logo
High Court to hear bid to challenge Palestine Action ban

High Court to hear bid to challenge Palestine Action ban

Yahoo2 days ago
The co-founder of the proscribed group Palestine Action is set to ask the High Court for the green light to challenge the Home Secretary's decision to ban the organisation at a hearing on Monday.
Huda Ammori is seeking to challenge Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe Palestine Action under anti-terror laws, after the group claimed an action which saw two Voyager planes damaged at RAF Brize Norton on June 20.
On July 4, Ms Ammori failed in a High Court bid to temporarily block the ban coming into effect, with the Court of Appeal dismissing a challenge to that decision less than two hours before the proscription came into force on July 5.
The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000.
The Government is opposing the bid for the legal challenge to be allowed to proceed, with the hearing before Mr Justice Chamberlain due to begin at 10.30am on Monday at the Royal Courts of Justice.
Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused an estimated £7 million of damage, was 'disgraceful'.
Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident, and are due to face trial in early 2027.
Since the ban came into force, dozens of people have been arrested at protests in cities including London, Manchester and Cardiff, including an 83-year-old reverend.
At the hearing earlier this month, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, said the proscription was an 'ill-considered, discriminatory and authoritarian abuse of statutory power'.
He also said that the Home Office 'has still not sufficiently articulated or evidenced a national security reason that proscription should be brought into effect now'.
Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, also representing Ms Ammori, told the court that the harm caused by the ban would be 'far-reaching' and could cause 'irreparable harm to large numbers of members of the public', including causing some to 'self-censor'.
Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC), a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court.
Mr Justice Chamberlain said that an assessment on whether to ban the group had been made as early as March, and 'preceded' the incident at RAF Brize Norton.
Dismissing the bid for a temporary block, the judge said that the 'harm which would ensue' if a block was not ordered was 'insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force'.
He added that some of the 'consequences feared by the claimant' were 'overstated'.
At a late-night Court of Appeal hearing, the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, Lord Justice Lewis and Lord Justice Edis threw out a bid to challenge the High Court's decision, finding that there was 'no real prospect of a successful appeal'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police attend protest outside London hotel which 'will be housing asylum seekers'
Police attend protest outside London hotel which 'will be housing asylum seekers'

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Police attend protest outside London hotel which 'will be housing asylum seekers'

Metropolitan Police officers attended the scene of a protest outside a hotel in east London where asylum seekers will reportedly be held. The protest took place on Tuesday outside the four-star Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf, which the government intends to use as temporary accommodation for asylum seekers, according to Tower Hamlets Council. A police statement from last night said: "Officers are currently in attendance at a protest outside a hotel in Canary Wharf. "We have a policing plan in place and will continue to monitor events." A spokesperson for Tower Hamlets Council said: "We are aware of the government's decision to use the Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf to provide temporary accommodation for asylum seekers. "It is important that the government ensures that there is a full package of support for those staying at the hotel. "We are working with the Home Office and partners to make sure that all necessary safety and safeguarding arrangements are in place." There have been a series of demonstrations outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, since asylum seeker Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, was charged with sexual assault after an incident earlier this month in which he is alleged to have attempted to kiss a 14-year-old girl. Kebatu denied the charge when he appeared at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court on Thursday. Four men have been charged with violent disorder after the protests outside the hotel in Essex, which is believed to be housing asylum seekers, police say.

'He lied to my face': Basildon Facebook marketplace scammer steals £1,450 camera
'He lied to my face': Basildon Facebook marketplace scammer steals £1,450 camera

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'He lied to my face': Basildon Facebook marketplace scammer steals £1,450 camera

A FACEBOOK Marketplace scam has left a Basildon man £1,450 out of pocket after he was tricked into handing over a camera with a fake bank transfer. Liam Hopper, 31, said the con had a 'massive impact' on his livelihood as a photographer after he fell victim to a man using a fake banking app to pay for the camera before vanishing and deleting his Facebook account. Despite being savvy to online scams, Liam said the man's friendliness in person when he came to collect the camera skewed his judgement when he handed it over. Impact - Liam is a videographer and photographer by trade and says the loss of the camera means he will have to take out a loan to replace it and keep working (Image: Liam Hopper) Liam said: "When he arrived we went into my garage so he could check the camera, he told me he didn't know much about them and he was buying it as a gift for his girlfriend. "He agreed to buy it and brought up a mobile banking app, I entered my details and it all came up correctly with the right bank; it didn't set off any alarm bells. "We waited for five minutes and nothing happened, I said I can't let you take it without the money. "I didn't realise when I gave my bank details it was a foreign bank account, at the bottom it said transactions can take between one and two working days. "I thought it will pop in on Monday and let him walk away with the camera, but as time went by I began to think 'what have I done?'" "Sure enough I went on Facebook to message him and the account was gone, as was the number he rang me on." Theft - The moment the man walks away with the camera knowing the money won't go through (Image: Liam Hopper) Following the incident on Sunday, Liam has reported the incident to police and is now urging residents to be aware. Liam added: "It's my livelihood. My business insurance won't cover it because it's classed as deception rather than theft, if he had prized it out of my hands I would be able to get my money back. "I will have to take out a loan to be able to do my job. Losing the money isn't the most aggravating thing, if I had dropped it and it smashed I could put it down to bad luck but he came into my house and lied to my face." "I recognise online scams all the time, I've grown up with the internet; but I suppose having met and spoken with him I let my guard down. "I'll never use Facebook again, there's no recourse against these scammers on their platform, zero accountability."

Prolific shoplifters get suspended jail terms as court recognises positive changes
Prolific shoplifters get suspended jail terms as court recognises positive changes

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Prolific shoplifters get suspended jail terms as court recognises positive changes

SUSPENDED jail terms have been handed to a man and a woman from Carlisle who have admitted a spate of shoplifting offences. Danielle Nicholson, 35, and Matthew Thompson, 31, both of Mayfield Avenue, entered guilty pleas to a series of thefts committed at local stores in recent weeks. Both have a history of previous offending. Magistrates described their offending as 'prolific' but drew back from handing them an immediate jail term after a defence lawyer said both can be rehabilitated. Nicholson stole from the Co-op in Central Avenue, Harraby, on June 7, 18, and 21, taking sweets and various meat items, including eight steaks. On the last occasion, Carlisle's Rickergate court heard, she was challenged by the staff because she is barred from the store. Despite this, she refused to stop stuffing items into her bag before leaving. On that one occasion, the left with goods worth £41, making no attempt to pay. Four days later, she and Thompson went on a joint shoplifting trip to the Aldi store on Petteril Bank Road in Carlisle, stealing goods worth £27. Thompson admitted two thefts from Aldi on June 25 as well as six further thefts from the Co-op and Spar stores on dates in May, June and July. Defence lawyer Lauren Heasley represented both defendants. For Nicholson, the lawyer said she had experienced difficulties in her life which have left her with long-term trauma. 'She was stealing from shops to feed herself and to fund her drug habit,' said Ms Heasley. 'She is 35 and wants today to mark the end of her offending,' said the lawyer. 'She is motivated to change and there is a recommendation [in the background Probation Service report] for female focused work to assist in her rehabilitation. "She is willing to work with that.' Nicholson had learned of the death of a relative two days ago, an event which in the past would have sent her down the path of alcohol abuse and self-destruction, but she had remained strong and resisted that reaction. 'She wants to show that she's committed to change,' said Ms Heasley. Referring to Thompson, Ms Heasley said he too was capable of rehabilitating. He had secured a job as a roofer and was engaging well with services to tackle drug misuse. The job had given him a sense of pride. Magistrates noted Nicholson's deprived background and the long period since she was last had a community-based sentence. They imposed eight weeks custody but suspended this for a year, ruling that she must complete 15 rehabilitation activity days. Addressing Thompson, magistrates said he had taken steps to improve his life. He too must complete 12 rehabilitation activity days, in his case as part of a 12-week jail term suspended for a year. Both defendants must compensate the shops they stole from for the loss of goods which were not recovered – in Nicholson's case to the tune of £199 and in Thompson's case the amount was £218. Neither was asked to pay costs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store