
Irish students cancelling J1 summers in Trump's America
In years past, many would now be preparing to spend a good chunk of their break bussing tables or bartending in US cities like Boston, New York and San Diego on J1 visas. The programme allows students to work and travel in the States for up to four months.
A rite of passage for more than five generations, a J1 visa is traditionally accompanied with a gentle reminder for students to watch their "ps and qs", have fun, be safe and to behave in front of the Americans. This year, however, the warnings are a little different.
In April, Union of Students in Ireland (USI) urged students to be 'cautious and informed' of the potential impact activism could have on their visa status.
In the days prior, US Citizenship and Immigration had announced it was to begin considering 'aliens' antisemitic activity on social media and the physical harassment of Jewish individuals' as grounds for denying immigration requests.
The order immediately affected those applying for 'lawful permanent resident status, foreign students and aliens affiliated with educational institutions linked to antisemitic activity.' In the month since, some students have changed their travel plans, opting not to go and taking the financial hit as a result.
A spokeswoman for the USI told the Irish Examiner that some have told the union they are reconsidering or cancelling their trips due to fears about how their activism, particularly pro-Palestinian advocacy, could be perceived by US immigration.
One student told the USI:
I had everything sorted for my J1 - job, accommodation, flights - but after seeing what's happening in the US, especially around how they're targeting protesters, I don't feel safe going anymore.
Another said: 'I've been involved in Palestine solidarity work at home, and I'm worried that even just posting about it on social media could be used against me when I land in the States. It's not worth the risk.'
This is just one ripple effect to reach our shores of the havoc the Trump administration continues to wreak on the entire US education system.
Within his first 100 days in office, the Trump administration froze billions in education funding, threatened to defund public schools found to be promoting diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) or 'gender ideology', and signed countless executive orders that have left education institutions from kindergartens to universities reeling.
Trump v universities
Work is well underway to dismantle the US Department of Education, with Trump promising taxpayers they will no longer be 'burdened with tens of billions of dollars wasted on progressive social experiments and obsolete programs' by returning power over education to families instead of 'bureaucracies'.
And less than a year after a wave of pro-Palestinian demonstrations and protests swept across US college campuses, the US president has also vowed to cut funding to the universities that permit 'illegal' protests and deport international students who take part.
He claimed universities such as Columbia and Harvard did not do enough to protect Jewish students during the protests, retaliating against the universities by slashing billions in federal funding.
At least 1,800 international students have seen their visa status revoked often with little to no explanation, amidst continued crackdowns on immigration, according to figures compiled by Inside Higher Education.
Students, faculty and members of the Harvard University community rally last month. On Friday, Trump threatened to revoke Harvard University's tax free status, the latest escalation in a war with the world famous Ivy League school over federal funding. File photo: AP
Universities and students are attempting to fight back against funding cuts and executive orders in the courts. On Friday, Trump threatened to revoke Harvard University's tax free status, the latest escalation in a war with the world famous Ivy League school over federal funding.
'We are going to be taking away Harvard's Tax Exempt Status. It's what they deserve!' Trump posted Friday morning on Truth Social.
Research cuts
Meanwhile, US scientists continue to see their research funding cut. Almost 800 grants have been eliminated at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the largest source of funding for medical research in the world.
The cuts have affected projects relating to trans healthcare, the health-related effects of climate change, HIV research and vaccine hesitancy.
Sunghee Lee, a research professor at the University of Michigan, saw her $5 million grant from the NIH terminated in March under the auspices of being a 'DEI' study. Her project was looking at different risk factors for Alzheimer's disease across all ethnic groups in the United States.
The news her grant had been cancelled came "out of the blue", she told The Conversation Weekly. "I can only speculate [why]. If anybody read an extract of this study, and if anybody had a scientific understanding of any sort of science, they would have known that this is not a DEI study."
The study title uses the word 'Latin X' instead of 'Latino', she added. "Perhaps Latin X is a word that one shouldn't be using. That's the only thing that I can really think of why this was identified as a DEI study."
'Brain drain'
Many academics here will be watching all this unfurl in the States. The US is often seen as a "paragon" for research, according to Scott Lucas, professor of international politics at the Clinton Institute, University College Dublin.
"Now, I would say that the US has lost that position of being a world leader because what is being done to it by the Trump administration.
You have American academics who now effectively cannot co-operate with researchers outside the United States because if they are in certain areas, such as researching climate change for example, they've been told to stop.
'The attempt to control universities under the guise of DEI and 'woke' is just a pretext, it has nothing to do with DEI. The whole question about whether you have freedom of academic thought, whether or not you have freedom of academic research, is now a very serious question.'
Many academics, both here and across Europe, are now quietly cancelling plans to travel, he believes. "It's just not worth the risk." There are now European and Canadian universities actively advertising for American academics, he added.
'There are other universities that aren't necessarily advertising for that but letting it be known to colleagues in the States that they would be welcome to come across.
'You are going to have a 'brain-drain' from the United States, both of foreign researchers who work in the US and US researchers who are going to leave, which is really going to hit expertise.
'That's in addition to the fact that many universities are going to be crippled anyway by what the Trump administration are doing. The line in terms of what the authorities might consider to be inappropriate, that they won't tolerate, they can come in and create a charge for that."
He added that he is grateful for the freedom he has in Ireland to criticise government policy. "I don't think you can necessarily have that level of honesty without retribution in the States now."
"This is one reason why my friends are thinking twice about going across because they know that in the nature of their research they've sometimes criticised US government policies, and I'm not talking about Trump-specific [policies]. They could have undertaken research on immigration, research on climate change, research on covid and they know it doesn't fit along with what the Trump folks want."
A spokeswoman for the Union of Students in Ireland (USI) said: "There is definitely concern that students may be stopped, questioned, or monitored, particularly in light of the US administration's recent moves to screen social media accounts and former president Trump's comments around protest-related arrests."
Read More
The numbers that matter from first 100 days of Donald Trump's second term in office
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Calls on Catholic Church to cut ties with Allianz insurance
The Association of Catholic Priests has called on the Catholic Church to immediately cut links with Allianz insurance. It comes as prominent sport stars made a similar call to the GAA to drop the company as a sponsor after the insurance company was among a series of companies listed in a report by UN special rapporteur on Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories Francesca Albanese. Allianz insurance was listed in the report published in June this year on the website of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights at the UN as being among companies and corporations Ms Albanese said were involved in sustaining and paying for Israel's actions in the Palestinian territories. The Association of Catholic Priests said "questions are now being asked of Allianz" following the report. "For decades, Allianz has been the trusted friend of the Catholic Church – even to the extent of enjoying representation on the Allianz Board – with Catholic Church properties in Ireland, including places of worship, schools, cars, etc almost all being insured by Allianz as a matter of course," the statement said. The association said that this Sunday, bishops are leading a "day of prayer and reflection for Gaza" and it referenced a pastoral letter from Archbishop Eamon Martin in which he calls for "a renewed commitment by the international community for a just and lasting peace in the Middle East". "In the light of that 'reflection' and because the present sense of outrage in the Irish Catholic Church at what's happening in Gaza will be increased exponentially by the revelation of the Irish Catholic Church's connection with Allianz and Allianz's connection with the state of Israel, we ask that the response of the Irish Catholic Church should be immediate and far-reaching in cutting our links with Allianz," the statement added. The UN report found that as a global insurance company, Allianz invested large sums in shares and bonds implicated in the occupation of Palestinian territories. In a statement yesterday, Allianz said: "Our long-standing partnership with the GAA is about supporting Irish sport and communities. "Allianz Ireland is part of a global group, and while the wider group operates internationally across insurance and investment, as a matter of principle, we do not comment on individual customers or business matters. "What we can say is that all Allianz business decisions are guided by strict legal standards and world-leading ESG (environmental, social and governance) principles." The Special Rapporteur is an independent expert appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council to follow and report on the human rights situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.


Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Israel's plan for massive new West Bank settlement would make a Palestinian state impossible
The Israeli government has approved a plan for construction of a massive new settlement bloc in the controversial E1 area in the occupied West Bank. In reviving a project first proposed in 1994, which will comprise about 3,500 new dwellings in a line across the West Bank, finance minister Bezalel Smotrich laid bare the intentions of his government. He declared that 'approval of construction plans in E1 buries the idea of a Palestinian state, and continues the many steps we are taking on the ground as part of the de facto sovereignty plan'. E1 ('East 1') refers to 12 sq km of unsettled land east of Jerusalem. It sits inside the boundaries of the third most populous Israeli settlement in the West Bank, Ma'ale Adumim. In 1975, Israel expropriated 30 sq km of land on which seven Palestinian villages had once stood. Here they built Ma'ale Adumim, one of three Israeli settlement blocs that form an 'outer ring' around the Israeli-defined municipal boundaries of Jerusalem. Israeli authorities refer to these blocs as 'facts on the ground'. They were initiated in the West Bank by the Israeli government after the 1967 War to ensure that Israeli population centres were protected from potential attacks. Today, almost 40,000 Israelis live in Ma'ale Adumim – largely secular Israelis and diaspora Jews who have moved to Israel. Far from the makeshift Israeli outposts that are scattered across the rural West Bank, Ma'ale Adumim was designated a city by Israel in 2015. It is considered by the majority of Israeli Jews to be a permanently protected settlement bloc, which will be retained through land swaps in any final agreement with Palestinians. The E1 development plan would involve a significant expansion of the existing settlement. All settlement building in East Jerusalem and the West Bank is deemed illegal under international law, but the E1 plans are particularly controversial. At the heart of the controversy is the viability of a Palestinian state. Israeli construction in E1 would cut the West Bank into two separate parts, rendering it impossible to establish a contiguous Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital. In addition, according to an objection lodged by the Israeli pressure group Peace Now, Israeli construction in E1 would negatively affect the economic development of a future Palestinian state. Its objection argues the E1 area is essential for expansion of an urban metropolis necessary for economic growth, and is the only land in East Jerusalem suitable for further development in the Palestinian part of the city. It states that E1 should therefore be left for Palestinian rather than Israeli development. Political threat The plan to develop E1 was first proposed in 1994 by Israel's then-prime minister, Yitzhak Rabin, to make sure Ma'ale Adumim was part of a 'united Jerusalem'. This was subsequently reaffirmed by Shimon Peres during his prime ministership in 1996, as part of proposed territorial swaps in the framework of a permanent peace agreement. In 2005, those plans were frozen after the US administration under George W Bush told Israel that settlement in E1 would 'contravene American policy'. The plan was reignited by Israel's current prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, in 2012, in retaliation for the United Nations' extension of non-member status to Palestine. But it was then put on hold for eight years due to international pressure. In 2020, a week ahead of the third national elections held in Israel in a single year, Netanyahu pledged to revive the E1 project, with the hope of securing votes and to court the ultra-nationalist parties into a potential coalition. In 2022, Netanyahu renewed the E1 construction plans, weeks before then-US president Joe Biden was due to visit Israel. Opposition and support Each time the plans have been proposed, the decision to advance construction has been met with both internal and international condemnation. On June 9 2023, the planning hearing was 'indefinitely' postponed following a call between Netanyahu and Biden's secretary of state, Antony Blinken. In response to the most recent announcement to reinstate the plans, the European Union put out a statement expressing concern. It urged Israel 'to desist from taking this decision forward, noting its far-reaching implications and the need to consider action to protect the viability of the two-state solution'. However, Donald Trump now appears to be breaking with the position of previous US administrations. It was recently reported in the Jerusalem Post that the Trump administration supports the reactivation of the development plans. A spokesperson for the US state department said 'a stable West Bank keeps Israel secure and is in line with this administration's goal to achieve peace in the region'. Israel's latest attempt to initiate construction in E1 shows that, while the plans have consistently been delayed, they have never been abandoned. The question is why did Smotrich, with the apparent approval of Netanyahu, make this announcement now? The answer is most likely that, with the international focus firmly on the continued assault on Gaza, the Israeli government believes it has the breathing space to press ahead with its commitment to building settlements across the West Bank. Alongside the proposed Israeli takeover of Gaza City, the promise by Smotrich that 2025 would be Israel's 'Year of Sovereignty' — and with it the end of a future Palestinian state — appears to be coming ever closer. Leonie Fleischmann is Senior Lecturer in International Politics at City St George's, University of London The Conversation

The Journal
3 hours ago
- The Journal
US court overturns $464m civil fraud penalty against Trump, calling the sum 'excessive'
A US COURT has thrown out a $464 million civil penalty against President Donald Trump imposed by a judge who found he fraudulently inflated his personal worth, calling the sum 'excessive' but upholding the judgment against him. Trump's son, Don Jr, has labelled it a 'massive win'. Judge Arthur Engoron ruled against Trump in February 2024 at the height of his campaign to retake the White House, which coincided with several active criminal prosecutions. Engoron went on to order the mogul-turned-politician to pay $464 million, including interest, while his sons Eric and Don Jr. were told to hand over more than $4 million each. The judge found that Trump and his company had unlawfully inflated his wealth and manipulated the value of properties to obtain favourable bank loans or insurance terms. Alongside the financial hit to Trump, the judge also banned him from running businesses for three years, which the president repeatedly referred to as a 'corporate death penalty.' On Thursday, the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court upheld the verdict, but ruled that the size of the fine was 'excessive' and that it 'violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.' Advertisement 'Massive win!' State Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the initial case, could now appeal to the state's highest court, the New York Court of Appeals. Following the initial verdict, Trump subsequently sought to challenge the civil ruling as well as the scale and terms of the penalty, which has continued to accrue interest while he appeals. He repeatedly condemned the case and the penalty as politically motivated. His son Don Jr. termed the appellate court ruling a 'massive win!!!' 'New York Appeals Court has just THROWN OUT President Trump's $500+ Million civil fraud penalty! It was always a witch hunt, election interference, and a total miscarriage of justice… and even a left leaning NY appeals court agrees! NO MORE LAWFARE!' he wrote on X. During hearings, conducted without a jury under state law, Trump accused then-president Joe Biden of driving the case, calling it 'weaponization against a political opponent who's up a lot in the polls.' As the case was civil, not criminal, there was no threat of imprisonment. - © AFP 2025