Netanyahu's Trial Hearings Cancelled Amid Trump's "Let Bibi Go" Post
The Jerusalem District Court cancelled this week's hearings in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's long-running corruption trial, accepting a request the Israeli leader made citing classified diplomatic and security grounds.
It was unclear whether a social media post by US President Donald Trump influenced the court's decision. Trump suggested the trial could interfere with Netanyahu's ability to join negotiations with the Palestinian militant group Hamas and Iran.
The ruling, seen by Reuters, said that new reasons provided by Netanyahu, the head of Israel's spy agency Mossad and the military intelligence chief justified cancelling the hearings.
Netanyahu was indicted in 2019 on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust - all of which he denies. He has cast the trial against him as an orchestrated left-wing witch-hunt meant to topple a democratically elected right-wing leader.
On Friday, the court rejected a request by Netanyahu to delay his testimony for the next two weeks because of diplomatic and security matters following the 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran, which ended last Tuesday.
He was due to take the stand on Monday for cross-examination.
"It is INSANITY doing what the out-of-control prosecutors are doing to Bibi Netanyahu," Trump said in a Truth Social post. He said Washington, having given billions of dollars worth of aid to Israel, was not going to "stand for this".
A spokesperson for the Israeli prosecution declined to comment on Trump's post. Netanyahu on X retweeted Trump's post and added: "Thank you again, @realDonaldTrump. Together, we will make the Middle East Great Again!"
Trump said Netanyahu was "right now" negotiating a deal with Hamas, though neither leader provided details, and officials from both sides have voiced scepticism over prospects for a ceasefire soon.
On Friday, the Republican president told reporters he believed a ceasefire was close.
Interest in resolving the Gaza conflict has heightened in the wake of the U.S. and Israeli bombings of Iran's nuclear facilities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
6 minutes ago
- Mint
US Targets Chinese Steel And Lithium for Forced-Labor Scrutiny
(Bloomberg) -- The Trump administration said it will step up scrutiny of imports of steel, copper, lithium and other materials from China to enforce a US ban on goods allegedly made with forced labor in the country's Xinjiang region. The announcement of new 'high-priority sectors' targeted under the four-year-old Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act was included Tuesday in an annual update to the US government's enforcement efforts. It also dovetails with President Donald Trump's broader trade goals, as he seeks to lower the US trade deficit with China and pressures Beijing to curb shipments of fentanyl and precursor chemicals. 'America has a moral, economic, and national security duty to eradicate threats that endanger our nation's prosperity, including unfair trade practices that disadvantage the American people and stifle our economic growth,' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement. Still, the administration went ahead with the announcement at a time when Trump has sought to improve relations with his counterpart, Xi Jinping. The US president last week extended a pause on higher tariffs on goods from China for 90 days as he seeks an in-person meeting with the Chinese leader. Under the 2021 law, the US government assumes that anything made even partially in the Chinese manufacturing hub of Xinjiang is produced with forced labor and cannot be imported into the US. Companies may win exemptions if they can provide 'clear and convincing evidence' forced labor was not used. The measure is meant to help combat alleged repression of Uyghurs and other minorities in the province of Xinjiang. Beijing has repeatedly denied accusations that minorities are compelled to work against their will. Although the law applies to all goods, it originally singled out apparel, cotton and cotton products, tomatoes and silica-based products — including polysilicon — as high-priority sectors for enforcement. Under former President Joe Biden, the government expanded the products subject to extra scrutiny to include aluminum, polyvinyl chloride and seafood. The Trump administration's Tuesday announcement expands the list again to encompass red dates, caustic soda and lithium, as well as steel and copper. The US doesn't import significant tonnage of copper from China, according to data from Morgan Stanley. In 2024, the US imported about 470,000 tons of steel from China, equal to 0.5% of domestic consumption, according to the Commerce Department. --With assistance from Joe Deaux. More stories like this are available on
Mint
6 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Targets Corporate America to Achieve Economic and Foreign Policy Goals
(Bloomberg) -- He didn't campaign on it. It wasn't even broached during his first administration. He criticized his predecessor for it. But this month President Donald Trump made clear that he's willing to use the full force of the US government to directly intervene in corporate matters to achieve his economic and foreign policy goals. Trump, backed by his team of Wall Street financiers, took the unprecedented step of seeking to collect a portion of money generated from sales of AI chips to China by Nvidia Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. And in a move that could see the US government become Intel Corp.'s largest shareholder, the administration is said to be in talks for taking a 10% stake in the beleaguered chipmaker. Last month, the Pentagon also decided to take a $400 million preferred equity stake in a little-known rare earth mining company. It's a series of moves that has surprised Wall Street and Washington policy veterans, who privately and publicly acknowledged they've never seen anything like it in their decades-long careers. The actions, if successful, could leave private investors and average 401(k) savings holders enriched while catapulting US national security further ahead of China. But they're also risky bets that could end with taxpayer losses and distort markets in ways investors can't predict. 'I'm very concerned that we're going to have these rolling sectors where the president starts saying 'you have to pay us just to sell internationally,'' Lee Munson, the chief investment officer at Portfolio Wealth Advisors, with $390 million in assets under management, said. 'Where does this end? I don't even know how to buy companies right now that have exposure to China that have high-tech IP.' The Trump administration's direct involvement in corporate matters is becoming a marker of the president's second term. Trump, a self-described dealmaker, has a mixed track record of success yet has vowed to bring more of a business approach to governing in Washington. In addition to the Nvidia and AMD revenue promise and potential Intel investment stake, his administration secured the 'Golden Share' from Nippon Steel Corp., a Japanese steelmaker that gives Trump personal power to make decisions on United States Steel Corp. corporate decisions. In these cases, the administration is picking winners and losers, and risks undermining the free flow of capital. 'The Trump administration's focus on industries like steel, semiconductors, and critical minerals is not arbitrary – these sectors are critical to our national and economic security,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in an emailed statement. 'Cooled inflation, trillions in new investments, historic trade deals, and hundreds of billions in tariff revenue prove how President Trump's hands-on leadership is paving the way towards a new Golden Age for America.' Trump surprised markets earlier this month when he announced Nvidia and AMD agreed to pay the US government 15% of their revenue from AI chip sales to China. The move rankled investors, trade experts, lawmakers and others who feared a much broader slippery slope in which the federal government could begin forcing pay-for-play scenarios in everything from trade negotiations to defense contracts. Word that the White House is contemplating using Chips Act money to take a direct stake in chip-maker Intel added to the uncertainty around changing norms between private sector companies and the US government. The move could provide a much-needed boost to Intel's ambitious plan for a sparkling new chips facility in Ohio, which is vital to rebuilding domestic chip production in the US but which has been delayed amid shrinking sales and mounting losses at the company. SoftBank Group Corp. agreed this week to buy $2 billion of Intel stock in a surprise deal. In America's free market economy, the government typically doesn't buy stakes in companies. There are exceptions, of course, such as during the financial crisis of 2008-2009, when it stepped in to support major names like Citigroup Inc., American International Group Inc. and General Motors Co. While Intel has performance issues to grapple with, it isn't facing the imminent threat of collapse. That's in part why investors, lawmakers, national security experts and others interviewed repeatedly referred to 'uncertainty' and 'uncharted territory' when asked to contemplate the risks associated with Trump's new policies. 'It's state direction that we haven't had in the US, it's very much the Chinese model making its way into US government,' Gary Hufbauer, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said. The Trump administration's approach to public companies in the first year of his second term is in some ways an evolution of the economic statecraft tools he deployed in his first four years as president. Back then he deployed trade levers that hadn't been used in years or decades, from Section 301 tariffs on entire countries, like China, to Section 232 tariffs on sectors like steel and automobiles. The policies weren't popular and they rattled markets, but supporters argued that the tariffs tamped down Chinese and other foreign products that flooded the US market and drove some American companies out of business. Trump has continued to push the boundaries of using novel tools in his second administration. 'What we see here is when it comes to big economic questions like tariffs and fees for exports and also the MP Materials deal, he is willing to push legal boundaries on big economic issues in a way that he wasn't in the first term,' said Peter Harrell, a nonresident scholar for the American Statecraft Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Caitlin Legacki, a former Commerce Department official in the Biden administration, said an argument in favor of 'national champions' is understandable, however a 'lack of transparency' around the deals in concerning. 'Instead of making this a cause for national security or technological independence that people from both parties can rally around, it feels more like a shakedown,' she said. --With assistance from Josh Wingrove and Ryan Gould. More stories like this are available on
Mint
6 minutes ago
- Mint
Bowman Focuses on Her Current Fed Role Including Rules Overhaul
(Bloomberg) -- US Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman said she's keeping her focus on the regulatory portfolio she has now, including plans to overhaul big-bank capital rules and to stamp out so-called debanking. 'I have a big agenda. We're moving through it quickly,' the Fed's top bank watchdog said during an interview with Michael McKee on Bloomberg Television. 'Obviously we need to get the capital proposals completed in the near future.' Bowman deflected when asked if she would be interested in leading the Fed as chair, rather than her current role of vice chair for supervision. Bowman is said to be under consideration for the top post by President Donald Trump. 'I'm really focused on the job that I'm doing,' the central bank's top bank watchdog said. The Fed is reviewing various capital rules and plans to re-propose some key measures, but those proposals aren't expected to be altered by the choice of a new chairman, she said. Bowman has kicked off the process for putting together a new risk-based capital rule that would be less burdensome on the biggest US banks than a Biden-era plan. Bloomberg has reported that regulators are largely throwing out the original 1,087-page version proposed two years ago, and will aim to unveil a new plan as soon as the first quarter of 2026. The latest plans are being informed by a conference that Bowman held in July as part of a holistic review of bank capital rules, Bloomberg reported. That effort is meant to ensure overall capital mandates are integrated with other proposals that officials are considering, such as easing a key leverage ratio rule. The Fed previously promised that its examiners would no longer consider reputation risk as part of its bank exams, following calls from some bank groups and Republican lawmakers to end a practice that critics have viewed as unfair. Trump has criticized debanking, the practice of depriving some individuals and businesses of banking services, as being motivated by ideological reasons. But some consumer advocates say that issue is overblown and question whether there is evidence of such cases that bank watchdogs have forced lenders to stop serving businesses solely for ideological reasons. Earlier this month, he signed an executive order that requires banking regulators to remove reputation risk from their guidance and training materials, and identify banks that unlawfully denied financial services to customers. That came after the president said banks had discriminated against him in the past. More stories like this are available on
