logo
Rhino horn trafficking: Conservationist John Hume among six accused in Pretoria court

Rhino horn trafficking: Conservationist John Hume among six accused in Pretoria court

IOL News18 hours ago
The six accused of being involved in a rhino trafficking syndicate.
Image: NPA
Well-known nature conservationist John Hume, 83, is among six people accused of running a rhino horn smuggling syndicate.
The accused, Hume, Clive Melville, Izak Du Toit, Elizabeth van Niekerk, Mattheus Poggenpoel, and Johannes Hennop appeared in the Pretoria Magistrate's Court on Tuesday.
According to the National Prosecuting Authority, Hume was granted R100,000 bail.
"Melville and van Niekerk were each granted R10,000 bail while du Toit, Poggenpoel and Hennop were granted R20,000 bail," said NPA spokesperson, Lumka Mahanjana.
Mahanjana explained that the six face 55 charges for racketeering, fraud, contravention of the National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act (NAMBA), contravention of Riotous Assemblies Act, theft and money laundering.
She said between 2017 and 2024, the accused allegedly operated an international rhino horn trafficking syndicate and defrauded the Department of Forestry, Fisheries, and the Environment (DFFE).
"They allegedly obtained permits to trade rhino horn locally, while intending to channel the horns into illegal international markets in Southeast Asia. The fraudulent scheme is estimated to involve 964 rhino horns valued at R250 million," Mahanjana stated.
After intensive investigations by the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation's (DPCI) Wildlife Trafficking Section of the Serious Organised Crime Investigation Unit, based at national headquarters, the six handed themselves over at the Pretoria Central Police Station on August 19, 2025, where they were formally arrested.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Former founder and owner of the Platinum Rhino Conservation Enterprise, John Hume, transport maintenance manager, Clive John Mervan Melville, practising attorney, Izak Hermanus Du Toit, Director of a non-profit organisation, Elizabeth Catharina Van Niekerk, insurance broker and part-time farmer, Mattheus Hendrikus Wessels Poggenpoel, game reserve manager, Johannes Abraham Hennop appeared in the Pretoria Magistrate's Court on Tuesday.
Image: NPA
Mahanjana said during bail proceedings, the accused asked to be released on bail because they were not flight risks.
"They further stated that they had cooperated with the police investigations. Through their affidavits, Melville disclosed to the court that he had 2019 previous conviction for fraud and being in possession and transportation of rhino horns which he was sentenced to pay a fine," she said.
Poggenpoel also disclosed to the court that he had a 2009 previous conviction of possession of a rhino horn where he paid an admission of guilt fee of R2500.
"Poggenpoel also disclosed that he has a pending case that will be appearing on September 17 at Winburg Magistrates' Court because during the visit to his residence, the investigation team found ammunition that was not locked away in a safe and supposedly scheduled medicine without a permit," the NPA said.
"The state, Advocate Patsy Jacobs read into the record an affidavit by the investigating officer Edward Du Plessis, confirming that the State did not oppose bail as the accused were not flight risks, their addresses had been verified, and they had cooperated with investigators. The State, however, requested bail conditions," Mahanjana said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Witness Admits Contradictions in Rushil Singh Fraud Trial
Witness Admits Contradictions in Rushil Singh Fraud Trial

IOL News

time42 minutes ago

  • IOL News

Witness Admits Contradictions in Rushil Singh Fraud Trial

During the ongoing fraud trial of Rushil Singh, a key Investec employee testifying for the State admitted under cross-examination that Singh was not directly involved in the alleged fraud. This acknowledgment challenges a central aspect of the prosecution's case, which is based on Singh's position as CEO of BIG and assumptions about his knowledge of the loan witness initially testified that the financial guarantee involved in the case was 'cash backed.' However, under questioning by the defense, he conceded that this was incorrect. 'The guarantee was not, in fact, cash backed,' the witness said. He further explained that no contractual agreement explicitly required the guarantee to be backed by cash. 'There was an assumption that the guarantee was cash backed, but there is no documentary proof to support this,' he added. This admission weakens the prosecution's argument that Singh knowingly engaged in fraudulent activity related to the guarantee. The witness also contradicted himself multiple times during cross-examination. When reminded that he was under oath, he responded, 'No man is infallible.' The defence highlighted these inconsistencies to question his credibility. Compounding these issues, the court heard that the original R20 million guarantee issued by Stanbic Bank was initially cash backed and included a conditional clause confirming this security. However, it was Investec that requested the removal of this clause, transforming the guarantee from a secured instrument to an unsecured one. 'The original Stanbic guarantee was secured, but Investec itself asked for the security to be removed,' the defence argued, raising concerns about Investec's internal oversight and defense further emphasized that Singh's involvement is based on presumption rather than evidence. 'The State's own witness conceded Rushil Singh was not directly involved,' the defence said. 'Singh's implication rests solely on the assumption that he must have known about a cash backing requirement, a notion without contractual or factual basis.'Adding to the scrutiny of Investec's role are allegations that several Investec employees received personal benefits from Nishani Singh, related to the loans. The Star has learnt of a new man on the story, referred to as Mr X reportedly received monthly payments of R19,000 through a shell company registered in his name from December 2020 to October 2021 — the period during which the loan agreements were being structured and finalized. Mr X. also received a lump sum payment of R70,000 in August 2020 and may have received a R2 million contribution towards his Pretoria home's construction. After resigning from Investec in June 2021, he joined BIG as a director with a reported monthly salary of R300, other bank employees were linked to questionable benefits. Mr X.2 received two Sandton City gift vouchers worth R10,000 each, given during active loan negotiations. Mr X.2 was given a fully paid Sun City trip in December 2016. The defence suggests these benefits breached banking ethics and could constitute inducements.

Former Johannesburg Property Company boss Helen Botes leaves city council
Former Johannesburg Property Company boss Helen Botes leaves city council

Daily Maverick

time7 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Former Johannesburg Property Company boss Helen Botes leaves city council

The City of Johannesburg has confirmed that the controversial former Johannesburg Property Company boss Helen Botes no longer works for the city. Johannesburg's politically powerful property boss Helen Botes is no longer employed by the city, spokesperson Nthatisi Modingoane has confirmed. Last week, the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) started delinquent director proceedings against Botes, who has been at the centre of two major governance scandals. She is implicated in negligence in the Usindiso shelter fire in August 2023, in which 76 people were killed. A second case is Botes' implication by the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) for spending R18.6-million on dodgy companies in Covid-19 procurement criminality. These providers failed to do the work on city property, and the spending happened even when most city staffers were working from home. (See Mark Heywood's report here.) 'The City wishes to confirm that Ms Helen Botes is not an employee of the City of Johannesburg or the Johannesburg Property Company (JPC). Consequently, the City is not in a position to comment on matters about Ms Botes,' said the metro government in a statement. Daily Maverick had asked for comment on the Outa court case. 'It is important to recognise that the City of Johannesburg is committed to transparency and accountability in all its dealings and will continue to cooperate fully with any investigations or inquiries related to this matter,' the statement added. For over a decade, Botes was CEO of the JPC, which oversees 29,001 properties worth R10-billion. She's also influential in the Johannesburg ANC regional structures. She was appointed acting chief operating officer of Johannesburg in January in unprocedural circumstances, before Tshepo Makola returned to the position. The Khampepe Commission into the Usindiso fire found that: The board of directors of the JPC must consider taking appropriate action against Botes for the total disregard of managing the Usindiso building despite knowledge of the disastrous state since at least 2019. Botes gave evidence and answered questions by the evidence leader of the commission and, in cross-examination, made concessions indicating awareness of the following relevant facts spanning from at least 2015 until the fire occurred: Since at least 2015, Usindiso Ministries had vacated the building; The building was not zoned for residential purposes; The building had been hijacked, remained occupied illegally and was overcrowded; Crime was rife in the building, and the building was not habitable; The building had illegal electricity connections and water consumption; The building lacked firefighting equipment and installations; and The JPC had failed to maintain the property since 2003. The evidence of the former residents indicated, without any shadow of a doubt, that the Usindiso building was dangerous or showed signs of becoming dangerous to life or property. In contrast, the evidence presented by Botes elsewhere demonstrated that the JPC and, by extension, the City of Johannesburg were aware that the Usindiso building was dangerous or showed signs of becoming hazardous to life or property, yet no steps appeared to have been taken to uphold applicable laws to ensure public safety. DM

Case against driver who allegedly killed teen girl, 13, postponed
Case against driver who allegedly killed teen girl, 13, postponed

TimesLIVE

time7 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

Case against driver who allegedly killed teen girl, 13, postponed

The case against a woman accused of ploughing into a group of teenage girls during a coming-of-age ceremony, killing one of them, has been postponed to September 26. Martha Christina, 67, briefly appeared in the Germiston magistrate's court on Wednesday. She faces a culpable homicide charge and is out on R5,000 bail. The state asked for further investigations into the death of Thando Pretty Mahlangu, 13.. Part of the information the state is to gather are photos and video footage of the incident. On 28 June, Christina allegedly drove into the crowd in Dinwiddie, Germiston, where girls had gathered for a traditional ceremony at the Khumalo home. Mahlangu's family said they had hoped Wednesday's court appearance would see the charges upgraded to murder. 'The pictures and video the state wants to retrieve were always part of the docket and were given to police,' said family spokesperson Mzwandile Soyaya . 'They also asked for the hospital report, postmortem and scene reconstruction, which were submitted. Why is this information still not before court? Is this a delay tactic or what?'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store