Newport supermarkets to be charged for abandoned trolleys
Under proposals, the local authority would remove an abandoned trolley from council land or highways and keep it in storage for up to six weeks.It will then find and contact each trolley's owner within seven days of its removal, notifying them of the seizure and making arrangements for its return.The proposed charge for this overall service would be set at £100 per trolley – lower than the £120 to £200 the council estimates each trolley costs.In cases where the owner is unknown or where a trolley is not collected, after six weeks the council will take ownership of that trolley and will likely resell or otherwise dispose of it.Some supermarkets have existing arrangements with a third-party organisation to collect reported abandoned trolleys, but the council argues "this process is far from sufficient".Under the new proposals, the council's powers would be limited to its own land and public highways, and would not include main rivers or other waterways under the management of agencies such as Natural Resources Wales.However, in those cases the council would contact those agencies to request a trolley's removal.The policy will also exclude private land, but the council has opened up the possibility of some collections if a landowner makes a request.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Car
19 minutes ago
- Auto Car
JLR opens new energy farm that is the size of 36 football pitches!
Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) has opened a solar farm the size of 36 football pitches at its Gaydon headquarters as part of efforts to increase its energy independence. The 26-hectare, 18MW site can generate enough electricity to power a third of the British firm's base. The site is home to JLR's design, engineering and R&D teams. It is part of a move from JLR to source at least 30% of its global energy use from on-site renewables, while also reducing its reliance on grid energy – and therefore fluctuating energy costs – and improving its environmental impact. A similar project is being completed at its Wolverhampton Electric Propulsion Manufacturing Centre. There, one of the UK's largest rooftop arrays, featuring more than 18,000 panels, will open in the coming months. This will be able to generate around 9500 MWh of energy each year, meeting 40% of the site's needs. Next year, the marque will install 10MW of solar car ports at its Merseyside site. These include canopies and solar walkways – structures like these are quite common in hotter countries, such as Spain. They will mostly provide energy for EV charging. JLR's chief sustainability officer Andrea Debbane said the steps were 'important'. She added: 'They directly reduce our global operational emissions and help move us closer to our net zero goal, whilst delivering tangible value today and for the long-term.'
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Fears new Labour property tax will hit the hardest workers, as Rachel Reeves's minister refuses to rule out controversial new levy to replace stamp duty
faced a furious backlash yesterday over a possible and highly controversial shake-up of property levies. The Chancellor was warned that proposals to replace stamp duty with an annual charge on homes worth more than £500,000 would damage the market as well as punish people who have worked hard to own their houses. And one of her Treasury ministers refused to rule out the possibility of her introducing the radical change in the Budget as she seeks to fill a £50 billion black hole in the public finances. Labour vowed before the last election that it would 'not increase taxes on working people', ruling out rises in National Insurance, income tax or VAT. But that language seemed to soften yesterday. Shadow Chancellor Sir Mel Stride said: 'Labour can equivocate all they like, but we know they are drawing up plans to raise taxes yet again at the Autumn Budget. ' Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves promised not to raise taxes on working people, then introduced a £25 billion Jobs Tax – which will leave the average working household £3,500 worse off. 'Now, after their botched welfare reforms and economic mismanagement, they are clearly gearing up to do it all over again this autumn. 'The British public simply cannot afford Labour. Only the Conservatives believe in sound money and low taxes.' As part of her efforts to fill the Government's coffers and boost economic growth, Ms Reeves is understood to have asked officials to look at a potential overhaul of property taxes. She has already been called on by economists to scrap the current system in which buyers having to pay thousands of pounds in stamp duty on house sales, which they say deters people from moving. The Guardian reported that owners of houses worth more than £500,000 could have to pay a 'proportional property tax' based on the value of their properties when they sell up. However, sources played down the claims that Treasury officials are looking at this proposal or threshold. Sources also moved away from suggestions that civil servants are drawing on the findings of a report published last year by think-tank Onward, which proposed that only future owners could pay an annual tax based on the value of the property instead of stamp duty. Under the plan put forward by economist Professor Tim Leunig, current homeowners would not be hit by the charge but if they do sell up in future, their buyers would pay the levy each year instead of stamp duty at the point of purchase. Kirstie Allsopp, the TV presenter who fronts Location, Location, Location, led a furious backlash over the reported plans It is intended to open up the property market by making it less expensive to move and encouraging those in large homes to downsize. TV presenter Kirstie Allsopp warned the Chancellor not to risk destabilising the market by 'flying kites' about potential new property taxes, telling Times Radio: 'It's not Rachel's to go after because it's their homes. 'It's the roof over their head. And this Government seems to want to punish people for making the sacrifices they've made to buy their own homes.' James Browne, senior economic policy adviser at the Tony Blair Institute, said: 'While replacing stamp duty with a new annual property levy on homes worth more than £500,000 is economically sensible, it would be politically challenging. 'Either long-standing homeowners who are asset-rich but cash-poor would be hit with much larger bills or, if it only applied after a property changed hands, would discourage moving just as much as stamp duty does at the moment.' Treasury minister Torsten Bell told Sky News: 'Tax decisions are made by the Chancellor. I'm not going to start speculating on individual taxes.' Last night a Treasury spokesman said: 'We are protecting payslips for working people by keeping our promise to not raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee National Insurance or VAT.' What are the plans for a 'national property tax'? What is being proposed? The Treasury is said to be considering plans for a national property tax on the sale of homes worth more than £500,000. What would this replace? This tax would replace stamp duty on owner-occupied homes. Buyers pay stamp duty under the existing framework, if they purchase property worth more than £125,000. How would the new tax work? The new levy would be paid by owner-occupiers on houses worth more than £500,000 when they sell their home, with the amount due determined by the value of the property and a rate set by the Government. What figures could be involved? This has not been confirmed. But a report by think tank Onward last year suggested replacing stamp duty with an annual 'national proportional property tax' levied on homeowners of houses with a value above £500,000, at a rate of 0.54% - plus a 0.278% supplement on values over £1million. A separate local property tax set at 0.44% of the house value up to £500,000 and with a minimum of £800 per household per year could replace council tax. What are current stamp duty rates? Stamp duty rates for buying a single property are currently 2% from £125,000; 5% from £250,001; 10% from £925,001; and 12% from £1.5million.
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Couple are jailed after victim was raped on camera - but only found out when blackmailer sent her footage and demanded £5,000
A couple has been jailed after a man raped an unconscious woman while his partner filmed it. Their victim only found out what had happened when one of the pair blackmailed her by sending her the footage and demanding £5,000. Indre Bruziene, 40, and her partner Vasile Radacanu, 33, invited the woman to their address in Sheerness, Kent on September 18, 2020. They downed alcoholic drinks together at the property, causing the victim to become intoxicated. Radacanu then raped her during which she was, at one point, unconscious. Bruziene filmed the incident throughout, first from through a window and later from inside the home. Radacanu clearly was aware he was being recorded as he made gestures towards the camera on several occasions. The victim then woke up in her own bed the next morning with no recollection of what had happened to her. In March 2021, she received a call from Bruziene accusing her of breaking up her family before sending her the clip of the rape. She asked the woman for £5,000 and claimed that if she did not pay her she would send the video to the victim's husband. The victim refused to pay the sum of money and told her family about the ordeal before calling the police. Radacanu, from Romania, and Bruziene, from Lithuania, were both arrested the next day. Their phones were seized by investigators and Radacanu was later charged with two rapes, attempted rape and two sexual assaults. Bruziene was charged with blackmail. The pair pleaded not guilty at Maidstone Crown Court but were convicted of these on January 28, 2025, following a trial. Radacanu was sentenced to 12 years and six months in prison on Thursday, and Bruziene was jailed for three years and three months. Detective Constable Hollie Brown said: 'The criminal actions of Radacanu and Bruziene were unspeakably vile as they took advantage of a vulnerable victim who was not aware of what was happening to her. 'As soon as the victim received the video of her abuse from Bruziene she showed great courage in disclosing her ordeal to her family and then contacting the police. 'Detectives then swiftly secured the offenders phones and they have now, quite rightly, been brought to justice.'
