Stocks plunge as China retaliates to Trump tariffs
Global stocks tumbled for a second day on Friday over US President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff plans, with the sell-off deepening after China said it would impose additional tariffs of 34 per cent on all US goods.
Banking stocks cratered as investors fretted about growth and priced in far more central bank rate cuts, with benchmark 10-year US Treasury yields sliding to their lowest since October, after Trump slapped a 10 per cent tariff on most US imports and much higher levies on dozens of countries.
"If the current slate of tariffs holds, a Q2 or Q3 recession is very possible, as is a bear market," said David Bahnsen, chief investment officer at The Bahnsen Group.
"The question is, does President Trump seek some sort of off-ramp for these policies if and when we see a bear market in the stock market."
Europe's STOXX 600 dropped 4.4 per cent after sliding on Thursday and was on track for its biggest daily fall since the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. Japan's Nikkei 225 slumped 2.8 per cent overnight for a second session running.
Futures for the US S&P 500 slumped 2.7 per cent after the cash index plunged 4.8 per cent on Thursday — the biggest drop since 2020.
Nasdaq futures were down 2.8 per cent after the index dropped 5.4 per cent on Thursday. The VIX index, a closely watched measure of expected volatility in US stocks, rose sharply to the highest since August, at 36. Oil prices slid on worries about growth and demand, with Brent crude futures down 6 per cent to $65.90 a barrel, the lowest in more than three years.
Traders on Friday were pricing in more than 100 basis points of Federal Reserve rate cuts this year, up from around 75 basis points on Wednesday and increased their bets on Bank of England and European Central Bank reductions too.
The risk of a US and global recession this year has risen to 60 per cent from 40 per cent after Trump's tariff announcements, J P Morgan said.
Lower interest rates — which dent lenders' margins — and worries about growth battered banking stocks, with the STOXX 600 banking index slumping 9.5 per cent.
That followed an 8 per cent rout for Japanese banks overnight and a sharp sell-off of Wall Street lenders on Thursday. Citigroup dropped more than 12 per cent, Bank of America sank 11 per cent and a host of other major lenders suffered similar falls.
"If we start seeing negotiations taking place, or Trump dialling back on some of these tariffs, that is the only possible route to allow for an abatement of the sell-off," said Aneeka Gupta, equity strategist and economist at WisdomTree.
"But for now that seems very unlikely."
As investors continued to hunt for safety, 10-year US government bond, or Treasury, yields dropped 17 basis points to 3.897 per cent, after falling 14 basis points on Thursday. Yields move inversely to prices.
The most obvious sign of nerves about the health of the US economy and markets was a 1.9 per cent drop in the dollar index on Thursday, the biggest fall since November 2022.
The dollar initially rebounded somewhat on Friday, but that faded after the China tariff announcement. The euro was last down 0.2 per cent after rallying 1.9 per cent on Thursday, with the dollar index 0.1 per cent higher.
The Japanese yen and Swiss franc, safe-haven currencies, rose around 0.6 per cent and 1 per cent respectively . The Australian dollar — sometimes seen as a barometer of investors' risk appetite and a proxy for the Chinese yuan — plunged 2.6 per cent.
Japanese 10-year government bond yields were set for their biggest weekly fall — at 37 basis points — since 1992 and last traded at 1.175 per cent. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
18 hours ago
- Observer
Effect of declining oil prices on Oman's budgetary obligations
US President Donald Trump's recent tariff-related decisions have unleashed a wave of economic and political impacts for developed and emerging countries alike. These decisions have negative repercussions on global oil markets, leading to a decline in revenues for countries that rely on exports of this commodity as a primary source of national income. Globally, average global oil prices fell to $73 per barrel during the first quarter of this year, down from $83 per barrel during the same period last year. This poses a challenge for many oil-producing countries, including the Sultanate of Oman. According to recent analysis, Omani oil export revenues fell by approximately RO 200 million. A part of this decline was offset by an increase in tax revenues from RO 27 million during the corresponding quarter in 2024 to RO 72 million this year, thanks to improved tax collection. However, the current second quarter is expected to be more difficult, with the average oil price expected to fall to $66 per barrel. Everyone knows that the Omani government seeks to diversify sources of income and develop alternative economic sources to oil, while simultaneously committing to repaying its external debt, which amounted to approximately 14.3 billion Omani riyals by the end of the first quarter of this year, 2025, compared to approximately 15.1 billion Omani riyals by the end of the same period in 2024. The Sultanate of Oman is committed to repaying its public debt, which amounts to approximately RO 2.5 billion annually. This represents a significant burden on the state budget, which is affected by the decline in global oil prices. According to the financial data report, Oman's public revenues decreased by approximately 7 per cent by the end of the first quarter of this year, recording approximately RO 2.635 billion, compared to RO 2.826 billion during the same period last year, due to the decline in global oil prices. Net oil revenues constitute a major item in the country's financial budget, along with gas revenues and followed by non-oil revenues. The government works to manage the country's various financial obligations related to the economic and social spheres each year. At the same time, the government is working diligently to reduce the country's public debt to an appropriate level relative to the gross domestic product. This helps the country improve its credit rating, which has become highly valued by international financial institutions. This also helps attract more foreign investment, especially as the country is now approaching the list of global investment-attracting countries. Indeed, the Sultanate has succeeded in attracting investments over the past years, which has contributed to the improvement of the country's financial, economic, and social conditions. As is well known, the decline in oil prices for oil exporting countries has a direct and significant impact on their public budgets. This leads to difficulties in their ability to meet financial obligations, both internally and externally, due to their economies' heavy reliance on oil revenues. In Oman, it has negative repercussions on the fiscal budget, as oil constitutes more than 65-70% of government revenues. Any decline in prices directly leads to a decline in revenues, causing a budget deficit. This forces the government to cover the deficit through borrowing or drawing from reserves. It also results in the postponement or reduction of development projects and a slowdown in the growth of the non-oil economy. HAIDER AL LAWATI The writer is a Muscat-based economic analyst who previously worked for CBO and OCCI.
Observer
2 days ago
- Observer
Airlines expected to show resilience, improved profitability
Muscat: With 5 billion expected to travel annually by air, in 2025, airlines will make a $36 billion profit on revenues of $979 billion. According to IATA's latest report, airlines are, however, expected to make a net margin of only 3.7% or $7.20 net profit per passenger while showing resilience in the face of global economic and political shifts. Willie Walsh, the director general of the International Air Transport Association (IATA), said, "Our profitability is not commensurate with the enormous value that we create at the heart of a value chain supporting 3.9% of global GDP and providing and supporting jobs for 86.5 million people. "While airline margins are half what most other industries earn, including those in the air transport value chain, airline resilience is the stuff of legend, as proven in our post-COVID bounce-back.. Net profits at $36 billion improved from the $32.4 billion earned in 2024, but were slightly down on the previously projected $36.6 billion (December 2024). Net profit margin at 3.7%, improved from the 3.4% earned in 2024 and the previously projected 3.6%.Return on invested capital at 6.7%, improved from the 6.6% earned in 2024 and largely unchanged from previous projections. "The first half of 2025 has brought significant uncertainties to global markets. Nonetheless, by many measures, including net profits, it will still be a better year for airlines than 2024, although slightly below our previous projections. The biggest positive driver is the price of jet fuel, which has fallen 13% compared with 2024 and 1% below earlier estimates. Moreover, we anticipate airlines flying more people and more cargo in 2025 than they did in 2024, even if previous demand projections have been dented by trade tensions and falls in consumer confidence. The result is an improvement of net margins from 3.4% in 2024 to 3.7% in 2025. That's still about half the average profitability across all industries. But considering the headwinds, it's a strong result that demonstrates the resilience that airlines have worked hard to fortify,' said Walsh
Observer
3 days ago
- Observer
The EU can play it cool with Trump's trade threats
Other governments have so far taken three main approaches to dealing with Donald Trump's trade threats. China hit back hard at the US president's tariffs and got him to back down partly. Canada also retaliated and avoided some of the pain Trump inflicted on other countries. Meanwhile, Britain cut a quick deal that favoured the United States. None of these is a model for the European Union. The 27-member group is not China. Though its bilateral goods trade with the United States last year was worth 70% more than between the US and the People's Republic, the EU is not an autocracy that can outpunch Trump. If it antagonises the US president, he might up the stakes by pulling the rug from under Ukraine and undermining the EU's defences. American hard power gives it what geopolitical strategists call 'escalation dominance'. The EU is not Canada either. Ottawa was able to hang tough because its people were infuriated that Trump was trying to blackmail Canada into becoming part of the United States. While anti-Trump sentiment is high in the EU, politicians who are sympathetic to him, such as Poland's new president, can still get elected. On the other hand, the EU is not the United Kingdom. Both are at risk from Russia's invasion of Ukraine. But the EU trades seven times more goods with the United States than Britain does - so Washington has more to lose if economic relations break down. There is another way for the EU to handle Trump's threats: play it cool. That is more or less what the bloc is doing. It involves neither escalating the conflict nor accepting a bad deal. It means being open to a good agreement if the US lowers its demands, but willing to play the long game if it does not. One reason to buy time is to help Kyiv. The longer the EU has to prepare its own support package for Ukraine, which should include getting it a lot of cash, the less the damage if Trump ultimately cuts off all US aid to the country. The president's own vulnerabilities may also increase over time. Just look at the spectacular end of his alliance with Tesla boss Elon Musk. The fragile US trade truce with China may break down causing more financial turmoil, making Trump less keen to pick a fight with the EU. If the Supreme Court stops him using emergency powers to impose tariffs, his negotiating position will be weaker. And tariffs could hurt the US more than its supposed victims, by pushing up inflation and crimping growth. A QUICK DEAL? Trump has zig-zagged in his trade threats and actions against the EU. The current state of play is that there are 50% tariffs on US imports of steel and aluminium from the bloc, a 25% tariff on cars and 10% so-called reciprocal tariffs on most other goods. And so they're trying to be the first and the best to get there, which is why everybody's throwing so much money at it without any clear sense of, you know, The US president has threatened to jack up these reciprocal tariffs to 50% if there is no deal by July 9. He is also looking at more 'sectoral tariffs', including on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. While the EU has complained to the World Trade Organization (WTO), it has delayed its own retaliation. Its negotiators accept that they are unlikely to overturn the reciprocal tariffs, the Financial Times has reported. The bloc still aims to avoid the sectoral ones. Those on cars and any on pharmaceuticals would hurt it the most. It has dangled the possibility of buying more US equipment and natural gas to get a deal. An agreement on those lines could be good for the EU. It needs to beef up its defences and eliminate its purchases of Russian gas. While it would be best to have its own arms and energy supplies, buying more from the US makes sense as an interim measure. An important nuance, though, is that the EU should reserve the right to take action against the reciprocal tariffs after the WTO issues its verdict, says Ignacio Garcia Bercero, a former senior EU trade official. Such a pact would involve quite a climbdown by Trump. True, arms and gas purchases would narrow the US goods deficit with the EU, which was $236 billion last year. But his administration has a host of other complaints including the bloc's value-added tax and food safety standards as well the digital taxes that some of its members impose on tech giants. It is hard to see the bloc agreeing anything in those areas, says Simon Evenett, professor of geopolitics and strategy at IMD. BACK TO WAR? Although the US side described last week's trade talks with the EU as 'very constructive', discussions could easily break down. The question then is how the bloc would react if Trump imposed higher reciprocal tariffs. The EU has so far imposed no countermeasures. Though it has agreed to tax 21 billion euros of US imports in response to the steel and aluminium tariffs, it has delayed these until July 14 to try to get a deal. The European Commission, its executive arm, is also consulting on taxing a further 95 billion euros of US imports in response to the car tariffs and the reciprocal ones. But added together, these tit-for-tat measures would be equivalent to only a third of the 379 billion euros of EU imports subject to Trump's tariffs. Some analysts think the bloc needs to be tougher. One idea is to crack down on American services, where the US had a 109 billion euro surplus with the EU in 2023. Another is to activate its 'anti-coercion instrument ', which would allow retaliation against US companies operating in the bloc. Yet another is to threaten to ban exports of critical goods, such as the lithographic equipment necessary to make semiconductors. Extreme events may require extreme responses. But for now, the EU should keep its cool. It should not kid itself that it is stronger or more united than it is. It should remember that Trump may get weaker with time. And it should never forget Ukraine. — Reuters Hugo Dixon The writer is Commentator-at-Large for Reuters. He was the founding chair and editor-in-chief of Breakingviews.
