
Nine Deadly Scenarios After US Attack On Iran's Nukes Which May Reshape Middle East
Is peace going to descend on the Middle East, or is the stormy sea of unending turmoil going to get redder and wider?
In the Iran-Israel conflict, America does not any longer have the gun to Iran's head. With the airstrikes on Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, it has pulled the trigger.
What is going to be the impact of this in the region and the world? Is peace going to descend on the Middle East, or is the stormy sea of unending turmoil going to get redder and wider?
Let us examine a dropdown of scenarios.
First, the Ayatollah Ali Khameini regime may fall. Israel, and now the US, are not just targeting nuclear, ballistic missile, and military infrastructure. They are going for the symbols of the regime, have assassinated almost the entire military leadership, driven Khameini himself to a secret bunker, and bombed places like the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting.
Second, the assassination of Khameini is not off the table. Israel has taken out a major chunk of his team, Trump said the US knew where he was hiding, and asked if the US would back a possible Israeli hit, US Vice President JD Vance said, it is 'up to the Israelis".
Third, if the Ayatollah regime indeed falls, it does not guarantee peace. In fact, the vacuum could be filled by ideological hardliners in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) or the Iranian military. The prospect of an Iraq 2.0 — with ISIS-like actors running amuck — is looming in Iran now, some analysts claim.
In spite of the western agencies' support for a prominent Opposition figure like US-based Reza Pahlavi — the son of the ousted Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi — he does not enjoy broad popularity inside Iran. A major reason is because Pahlavi wants the restoration of the warm ties which existed between his late father and Israel and to upturn the Islamic Republic's refusal to recognise Israel as a nation.
Monarchists want such a reconciliation to be termed the 'Cyrus Accords', after the ancient Persian king who is credited with freeing the Jews from Babylon.
The other challenger group is the People's Mujahedin (MEK), whose leader Maryam Rajavi told the European Parliament recently: 'The people of Iran want the overthrow of this regime." But most of the other Opposition dislikes the MEK and many Iranians distrust it for supporting Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war.
Fourth, Iran could resume nuclear talks. This is despite Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi posting on X right after the US bombings: 'Last week, we were in negotiations with the US when Israel decided to blow up that diplomacy. This week, we held talks with the E3 (group of European ministers)/EU when the US decided to blow up that diplomacy."
Iran has made it clear that the scenarios may not necessarily work out for the US-Israel-West alliance. Speaking in Istanbul, Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi cautioned on Sunday that his country has 'a variety of options".
Fifth and a distinctly possible outcome could be that of Iran retaliating. Mapping possibilities, James M. Acton, the chair and co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, told The New Yorker: 'The first one is immediate Iranian retaliation. Iran has many short-range ballistic missiles that can reach American bases and American assets in the region. Israel has not particularly targeted that infrastructure. It's been primarily focussed on Iran's longer-range missiles that can reach Israel. So I'm expecting to see some pretty dramatic attempted retaliation by Iran, and I think that puts enormous pressure on the President to respond again."
According to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the US maintains a presence at 19 sites across the region, with eight of those considered by analysts to have a permanent US presence. As of June 13, the CFR estimated 40,000-odd US troops were in the Middle East. In 2020, an Iranian missile attack on a US garrison left more than 100 soldiers with crippling brain injuries.
Sixth, the escalation could see IRGC activate its much-weakened but existing proxies across Iraq, Yemen, and Syria which have previously attacked US assets in the region. Israel has brought Hezbollah and Hamas on their knees, but Houthis are a less organised ragtag militia still capable of much harm.
Seventh, Iran has moved to block the Strait of Hormuz. It could affect the whole of commercial shipping in the Gulf.
The narrow strait connects the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, and flows out into the Arabian Sea. Major oil producers like Iran itself, Saudi Arabia, and UAE depend on the Strait of Hormuz to access the open seas. The strait is in the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. A blockage will dramatically affect the world's oil trade and prices.
Interestingly, the Strait of Hormuz accounts for 50 per cent of China's total oil supplies and only 5 per cent of America's, according to some estimates.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged China to ask Iran to not shut down the Strait. 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Strait of Hormuz for their oil. If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It's an economic suicide for them if they do it," Rubio told Fox News.
About 20 million barrels of oil flow through the strait each day, according to the US Energy Information Administration.
Eighth, Iran may restart its nuclear programme.
'In the slightly longer term, I believe it's very likely that Iran's going to reconstitute its nuclear program. I think Iran is likely to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and thus kick out inspectors," Acton has been quoted saying in The New Yorker. Iran had a batch of highly enriched uranium once believed to be stored in tunnels underneath Isfahan. While Iranians have claimed that they have removed it, none can say for sure.
Ninth, with its nuclear sites bombed, Iran could make its nuke set-up portable and thus, more ominous. Components for building centrifuges which were being monitored when the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) under Barack Obama's 2015 nuclear deal. Trump pulled out in 2018.
So, these parts are no longer being monitored.
If the highly enriched uranium and the centrifuge components are small, it means they are portable, Acton avers. They can be moved around the country and be easily hidden.
top videos
View all
And that could be the worst scenario born ironically out of the US-Israel attempt to stub off Iran's nuclear challenge. In all these, one outcome seems clear: the war in the Middle East is still not over.
Abhijit Majumder is a senior journalist. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
10 minutes ago
- First Post
Freedom Flotilla's Handala approaches Gaza, faces Israeli navy threat
An aid vessel launched by the Freedom Flotilla, carrying 19 activists and two journalists, is nearing Gaza in defiance of Israel's blockade. Named Handala, the boat could face interception like its predecessor Madleen, as tensions mount over humanitarian access. read more The Freedom Flotilla ship "Handala" as it leaves for Gaza at a port in Syracuse, Sicily, southern Italy. AFP The activist group Freedom Flotilla announced Saturday that its latest aid boat dispatched to Gaza was approaching the territory and planned to land there the following morning in defiance of an Israeli blockade. The vessel, named the Handala after a popular Palestinian cartoon character, was just 105 nautical miles (194 kilometres) from its destination, organisers said – closer to Gaza than its predecessor the Madleen was when it was intercepted in June. The Israeli navy said it would likewise block the new vessel from reaching the war-torn Palestinian territory. 'The [Israeli army] enforces the legal maritime security blockade on the Gaza Strip and is prepared for a wide range of scenarios, which it will act upon in accordance with directives of the political echelon,' an army spokesperson told AFP on Saturday. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Carrying 19 activists and two journalists from various countries, the Handala first set sail from Sicily on July 13 in a bid to break the Israeli blockade on Gaza and deliver aid to its population. The territory is facing severe shortages of food and other essentials, with the United Nations and NGOs warning of an imminent famine. The Handala's crew said in a post on X that they would go on a hunger strike if the Israeli army intercepted the boat and detained its passengers. The last boat sent by Freedom Flotilla, the Madleen, was intercepted by the Israeli army in international waters on June 9 and towed to the Israeli port of Ashdod. It carried 12 campaigners on board, including prominent Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg.


Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
No proof Hamas routinely stole UN aid: Israeli military officials
JERUSALEM: For nearly two years, Israel has accused Hamas of stealing aid provided by the United Nations and other international organisations. The govt has used that claim as its main rationale for restricting food from entering the Gaza Strip. But the Israeli military never found proof that the Palestinian militant group had systematically stolen aid from the United Nations, the biggest supplier of emergency assistance to Gaza for most of the war, according to two senior Israeli military officials and two other Israelis involved in the matter. In fact, the Israeli military officials said, the UN aid delivery system was largely effective in providing food to Gaza's hungry population. Now, with hunger at crisis levels in the territory, Israel is coming under increased international pressure over its conduct of the war in Gaza and the humanitarian suffering it has brought. Israel has largely brushed off the criticism. David Mencer, a govt spokesperson, said this past week that there was "no famine caused by Israel." Instead, he blamed Hamas and poor coordination by the United Nations for any food shortages. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Up to 70% off | Shop Sale Libas Undo Israel moved in May toward replacing the UN-led aid system, opting instead to back a private, American-run operation guarded by armed US contractors in areas controlled by Israeli military forces. Some aid still comes into Gaza through the UN and other organisations. The new system has proved to be much deadlier for Palestinians. According to the Gaza health ministry, almost 1,100 people have been killed by gunfire on their way to get food handouts under the new system, in many cases by Israeli soldiers who opened fire on hungry crowds. In the latest such incident, three people were killed by Israeli gunfire while waiting for aid in three separate incidents in northern, central and southern Gaza, said the civil defence agency on Saturday. In total, at least 25 people were killed, reports AFP. The military officials who spoke to The New York Times said that the original UN aid operation was relatively reliable and less vulnerable to Hamas interference than the operations of many of the other groups bringing aid into Gaza. Hamas did steal from some of the smaller organisations that donated aid, according to the senior Israeli officials and others involved in the matter. But, they say, there was no evidence that Hamas regularly stole from the UN, which provided the largest chunk of the aid.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
40 minutes ago
- First Post
Macron's Palestine move could tilt West Asia dynamics as US and Israel dig in
French President Emmanuel Macron's bid to recognise a Palestinian state could shift power dynamics in West Asia, pressure Western allies and revive long-stalled peace efforts amid growing frustration over the ongoing war in Gaza. read more French President Emmanuel Macron's announcement to officially recognise a Palestinian state this September may not immediately alter realities in Gaza or halt Israel's war but it has injected new momentum into the global debate over peace and statehood in West Asia, especially at a time when the United States and Israel have stepped back from diplomacy, blaming Hamas for failing to reach a deal and stating that they would 'consider alternative options'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If implemented, France will become the first Western permanent member of the United Nations Security Council to grant such recognition, joining China and Russia. This could shift power dynamics within the council and add pressure on Western allies to reconsider their positions. Macron's announcement follows months of failed attempts to build consensus with G7 allies like the UK and Canada. While those efforts faltered due to fears of antagonising the United States, France has decided to move ahead unilaterally. French diplomats say the country will now attempt to bring others on board ahead of a broader peace-focused conference in September. Although symbolic, Macron's move highlighted a growing frustration with military-led approaches to the crisis. With war continuing in Gaza, peace talks dormant and civilian casualties mounting, the French president has sought to revive the long-stalled two-state solution as the only credible path to a lasting resolution. 'The prospect of a negotiated solution… seems increasingly distant. I cannot resign myself to that,' Macron wrote to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, reaffirming his country's intent. He added that recognising Palestine is essential to keeping diplomatic options alive and meeting the legitimate aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians. Macron's decision also serves a domestic purpose: addressing mounting public pressure over the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. But given France's influential position in the EU and the UN Security Council, its move could ripple far beyond its borders. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Strategic analysts note that Macron's timing is deliberate. With less than two years left in office, he is seeking to define his legacy in foreign policy. His decision comes at a moment when US-led efforts have largely stalled, and Israel has shown little appetite for negotiations. The United States and the UK, still opposed to recognising Palestinian statehood, could soon find themselves isolated on the Security Council if more countries follow France's lead. 'This could set a diplomatic precedent among Western powers,' David Rigoulet-Roze of the French Institute of Strategic Analysis told AP. France would be the first G7 nation and the most influential European power to endorse Palestinian statehood, lending the move symbolic and geopolitical weight. Already, 147 countries have recognised Palestine; France would be the 148th, and the most powerful among them in Europe. While Germany has ruled out recognition and the UK has no immediate plans to follow suit, Macron's initiative may force a re-evaluation among Western capitals. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Israel and the United States have denounced the move, accusing Macron of rewarding Hamas following its October 7, 2023 attack that triggered the ongoing war. Trump has dismissed the announcement as inconsequential, although he softened his tone by calling Macron 'a good guy'. With Gaza in ruins and Israeli settlement expansion continuing in the West Bank, hopes for a viable two-state solution may seem distant. Yet Macron's recognition bid could redefine the contours of diplomacy, forcing difficult conversations in Western capitals and possibly creating new space for negotiations in the long run. With inputs from agencies