Nothing Headphone 1 vs. AirPods Max: Which Over-Ear ANC Headphones Win?
There's a lot to unpack in that question, but luckily, I've tested both for you (and a lot of other audio products) and can offer my sage guidance on where to throw hundreds of dollars if you need to save yourself from the scourge of subway sounds or your neighbor's incessant singing. First, let's start with the looks.
See AirPods Max at Amazon
See Nothing Headphone 1 at Amazon
At the risk of pointing out the obvious: AirPods Max and Nothing's Headphone 1 look very different. While Apple's super-popular headphones opt for a minimalist design, Nothing's Headphone 1 have a retro-inspired look that riffs on cassette tapes of yore. Undoubtedly, you'll have your own thoughts on which looks better—these things are subjective after all—but from a more objective standpoint, they also use different materials that make them feel noticeably different.
AirPods Max, for example, use stainless steel and anodized aluminum, which means two things: they feel more premium, and they're also a little bit heavier—that's just physics for you. Nothing's Headphone 1 wins points for unique style, but they're made mostly from plastic and a little bit of aluminum so they definitely feel a lot cheaper but are also a lot lighter. Which pair speaks to you is a matter of preference, but if you're looking for a lighter carry, Nothing's Headphone 1 has AirPods Max beat: the weight breakdown here is 329g compared to almost 385g.The Headphone 1 have a retro-inspired design. © Raymond Wong / GizmodoNothing's Headphone 1 also expand on AirPods Max's hardware with a whole host of physical buttons that include a dedicated track skip/fast-forward/rewind paddle, a volume roller, and an on/off switch. AirPods Max have a crown for volume adjustment and pause/play and that's it; to the frustration of many, there's no on/off switch. The number of buttons on the Headphone 1 was a welcome surprise when I tested them out, and while I wish they were a little more refined and less finicky to use, they do set the Headphone 1 apart not just from Apple but from pretty much every brand of over-ear headphones.
Aesthetically, you'll have to dig deep and figure out what you want out of a pair of headphones. If you want something that's more of a fashion statement, the Headphone 1 are going to speak to you. If you want something that's going to fade into the background, then AirPods Max are more your speed. Personally? I find AirPods Max to be a bit on the boring side, but I respect that not everyone cares about looking the part of a Brooklyn-based hipster. I'm opting for the Headphone 1 in this department for feeling lighter on my head and also bringing a design that I find exciting, sleek, and worth writing home about. Sorry, AirPods Max, stainless steel or not, the minimalism thing is a little bit tired.
Sure, your eyes may be the first way you judge a pair of headphones, but ultimately, your ears are what really matter. As a result, you're probably wondering: can Nothing's Headphone 1 really challenge the AirPods Max in the sound department? The answer is… to be honest, yes.
I was pleasantly surprised to find the sound on the Headphone 1—tuned in collaboration with hi-fi audio company KEF—actually held its own against the significantly more expensive and popular AirPods Max. Nothing's headphones performed particularly well in the low-to-mid-range frequencies, though—sorry, budget seekers—I think Apple's AirPods Max premium still means something in the audio department.
As I wrote in my review, I still think Apple's AirPods Max have a noticeable edge when it comes to sound. In particular, mids-to-highs have slightly more texture and room, which makes vocals feel more organic and clear. That being said, Nothing holds its own against a competitor that charges a very hefty premium, and the fact that it comes close at all is definitely a feat. Still, better is better, and AirPods Max still feel clearer and more dynamically rich, even if by a close margin.
A big reason why people buy over-ear headphones is that they may not like sticking earbuds inside their ears, which is fair, because even the most comfortable ear tips will become irritating over time. So, with comfort in mind, you're probably wondering if AirPods Max feel as luxurious as the materials they're made out of or, on the other side of the coin, if Nothing's Headphone 1 feel rougher with less premium materials. At the risk of spoiling the result, this one is almost too close to call.
One of the first things that struck me about the Headphone 1 is that they fit my head well, which may not be a selling point for everyone, but for me, a person with a small head, that's a huge win. Not only was the fit snug, but the vegan leather headstrap and earcups also felt cushy and smooth on my head and ears, respectively. There's actually a pretty big difference material-wise when it comes to earcups on the AirPods Max, as Apple's headphones are made with a mesh textile. Those mesh materials are designed to be more breathable than their counterparts, and while I'm not a big cardio guy, I'm willing to bet that they might be highly preferable to someone who wants to wear headphones while exercising.
Another major difference is in the head strap, which is a solid piece of plastic with memory foam and vegan leather on the Headphone 1. That's opposed to AirPods Max, which have a mesh band that achieves a couple key things. First, it helps reduce the weight of the headphones, which have some heft due to the premium materials. Secondly, the mesh band also (similar to the mesh earcups) makes AirPods Max more breathable, giving them an edge for anyone who's more fitness-focused.
Ultimately, both headphones are comfortable, even despite the weight difference, but I think I'm going to have to give AirPods Max the nod here if just because the materials and design of the earcups and head strap make them more suitable for a wider variety of use cases.
Battery life is key in any gadget, but for headphones, that metric feels even more important since running out of juice while you're on an airplane or commuting to work can be a huge drag. Given the importance of battery life, you'd think that shelling out more money for a premium product gets you more juice as a given, right? Couldn't be more wrong.
Nothing's Headphone 1 trounce AirPods Max in the battery life department, delivering up to 35 hours with active noise cancellation (ANC) on as opposed to AirPods Max's 20 hours. I find those battery life estimates to be accurate in my testing, and if you're looking for more longevity, the Headphone 1 have an edge.
Both pairs of headphones have pretty much all the features you'd expect, including transparency (mixes music and ambient noise), adaptive noise cancellation, and spatial audio. Both headphones also have software-based hearing tests that allow you to customize the EQ of your audio to your specific hearing idiosyncrasies, and can also be custom-tuned either via Nothing's X app or on iOS for Apple AirPods Max, though Nothing's is more granular. Both also take advantage of custom hi-res codecs if you're an audiophile looking for the best, lossless sound, though iOS doesn't support LHDC (Low Latency High Definition Audio Codec), so you should keep your ecosystem in mind here. I will say AirPods definitely have an advantage if you're in the Apple ecosystem, since they switch more seamlessly between working on your MacBook or iPhone.
While feature-wise these headphones are pretty much a tie, Nothing gets the nod for having a much longer battery life. It's hard to argue with not having to worry about charging up your headphones.
A good component of any premium pair of headphones or earbuds is their ability to cancel outside noise, and on that front, Apple's AirPods Max always get high marks. But just because Apple gets the kudos doesn't mean that they're necessarily that good, right? Wrong.
AirPods Max do have an edge when it comes to noise cancellation, and while Nothing boasts an impressive 52dB of cancellation, lab tests from Sound Guys show that AirPods Max still beat the Headphone 1 with an impressive 88% noise reduction compared to the Headphone 1's 85% reduction. Anecdotally, I can notice the difference when switching between the two headphones, and I think it has a lot to do with the earcups. I find AirPods Max's cups create a tighter seal around my ears, which just naturally blocks out more sound. Apple's noise-cancellation tech does the rest. If you're looking for headphones with truly great noise cancellation, Apple's AirPods Max still get the point here.
Everyone has different priorities when it comes to audio, but there are still some categories that are unavoidable. You need your headphones to sound good, of course, but you also need them to fit your head, be comfortable, and block out noise effectively. Apple's AirPods Max are still some of the best at doing all of those things, but they come with a burdensome premium that might scare a lot of people away. Nothing's Headphone 1, on the other hand, still excel in those key metrics, and while they fall slightly short in major categories like sound quality and ANC, they also make up for those shortcomings with a cool design, lots of features, and a heck of a lot of buttons.
If you have the money and want the best of the best there's no reason not to go Apple, but I'm a firm believer that Nothing's Headphone 1 still get you most of the way there, and if you're a fan of what Nothing is putting down in the design department, you won't regret saving yourself $250 and going with the underdog.
See AirPods Max at Amazon
See Nothing Headphone 1 at Amazon
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Digital Trends
5 hours ago
- Digital Trends
A brief history of folding phones and why the best is yet to come
If you're a fan of the best folding phones like me, you'll know it's been a breakout year for the category. The new Galaxy Z Fold 7 caps a year of multiple releases that have all vied to solve the common complaints with previous folding phones and prove that they can be just as comfortable as a regular phone. Several folding phone makers have released phones to compete in a key metric: thickness, or, namely, the lack of it. The ultra-thin folding phones sub-category has had three competitors this year that aimed to be the world's thinnest folding phone, but only one of them also delivers the smartphone-like experience we've been waiting for. Recommended Videos This is just the seventh year of folding phones, but we've already reached the point where they feel just like a regular smartphone in the pocket. Yet, Apple is still to release the rumored iPhone Fold, and every Android phone maker will also be looking to release its best foldable phone as well. Here's a look at the brief history of folding phones, and why the best is yet to come. 2018 — 2020: The Initial Foldable Era This may be surprising, but the world's first folding phone was by a company most won't have heard of. We need to rewind almost seven years to 2018 for the first commercial folding phone in the form of the Royole Flexpai, which launched in China in October that year. It started at ￥8,999 ($1,250), but as we learnt, it didn't deliver on the true promise of the folding phone. The following year, Samsung launched — and relaunched — the Galaxy Fold, and just four days after its announcement, Huawei took to the stage to unveil the Mate X. One key difference? Rather than two displays, the main display folds around the phone, forming part of its back. The smaller bezels of the Huawei Mate X also hinted at an inevitable trend. The folding phone market features more than just book-style folding phones, and that year also saw the revival of the Motorola Razr on November 13, 2019. Six years later, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is the latest in a long line of Razr flip phones to dominate the flip phone market. A couple of months later, in February 2020, Samsung unveiled the Galaxy Z Flip, and the true flip phone competition began in the US. While book-style folding phones have had considerable competition, the flip phone market has featured several attempts by Android phone makers to launch a flip phone, but with limited success. Despite more than ten brands attempting different flip phones, the market remains an oligopoly dominated by Motorola and Samsung. The book-style market, however, is very different, and the launch of the Galaxy Z Fold 2 in September 2020 saw Samsung adopt a full-screen on the front, a design language that has continued through to the latest iteration. It also featured improved durability with new Ultra-Thin Glass, a larger battery, and triple cameras. Most importantly, it was also the launch vehicle for Samsung DeX, which remains a key part of Samsung's folding phone experience. 2021 — 2023: A Defining Era 2021 and 2022 saw the foldable market explode, as Samsung released the Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Galaxy Z Fold 4, the latter the best Samsung fold until the Galaxy Z Fold 7. Meanwhile, Huawei released the Mate X2 in February 2022 with an inward folding design, similar to other folding phones. Xiaomi launched its first and second-generation Mix Fold folding phones, and Oppo and Vivo launched their first folding phones. 2023 ushered in several changes in the folding phone market that are still prevalent today. Samsung continued its annual release with the Galaxy Z Fold 5 and Z Flip 5 in August, Google launched the first-generation Google Pixel Fold, and Honor began its current focus on thin and light design with the Honor Magic V2. However, all were dwarfed by the OnePlus Open — also known as the Oppo Find N3 — which launched in December to wide acclaim. It was a breakthrough folding phone for that era, bringing a thinner, lighter design and a focus on a great camera and excellent battery life. The OnePlus Open remains a strong folding phone in the US, despite being two years old. It wasn't just the book folding phone market that saw a major change, as the Flip phone market underwent a large shift to the current big-screen era that we're now accustomed to. Ushered in by the Razr 2023 series — which features large front screens and the innovative Razr approach to the front display — even Samsung has had to adopt this trend with the new Galaxy Z Flip 7. 2024 — 2025: The ultra-thin era Last year saw the start of the current ultra-thin era, in which Honor, Oppo, and now Samsung are all competing. A year ago, the Honor Magic V3 became the world's thinnest folding phone at 4.4mm thick when unfolded. It retained that title until the Oppo Find N5 surpassed it in February 2025, measuring 4.2mm thick when unfolded. However, this didn't last, as Honor then launched the Honor Magic V5 a few weeks ago on July 2, 2025, and it measures 4.1mm thick when unfolded. A week later, Samsung cemented its place atop many global smartphone wishlists with the Galaxy Z Fold 7, which doesn't set a record for thickness, but does so for weight at 215 grams, three grams lighter than the Magic V5. Despite not setting a record, a thickness of 4.2mm when unfolded and 8.9mm when folded means it's the first folding phone to be indistinguishable from a regular smartphone. As I covered in our Galaxy Z Fold 7 review, the design has set a new benchmark for how folding phones should feel. The Magic V5 boasts the largest battery in this category and one of the best camera systems. Meanwhile, Google is set to announce its new Pixel 10 Pro Fold later this month. 2026 onwards: the iPhone Fold era? Of course, there's one major smartphone player still to make its foldable phone entrance: Apple. The iPhone Fold is rumored to launch in September next year, potentially enabling folding phones to reach escape velocity. The iPhone, the iPad, and several products since have proved that Apple's participation in a category is necessary for that category to reach its total addressable market (TAM). Samsung has been key to the success of folding phones so far, and devices like the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Galaxy Z Flip 7 show that the company is still able to innovate. With Apple set to launch, Samsung likely to respond, and most other phone makers are likely to launch new folding phones in the wake of Apple's entrance, it's safe to say that the best is yet to come. In case it wasn't obvious, I can't wait!
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Big tech has spent $155bn on AI this year. It's about to spend hundreds of billions more
The US's largest companies have spent 2025 locked in a competition to spend more money than one another, lavishing $155bn on the development of artificial intelligence, more than the US government has spent on education, training, employment and social services in the 2025 fiscal year so far. Based on the most recent financial disclosures of Silicon Valley's biggest players, the race is about to accelerate to hundreds of billions in a single year. Over the past two weeks, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet, Google's parent, have shared their quarterly public financial reports. Each disclosed that their year-to-date capital expenditure, a figure that refers to the money companies spend to acquire or upgrade tangible assets, already totals tens of billions. Capex, as the term is abbreviated, is a proxy for technology companies' spending on AI because the technology requires gargantuan investments in physical infrastructure, namely data centers, which require large amounts of power, water and expensive semiconductor chips. Google said during its most recent earnings call that its capital expenditure 'primarily reflects investments in servers and data centers to support AI'. Meta's year-to-date capital expenditure amounted to $30.7bn, doubling the $15.2bn figure from the same time last year, per its earnings report. For the most recent quarter alone, the company spent $17bn on capital expenditures, also double the same period in 2024, $8.5bn. Alphabet reported nearly $40bn in capex to date for the first two quarters of the current fiscal year, and Amazon reported $55.7bn. Microsoft said it would spend more than $30bn in the current quarter to build out the data centers powering its AI services. Microsoft CFO Amy Hood said the current quarter's capex would be at least 50% more than the outlay during the same period a year earlier and greater than the company's record capital expenditures of $24.2bn in the quarter to June. 'We will continue to invest against the expansive opportunity ahead,' Hood said. For the coming fiscal year, big tech's total capital expenditure is slated to balloon enormously, surpassing the already eye-popping sums of the previous year. Microsoft plans to unload about $100bn on AI in the next fiscal year, CEO Satya Nadella said Wednesday. Meta plans to spend between $66bn and $72bn. Alphabet plans to spend $85bn, significantly higher than its previous estimation of $75bn. Amazon estimated that its 2025 expenditure would come to $100bn as it plows money into Amazon Web Services, which analysts now expect to amount to $118bn. In total, the four tech companies will spend more than $400bn on capex in the coming year, according to the Wall Street Journal. The multibillion-dollar figures represent mammoth investments, which the Journal points out is larger than the European Union's quarterly spending on defense. However, the tech giants can't seem to spend enough for their investors. Microsoft, Google and Meta informed Wall Street analysts last quarter that their total capex would be higher than previously estimated. In the case of all three companies, investors were thrilled, and shares in each company soared after their respective earnings calls. Microsoft's market capitalization hit $4tn the day after its report. Even Apple, the cagiest of the tech giants, signaled that it would boost its spending on AI in the coming year by a major amount, either via internal investments or acquisitions. The company's quarterly capex rose to $3.46bn, up from $2.15bn during the same period last year. The iPhone maker reported blockbuster earnings Thursday, with rebounding iPhone sales and better-than-expected business in China, but it is still seen as lagging farthest behind on development and deployment of AI products among the tech giants. Tim Cook, Apple's CEO, said Thursday that the company was reallocating a 'fair number' of employees to focus on artificial intelligence and that the 'heart of our AI strategy' is to increase investments and 'embed' AI across all of its devices and platforms. Cook refrained from disclosing exactly how much Apple is spending, however. 'We are significantly growing our investment, I'm not putting specific numbers behind that,' he said. Smaller players are trying to keep up with the incumbents' massive spending and capitalize on the gold rush. OpenAI announced at the end of the week of earnings that it had raised $8.3bn in investment, part of a planned $40bn round of funding, valuing the startup, whose ChatGPT chatbot kicked in 2022, at $300bn. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Shooting ourselves in the foot': how Trump is fumbling geothermal energy
Geothermal is one of the most promising clean energy sources in the US, providing 24/7 renewable power that could meet rising energy demand from AI datacentres. But former Department of Energy officials are alarmed that Donald Trump is fumbling its potential. Compared with other clean energy sources such as solar and wind, geothermal enjoys rare bipartisan support. The US energy secretary, Chris Wright, has praised the technology, calling it 'an awesome resource that's under our feet'. And Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act preserved tax credits for geothermal. But the administration's slashing of Department of Energy staff, delays in issuing low-interest loans, and tariffs are together creating uncertainty for the industry and investors. The US has an advantage on geothermal over China and must move urgently, said David Turk, who served as the deputy secretary of energy under former president Joe Biden. 'Anything that stops our ability to execute on a plan – staffing, other funding – I think, is shooting ourselves in the foot,' Turk said. The White House and Department of Energy did not respond to questions about how their policies are affecting enhanced geothermal. Related: US renewable energy has tripled in a decade – but almost $8bn in projects now face cuts The potential of geothermal Geothermal energy uses the heat from the Earth's crust to transform water into steam that turns turbines and generates electricity. It has been used for more than a century, but has been limited to places where hot water reached the Earth's surface, including hot springs. Now there's a new technique that can generate energy anywhere, known as enhanced geothermal. The same horizontal drilling approach used in fracking can reach hot rock deep below the surface. 'It opens up enhanced geothermal all over the country, all over the world,' Turk said. 'That's just tremendous.' So far, enhanced geothermal systems are located in the Western US. One of the most promising geothermal projects by Fervo Energy can be found in Utah. But the technology can also work in the east. The US is ahead of other countries on enhanced geothermal because of its shale gas boom over the past 15 years, said Eva Schill, a staff scientist who leads the Geothermal Systems Program at Berkeley Lab. 'The reason is that we have a lot of experience here from oil and gas fracking,' she said. The enhanced geothermal industry is nascent, generating only 1% of the US's electricity. And it's still too expensive to compete with coal and natural gas. But under the right conditions, it could evolve into a cheap source of power. A January article in the journal Nature Reviews found that it could be cost competitive with the national average cost of electricity generation by 2030. The US is the world's second-largest greenhouse gas emitter after China, and although US emissions have trended downward for the past two decades, the country is still not on track to meet its climate targets. The rapid growth of AI datacentres is further threatening those targets by fueling rising energy demand; datacentres need to run 24/7, so they tend to rely on fossil fuels. We have the technology, we have the tools … and I think now what we really need to do is establish the confidence Jigar Shah, clean energy entrepreneur Geothermal can potentially solve that problem. It could create 80,000 megawatts of new power, according to a liftoff report published by the Department of Energy. 'To put that in perspective, that could meet 100% of all of the AI datacenter load growth for the next 10 years,' said Jigar Shah, a clean energy entrepreneur who served as the director of the loan programs office at the Department of Energy under Joe Biden. 'That's pretty impressive.' Already, Google and Meta have signed deals that would see geothermal companies power their datacentres. How the Trump administration is fumbling geothermal Enhanced geothermal accelerated under Biden-era policies. But several former energy department officials say the Trump administration is failing to provide the business certainty needed to get the fledgling industry off the ground. 'The whole ball game right now is bringing down those costs, proving it for investors,' Turk said. 'This is really about feelings,' Shah said. 'Do the investors feel like this administration really has their back when it comes to investing in these new technologies? They felt like we actually had their back when I was running the loan programs office, and when secretary [Jennifer] Granholm was running energy. They're unsure whether this administration has their back on these technologies.' Under the Biden administration, the loan programs office was working on closing a low-interest loan for geothermal. Similar loans previously boosted Tesla and utility-scale solar. However, the Trump administration has yet to close a low-interest loan for geothermal, Shah said. The gutting of energy department staff has lowered its capacity to support geothermal, several former energy department officials said. Thousands of scientists, analysts, engineers and procurement officers took deferred resignation offers or were fired. Politico reported that the administration was considering cutting loan programs office staff by half. The Department of Energy has lost 'absolutely indispensable' experts on geothermal and loans, Turk said. 'So I would worry about, have we lost some of that capacity to actually execute?' Trump's zeal for tariffs is adding to the industry's anxiety. Steel tariffs, now at 50%, are hurting companies that use steel in wells. Enhanced geothermal wells require installing miles of steel pipes. Behind the scenes, geothermal companies are 'freaking out' about the steel tariffs, Shah said. 'They don't want to say anything negative, lest the Eye of Sauron find them,' he added. The survival of the Inflation Reduction Act tax credits for geothermal provides some certainty. Geothermal can still access the full tax credit, as long as they begin construction by 2033, when the value of the credit will begin phasing down. But geothermal projects now face strict restrictions on the involvement of 'foreign entities of concern,' such as Chinese companies and individuals, known as FEOC requirements. Geothermal projects use rare earth elements in their drill bits, and China dominates the rare earth minerals market, said a former energy department official who requested anonymity. What Trump officials can do to boost geothermal 'This is a good enough market opportunity that somewhere in the world is going to come true, and we are really well set up for it, if we're not stupid,' the official said, talking generally about the industry. 'But we've unfortunately been pretty stupid, and we're making it harder on ourselves to win in an area that should be pretty easy to win.' There are actions the Trump administration can take immediately to bring down costs and boost the industry. The government can speed things along by 'doing a lot of mapping of resources to make it cheaper and less risky for drilling in this area versus that area', Turk said. 'Close a loan,' Shah said, explaining that it would send a strong signal to investors. 'We have the technology, we have the tools – the loan programs office and other tools – and I think now what we really need to do is establish the confidence,' Shah said. Solve the daily Crossword
