logo
How the US-China tariff war is changing the way we look at luxury

How the US-China tariff war is changing the way we look at luxury

Khaleej Times5 days ago

'Everyone wants to be us,' said Miranda Priestly in The Devil Wears Prada. What she forgot to mention is that everyone also wants to tax us. That is, if 'us' includes luxury brands trying to remain elegant while navigating the economic equivalent of a catwalk on broken glass — otherwise known as the ongoing US-China tariff war.
While headlines obsess over tech chips and shipping containers full of soybeans, the luxury fashion world is quietly reworking its strategy — not with fashion weeks or performative pivots, but by staying quiet and not clapping back. This is a recalibration, not a collapse. Every luxury buyer, owner and aspirant at the moment is questioning if purchasing from luxury brands makes sense, or ever made sense.
The appetite for luxury is not fading. If anything, it's maturing. True luxury buyers — the kind who value heritage, craftsmanship and emotion over logos and noise — are not stepping away. They are stepping in, just with sharper eyes. The price isn't the issue anymore. It's the provenance. The principle. And maybe even, the politics.
Take Hermès, for instance. The house has acknowledged price shifts in the US, in part due to the broader ripple effects of geopolitical tension. But let us not confuse strategy for struggle. As quoted to Business Insider, 'Luxury won't vanish — it just gets quieter.' The lack of panic or noise signals that brands are evolving on their own terms.
A modular approach
Many brands — especially those rooted in American markets — have already begun to shift operations out of China. Coach and Michael Kors, for instance, are looking at places like Vietnam and India. European houses are experimenting too, with a more modular form of production. You might design the product in Paris, source components from Italy, and assemble it in Dubai. It is less about cost-cutting now, more about agility. 'With the new tariffs released, I'd expect an increased diversification of manufacturing bases beyond the China hubs into neighbouring countries in Asia. I'd expect new facilities implemented across Europe and possibly South America; however, these will pose obvious challenges on manufacturing costs, and in turn affect overall retail prices. Quality will be the hardest factor to ensure during the transition period,' suggests Rubee Variava, Founder of RV Consulting for Retail and Fashion.
She continues, 'With overall prices in luxury increasing on a year-on-year basis, I would expect luxury houses to absorb some of the tariff costs and some being passed onto the consumer. A large element will be to protect a brand's positioning through an emphasis on storytelling heritage, craftsmanship and highlighting the value of quality through a narrative beneficial to the brand. I'd anticipate stronger marketing to leverage these manufacturing challenges as opportunities through a palatable narrative.'
The Middle East perspective
In the Gulf, the question isn't whether people will stop buying luxury. It's how they will choose to buy it. From Dubai to Doha, shopping has always been about expression. But now, we're seeing a deeper awareness. Where was this crafted? Why does it cost what it costs? What values does it stand for?
'I still buy,' says Mariam, an Emirati Beauty Entrepreneur based in Dubai. 'But it's more intentional now. It has to be a piece that tells me something — about where it came from, or who made it, or why it exists in the first place.'
And this is where brands have to respond — not by shouting louder, but by becoming more personal. Luxury, going forward, will not be about scale. It will be about community. We're already seeing this with Chanel's private client events, Gucci's micro-experiences, and Louis Vuitton's city-specific drops. It's no longer about serving everyone. It's about serving someone, deeply.
As Marco Bizzarri, former CEO of Gucci, once said in a BoF panel, 'The future of luxury isn't more — it's closer.'
Even the storytelling has evolved. A scent today is not just about bergamot or sandalwood. It's about narrative. Positioning. Belonging. As China pushes for a self-made luxury language and the West retrenches into legacy, brands are being forced to examine where…and how they exist.
This is exactly why we see Jimmy Choo launching a Middle East exclusive and Richard Mille taking its VIP clients on a safari trip into the Saudi Arabian desert. Because now, relevance has a postcode. In truth, tariffs aren't the cause of luxury's shift. They're just enablers the fashion industry needed, to finally prioritise traceability.
When someone buys a luxury bag, they know they're not just paying for leather and stitching — they're paying for a whole world that comes with it.
Navigating luxury from here on
Luxury consumers today are becoming more discerning, not less indulgent. That rare Valentino dress made with hand-dyed silk? Likely worth the investment. A monogrammed sweatshirt produced across three countries in five days? Perhaps not.
Another shift we're seeing is, strategic relocation — not price inflation — is becoming the quiet response to tariffs. Rather than simply increasing prices, many luxury brands are subtly shifting parts of their production to tariff-free regions, maintaining quality without compromising on provenance.
Limited-edition localism is on the rise. In response to shifting trade regulations, brands are crafting hyper-local collections made for — and sometimes only available in — specific markets. Shopping within regions like the UAE, where duties on many European imports remain relatively low, can be a smart move. Even better, forming relationships with boutique managers and brand reps can unlock early access, transparency, and personalised trust-based experiences.
Meanwhile, the resale market has stepped out of the shadows. No longer niche or taboo, it's become one of the most authentic corners of luxury. Platforms like The RealReal, Hardly Ever Worn It and The Luxury Closet offer legacy pieces and deadstock classics — lower the markup, but with the charm.
And finally, digital-only drops and direct-to-consumer strategies are changing how we access luxury. Brands are increasingly leaning into e-commerce exclusives, digital sampling, private online previews, and even metaverse activations to engage directly with their audience — minimising inventory risk while maximising personal relevance.
So no, luxury is not going anywhere. Not here, not globally. But it will look different. It will act differently. It will feel more human. Perhaps even more honest, and definitely more traceable. Because in 2025, luxury is not about what you own. It's about what you believe you're a part of. And that, if nothing else, is worth paying for.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wall Street lifted by upbeat US jobs report and Tesla rebound
Wall Street lifted by upbeat US jobs report and Tesla rebound

The National

time3 hours ago

  • The National

Wall Street lifted by upbeat US jobs report and Tesla rebound

Wall Street closed higher on Friday, buoyed by a better-than-expected US jobs report and a rebound in Tesla Motors shares, although concern about the Federal Reserve's rates policy remained. The Labour Department reported on Friday that the American economy added 139,000 jobs in May, slower than previous months but beating analyst estimates, with the unemployment rate holding steady at 4.2 per cent. It also indicated that wages grew at a solid pace, which may mean the Fed is unlikely to cut interest rates – something that US President Donald Trump has demanded from the US central bank. Mr Trump on Thursday increased the pressure on Fed chairman Jerome Powell, urging him to cut interest rates by a full percentage point. Mr Powell so far has resisted the calls from the White House and maintains that policy decisions will be data dependent. He met Mr Trump at the White House last week and was firm that rate decisions will be made 'as required by law'. 'The labour market's resilience puts the Fed in a difficult spot: inflation pressures remain sticky and the cooling many expected simply hasn't materialised in the data that matters most,' said Nigel Green, chief executive of Dubai-based financial services firm deVere Group. 'This report puts another nail in the coffin for any talk of rate cuts in the summer. The Fed has said time and again it needs to see weakness in the labour market to move. This isn't weakness. It's strength with staying power.' Investors also continue to monitor the tariff situation between the US and China. After imposing substantial tit-for-tat levies on imports, the world's two biggest economies agreed to a detente on their trade war on May 12. Talks appear to be progressing: Mr Trump on Thursday spoke with Chinese President Xi Jinping, and on Friday Mr Trump said trade officials from Washington and Beijing will meet in London on Monday to resume discussions. 'Investors couldn't care less. Dips in equity markets are still seen as opportunities to buy cheaper. And while the data is fun to watch, it remains secondary to the blind bullishness,' said Ipek Ozkardeskaya, a senior analyst at Swissquote Bank. 'That's the takeaway from the post – April 2 rally: the world may be wobbling, but markets march on,' she added, referring to the day Mr Trump announced his sweeping global tariffs programme. On Wall Street, the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average both settled 1 per cent higher, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite gained 1.2 per cent. Tesla, whose stock plummeted 14 per cent on Thursday in response chief executive Elon Musk's escalating public feud with Mr Trump, rebounded to close 3.7 per cent higher. The Texas-based company's shares rose by as much as 6 per cent. For the week, the S&P was up 1.5 per cent, the Dow added 1.2 per cent and the Nasdaq rose 2.2 per cent. Year-to-date, the indices are up 2 per cent, 0.5 per cent and 1.1 per cent, respectively. In Europe, markets were mostly up after the US jobs report eased fears of an economic slowdown. London's FTSE 100 closed up 0.3 per cent, boosted by banking stocks. Paris' CAC 40 added 0.2 per cent, while Frankfurt's DAX retreated 0.1 per cent. Earlier in Asia, major indices were mixed, with Tokyo's Nikkei 225 adding 0.5 per cent, Hong Kong's Hang Seng index declining 0.5 per cent and the Shanghai Composite closing flat. In commodities, oil prices jumped nearly 2 per cent on Friday to post their first weekly gain in three weeks amid hopes for a US-China deal on tariffs and the jobs report. Brent rose 1.73 per cent to settle at $66.47 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate closed 1.91 per cent higher at $64.58 a barrel. Gold, meanwhile, fell more than 1 per cent on investor concerns that the US jobs report won't sway the Fed to cut rates soon. The precious metal, a hedge against inflation, declined nearly 1.3 per cent to $3,311.70 an ounce.

$3 Billion to Buy U.S. Agricultural Commodities: Vietnam Seeks a Good Deal of Reciprocal Trade Agreement with the U.S.
$3 Billion to Buy U.S. Agricultural Commodities: Vietnam Seeks a Good Deal of Reciprocal Trade Agreement with the U.S.

Zawya

time8 hours ago

  • Zawya

$3 Billion to Buy U.S. Agricultural Commodities: Vietnam Seeks a Good Deal of Reciprocal Trade Agreement with the U.S.

WASHINGTON D.C, US - Media OutReach Newswire - 7 June 2025 - Vietnam's Minister of Agriculture and Environment Do Duc Duy led a delegation of nearly 50 agencies, agribusinesses, and associations to the United States from June 2–6, 2025, to promote trade and increase imports of agricultural and timber products. The delegation held business dialogues in Iowa, Ohio, Maryland and Washington, D.C. The visit aimed to boost two-way trade and open new opportunities for Vietnam to import more U.S. agrifood and timber, contributing to a more balanced trade relationship. Beyond trade, the delegation also sought access to new technologies to enhance the competitiveness of Vietnam's agricultural value chains. Minister Duy noted that while both countries have strong agricultural sectors, their strengths are complementary rather than competitive. "With strong support from both governments, agriculture in Vietnam and the U.S. is becoming more interconnected. We now share parts of the same supply chains, which helps increase our competitiveness and benefits producers and consumers in both countries," the Minister stated. "Vietnamese agribusinesses are working closely with the government to increase purchases of US agrifood and timber products. This effort supports trade balance and strengthens the supply chain between our two countries, hence contributing to global food security". He emphasized that this initiative also reflects Vietnam's commitment to deepening trust and advancing the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership as the two countries celebrate 30 years of diplomatic relations. During the trip, Vietnamese businesses signed 20 MoUs, worth a total of $3 billion to buy U.S. agricultural commodities. These agreements highlight the strong commitment and goodwill of Vietnam's business community and government to promote balanced trade with the U.S., and to encourage the Trump Administration to reconsider high reciprocal tariffs on Vietnamese goods. The visit was warmly welcomed and highly valued by U.S. partners. Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds immediately shared her appreciation on X following her meeting with Minister Do Duc Duy:"Excited to welcome Vietnam's Minister of Agriculture and Environment, Do Duc Duy, and the whole Vietnamese delegation to Iowa and celebrate the signing of MOUs and purchase agreements for Iowa commodities. The agreements today will help our farmers and strengthen the agricultural supply chain between Vietnam and Iowa". Following the Governor, Mike Naig, Secretary of Iowa Department of Agriculture, put on X: "Yesterday, I met with Vietnam's ag minister and a major trade delegation working to strengthen ties with U.S. ag producers. Of the $2B in new MOUs signed, $800M is tied to Iowa". Brian Baldridge, Ohio Secretary of Agriculture, emphasized during his meeting with Minister Duy that Vietnam and the US, especially Vietnam and Ohio, have complementary strengths, particularly in agricultural trade. Ohio sees strong potentials in Vietnam and recognizes the opportunities to expand bilateral trade. He noted that stakeholders from both sides should explore new ways for farmers, agribusinesses, and associations to collaborate and build strong, integrated supply chains. To support this, both governments should work to remove barriers to agricultural trade. Following the signing of MoUs with Vietnamese partners to purchase more than $600 million worth of animal feed from Ohio, Patty Mann, Chair of the Ohio Corn Checkoff, stated:"These agreements represent a major win for Ohio corn farmers. Vietnam continues to be a growing and reliable export market, and partnerships like this help ensure we can keep delivering high-quality, Ohio-grown products to the world". This was elaborated further by Wendy Osborn, Director of Market Development, Ohio Corn and Wheat: "The MOUs signed today represent potential commitments of significant volumes of agricultural commodities and strategic partnerships that will support Vietnam's growing agricultural sector while providing sustainable markets for Ohio's farm families. These agreements build upon the strong foundation established through years of relationship-building. May these agreements serve as a foundation for many years of continued collaboration and mutual prosperity". During a roundtable with the US-ASEAN Business Council (USABC) in Washington D.C, Ted Osius, President and CEO of USABC, expressed strong support for Vietnam's agricultural development:"Rapid changes in U.S. tariff policies have created a challenging trade environment. We're encouraged that Vietnam is considering increasing imports of agricultural goods to help reduce its trade deficit with the U.S. USABC and its member companies remain committed to supporting the growth of Vietnam's food and agriculture sector". In response to the USABC President, Minister Duy reaffirmed the Vietnam government's strong commitment to continuing institutional reforms, improving administrative efficiency, upgrading infrastructure, and creating the most favorable environment for international businesses, including U.S. enterprises, to expand trade and investment with Vietnam in a long-term and effective manner. During the meeting with Minister Duy, the Chairs of the Agriculture Committees of both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives expressed enthusiasm and optimism about the remarkable outcomes of the Vietnamese delegation's visit to Iowa, Ohio, and Washington, D.C. Senator John Boozman was particularly impressed by Vietnam's robust economic growth and the strong potential for long-term cooperation between the two countries. He highlighted Vietnam's role as a dynamic and reliable economic partner in the Asia-Pacific region. The Senator expressed support for efforts to achieve a fair tariff agreement and pledged to fully convey Vietnam's recommendations to relevant US authorities. Representative Glenn Thompson showed special interest in the high-value deals for US agricultural commodities secured during the Minister's visit. He expressed confidence in the prospects for deeper cooperation between the two agricultural sectors and emphasized the need for the US government to promptly address concerns over the high reciprocal tariffs that may be applied to Vietnam exports. He welcomed Vietnam's decision to commercialize biotechnology-based agricultural products imported from the US, calling it a clear signal of Vietnam's determination to modernize its agriculture and integrate more closely with the US supply chains. Businesses and associations from both countries expressed hope that the Vietnamese and US governments would continue to support bilateral trade and strengthen links across their complementary agricultural supply chains. Their shared goal is to bring tangible benefits to millions of farmers, consumers, and businesses in both countries. As such, businesses on both sides are urging the removal of the reciprocal tariffs imposed by the Trump Administration on Vietnam. The 46% tariff has been reported to harm not only Vietnamese exporters but also U.S. businesses and consumers. Since agrifood is a staple commodity, higher price would place a considerable burden on average-income American households. Moreover, such measures could disrupt the supply chains that both governments and the private sector have worked hard to establish in recent years. Businesses wish for a trade agreement between the U.S. and Vietnam soonly concluded, thereby lowering tariffs on agricultural commodities, reinforcing shared supply chains and contributing to the prosperity of both countries under the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. Hashtag: #MAE The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement. MAE (Vietnam's Ministry of Agriculture and Environment)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store