NATO learns as Ukraine's 'creativity' changes battlefield
Ukraine's "creativity", including its massive "Spider's web" drone attack deep inside Russia, holds profound lessons for Western militaries, the top NATO commander overseeing battlefield innovation told AFP.
"What the Ukrainians did in Russia was a Trojan horse -- and the trojan horse was thousands of years ago," French Admiral Pierre Vandier, NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation, said in an interview.
"Today, we see this kind of tactic being reinvented by technical and industrial creativity."
Vandier said the operation showed how crucial innovation and adaptation were for victory, as modern warfare changes at lightning speed.
"It was a real coup."
"We are entering a dynamic era where armies must rely on both major planning but also adaptive planning," the navy commander said.
"We will witness continuous innovation where, week by week, month by month or year by year, we will be able to invent things we hadn't anticipated."
- 'Must act quickly' -
Faced with the Russian threat, NATO this week adopted new objectives for its defence capabilities to ensure it will be able to repel Moscow.
But Western intelligence agencies have warned that the Kremlin is reconstituting its forces at a pace far outstripping NATO and could be ready to attack the alliance in as little as four years.
"Time is truly a crucial parameter. We must act quickly," Vandier said.
The admiral, who previously commanded France's flagship Charles De Gaulle aircraft carrier, said NATO needed to amass the forces to dissuade any adversary from trying an attack.
"When you say 'I'm defending myself', you have the weapons to defend. When you say you deter, you have the weapons to deter," he said.
"That's what should prevent war -- making the adversary think: "Tomorrow morning, I won't win."
NATO countries under pressure from US President Donald Trump are expected to agree a major increase in their defence spending target at a summit in The Hague this month.
That should see a dramatic surge in spending on military hardware.
But if cheap Ukrainian drones can inflict billions of dollars in damage on Russian bombers, is it still worth investing in vastly expensive systems?
"No-one in the military sphere will tell you that we can do without what we'll call traditional equipment," Vandier said.
"However, we are certain we need new equipment to complement it."
Officials say that over 70 percent of battlefield casualties in Ukraine are caused by drones.
But while drones are indispensable in modern warfare, they are not omnipotent.
"Today, you won't cross the Atlantic with a 10-meter-long (33-foot-long) drone. You won't easily locate submarines with such tools," Vandier said.
"If they accompany your large platforms, you'll be able to achieve much better results at much lower costs."
- Integrating new technologies -
The admiral, who works out of NATO's US base in Norfolk, Virginia, said the major challenge was "integrating new technologies and new combat methods, based on what we've witnessed in Ukraine".
NATO and Ukraine have established a centre in Poland designed to help the alliance learn lessons from Russia's invasion of its neighbour.
Artificial Intelligence and robotics are also increasingly having an impact and are set to help reshape the battlefield.
"All modern armies will have piloted and non-piloted capabilities," Vandier said.
"It's much more efficient to deliver ammunition with a ground robot than with a squad of soldiers who could face a 155-millimeter (six-inch) shell."
This transformation of military capabilities within the alliance, which NATO aims to expand by at least 30 percent over coming years, will come at a significant cost, estimated in hundreds of billions of euros (dollars).
Vandier insisted that while the financial effort was "substantial" it was "fully realistic".
"Today, we have all the tools. We have the engineering. We have the expertise. We have the technology. So, we need to get started," he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Key figures respond to AUKUS review
Rachel Mealey: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is yet to secure a crucial face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump as he heads off today en route to Canada for the G7 summit. As he awaits confirmation of a meeting, the government is playing down the Trump administration's decision to review the AUKUS security pact. Here's political reporter Evelyn Manfield. Evelyn Manfield: It was a shot in the arm for critics of AUKUS when the US yesterday announced a 30-day review of the major defence pact. And it's news China could be welcoming too, according to Professor Gordon Flake from the Perth US-Asia Centre. Gordon Flake: China's happy to be relatively quiet and let developments in Washington DC call into question America's commitment to allies. Evelyn Manfield: While Professor Flake doesn't think the pact will fall over, if it does, he warns of dire consequences. Gordon Flake: That would be a major blow, not just to Australia, but to the United Kingdom, to the stability of the Indo-Pacific, and most importantly, I believe, it would be a major blow to the United States' credibility among allies everywhere. Evelyn Manfield: The Australian government argues a review is only natural for a new administration, but questions do remain about the US's ability to produce enough submarines to have spares to give to Australia. Although Defence Minister Richard Marles insists he's confident. Richard Marles: We need to get to that point in the early 2030s, that's the time frame, and right now we are confident that we can meet that. Evelyn Manfield: But former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull says production isn't happening quickly enough. Malcolm Turnbull: We have a submarine deal which is very likely to end up with us having no submarines, and we've got to start acknowledging that risk. Evelyn Manfield: If that is the case, there's much more to be worried about, according to Ambassador Kevin Rudd's former deputy in Washington, Paul Myler. Paul Myler: The key thing is if they can't sign off on them because they've failed, then we have bigger concerns of whether AUKUS itself fails. We have a collapse in the US submarine industrial base. Evelyn Manfield: But Mr Myler, who now heads up strategic advisory firm StratQ, doesn't think that's actually the case. Paul Myler: Addressing the workforce challenges and the supply chain integration challenges, and they seem to be turning the corner. Evelyn Manfield: Over in the United Kingdom, the other country part of the trilateral pact, Defence expert Trevor Taylor says there is concern because it raises questions about submarine development, but also the reliability of the US as a partner. Trevor Taylor: There is concern in the UK, and I'm sure we will be feeding in evidence into the inquiry through discrete channels. Evelyn Manfield: It may well be a direct channel that Australia's PM Anthony Albanese has if he secures a meeting with US President Donald Trump in coming days as he heads to Canada for the G7 summit. Rachel Mealey: Evelyn Manfield reporting.

AU Financial Review
3 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
US senator pushed to ground, handcuffed at LA briefing
Lawyers for Harvard University urged a federal judge to reinforce her block on the Trump administration's effort to bar the college from enrolling foreign students. In a filing in federal court in Boston on Thursday (Friday AEST), the university said the judge should do more to ensure the administrating is complying with her previous order. Harvard cited concerns that the administration would impose alternative restrictions on its ability to enroll foreign students. The filing is the latest salvo in the high-stakes battle between President Donald Trump and the US's oldest and richest university. Earlier, a Russian scientist at Harvard was freed on bail by a federal judge after spending four months in detention for failing to declare biological material she brought into the US for research. After winning release on Thursday, Kseniia Petrova is scheduled to reappear in court on June 18 for a hearing over whether the government will proceed with a criminal charge for smuggling, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison and a $US250,000 fine. In February, US customs agents detained the Russia-born researcher and revoked her visa because she didn't declare frog embryos that she brought on a flight into Boston's Logan Airport. After the Trump administration called Petrova a threat to national security, and she challenged efforts to deport her, she was charged in May with illegal smuggling.

News.com.au
11 hours ago
- News.com.au
Business Council of Australia calls for R&D funding to hit 3pc GDP, amid productivity push
Australia could miss out on its next great invention plus significant economic benefits, with one prominent business leader calling for an increase in research and development spending so we no longer lag behind other developed countries. Business Council of Australia chief executive Bran Black says the Albanese government should help boost public and private spending into research and development from 1.7 per cent of GDP to 3 per cent. As it stands, Australia is dragging behind the other OECD countries which on average invest 2.7 per cent of GDP into funding and developing innovating ideas. Australia was also significantly behind the United States and South Korea which invest 3.59 per cent and 5.21 per cent respectively. As a result, the country was missing out on the economic returns, with Mr Black pointing to analysis from the CSIRO which found that every dollar invested in R&D offered a $3 return to GDP. 'They're doing that because they see that the economic return, the dividend to their economy associated with these types of investment makes it worthwhile,' he said. More and better innovation also had the power to make 'life better' too, said Mr Black, pointing to world-leading Australian inventions such as the cochlear implant, Google Maps, pacemakers and even Wi-Fi. 'If we talk about these types of inventions – being able to hear, being able to see your child, being able to navigate your way through cities and towns with confidence – that is genuinely a reflection of how our society has changed as a consequence of good old Australian R&D,' he said. 'R&D when done right changes the way we live, every single day.' While sectors such as agriculture, health, renewables and the resources sector were areas where Australia had 'existing advantages,' he said there was also 'scope for opportunity' in more left field areas like quantum computing. Figures released by the Department of Industry, Science and Resources tip Australia's technology sector is set to contribute $244bn a year to the economy by 2031, a rapid increase from the current $167bn. Increasing Australia's quantum capabilities is set to amplify the growth of the sector. 'Who would have thought that Australia would be at the absolute forefront of global research with respect to this cutting edge technology, and yet we are,' he said. The push for a higher spend on R&D comes as Labor seeks to unite union and business leaders for a productivity roundtable which will be held at Parliament House in August. Mr Black said boosting Australian innovation was a key way to expose Australia to new market, create new jobs and develop emerging industries. In addition for a 5 per cent target on increased funding from the public and private sector, the BCA is also calling for a better tax incentives to encourage domestic and international to invest in Australian projects, plus a publicly accessible National Researcher Directory to help connect industry with research expertise. 'Ultimately what that means is that R&D is an excellent way of driving productivity (and) productivity is the main determinant for how we can deliver real wages growth across our economy,' he said. Labor is undertaking a strategic review into its R&D processes, with the government set to receive the recommendations by the end of the year. Former industry and science minister Ed Husic also acknowledged in October last year that R&D funding in Australia was at a 'sorry state,' and said the government was 'very focused on fixing up our languishing national R&D spend'.