Safety projects on dangerous Sacramento roads could be fast-tracked if City Council approves
A Sacramento City Council committee will vote Tuesday on whether to shift funds toward a 'quick-build' program that would fast-track targeted road safety projects on dangerous roads.
The Department of Public Works will make the proposal at the council's Budget and Audit committee meeting.
A quick-build program could help curb the city's high traffic death toll through targeted interventions designed and built within a year. Currently, road safety projects often stall for years or decades.
Citing the city's high traffic death rate, Councilmember Caity Maple said that this type of program is critical as an interim measure.
'Most of what we have historically done ... has been focused around the long-term projects, right? The transformative projects,' she said. The city will continue such work, but still, 'We can't really afford to wait.'
Because the department is not asking for new money, Maple said, if the budget committee and the full City Council both approve the plan, the department could begin staffing a tactical urbanism team this spring.
Under the proposal, six full-time-equivalent staffers would be focused solely on relatively fast and inexpensive safety improvements to city streets.
A project in the quick-build mold made the intersection of Broadway and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard safer after a series of people drove their cars into a senior apartment complex on the corner. Those tweaks cost just $60,000.
The vast majority of traffic deaths are preventable with changes to infrastructure, which is why the City Council made a 'Vision Zero' pledge in 2017 to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries by 2027. In the years since the council set this ambitious goal, more than 300 people have died, and the city had not established a mechanism for making relatively rapid changes to infrastructure, even in the wake of fatal crashes.
Since January 2024, at least 35 people have died in crashes on city streets: Mattie Nicholson, 56; Kate Johnston, 55; Jeffrey Blain, 59; Aaron Ward, 40; Michael J. Kennedy, 40; Federico Zacarias Cambrano, 28; Marvin Moran, 22; Sam Dent, 41; Daniel Morris, 38; Terry Lane, 55; David Rink, 51; James Lind, 54; Tyler Vandehei, 32; Jose Valladolid Ramirez, 36; Larry Winters, 76; Sau Voong, 84; Johnnie A. Fite, 82; Robert Kohler Jr., 50; Edward J. Lopez, 61; David D. Taylor, 60; José Luis Silva, 55; Geohaira 'Geo' Sosa, 32; Kaylee Xiong, 18; Muhammad Saddique, 64; Azure Amonti Daniels, 48; Duane Ashby, 35; Martin Chavez, 41; Daniel Lee Jennings Jr., 54; Jordan Nicolas Rodriguez, 38; Alfred Ramirez, 23; Nelson Lee, 64; and Lindie Kraushar, 53.
On Jan. 31, Najah Islam became one of the first people to die on a Sacramento street this year. She was a passenger in a single-vehicle crash in Gateway West near North Natomas.
Islam was 30. Among her survivors is her daughter — a toddler.
Since Islam's death, two pedestrians have died in collisions. Jonathon T. Slaugh, 62, was killed Feb. 13 on Roseville Road. The second pedestrian, whose name has not yet been released by the Sacramento County Coroner's Office, was killed in a hit-and-run Wednesday in the River District.
Of the 35 killed in 2024, 22 were pedestrians or cyclists, and two were on electric scooters.
Separate from the quick-build program, the city will soon consider whether to declare a state of emergency over dangers to pedestrians and cyclists. Maple emphasized that the quick-build program would not replace other efforts — including long-term projects and the emergency resolution — to make city streets safer.
'This is an issue in our city,' she said, 'that needs to be addressed urgently.'
Typically, transportation projects in California's capital, along with other municipalities, have relied heavily on both state and federal grants. The grants have made large-scale, expensive projects such as the changes underway on Broadway possible. A reliance on grants has also dramatically slowed the timeline for many street overhauls, which need separate competitive grants — which are never guaranteed — for each major stage of development.
But local officials are now concerned that even that flawed and unreliable source of money could disappear. During President Donald Trump's second term, the White House has pursued vast cuts to government spending already authorized by Congress.
That unpredictability at the federal level makes the quick-build program even more important, Maple said.
'As we see what's happening with the federal government, there's a lot of concern that we may not even have access to some of the grants that we historically have,' Maple said. 'And so we have to pivot as well and say, 'What can we do quickly while we continue to try and get these resources from the state and federal governments?''
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tulsa mayor proposes $100M reparations plan for descendants of 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre
Tulsa's first Black mayor proposed creating a $100 million private trust as part of a reparations plan for the impact of the Tulsa Race Massacre which took place more than 100 years ago. Mayor Monroe Nichols IV, elected mayor in November, says the trust would be used to provide scholarships and housing to the descendants of those impacted by the massacre. He clarified that the trust would not involve direct cash payments, however. "For 104 years, the Tulsa Race Massacre has been a stain on our city's history," Nichols said Sunday. "The massacre was hidden from history books, only to be followed by the intentional acts of redlining, a highway built to choke off economic vitality and the perpetual underinvestment of local, state and federal governments." "Now it's time to take the next big steps to restore," he added. Black Caucus Chair Accuses Trump Of 'Purge' Of 'Minority' Federal Workers The private charitable trust would be created with a goal to secure $105 million in assets, with most of the funding either secured or committed by June 1, 2026. Read On The Fox News App Nichols says the City Council would have to approve the transfer of any city assets to the trust. The plan calls for the bulk of the funding, $60 million, to go toward improving buildings and revitalizing the city's north side. 'Tipping The Scales': House Gop Leaders Rip Actblue After Dem Fundraising Giant Hit With Subpoena "The Greenwood District at its height was a center of commerce," Nichols told the Associated Press. "So what was lost was not just something from North Tulsa or the Black community. It actually robbed Tulsa of an economic future that would have rivaled anywhere else in the world." Nichols' push comes just weeks after Rep. Summer Lee, D-Pa., announced plans to introduce the Reparations Now Resolution, which calls for the U.S. to spend trillions of dollars on reparations for Black Americans. Lee's resolution cites U.S. slavery, Jim Crow laws, and other racially discriminatory laws and policies to justify spending trillions of dollars supporting the descendants of Black Americans in the U.S. Click To Get The Fox News App "That's why we recognize that the fight to restore Black folks has to be so much more substantive," she added. The Associated Press contributed to this article source: Tulsa mayor proposes $100M reparations plan for descendants of 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Man convicted over Koran-burning in London says ruling is assault on free speech
A man who burned a Koran outside the Turkish consulate in London has branded his prosecution 'an assault on free speech' as campaigners argued the ruling 'signals a concerning capitulation to Islamic blasphemy codes'. Hamit Coskun was found guilty on Monday of a religiously aggravated public order offence, having shouted 'f*** Islam', 'Islam is religion of terrorism' and 'Koran is burning' while holding the flaming religious text aloft earlier this year. The 50-year-old had argued his criticism was of Islam in general rather than its followers, but District Judge John McGarva said he could not accept this, finding that Coskun's actions were 'highly provocative' and that he was 'motivated at least in part by a hatred of Muslims'. Coskun was convicted at Westminster Magistrates' Court of a religiously aggravated public order offence of using disorderly behaviour 'within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress', motivated by 'hostility towards members of a religious group, namely followers of Islam', contrary to the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and section five of the Public Order Act 1986. Turkey-born Coskun, who is half-Kurdish and half-Armenian, travelled from his home in the Midlands to carry out the act in Rutland Gardens, Knightsbridge, on February 13 and in court argued he had protested peacefully and burning the Koran amounted to freedom of expression. His legal fees are being paid by the National Secular Society (NSS) and the Free Speech Union (FSU), both of which criticised the ruling and said they intend to appeal 'and keep on appealing it until it's overturned'. In a statement issued through the FSU, Coskun said: 'This decision is an assault on free speech and will deter others from exercising their democratic rights to peaceful protest and freedom of expression. 'As an activist, I will continue to campaign against the threat of Islam. 'Christian blasphemy laws were repealed in this country more than 15 years ago and it cannot be right to prosecute someone for blaspheming against Islam. Would I have been prosecuted if I'd set fire to a copy of the bible outside Westminster Abbey? I doubt it.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Man convicted after burning Koran in public
The Crown Prosecution Service has been accused of reviving blasphemy laws after a man who set fire to a copy of the Koran was convicted of a racially aggravated public order offence. Hamit Coskun shouted 'f--- Islam' and 'Islam is religion of terrorism' while holding the religious text above his head during a protest on Feb 13. The 50-year-old, who was violently attacked by a passerby during the demonstration in London, went on trial last week, accused of an offence under the Public Order Act. At Westminster magistrates' court on Monday, he was found guilty of a religiously aggravated public order offence of using disorderly conduct, which was motivated 'in part by hostility towards members of a religious group, namely followers of Islam'. Robert Jenrick, shadow justice secretary, said: 'This decision is wrong. It revives a blasphemy law that parliament repealed. 'Free speech is under threat. I have no confidence in Two-Tier Keir to defend the rights of the public to criticise all religions.' Blasphemy laws were abolished in the UK 17 years ago. The CPS said that Coskun was not being prosecuted for burning the book. They argued it was the combination of his derogatory remarks about Islam and the fact that it was done in public that made it an offence. The CPS originally charged Coskun, who is an atheist, with harassing the 'religious institution of Islam'. However, the charge was later amended after free speech campaigners took up his cause and argued he was essentially being accused of blasphemy. District Judge John McGarva said, 'there was a real problem with the original charge, which referred to Islam as if it was a person, when it is not'. He said, however, that the current prosecution was not 'an attempt to bring back and expand blasphemy law.' He said: 'A decision needs to be made as to whether your conduct was simply you exercising your right to protest and freedom of speech or whether your behaviour crossed a line into criminal conduct.' Katy Thorne KC, Coskun's barrister, had argued that even the amended charges against him effectively criminalised any public burning of a religious book and were tantamount to blasphemy laws. 'It is effectively chilling the right of citizens to criticise religion,' she said. She said Coskun's actions were not motivated by hostility towards the followers of Islam but to the religion itself. Judge McGarva, however, said he did not accept that argument. Addressing Coskun, he said: 'You believe Islam is an ideology which encourages its followers to violent paedophilia and a disregard for the rights of non-believers. 'You don't distinguish between the two. I find you have a deep-seated hatred of Islam and its followers. That is based on your experiences in Turkey and the experiences of your family.' Giving his verdict, Judge McGarva said: 'Your actions in burning the Koran where you did were highly provocative, and your actions were accompanied by bad language in some cases directed toward the religion and were motivated at least in part by hatred of followers of the religion.' The judge ordered Coskun, who is currently claiming asylum, to pay a fine of £240. The court heard Coskun, who is now in hiding, had to flee his home country of Turkey two and a half years ago to escape persecution. He argued he was protesting against the 'Islamist government' of Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Giving evidence, Coskun made a number of comments about Islam, including claiming the majority of paedophiles are Muslim. Lawyers for the CPS insisted that Coskun was not being prosecuted for setting fire to the Koran. Philip McGhee, for the CPS, said: 'He is being prosecuted for his disorderly behaviour in public.' He added: 'Nothing about the prosecution of this defendant for his words and actions has any impact on the ability of anyone to make any trenchant criticism of a religion. On Feb 13, Coskun, who is of Armenian-Kurdish descent, travelled from his home in the Midlands to the Turkish consulate in Knightsbridge. He then set fire to the holy book and held it above his head, shouting, 'Islam is religion of terrorism'and 'f--- Islam'. As he did so, a passerby attacked him and appeared to slash at Coskun with a blade and then began kicking him when he fell to the ground. Although the man has admitted assaulting Coskun, he has denied using a knife in the attack. The man, whose identity is subject to reporting restrictions, will go on trial in 2027. The National Secular Society (NSS), which, alongside the Free Speech Union, paid for Coskun's legal fees, said the verdict 'jeopardises' free expression. A spokesperson for the FSU said: 'This is deeply disappointing. Everyone should be able to exercise their rights to protest peacefully and to freedom of expression, regardless of how offensive or upsetting it may be to some people. 'The Free Speech Union and the National Secular Society intend to appeal this verdict and keep on appealing it until it's overturned. If that means taking it all the way to the European Court of Human Rights, we will do so.' 'Religious tolerance is an important British value, but it doesn't require non-believers to respect the blasphemy codes of believers. On the contrary, it requires people of faith to tolerate those who criticise and protest against their religion, just as their values and beliefs are tolerated.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
