'Bring the Madness': Long-awaited college basketball video game teased by EA Sports
Following the successful return of the college football franchise ― EA Sports College Football 25 ― by EA Sports in the summer of 2024, the company teased the return of the basketball rendition of the video game in a social media post on June 30.
"Bring the Madness. Let's run it back," the social media post by EA Sports read.
According to Matt Brown of Extra Points, he obtained a memo from the Collegiate Licensing Company, which indicated the game would return for the 2028-29 season, but that has not been confirmed.
The game will feature both men's and women's basketball rosters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
EA College Football 26 Review: The Good, The Bad And The Bottom Line
EA College Football 26 EA College Football 26 dropped this past week on early access and full retail. I've been putting the game through the paces as much as time would allow for the past three days, and I'm mostly pleased with what I see, feel, and hear. There are 10 key points about the new title. Here's what EA has presented, along with my thoughts on each new or improved feature and a few takes. Here's the good, the bad, and the bottom line on EA College Football Football 25 captured the vibe of its sport better than any sports game ever created, and this year's game tops that. CF 26 brings deeper immersion with 34 new mascots, 88 band songs, unique runouts, and stadium traditions like the Sooner Schooner and Cockaboose. The pageantry and detail are augmented by the overall beauty of the game. I'm not overselling here—College Football 26 is the most visually attractive sports video game ever made. Player models, grass, crowd, the dynamic lighting (it's a real thing), you name it. All of it is real coaches takes this team/school authenticity thing to another level. I think EA did a solid job with most of the coach likenesses, though there are a few that still need to be updated over the course of the season. As for the signature playcalling styles, I need to see a few more games vs. the CPU to give a definitive statement, but so far, I've had Michigan try to cram the ball down my Illinois Fighting Illini's throat with the run game and seen a bit of an aerial assault from the Texas Tech Red Raiders, so that checks out. I love the new depth with recruiting pipelines and unlockable abilities that affect Dynasty outcomes. Having the recruiting interactions happen with real coaches deepens the playbooks are bottomless. There are 2,800+ plays and 45 new formations. Each team's handcrafted playbooks lean into the concept of real-life tendencies. I've only used three teams so far, but I can see the difference in playbooks. While I see the larger playbooks, I'll say this is one of the features that was a bit oversold. Maybe it'll be a quality-of-life feature, but over the course of the review period, it was more of a slight nod than a true head bop.I felt like I could see some differences in the way older quarterbacks played compared to freshmen and other underclassmen. I cannot vouch for shorter QBs struggling with sightlines, but that's likely going to take some time to compare and was trying to do away with the INTs that come from defenders who seemingly have their eyes away from the ball, only to snap into awareness in time to snag a pass out of the sky. In this year's game, defenders won't make INTs unless they're looking at the ball. The idea was to reduce cheap turnovers and to increase fairness. What I've seen through my time with the game is defenders behaving blindly and dropping a ton of balls that should have been picks. This is a fixable issue that doesn't ruin the experience, but I'm not sure this is working as Wear and Tear concept was one of my favorite additions to sports video games in 2024. I love to see EA building on it and also seeing the concept making its way to Madden this year. This year, the damage is supposed to be based on physics. I am enjoying this, and I can see as my Dynasty moves along it will become a bigger factor in my there was a primary criticism of College Football 25, it was that it was nearly impossible to defend in the wide-open game. It made for some exciting plays and contests, but EA is right to try and level the playing field. This year, route commits, zone depth changes, block steering, and stunts/twists now give defenders real-time tools to counter spam tactics. Also, ballhandlers aren't as impossible to line up for a tackle or hit. However, the stiff arm for some running backs has the power of Mjölnir. That's already been a topic of discussion in the game's community. This YouTube Short highlights it. I think it'll get nerfed in an upcoming patch. Once that happens, we may have a bit more features include formation subs, 160 trophies to chase, protected rivalries, and the ability to break NCAA records dating back to 1869. CFB 26 also introduces 'Dynamic Dealbreakers' that evolve player needs, 2,000 annual transfers, and revamped recruiting with proximity-based visit costs. The recruiting should be the benchmark for all forthcoming recruiting and free-agency engines in sports video games. To put it plain, Dynasty Mode is mostly fantastic as EA even expanded the already strong Team Builder feature to improve team creation. That said, you still can't create or edit players on existing schools. I understand the caution and limitation, but it doesn't change the fact that this reality creates a lesser experience for true sandbox players.I applaud EA's approach to gamify the high school portion without having users play through full prep games. It's more mission-based, and the quick feedback you get from schools makes it move at a solid pace. You can even recreate your high school while you traverse through the journey of being signed on National Signing Day. I enjoyed RTG a lot, including the varying has done decently well with CUT, but there are two major issues. I like sports collector modes that don't break their sport in the name of increasing power. When that happens, it creates a no-rules, all-out dash for power cards that ultimately gets ridiculous about six months after release. I'm not a microtransaction hater. Like it or not, it's how developer studios stay afloat, devs keep their jobs, and it funds new projects. Gamers benefit from them, even though they don't realize it. So this isn't a slap at the spending aspect of CUT. It's more about the mode needing a safe space that is more governed by rules that keeps things from always being about pure power. The second issue is EA's insistence on keeping legends locked exclusively in Ultimate Team. I cannot tell you how irrational that is from a holistic standpoint. Perhaps higher-ups believe that allowing fans to unlock—or even purchase—the legends will cost them money. I contend it will open up a new revenue stream that they're not currently collecting. Some franchise mode fans would love to simply buy a legends pack that unlocks them for use in the base game. They would happily fork over $19.99 for the legends. If we're talking about a hardcore franchise mode gamer, chances are they aren't setting foot in Ultimate Team anyway. So as it is, you're not getting anything from them beyond the base price for the Standard Edition. If the MVP and Digital Deluxe Editions also included legends unlocked for base game and franchise mode, I believe EA would see an increase in pre-orders above their already strong total—and it wouldn't negatively impact spend in Ultimate Team. But I digress. It's a philosophical pattern that EA Sports games follow, and I believe it's an annual misstep that also creates unnecessary hostility toward Ultimate Team. The RTCF flow is quick and exciting. Opponent tendencies are now visible before the game, and away games apply pressure that affects performance and point totals. It all flows into the pageantry and presentation, but the impact on gameplay is a nice addition. EA College Football 26 won't be judged as softly as last year's game because fans aren't simply fired up to have college football back. That said, EA's dev team hasn't rested on its success, and they've delivered a strong follow-up with noteworthy improvements. The issues are mostly out of the dev's hands and based on the handling of legends or legalities that limit in-game customization.
Miami Herald
20 hours ago
- Miami Herald
BRN: The impact of sports betting is complicated
Transcript: Jeffrey Snyder: This morning on BRN, sports betting has yielded considerable revenue for states, but what's the impact on addiction? Joining me now to help break it all down is Dr. Michelle Malkin of East Carolina University. Michelle, great to see you again. Thanks for joining us in the program this morning. Michelle Malkin: It's great to be here. Thanks for having me back. Snyder: And since you're in an academic setting at a prominent university, tonight is the NCAA men's championship game. And I thought we would talk about sports betting, not betting that you and I will do, but the betting in general that goes on during March Madness. And by all accounts, Michelle, I think I read somewhere $3 billion will be bet online, or I could be wrong on that number, but it's still a significant amount of money that's changing hands. Malkin: Yeah. And I think there's a lot of losses out there because when you have the four first-seeded teams all making it to the final, it means that all the favorites that were probably not being bet on because everybody wanted the long shots and to make more money, those didn't win. And so people lost a lot of money this season for sure. But there's a lot of money exchanging hands, a lot of people able to do it very healthy within their own limitations. And some people probably are suffering from some substantial losses. Snyder: Yeah. So they're suffering from substantial launches. And we're going to talk about addiction in a few minutes, but, and you're right, I think, and I'm not a basketball guy. I wrestled in high school because I'm short statured, but they're all number ones, as you said. So probably, you know, if you're going to bet, you don't bet on the number one, you bet on the number one to lose. But my understanding in, well, let me take a step back and ask, since we last spoke, and I think it's been since probably January when we last had you on the program, how has the expansion of sports betting gone across the United States? I think it was in 30 or some odd states. Has it been taken up by other legislatures and other states indulging in sports betting? Malkin: There are several states looking at more expansion. We're still at about 38 states that have legalized. There's still a lot of issues going on and even in courtrooms and things like that to figure things out. But for the most part, about two thirds of our country can bet legally in their state, usually from the palm of their hand. And even if they can't, they're accessing it through offshore illegal ways. So pretty much anybody in the is able to. Snyder: So why wouldn't a state, I'm thinking about the revenue implications, three billion dollars changes hands or more, it's probably going to be more by the time the final is over. And that's just the NCAA men's, there's going to be sports betting on NBA, on NHL, Major League Baseball just started. So why, what would the hang up be for a state when they look and say, all that money's changing hands, I want a bit of that tax revenue? Malkin: Yeah, I just want to put out that we also see growing demand of people sports betting on the NCAA women's and on the women's sports as well. So I just want to say it's not just the men's, even though we're seeing the more substantial wagers put down for that. But states have to kind of decide. They have the state revenue side of things, which always looks good. But depending on the state you're in, they have the idea of protecting the consumer. And some states just feel either ethically, morally, or because they don't feel like there's enough protection out there that gambling is not right. So, for example, the state of Utah and the state of Hawaii don't yet have most legalized forms of gambling. I say most because there is fantasy sports in Utah, but there's no legalized gambling right now in Hawaii, but Hawaii is actually considering it. So even the states that have traditionally not allowed for most forms of gambling or claim to only have something like the lottery are now looking at least at it. We see bills being introduced, but it all depends on if it's going to be a priority for that state. And part of the priority comes from, are they having shortfalls from other funding sources? Is this money going to help? And most states say yes. What they don't necessarily consider is what are the costs going to be on the state and how much are they going to put from that revenue back into the community to ensure that people can gamble in a healthy way and the resources are there for those who can't. Snyder: And, you know, let's talk a little bit about the addiction side. Let's talk a lot about it, though, because I think you bring up a good point, a very good point, obviously. I mean, it's a balancing act. You've got a pension. If you have a state pension for public sector workers, as an example, it might be underfunded. You might want revenue to do that. You might want revenue, for example, to fix roads that are not federal roads. But let's talk about the addiction side, because as more and more people get involved with this, look, I've seen the ads for Candy Crush, never play the game. That looks pretty addictive. Gambling, sports gambling has got to be addictive as well. Malkin: Well, yeah. And actually you brought up Candy Crush. Social games are actually one of the emerging forms of gambling or addiction type behavior that we're seeing in mobile apps. People are putting thousands of dollars into these social apps that have gambling-like behavior to them, even though all it does is stay in the game. You're never going to get anything back from it. But when we talk about sports wagering and addiction, what we have learned up to now, I mean, a lot of the research is still very young, is that it's the type of gambling that can lead to gambling-related harms faster. And the faster that it can lead to gambling-related harms, the more likely somebody can go down the pathway towards gambling disorder, which is the medical term for gambling addiction. And that is because people don't know what it looks like to experience a gambling-related harm. And therefore they don't know if they themselves or somebody they care about has that. If you have a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER. What does it mean to have a gambling problem? They don't know. We haven't done the outreach. We haven't done the education. And so people experience multiple types of gambling-related harms. Is it the first time they gamble more than they can afford to lose? Is it when they have a relationship issue because they're paying too much attention to the game or their phone? All these things are types of gambling-related harms that people don't know to recognize. Snyder: And Michelle, you talk about education. I just recall watching the NFL pregame. Like most sports now, they have a gambling segment. But this gambling segment is always led by some type of, I don't know, disclaimer or some type of education. That to me always felt like tongue-in-cheek, like talking out of both sides of your mouth maybe is the way I would phrase it. Hey, before you do this, think about this. But that's probably not enough education for somebody. They're going to be like, OK, well, fine. But I'm going to bet on Derrick Henry of the Baltimore Ravens running for 200 yards. It's a sure thing, right? Malkin: I have the inside info, right? The reality is that gambling is always a risk. And people need to look at it as a form of entertainment that they would put the same money they can afford to lose by going out to dinner or going to a movie theater towards what they're wagering on. And when they lose, they have to be OK with that loss because that was part of the risk. Unfortunately, people don't see gambling funds as the same as their other entertainment funds. They see it as a way to gain more money and to get out of whatever financial stuff that they're in. And so there is just this overarching belief that, you know, it's going to be my turn. I'm going to be lucky and I'm going to win. And so people will chase that dream. And the worst thing is, is if they win really early, especially some of these long shot bets, maybe somebody had something that was like a huge win. Now they think I can do it again. And so they chase it. And so they lose everything they just won by trying to chase back that great feeling. But actually what they're doing is going down a really dangerous pathway because our brains are actually impacted by that. Our reward center, our neurotransmitters. And we can't reconfigure all that on our own. We need to actually get help for that. Snyder: No different, Michelle, than if you go to a casino and pull the slot machine, although you probably don't, they probably don't have the. Malkin: No, they just touch a button. Snyder: You just touch a button. It's probably easier now. Malkin: But it's actually the same technology. So a lot of psychology went into how to make the best experience for the slot machine player so that they will stay. So how often does it have to win? What does a win have to look like? How much, what percentage, what does it, what colors does it have? What, what tune does it do? What active is it in? Like all of that was done. And then they turned around and made that same technology, all that same stuff into these sports, mobile apps, and also the social games, as you mentioned before. And so that's what keeps you engaged an opportunity to totally zone out while also trying to win a lot. So you have both the potential for that big win, that excitement, but you also have this opportunity to just keep betting every second and constantly be looking and saying, did I have that bet? Did I not have that bet? In when it comes to the mobile apps, individuals are constantly just checking and checking and checking. And sometimes they have bets on so many different games. So they're just so into their phone. They're not even watching the game they used to love. Snyder: And Michelle, last question. How do we know, like the slot machine, I would think the slot machine is favored in the house favor. They're the ones that manage it. They're the ones that program it. Likewise, the sports app, how do we know that that is fairly adjudicated in terms of the odds and the rewarding of if you win? I mean, there's a lot of questions that I have. I mean, would that be a concern? Malkin: Well, the legal apps that we have that the state authorizes, those industry partners are upheld to very high standards. But they do do things that they're allowed to do, like betting boosts and parlays and things that are kind of really, really difficult to win. And that's where they make their edge. They're not making their edge on, you know, a plus minus 110 kind of bet. They're making their edge on the people going for the long shots. And they're getting people to do that by giving them free money to play with, which is not free money. It's only free money if you win. But to keep somebody engaged. And the more you play, the more bonuses and things like that you will get. So keeping you engaged, giving you these opportunities for a big win that if you get one, keeps you totally into that app or that activity for a much longer period of time. Snyder: Yeah, it almost sounds very analogous to the social media craze, too. You know, just keep pulling down, you get the next TikTok. Michelle, we're going to have to leave it there. I don't know if you'll be tuning into the basketball game. I know I will not. I'll be sleeping. But I guess we'll have to pick up the conversation next month to see the end result. And sure, we'll have baseball and other things to talk about as well. Great to see you. Enjoy the rest of your day. And we look forward to having you back on the program again very soon. Malkin: Sounds good. Thank you so much. Snyder: And don't forget to subscribe to our daily newsletter, The Warning Pulse, for all the news in one place. Details, of course, at our website. And your subscription helps support all this great BRN content. And don't forget, we're back again tomorrow for another edition of BRN. Until then, I'm Jeff Snyder. Stay safe, keep on saving, and don't forget, roll with the changes. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
USA Today
2 days ago
- USA Today
Where does LSU running back Harlem Berry rank among top freshman in College Football 26?
LSU's Harlem Berry ranks among the best freshmen in EA Sports' College Football 26 video game. Nakos slotted the running back at No. 3 on his top 10 list with an overall rating of 83. He tied with fellow back Gideon Davidson from Clemson. Oregon's Dakorien Moore leads the way with an 84, while Michigan quarterback Bryce Underwood placed No. 10. Moore and Underwood are both former LSU commits. Berry is one of two five-star signees from the Tigers' 2025 signing class. He hails from Metairie, LA and finished as the state's top recruit and the No. 1 running back in the cycle, per On3's Industry Rankings. He committed to his home state school in January 2024 and never looked back. After early enrolling in spring 2025, Berry drew rave reviews from his coaches and teammates. Head coach Brian Kelly says the true freshman takes chances and possesses raw abilities that aren't teachable. With a strong fall camp, Berry can carve out a real role on this 2025 squad. Here are the top 10 freshmen on College Football 26.
