&w=3840&q=100)
'Hope the food was good': Tharoor takes a jibe at Asim Munir's luncheon with Trump
Trump and Munir reportedly discussed a wide range of topics, including India and Pakistan, wherein the Pakistani general expressed his gratitude to the president for preventing a potential nuclear war following the Pahalgam terror attack read more
(File) Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir (C) prays after laying wreath on the martyrs' monument during a guard of honor ceremony at General Headquarters (GHQ) in Rawalpindi on May 21, 2025. Photo by Handout/ Pakistan's Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR). AFP
Congress MP and leader Shashi Tharoor has taken a dig at Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir's lunch meeting with US President Donald Trump.
Commenting on the White House reporting that Munir nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, Tharoor said, 'According to the White House, this general had said that the president should get the Nobel peace prize, and then he was rewarded with a lunch. I hope the food was good and he has also got some food for thought in the process.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Trump and Munir reportedly discussed a wide range of topics, including India and Pakistan, wherein the Pakistani general expressed his gratitude to the president for preventing a potential nuclear war following the Pahalgam terror attack.
On Trump's mediation claims, Tharoor said, 'We welcome any pressure the US may have on Pakistan. But we did not ask for it. We did not request anyone's mediation.'
Meanwhile, Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a phone call with Trump on Wednesday, where he rejected his claims of US mediation.
'Working on trade deals with India, Pak'
After their luncheon meeting, Trump said, 'The reason I had him here was I wanted to thank him for not going into the war and ending the war. Prime Minister Modi just left a little while ago, and we are working on a trade deal with India.'
The president further said that his administration is also working on reaching a trade deal with Pakistan, adding that he is 'very happy' that 'two very smart people decided not to keep going with the war.'
The White House has confirmed that the meeting was arranged in response to Munir's public remarks praising Trump's role in de-escalating tensions between the two nuclear-armed countries.
'They know Iran better than most'
The duo also discussed the ongoing situation in West Asia triggered by Israel's strikes against Iran and the following retaliatory attacks.
'They know Iran very well, better than most, and they're not happy about anything. They see what's going on. And he agreed with me,' Trump said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Americans split on AI's future as leadership stalls and classrooms struggle
In a rare moment of political symmetry, Americans across all ideologies have found common ground, not in unity of belief, but in collective uncertainty. Artificial Intelligence, once the darling of Silicon Valley hype and academic theory, now stands at the centre of a divided American consciousness. According to the NBC News Decision Desk Poll powered by SurveyMonkey, opinions on AI are fractured and unresolved, with no clear party, age group, or ideological bloc leading the charge. The future, it seems, is no longer left or right; it's undecided. This ambivalence plays out in stark numbers. Just 7% of Americans believe AI will make their lives 'much better,' while 16% believe it will make things 'much worse.' The bulk of the nation hovers in the gray middle, unsure, anxious, and watching. Policy paralysis in Washington Despite AI's growing ubiquity, from customer service to content creation, Washington remains stubbornly inert. The few regulatory frameworks introduced under President Joe Biden have largely been dismantled by the Trump administration. President Donald Trump's rollback of AI oversight has since become part of a broader Republican embrace of tech deregulation, allowing powerful AI corporations to operate in an ethical vacuum. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Laku keras kat Guardian! Umur 40-an pun tak perlu kolagen dah URUHIME MOMOKO Undo Yet, this isn't a battle of partisan lines. The poll reveals that Democrats, Republicans, and independents use AI tools like ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Google Gemini at nearly identical rates. This technological neutrality, though rare in a polarized nation, has resulted not in consensus but in chaos. Schools on the frontline If AI is the future, then America's classrooms are its proving grounds. But here, too, the nation is torn. A narrow majority, 53%, believes integrating AI into education better prepares students for the future. The remaining 47% argue the opposite, fearing dependency, diminished learning, and ethical blind spots. Educators are divided, not by doctrine but by desperation. Some are reverting to old-school tactics, handwritten essays, in-person exams, and AI detection software, while others are innovating with AI-integrated assignments. No red, no blue—just gray Surprisingly, the AI debate defies political stereotypes. Fifty-seven percent of Democrats support classroom AI use, compared to 50% of Republicans and 51% of independents. On the flip side, half of Republicans and nearly half of independents say banning AI better equips students, a view shared by 43% of Democrats. This strange ideological neutrality extends beyond education. When asked whether AI will improve their families' futures, 50% of Republicans said yes, alongside 42% of Democrats and 41% of independents. Similarly, 39% of Republicans and 47% of Democrats believe AI will worsen lives. For once, the partisan compass is spinning without direction. A nation holding its breath Even age, often a key indicator in tech adoption, offers no clear fault lines. Younger adults, ages 18–29, are evenly split on whether schools should embrace or ban AI. Those aged 30–44 lean slightly more toward integration, but older generations remain similarly indecisive. The result: A technological revolution without a generational leader. Despite AI's explosive potential, the national mood is less one of enthusiasm and more of caution, an eerie calm before an uncharted storm. Waiting for a tipping point In the absence of decisive legislation, AI's integration into American life is being dictated not by lawmakers but by market forces, educators, and individual choices. Companies continue to roll out AI education tools, OpenAI's ChatGPT Edu, Google's Gemini for education, and Microsoft Copilot, while platforms like Khan Academy experiment with AI-powered tutors. Yet without a guiding national vision, these tools risk deepening inequality and confusion. The NBC poll doesn't merely capture public opinion; it reveals a country stuck in philosophical limbo. The question is no longer whether AI will shape the future; it already is. The question now is: whose future will it serve, and at what cost? Until America decides, AI remains a mirror, not of what we believe, but of what we fear to answer. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
As Munir meets Trump, a look at the past legacy of Pak's military chiefs
Since achieving independence in 1947, Pakistan's military leadership has seen a very close engagement with the political, economic, and foreign relations of the country. Army chiefs have not only led coups and managed wars, but they have also shaped and controlled the frameworks within which states operate. The evolution of power has transitioned through two key titles, Commander-in-Chief (1947-1972) and Chief of Army Staff (COAS) from 1972 onwards. This long arc of military dominance reached a new milestone on Wednesday (June 18), when General Asim Munir, Pakistan's current army chief, held a direct meeting with US President Donald Trump at the White House. This was the first time a sitting Pakistani Chief of Army Staff, who was not a politician or ruling under martial law, was formally received at such a high diplomatic level, which indicates the global weight of the military organisation. Over the years, each army chief stamps a different mark as the organisation transformed with coups, wars, diplomacy to commercialising itself. Here is an overview of how subsequent military leaders have shaped the civil-military relationship in Pakistan and extended the army's role in statecraft. Field Marshal Muhammad Ayub Khan (1951–1958) This legacy began with Field Marshal Muhammad Ayub Khan when he served as the Commander-in-Chief from 1951 to 1958 as the United States increased its military aid to Pakistan. A series of events led Ayub Khan to seize power in a military coup in 1958, cloaked as a necessary response to civilian mismanagement. He set up an operational "developmental dictatorship," consolidating economic and administrative power and dividing profits with military elites through the Fauji Foundation and massive parcels of land. His rule ended with a negotiated settlement that reestablished its international martial image when the 1965 war with India came to an end. His rule established a future pattern: seize power, entrench economically, and command diplomacy. General Muhammad Musa Khan (1958-1966) Following him, General Muhammad Musa Khan (1958-1966), a symbolic figure installed by Ayub, extended the same centralised authority and military privileges without initiating a new coup. He remained involved during the 1965 war and supported the Ayub-era political-economic framework. General Agha Muhammad Yahya Khan (1966-1971) General Agha Muhammad Yahya Khan (1966-1971) assumed power after Ayub's resignation, imposing martial law to address a growing crisis in East Pakistan. He disbanded the parliament and cracked down on dissent, centralising authority in West Pakistan. His tenure ended in catastrophe during the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War, as Pakistan faced military defeat and diplomatic isolation, ultimately leading to the creation of Pakistan. This marked a big rupture in the myth of Pakistan's military invincibility and exposed the limitations of authoritarian rule. Lt. Gen. Gul Hassan Khan (Dec 1971-Mar 1972) Lt. Gen. Gul Hassan Khan briefly served from December 1971 to March 1972 during a transitional phase. His role was largely ceremonial, presiding over a caretaker military command during national disintegration. General Tikka Khan (1972-1976) In the post-1971 period, General Tikka Khan (1972-1976) was appointed COAS under Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. He initiated military restructuring and oversaw violent campaigns in Balochistan. While supporting Bhutto's nationalisation efforts, he ensured the military retained its institutional privileges. Diplomatically, he repositioned the military after the 1971 setback, marking the army's re-entry as a core power broker in civilian governance. General Zia??'ul??'Haq (1976-1988) General Zia??'ul??'Haq (1976-1988) executed a coup in 1977, Operation Fair Play, after fuelling political unrest. He imposed martial law, institutionalised Islamisation, and expanded military economic interests through the Defence Housing Authority, Fauji Foundation, and other welfare corporations. His foreign policy pivoted around alignment with the United States during the Soviet-Afghan War. While remaining neutral during the Iran-Iraq conflict, Zia actively supported Afghan Mujahideen. His rule left a legacy of ideological, political, and commercial militarisation. Weak generals in turbulent times After Zia's death in 1988, General Mirza Aslam Beg (1988-1991) facilitated a return to electoral democracy but ensured the National Security Council (NSC) retained supervisory authority. He maintained behind-the-scenes influence over fragile civilian administrations. General Asif Nawaz Janjua (1991-1993), selected on the basis of seniority, died unexpectedly in office. His brief tenure did not register any significant political or economic shift. General Abdul Waheed Kakar (1993-1996) took charge amid political unrest. He influenced the dismissal and restructuring of governments and continued to utilise the NSC as a policy advisory instrument. General Jehangir Karamat (1996-1998) assumed command under constitutional norms but was forced to resign after advocating parliamentary oversight of the NSC, an action that exposed military discomfort with civilian checks. General Pervez Musharraf (1998-2007) In 1998, General Pervez Musharraf seized power after the Kargil War in a coup against the Nawaz Sharif government, citing administrative failures. His regime restructured the Constitution, liberalised the economy, and significantly expanded military-led business ventures. Under Musharraf, Pakistan allied with the United States during the post-9/11 global war on terror and maintained strong ties with China and Gulf states. His controversial Kargil campaign attracted international condemnation and resulted in retreat under US pressure. Musharraf's leadership institutionalised the military's supremacy in politics and global diplomacy. The post-Musharraf era General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani (2007-2013), a Musharraf appointee, led during the post-coup normalisation period. Though he projected a reduced public military footprint, his tenure ensured continued control of the NSC and Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). Appointed in 2013 by Kayani, General Raheel Sharif (2013-2016) prioritised counter-terror operations, particularly Operation Zarb??'e??'Azb, and expanded the army's role in infrastructure under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). He largely avoided political entanglement while engaging internationally to secure infrastructure investment. General Qamar Javed Bajwa (2016-2022) assumed command over senior contenders and received two extensions from Parliament. His tenure deepened military involvement in electoral processes, most notably engineering the rise of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and orchestrating the 2022 regime change. Under him, the military strengthened its economic stakes in CPEC and intensified diplomatic alignment while tightening domestic political control. Field Marshal General Asim Munir (2022-present) General Asim Munir, the current Chief of Army Staff (COAS), assumed office in November 2022 amid political upheaval. In May 2025, he was elevated to the rank of Field Marshal, only the second in Pakistan's history after Ayub Khan. Munir's tenure has seen the reintroduction of military courts to prosecute civilian dissenters and a major expansion of 'milbus' (military-business) interests across mining, agriculture, and infrastructure. His leadership was tested during the April-May 2025 conflict with India, triggered by the Pahalgam terror attack. India responded with Operation Sindoor, targeting Pakistani military installations. Pakistan retaliated with Operation Bunyan??'um??'Marsoos. A ceasefire was reached on May 10. Munir emerged as a national hero, with a dramatic increase in public approval. On June 18, he attended a high-profile White House lunch hosted by U.S. President Donald Trump, where discussions focused on regional stability, Iran, and Indo-Pak relations. Munir has since broadened military diplomacy, finalising jet deals with China, strengthening ties with Gulf nations, and elevating Pakistan's engagement in the United Nations Security Council and the International Monetary Fund. So far, his legacy is marked by unprecedented consolidation of military power in both state and commercial spheres. However, critics warn of an authoritarian drift and an increasingly militarised political landscape. Over the course of seven decades, Pakistan's army chiefs have followed a familiar blueprint: seize control through coups or exploit crises, institutionalise their authority via the NSC and influence over the judiciary and bureaucracy, monetise power through sprawling military business empires and justify their hold through war and diplomacy.
NDTV
32 minutes ago
- NDTV
Donald Trump's Verbal Gaffes Under Spotlight At Hearing Meant For Biden
New Delhi: A Senate hearing to scrutinise former US President Joe Biden's mental acuity, took a 180-degree turn with Illinois Senator Dick Durbin putting Donald Trump in the spotlight. Durbin, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, played a video montage of Trump's verbal gaffes, calling attention to the US President's own cognitive abilities. "I'd like you to see a short video that includes some other examples of cognitive ability," Durbin said, as he introduced the clip. The footage included bizarre one-liners such as: "They're eating the dogs, the people that came in. They're eating the cats. They're eating." "This is a tough hurricane, one of the wettest we've ever seen from the standpoint of water." "The windmills are driving the whales crazy, obviously." "I have concepts of a plan." "The kidney has a very special place in the heart." "And then I see the disinfectant that knocks [COVID-19] out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside, or almost a cleaning?" Durbin also referred to a recent Trump gaffe at the G7 summit in Canada where the President fumbled trade documents and wrongly claimed the UK was part of the European Union. Before playing the video, the Senator criticised his Republican colleagues for convening the hearing, which aimed to investigate Biden's mental sharpness and alleged efforts to cover up any decline. "This is our first Judiciary Committee oversight hearing of the 118th Congress," Durbin said. "And not one single oversight hearing has been held despite numerous critical challenges facing the nation that are under our jurisdiction." He went on to list those challenges, including the shooting of two Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota, the removal of Sen. Alex Padilla (D-CA) by federal agents, and the deployment of Marines and the deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles under Trump's administration. "But instead of exercising this constitutional oversight duty," he continued, "my Republican colleagues are holding this hearing. Apparently, armchair diagnosing former President Biden is more important than the issues of grave concern, which I have mentioned." Last year, mounting concerns over Joe Biden's mental acuity, fuelled by a string of public gaffes, ultimately forced him to withdraw from the 2024 race and endorse former Vice President Kamala Harris. Repeated slip-ups, like calling Ukraine's Volodydmyr Zelensky "President Putin," mixing up Trump and Harris, and freezing during the presidential debate, intensified bipartisan concerns about his cognitive health. A particularly poor showing at the G7 summit and NATO events only added to the growing unease. Democratic leaders, alarmed by internal polling and public backlash, began pressuring Biden behind the scenes. After weeks of speculation and rising calls to step aside, Biden announced on July 21, 2024, that he would not seek re-election.
