&w=3840&q=100)
US governors divided along party lines about troops deployed to protests
California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom is calling President Donald Trump's military intervention at protests over federal immigration policy in Los Angeles an assault on democracy and has sued to try to stop it.
Meanwhile, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott is putting the National Guard on standby in areas in his state where demonstrations are planned.
The divergent approaches illustrate the ways the two parties are trying to navigate national politics and the role of executive power in enforcing immigration policies.
In his live TV address this week, Newsom said that Trump's move escalated the situation and for political gain.
All 22 other Democratic governors signed a statement sent by the Democratic Governors Association on Sunday backing Newsom, calling the Guard deployment and threats to send in Marines an alarming abuse of power that "undermines the mission of our service members, erodes public trust, and shows the Trump administration does not trust local law enforcement.
The protests in Los Angeles have mostly been contained to five blocks in a small section of downtown; nearly 200 people were detained on Tuesday and at least seven police officers have been injured.
In Republican-controlled states, governors have not said when or how they're planning to deploy military troops for protests.
Since Trump's return to office, Democratic governors have been calculating about when to criticise him, when to emphasise common ground and when to bite their tongues.
There probably is some concern about retributions what the reaction of the administration could be for a governor who takes a strong stance," said Kristoffer Shields, director of the Eagleton Center on the American Governor at Rutgers University.
And in this case, polling indicates about half of US adults approve of how Trump is handling immigration, though that polling was conducted before the recent military deployment.
On other issues, Democratic governors have taken a variety of approaches with Trump.
At a White House meeting in February, Maine Democratic Gov. Janet Mills told Trump, we'll see you in court over his push to cut off funding to the state because it allowed transgender athletes in girls' school sports. Michigan's Gretchen Whitmer, a possible 2028 presidential candidate, publicly sparred with Trump during his first term but this time around, has met with him privately to find common ground.
Initially, Hawaii Gov. Josh Green referred to Trump as a straight-up dictator," but the next month he told a local outlet that he was treading carefully, saying: I'm not going to criticise him directly much at all." Democratic governors speaking out but some cautiously Apart from their joint statement, some of the highest-profile Democratic governors have not talked publicly about the situation in California. When asked, on Wednesday, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul's office pointed to a Sunday social media post about the joint statement. Whitmer didn't respond.
The office of Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who is set to testify before Congress on Thursday about his state laws protecting people who are in the country without legal status, reiterated in a statement that he stands with Newsom.
The office said local authorities should be able to do their jobs without the chaos of this federal interference and intimidation.
Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, in an interview Wednesday in The Washington Post, said Trump should not send troops to a weekend protest scheduled in Philadelphia.
He's injected chaos into the world order, he's injected it into our economy, he is trying to inject chaos into our streets by doing what he did with the Guard in California," Shapiro said.
As state attorney general during Trump's first term, Shapiro routinely boasted that he sued Trump over 40 times and won each time. As governor he has often treaded more carefully, by bashing Trump's tariffs, but not necessarily targeting Trump himself.
GOP governors weighing in Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis has often clashed with Newsom, a fellow term-limited governor with national ambitions.
Newsom's office said DeSantis offered to send Florida State Guard troops to California.
Given the guard were not needed in the first place, we declined Governor DeSantis attempt to inflame an already chaotic situation made worse by his Party's leader, Newsom spokesperson Diana Crofts-Pelayo said in an email to The Associated Press.
Speaking on Fox News on Tuesday, DeSantis said the gesture was a typical offer of mutual aid during a crisis and was dismissive of the reasons it was turned down.
The way to put the fire out is to make sure you have law and order, he said.
States are preparing for more protests this weekend Protests against immigration enforcement raids have sprung up in other cities and a series of No Kings demonstrations are planned for the weekend with governors preparing to respond.
In Connecticut, Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont said he has spoken with his public safety commissioner to make sure state and local police work together.
I don't want to give the president any pretext to think he can come into Connecticut and militarise the situation. That just makes the situation worse, said Lamont, who called Trump "a little eager to send federal troops and militarise the situation in Los Angeles.
It is unclear how many Texas National Guard members will be deployed or how many cities asked for assistance. In Austin, where police used chemical irritants to disperse several hundred protesters on Monday, the mayor's office said the National Guard was not requested.
San Antonio officials also said they didn't request the Guard.
Florida's DeSantis said law enforcement in his state is preparing The minute you cross into attacking law enforcement, any type of rioting, any type of vandalism, looting, just be prepared to have the law come down on you, DeSantis said Tuesday. And we will make an example of you, you can guarantee it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's 'peacemaker' pledge takes big hit as Israel strikes Iran
President Trump's promises of global peace face significant setbacks as Israel attacks Iranian targets, escalating regional tensions and defying Trump's diplomatic efforts. The strikes, a rebuke to Trump's envoy's negotiations, raise concerns about a broader conflict and the future of U.S.-Iran relations. With conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine unresolved, Trump's peacemaking aspirations are in jeopardy. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads "SPIRAL OF ESCALATION" On the campaign trail, U.S. President Donald Trump promised to end the world's hottest conflicts and usher in global peace, but nearly five months in, with Israel attacking Iran and bloodshed in Gaza and Ukraine unabated, those hopes are in shambles.U.S. ally Israel struck dozens of Iranian targets in a dramatic and multi-faceted attack on Thursday that analysts say threatens to eventually spiral into an all-out regional strikes appear to be a snub to Trump, who had repeatedly pushed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to attack Iran, though the president himself had threatened to bomb the Gulf nation if nuclear talks failed."Trumpian diplomacy is one of the first casualties of these attacks," said Brett Bruen, a former foreign policy adviser to Democratic President Barack Obama."He has struggled to even get close to a ceasefire (in Gaza), let alone peace in any major conflict. Iran was looking the most promising - and Netanyahu just spoiled it."The White House, the Israeli embassy in Washington and Iran's U.N. mission did not immediately respond to requests for strikes are also a rebuke of Steve Witkoff, Trump's Middle East envoy and close aide, who has been working intensively with Iranian negotiators towards a diplomatic solution to curb its nuclear had sought unsuccessfully to persuade Netanyahu to remain patient while U.S.-Iran negotiations proceeded. Those talks have been Trump allies privately acknowledge that his diplomatic efforts had been faltering even before Israel's second term in office started with what seemed like a foreign policy win. Shortly before Trump's inauguration, Witkoff worked with aides to then-President Joe Biden to secure a long-sought ceasefire in Gaza between Israel and Hamas that accord fell apart in U.S. has also made little discernible progress toward a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine, whose conflict Trump vowed to end before even taking his administration has taken no visible steps toward expanding the Abraham Accords, a landmark pact brokered in Trump's first term to forge diplomatic ties between Israel and several Arab Trump has struggled to seal peace accords, foreign policy divisions have opened inside his own administration. Dozens of officials, from the National Security Council to the Pentagon to the State Department, have been jettisoned amid the before Israel's attack, several administration officials had begun to privately question if Witkoff, who lacks diplomatic experience but has emerged as Trump's top negotiator, had overstayed his Israel's attacks unfolded on Thursday, some prominent Democrats expressed frustration that Trump had scrapped during his first term a deal between the United States, Iran and European allies forged during the Obama and Republicans had condemned that deal, saying it would not have kept a nuclear bomb out of Tehran's hands. Democrats fault Trump for not yet coming up with a credible alternative."This is a disaster of Trump and Netanyahu's own making, and now the region risks spiraling toward a new, deadly conflict," Democratic Senator Chris Murphy said in a post on Thursday's strikes will trigger a regional conflict remains unclear. Even so, analysts said, Tehran could see U.S. assets in the region as legitimate example, Tehran-aligned Houthi rebels in Yemen could resume their bombing campaign against ships transiting the Red unclear is Israel's ability to permanently impede Iran's nuclear doubt in particular the ability of Israel to destroy Iran's Fordow enrichment plant, which is buried deep underground. While Israel could probably do extensive damage, experts say a more lasting blow would require U.S. military assistance, which U.S. officials said was not question mark is just how effectively Tehran can respond. Israel has indicated that it has targeted several Iranian leaders in the bombing campaign, which is expected to continue in coming these factors will decide if the blow to Trump's aspirations to be seen as a global peacemaker will be a terminal one, or merely a setback."If Israel is to be taken at its word that tonight's strikes were the first round in an all-out Israeli campaign against Iran's nuclear and missile programs, Iran's regime is now knee-deep within a potentially existential, life-or-death moment," said Charles Lister, head of the Syria Initiative at the Middle East Institute."That paints tonight's strikes in a whole new, unprecedented light and makes the risk of a major spiral of escalation far more real than what we've seen play out before."
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
An overview of Iran's energy industry and infrastructure
Israel launched strikes on Iran targeting nuclear and military sites. Iran's oil facilities reportedly sustained no damage. Iran produces about 3% of global oil. Sanctions have impacted Iran's oil exports, which peaked in the 1970s. China is a major buyer of Iranian oil, despite sanctions. Saudi Arabia and other OPEC members might compensate for any supply drop. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads SANCTIONS AND OPEC Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads WHO IS THE MAIN BUYER OF IRANIAN OIL? PRODUCTION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Israel carried out strikes on Iran on Friday, targeting its nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders at the start of what it warned would be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic National Iranian Oil Refining and Distribution Company said refining facilities and oil storage did not sustain any damage in the the third largest producer in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, extracts about 3.3 million barrels of oil per day (bpd), or around 3% of global are some facts on the country's energy industry, exports and the impact of previous Western oil production was at its peak in the 1970s with record output of 6 million bpd in 1974, according to OPEC data. That amounted to over 10% of world output at the 1979, the United States imposed the first wave of sanctions on Tehran and since then the country has been the target of several waves of U.S. and European Union United States tightened sanctions in 2018 after Trump exited a nuclear accord during his first presidential term. Iran's oil exports fell to nearly zero during some rose steadily under Trump's successor President Joe Biden's administration with analysts saying sanctions were less rigorously enforced and Iran had succeeded in evading is exempt from OPEC+ output crude exports have risen to a multi-year high of 1.8 million bpd in recent months, the highest since 2018, driven by strong Chinese says it does not recognise sanctions against its trade partners. The main buyers of Iranian oil are Chinese private refiners, some of whom have recently been placed on the U.S. Treasury sanctions list. There is little evidence, however, that this has impacted flows from Iran to China has for years evaded sanctions through ship-to-ship transfers and hiding ships' satellite consultancy says Iran refines about 2.6 million bpd of crude and condensate and exports 2.6 million bpd of crude oil, condensate and refined country also produces 34 billion cubic feet of gas per day, according to FGE, accounting for 7% of global production. All gas is consumed hydrocarbon production facilities are primarily concentrated in the southwest, in the Khuzestan province for oil and in the Bushehr provinces for gas and condensate from the giant South Pars exports 90% of its crude via Kharg say Saudi Arabia and other OPEC members could compensate for the drop of Iranian supply by using their spare capacity to pump more. Though with a number of producers in the group currently in the process of raising output targets, their spare capacity is becoming more strained.
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Will Trump show restraint in the middle east?
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has bombed Iran in what may lead to yet another war in the Middle East, and the challenge for President Donald Trump will be to protect American troops in the region and to stay out of this mess. Netanyahu justified his latest military campaign by saying that Iran was a "clear and present danger." And it's true that Iran was enriching uranium to worrisome levels. It's believed to be just weeks from having enough fissile material to make several bombs (although creating bombs and a way to deliver them would take much longer). But a key reason for Iran's increasingly dangerous course was the past colossal misjudgments by Netanyahu and Trump in their dealings with Iran. With strong backing from Netanyahu, Trump in 2018 pulled out of the nuclear agreement that President Barack Obama had reached that largely contained Iran's nuclear program. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Hiep Thanh: Unsold Furniture Liquidation 2024 (Prices May Surprise You) Unsold Furniture | Search Ads Learn More Undo Trump apparently expected Iran to come crawling back and make concessions. Instead, Iran accelerated its enrichment of uranium. One former Israeli security official has described the decision to cancel the deal in 2018 as a "disaster," and another has said it was a "historic mistake." Netanyahu's bellicosity didn't work then, and it seems unlikely to work now. The bombing might have been intended to undercut Trump's recent diplomatic efforts to restore something close to the original nuclear deal with Iran. Live Events We'll see what the results of the bombing are, but there have always been doubts that the Iranian nuclear site Fordow could be destroyed, at least without American bunker-buster bombs, because it is deep underground. (It was unclear as of late Thursday whether it had been targeted.) Israel has also reportedly bombed housing where Iranian nuclear scientists live, and that may be more effective; military experts have said for years that Iran would have a harder time replacing its nuclear scientists than its centrifuges. Attacks like this may simply accelerate Iran's drive for nuclear weapons, because there will be more arguments by its leaders that this shows that the country needs a nuclear deterrent. More broadly, the Iranian regime has seemed on my reporting trips to Iran to be deeply unpopular. Ordinary Iranian workers, farmers and others constantly complained to me about corruption, hypocrisy and economic mismanagement -- but Iranians are also patriots, and foreign bombing may lead people to rally around the flag. In the coming hours or days, Iran is likely to respond militarily against Israel; an open question is whether or to what extent it will also target American troops in Iraq, Bahrain or elsewhere in the Middle East. The risk is that we see a cycle of escalation leading to a regional war that no one wants. American troops and embassies will be at risk, and the best way Trump can protect them is to stay out of this fight and try to resurrect a nuclear deal. Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, warned that Netanyahu had undertaken "a reckless escalation that risks igniting regional violence," and that seems right to me. To his credit, Trump has seemed wary of getting into foreign wars, and let's hope he shows restraint this time instead of wading into a fight with Iran.
