. Wells Fargo analyst Ken Gawrelski downgraded the stock from overweight to equal weight after Reddit's first-quarter earnings report. The analyst believes Google's move toward AI-driven search will likely lead to declines in traffic to Reddit. It's essential for investors to be aware of the challenge these AI models pose to Reddit's business. That said, these models have been around for several years now, and the company is still posting strong user and revenue growth. There is one important advantage Reddit has that AI can't compete with. AI models are very efficient at providing summaries and answers, but it's not the same as interacting with other people. Even while usage of AI models increases, there will still be demand for online social interaction, which AI summaries can't quite replace. Reddit's latest financial report shows people are still highly engaged with the platform and visiting in large numbers. It ended Q1 with over 400 million weekly active users and 108 million daily active users. These users have created over 100,000 communities on the platform. Because many of these people are visiting Reddit to learn about products and services, it makes the platform the perfect vehicle for brands to invest. Average revenue per user grew 23% year over year in the quarter, which signals strong ad performance, improved targeting, and growing appeal of the platform to advertisers. Reddit is even benefiting from the use of its data to train AI models. Its other revenue, including data licensing sales, grew 66% year over year to $34 million. The billions of posts and data it has collected from user interactions provide Reddit with a valuable asset and competitive advantage. These are healthy indicators of a vibrant platform. Investors should be aware of the risks and monitor Reddit's earnings reports for signs of weakening momentum, but this is still a healthy, fast-growing business. The stock's recent dip is a buying opportunity. Before you buy stock in Reddit, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Reddit wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Wells Fargo is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Ballard has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet and Shopify. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Buy the Dip on Reddit Stock? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
