How a four-day equipment recovery mission turned into 100 'nightmare' days locked in a 'hellhole' African jail for two British men
Two British men have told how they survived a 'nightmare' 100 days in a violent West African prison swarmed with rats and diseases after being arrested while on a four-day work trip.
Paul Inch, 50, of Blaenau Ffestiniog, Gwynedd, and Richard Perham, 29, of Bristol, had travelled to Guinea earlier this year to recover equipment from a high-altitude research balloon for Aerostar International.
But within days of touching down, the pair were arrested and accused of spying, sedition, breaching national defence, and violating airspace by the authorities – all of which were unfounded.
Mr Inch and Mr Perham were thrown into Conakry Central Prison, a facility operating at 475 per cent of its capacity and notorious for inhumane conditions.
They were confined in a swelteringly hot overcrowded cell, sharing a single toilet with inmates convicted of violent crimes. They were also extorted and threatened with violence and had to pay prisoners and staff to avoid being transferred to a more dangerous section.
The prison was infested with rats, cockroaches and mosquitoes with contaminated water causing Mr Inch and Mr Perham to suffer dehydration, gastrointestinal illness and skin infections.
Serious diseases like malaria, tuberculosis, and bloody diarrhea circulated in the jail. And with no guards stationed inside the cell blocks, order was maintained by violent prisoner hierarchies.
Speaking after being freed and arriving at Heathrow Airport this evening, Mr Inch said the experience was a 'nightmare' he could have 'never imagined'.
He said: 'In my work I understand the meaning of responsibility.
'I was in Guinea, doing my job, trusting that everything was in order. Yet I was locked away for 100 days in unbearable conditions.'
His detention tore him away from his wife, their five children, and his three brothers who were left to hold their families together throughout the traumatic ordeal.
Mr Perham said tonight: 'We had to literally fear for our lives each day. After we had been there for two months, the UK Ambassador walked us to the prison gate, believing we were finally being released.
'But a phone call to the prosecutor stopped it. We had to turn around and walk straight back in for another month. It was devastating.
'This was meant to be a simple four-day job. Instead, it became 100 days trapped in a nightmare in which I missed the first steps and first words of my baby daughter, moments I can't get back.'
The pair added: 'We're incredibly grateful to everyone who stood by us.
'We would not be here today without the tireless support of our MPs, Liz Saville Roberts, and Carla Denyer, who stayed closely in touch with our families throughout.
'We're also deeply thankful to the British Embassy – especially Ambassadors Daniel Shepherd and John Marshall, and Deputy Head of Mission Mark Kelly – for their unwavering commitment.'
Both men had entered Guinea under contract to Aerostar International, tasked with conducting a civilian, peaceful, and lawful recovery operation.
The Aerostar balloon N254TH had been diverted off course by unexpected winds and was intentionally brought down in Guinea by the company.
Aerostar believed that all necessary permits for the flight and landing had been secured, but it later emerged that neither had been properly authorised.
After enduring months of court hearings and delays, the two men were finally freed on bail on April 11.
They remained stuck in Conakry without their passports and unable to leave the country for another 42 days before touching down in London tonight.
Liz Saville Roberts MP said: 'I am delighted that Paul Inch and Richard Perham are at liberty at last after being held in Conkary Prison under hideous conditions and then house arrest.
'This has been a nightmare for the two men and their families and friends who have been focussed, resourceful and determined to ensure that never a day went by without seeking their release.'
Guinea's political climate under a military junta, which has strained relations with Western nations and aligned with countries like Russia and China, complicated diplomatic efforts.
Additionally, systematic corruption within Guinea's justice system created ongoing obstacles, with officials repeatedly blocking court-ordered releases.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Convicted Somalian knife attacker wins human rights case to stay in UK because his clan faces persecution in his home country
A convicted Somalian knife attacker has won a human rights case to stay in the UK because he is a member of a clan that faces persecution in his home country. Abdilahi Essa Darwish, 41, was jailed for violence and wielding a blade in 2021 but has since won an immigration case after an asylum tribunal ruled he could be in danger if sent back. The Home Office tried to deport Darwish after his conviction four years ago but a judge said it was a violation of his human rights. In Somalia, Darwish was part of a minority tribe and it was found that he would face 'persecution' if he was returned to the east African nation. Now he has been granted protection in the UK. The Upper Tribunal of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber was told that Darwish originally came to Britain in June 2001 and claimed asylum that summer. The hearing in Bradford, was told he was granted Indefinite Leave to Remain in 2002 because he qualified as a refugee due to his clan membership. He was a member of the Shanshiya tribe, which is a sub-clan of the minority Reer Hamar clan, from the town of Afgoye, which is on the south coast of Somalia near the capital Mogadishu. At the time of his arrival more than 20 years ago the Home Office accepted he had a 'well-founded fear of persecution' from majority clans in Somalia. It was concluded he could face harm, punishment, or even torture if he were to return - a violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). However, in 2021 the Home Office tried to deport Darwish and revoke his protected status after he committed a knife crime. '[Darwish] committed an offence of possession of a bladed article and affray in respect of which he pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment', a tribunal report said. 'Thereafter the [Home Secretary at the time, Priti Patel] made a decision to deport [Darwish] to Somalia and to revoke his refugee status and this was done on January 5, 2021, and the deportation order was made on February 9, 2021.' Darwish, who claimed he had a mental health condition, instructed lawyers to launch an appeal. He won his appeal at the First-tier Tribunal last year but the Home Office appealed that decision at the Upper Tribunal. The Home Office argued that last year's tribunal 'failed to establish a reason for which [Darwish] would suffer persecution on return to Somalia'. The Home Office argued that the circumstances under which he was granted refugee status in 2002 had changed. However, Upper Tribunal Judge Christopher Hanson found that Darwish still remains a refugee for the same reasons as 2002 and so dismissed the Home Office's appeal. The tribunal heard that official country guidance for Somalia states: 'The starting point is that male and female members of minority clans from the south will, in general, be at risk of breaches of their Article 3 rights, and will be refugees, in the absence of evidence that they have a clan or personal patron and the means to access that area of safety without a real risk.' Judge Hanson concluded: 'Whilst subsequent [country guidance] decisions... show that minority clan members are no longer ipso facto at risk of being persecuted in Mogadishu, there is no country guidance indicating that the position in Southern Somalia i.e. outside of Mogadishu has altered. 'Consequently, given that [Darwish] is from Afgoye, South Somalia, the starting point is that[he] continues to have a well-founded fear of persecution in his home area and thus the issue... is one of internal relocation. 'It is clear that the Refugee Convention reason remains a fear of persecution on the basis of a particular social group viz [Darwish's] minority clan membership of the Shanshiya sub-clan of the Reer Hamar.'
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Our two-tier justice system is turning Lucy Connolly into a martyr
Court of Appeal judges may believe that they were right to deny early release to Lucy Connolly, the 42-year-old Northamptonshire childminder who is serving 31 months in prison for an offensive tweet about asylum seekers. But even if they maintain that her sentence was just, I think they would have been wise to let her out anyway – for a simple and pragmatic reason. Keeping her locked up is eroding public faith in the justice system. Because, almost every single day now, we read of criminals being convicted of what seem like far worse crimes than hers – and yet somehow avoiding jail. Indeed, some of them manage to avoid it more than once. In 2022, a paedophile in South Shields admitted three charges of 'making indecent images of children' (as the law calls it), as well as one charge of possessing extreme pornography (which involved bestiality). As the judge at the time noted, however, 'You identify as transgender and that has caused issues for you and anxiety for you in how you would cope with that if you were sent immediately to prison.' Well, I suppose it would, although why we're meant to worry about prison being unpleasant for paedophiles, I'm not sure. But at any rate, he wasn't sent to prison. And nor was he sent there this week, when he was hauled back to court after breaching a sexual harm prevention order. On this occasion, the judge (a different one this time) said: 'You would undoubtedly be at risk of physical or sexual assault in custody because of your presentation in a male prison.' These words are of course wonderfully kind and compassionate. But, just for a moment, let's set aside questions of 'identity', and ask: which do we think is the worse crime? Writing something horrible on the internet about asylum hotels? Or downloading images of children being sexually abused – thus boosting the market for such images, and ensuring that more children will be sexually abused in future? Now, I haven't conducted a nationwide opinion poll on the above question. But I'm fairly confident that I can guess what the result would be. And I'm equally confident that I'm not alone in remembering the name 'Lucy Connolly' every time I read about some thug or pervert sauntering off with a suspended sentence. I don't for a moment deny that what Mrs Connolly wrote was awful. Nor do I deny that she broke the law. Yet our two-tier justice system is contriving to turn her into a martyr. So, even if the powers that be have no sympathy for her, they should at least look after their own interests. Which means letting her out.
The Guardian
13 hours ago
- The Guardian
Guatemalan man deported to Mexico flown back to US after judge's orders
A Guatemalan man who said he was deported to Mexico despite fearing he would be persecuted there was flown back to the US on Wednesday after a judge ordered the Trump administration to facilitate his return, his lawyer said. Brian Murphy, a US district judge in Boston, Massachusetts, had ordered the man's return after the US Department of Justice notified him that its claim that the man had expressly stated he was not afraid of being sent to Mexico was based on erroneous information. In a court order last month, Murphy found that the deportation of the man, identified in legal filings only as OCG, likely 'lacked any semblance of due process'. 'No one has ever suggested that OCG poses any sort of security threat,' Murphy wrote, adding: 'In general, this case presents no special facts or legal circumstances, only the banal horror of a man being wrongfully loaded onto a bus and sent back to a country where he was allegedly just raped and kidnapped.' Murphy went on to say: 'At oral argument, defendants' counsel confirmed that it is 'the policy of the United States not to expel, extradite, or otherwise effect the involuntary return of any person to a country in which there are substantial grounds for believing the person would be in danger of being subjected to torture' … The return of OCG poses a vanishingly small cost to make sure we can still claim to live up to that ideal.' According to a court declaration, OCG, who had returned to Guatemala following his deportation to Mexico two months ago, said: 'I have been living in hiding, in constant panic and constant fear.' OCG, who is gay, had applied for asylum in the US last year after he was attacked multiple times in homophobic acts of violence in Guatemala. 'I don't stay in any of the places I used to stay because the story is the same as ever here: gay people like me are targeted simply for who we are. This produces constant fear and panic,' OCG said in his court declaration from Guatemala, adding: 'Living a normal life is impossible here, and I live in fear because of the past hateful incidences I experienced … There is no justice for me here.' Following Murphy's court order, Donald Trump's administration said in a court filing on 28 May that federal immigration officials were working 'to bring OCG back to the United States on an air charter operations flight return leg'. Last month, Trump officials admitted to an 'error' of falsely claiming that OCG was not afraid of being returned to Mexico. 'Upon further investigation, defendants cannot identify any officer who asked O.C.G. whether he had a fear of return to Mexico. Nor can defendants identify the officer who O.C.G. states 'told [him] that he was being deported to Mexico',' government lawyers said in a court filing. The Guardian has reached out to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for comment. Reuters contributed reporting
