Irish tourists to face summer of disruptive hotel strikes on Spanish islands
Union chiefs decided to call six days of industrial action starting from July 10th.
Advertisement
Further strikes have been scheduled for July 18th, 19th, 25th, 26th, and the 31st.
More than 180,000 workers employed in the hospitality sector in Majorca, Ibiza, and Formentera are expected to take action, affecting not just hotels but also restaurants and other nightspots.
Confirmation attempts to resolve outstanding pay and condition issues between workers' representatives and employers had failed emerged last night.
Union chiefs said they couldn't continue with talks given the fact they had lowered their wage increase demands to 16 per cent over three years but only 11 per cent was on the table.
Advertisement
Thursday's crunch negotiations had been suspended around midday for a lunchtime break - but ended around 6:30pm with the strike action announcement coming soon after.
Balearic Islands hotel chiefs had increased a wage rise proposal that was already on the table to 9.5 per cent over three years at the start of the month, but were warned to expect a 'no' from worker representatives ahead of an earlier meeting on June 11th.
UGT union spokesman Jose Garcia Relucio described the offer at the time as 'more crumbs' and claimed hotel bosses wanted their workers to survive on tips.
He said after walking out of today's meeting: 'We'd come here to negotiate to improve the conditions of service industry workers, not to worsen them.'
Advertisement
Javier Fich, president of the Majorca Hotel Business Federation, admitted the outcome of today's talks represented 'failure' on the part of negotiators and claimed union representatives had been 'too focused' on the wage increase issue.
The federation vice-president Maria Jose Agilo added: 'We regret and condemn the behaviour of the UGT union, which from the start has put on the table a strike threat which doesn't favour a good negotiating climate.'
The bad news from the Balearic Islands followed close on the heels of a last-minute deal to avert the threat of hotel strike action in Tenerife and three of the other Canary Islands in the Atlantic archipelago.
Union representatives and employers sealed the deal after reaching a wage rise increase agreement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Is it time we ditched annual salaries in favour of ‘surge wages'?
Just as we've reluctantly accepted dynamic pricing in various corners of our lives – from smart energy metering to Oasis gig tickets – now, it seems, artificial intelligence is coming for your salary. 'Surge wages' could be coming soon to a payslip near you. Consider how dynamic pricing might work in the City: instead of being offered a set annual salary – one based on the requirements of the job and a candidate's expertise and experience – an algorithm could come up with an ever-changing daily pay rate, one based on your productivity and dedication to the task, perhaps, or your perceived value and committment to the business as a whole. The more all-round competent and irreplaceable an employee, the more they're paid. Those who are underperforming in a sector with other candidates keen on the role can have their date-rate downgraded until they get the message… Surge wages – a new macroeconomic buzzword, also known as 'dynamic wages' – is a high-concept that's already in use in the gig economy: your cab driver or food delivery rider has an option to accept or reject work whose fee is based on multiple factors, including time of day, day of the week, traffic flow, arrival time and distance. In theory, this improves the efficiency of the customer service and benefits the worker as well as the company, who get paid more for working at busy times. Critics, however, argue that it also leads to gig economy companies bearing down on pay by using AI to squeeze rates at less busy times. In Britain, at least, the minimum wage does apply to this sort of work, providing gig workers with some level of protection. But let's run a thought experiment. What happens if you extend this to other businesses? What happens if AI-set pay becomes the norm? To many, the very idea probably sounds dystopian. Many firms already offer bonuses based on production – in theory. We know it doesn't always work out that way in practice, because favouritism and unconscious biases interfere. Women, for example, receive much less than their male counterparts. The bonus gap at Deutsche Numis, part of Deutsche Bank, shows that the median (middle) average awarded to women was just 81.9 per cent of what was paid to men in its 2023/24 pay gap report. The mean average was even lower: 77.7 per cent. Similar numbers can be found across the City. This isn't new. So what if bonuses were set by AI, instead of old-school bosses? Could that narrow, or even eliminate, the gap and correct an injustice in the process? If the banking industry's noisy rainmakers were willing to put up with it, of course. I'm not sure they would be. Sill horrified? Think on this. Would AI making an unbiased assessment of production and value added have been wiling to award Elon Musk the $29bn he was paid by the compliant board at Tesla? Perhaps his Grok AI should be delegated to set the boss's pay in future. That would certainly be fun to watch. But let's get serious. AI wages could also benefit other groups of currently underpaid workers. One of the things campaigners for disabled people often like to point out is that these workers are highly productive. That might seem counter-intuitive. Those of us with disabilities (myself included) have health issues to contend with, right? But wait, if you're disabled, and you have a job, you are going to do your damndest to keep hold of it given. As disability charity Scope points out, there are a million disabled people out there who want to to work but can't find it. AI could eliminate those 'unconscious biases' we keep hearing about – and chances are you'll work your tail off to protect the job you have. An algorithm would recognise that. Bosses? Maybe not. This brings us to the question of younger workers, who are currently in a jam thanks to one of the less beneficial impacts of AI. Tech has already been busy eliminating entry-level positions from a host of sectors, including, but not limited to, the City of London. Their plight might be about to get worse, if deputy prime minister Angela Rayner pushes ahead with plans to increase the minimum wage for younger workers to parity with everyone else. Her intentions are good – but we all know what road to hell is paved with. If younger workers are finding it hard now, when they are cheap, just imagine what the effect will be when that discount is forcibly removed. Employers already prefer more experienced staff who don't suffer from the curse of Generation Covid: unthethered exam grading, a blank CV, less chance of work experience in an era of hybrid working, and myriad lockdown-induced problems with socialising. This will simply exacerbate the problem. Surge wages could be the thing that helps get the feet of younger workers on the ladder and out of the NEET's (not in employment, education or training) slough of despond. Confession time: This is a thought experiment. Letting AI run wild is something that has me chewing on my nails as much as anyone. Employers using AI to squeeze wages at every level is something that worries people, and it should. It is a real risk – a dystopian fiction made real. It almost cries out for regulation, which may well follow as AI related controversy grows. I don't need a bot to tell me that. Age and experience do the job just fine. It would be politically popular, but bad regulation could strip any potential benefits that may emerge from AI (which is probably already at work in an HR sandbox before being unleashed). But benefits do exist, if this is handled right. Of course, I do realise that 'if' is doing a lot of work there.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Pay rise for millions as new minimum wage increase proposed – are you eligible?
MILLIONS of workers could see their pay increase from next year as the Government has set out proposals on the new living wage. The Government has pledged to provide a 'genuine' living wage for workers and says it wants to factor the cost of living crisis into decision-making on wages for the country's lowest-paid workers. A new update from the Low Pay Commission, which advises the Government on changes to the national minimum wage and national living wage each year, suggests next year could be another inflation-busting wage rise. It's estimated the national living wage - which is the minimum most adults can be paid - could increase to £12.71 next year. However it said predicting the exact figure was difficult so the range could be from £12.55 to £12.86. The figure currently sits at £12.21 per hour for most adults. So a rise to £12.71 would equate to a 4% increase - beating the current inflation rate of 3.6%. If minimum wage rises again, it will come into force in April 2026. The national minimum wage is the minimum amount of pay per hour that workers are entitled to. You are eligible to receive the pay rate if you work full-time or part-time. Meanwhile, the national living wage is the minimum wage for those over 21 and is slightly higher. The national living wage is set annually and typically rises each spring to keep pace with inflation and the cost of living. The annual adjustment is made to help keep wages in line with inflation and the cost of living. The national living wage rose in April this year in a move that was welcomed by lower paid workers. For most people it was a 6.7% increase - or a boost of £1,400 a year. The Government has said three million workers benefited from the increase. Scrapping 'discriminatory' age bands People aged 18 to 20 have a national minimum wage of £10 per hour, while 16 to 17-year-olds can be paid £7.55. Millions of 18 to 20-year-olds saw a record 16.3% rise in the national minimum wage this year. This is because the Government is aiming to make things fairer for younger workers by bringing their pay closer to the national minimum wage for older adults. It says it wants to eventually create a single wage rate for adults and completely scrap 'discriminatory' age bands. The Low Pay Commission has said it will consult with employers, trade unionrs and workers on closing the pay gap between 18 to 20-year-olds and the national living wage. It's not clear yet what a single adult rate could look like. The commission will make its annual recommendations to the Government in October so it's likely we will get more details then. An increase to the minimum wage will be a huge boost for lower paid workers - but it could hit businesses hard. Industries such as hospitality and retail, which employ lower paid workers, say they've already seen their costs rise dramatically. Staff costs in particular have risen because of the minimum wage increase this year and also a rise in the amount of National Insurance contributions employers have to pay. As a result, some businesses say they've had to stop hiring staff or even let workers go. What if your employer doesn't pay you the right amount? If you qualify for national minimum wage or national living wage but your payslip doesn't reflect this, you should challenge it with your employer. If this is ineffective, the next step is to file a complaint on the government's website. You can do this by visiting the Government website. Employers who do not pay the minimum wage can be publicly "named and shamed". Those who blatantly fail to comply are also at risk of facing criminal prosecution.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Reeves blamed for pushing restaurants and pubs into 'survival mode'
Rachel Reeves has been blamed for pushing restaurants and pubs into 'survival mode' as as two venues have shut per day for the first half of 2025. The number of hospitality sites plunged by 374 to 98,746 sites at the end of June, sparking fresh concerns about the fight for survival faced by many businesses. The closures signalled 'the hollowing out of our high streets and communities', warned Kate Nicholls, chair of industry group UKHospitality. Labour's tax-raid on employers was blamed for the fall by market research firm NIQ and consultancy AlixPartners, which published the analysis. It means that the sector is now 14.2 per cent smaller than at the start of Covid in March 2020, with more than 16,000 net closures over the past five years. Researchers pointed to a cocktail of costs including higher National Insurance contributions for employers, business rates and wages. Graeme Smith, a senior partner at AlixPartners, said: 'The effects of a step change in costs and taxation, which landed this April, have made the trading environment more challenging for many hospitality businesses.' And UKHospitality's Nicholls said: 'These latest figures are a devastating blow, showing in the starkest terms the impact of Government-driven cost pressures. Two hospitality venues closing every day is not just a statistic; it represents the hollowing out of our high streets and communities. 'The result is a sector in survival mode, where investment is at a standstill. Businesses are being forced to focus on just keeping the lights on, and growth is secondary.' Businesses to shut sites recently include craft beer maker BrewDog and cocktail bar chain Simmons. The worrying figures come just weeks after TV star and landlord Jeremy Clarkson, told The Mail on Sunday that penalising business rates had left publicans 'like Butch and Sundance at the end of the movie – taking fire from absolutely everywhere'. An industry forecast in June showed that one pub could close every day this year across Britain. It comes after Britain's hospitality industry was hit by a £500 million-a-year rise in business rates in April alongside a barrage of other costs imposed by Labour. Before the Budget, small businesses had called for a Covid-era discount of 75 per cent on business rates to be extended to give them breathing space. But the Government cut this to a 40 per cent discount, capped at £110,000 per pub. Labour has promised to reform rates, which are a levy based on the notional rental value of a commercial property. This currently means High Street shops and pubs often pay a premium compared with online giants such as Amazon. But there have been concerns that Labour's reforms will be too little and too late for many firms. And there are fears the Government will once more hike taxes on businesses as the government comes under pressure to reduce the country's huge debt pile.
