Chinese scientists create rare meteorite diamonds much harder than ones found on Earth
Diamonds are usually made of carbon atoms in a cubic arrangement (like stacked Lego blocks in a cube pattern). But there is a rarer form, the hexagonal diamond (atoms stacked in a honeycomb-like pattern), that seems to originate when meteorites smash into Earth, producing extreme heat and pressure.
The very first hexagonal-structured diamond was found within the 'Diablo Canyon' meteorite which is believed to have hit the Earth about 50,000 years ago and landed in what is present-day Arizona.
Now, a joint team of experts from the Centre for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research and the Chinese Academy of Sciences' Xian Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics have claimed to have recreated the enigmatic 'meteorite diamond' in a laboratory.
Cracking the meteorite's secrets
Most diamonds are forged nearly 90 miles (150 kilometers) below the Earth's surface, where temperatures can reach more than 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit (1,093 degrees Celsius). The temperature and pressure at this depth causes carbon atoms to arrange themselves into cubic shapes.
In contrast, the Diablo Canyon meteorite contains a series of strange, alien diamonds formed during its violent path to Earth. The diamonds found inside the meteorite have a hexagonal crystal structure called lonsdaleite. This crystal structure makes the diamonds even harder than 'traditional' ones, perhaps by as much as 60%.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yb_0sDZoo0&t=285s&pp=ygUXY2FueW9uIGRpYWJsbyBtZXRlb3JpdGU%3D
Since their discovery, there has been a decades-long debate about whether meteorite diamonds actually exist in pure form, or if these tiny crystals are just mixed phases of cubic diamond and graphite.
Earlier attempts at finding answers usually ended up making ordinary cubic diamonds or messy mixtures. For example, a team was partially successful in synthesizing them using gunpowder and compressed air on graphite disks. However, the Chinese team's success appears to have now settled a 60-year scientific argument.
Synthesizing alien diamonds
According to reports, the team managed to make pure hexagonal diamond crystals which are 100 micrometres in width, or about the thickness of a strand of human hair. This was achieved by using extremely pure, single-crystal graphite with the idea that fewer impurities would mean less chance of 'defaulting' to the cubic structure.
Using this, the scientists applied controllable high pressure and temperature, plus quasi-hydrostatic conditions (meaning the pressure is uniform in all directions). They also used in-situ X-ray techniques during the process to observe the transformation real time and adjust conditions to favor hexagonal diamond growth.
The breakthrough is being touted as the first macroscopic proof that hexagonal diamond really exists as a distinct, stable structure. It also pushes the limits of what 'superhard' means, beyond the properties of a traditional cubic diamond.
Considering that the new synthetic hexagonal diamond promises superior hardness and thermal resistance, its could be used in manufacturing cutting tools, wear-resistant coatings, and possibly high-end electronics (diamonds are excellent thermal conductors and can handle extreme conditions).
"This synthesized hexagonal diamond is expected to pave new pathways for the development of superhard materials and high-end electronic devices," stated Ho-kwang Mao from the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
The study has been published in the journal Nature.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TMO Receives FDA Approval for Oncomine Dx Target Test
Thermo Fisher Scientific TMO recently received approval from the Food and Drug Administration ('FDA') for its Oncomine Dx Target Test as a companion diagnostic (CDx) to identify patients who may be candidates for HERNEXEOS (zongertinib tablets), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The HERNEXEOS, developed by Boehringer Ingelheim, is the first and only FDA-approved orally administered targeted therapy for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The recent approval is expected to bolster Thermo Fisher's Specialty Diagnostics arm. About TMO's Oncomine Dx Target Test The Oncomine Dx Target Test checks if NSCLC tumors harbor human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/ERBB2) tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) activating mutations. It enables multi-biomarker analysis from a single tissue sample to aid treatment decisions in as little as four days. This reduces the need for second biopsies and avoids suboptimal therapy selection in the absence of a complete biomarker report. The test is fully reimbursed by Medicare, as well as by the top 20 commercial payers in the United States. Oncomine Dx Target Test's Global Approvals The Oncomine Dx Target Test received its first approval by the FDA as an NGS CDx in 2017, followed by regulatory approvals in 20 countries for 11 biomarkers and over 20 targeted therapies. The test is reimbursed by government and commercial insurers in the United States, Europe, Japan, South Korea and Israel, covering more than 550 million lives globally. In the United States alone, it is approved for targeted therapies in NSCLC, cholangiocarcinoma (CC), astrocytoma (AC) and oligodendroglioma (OG), anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC), medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) and thyroid cancer (TC). Industry Prospects Favor TMO According to the American Cancer Society, lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women in the United States, with NSCLC accounting for about 85-90% of all lung cancer cases. Research further indicates that roughly 2-4% of NSCLC patients carry a HER2 mutation. With lung cancer cases continuing to rise, the global market for NSCLC treatments is expected to expand significantly, reaching $66.04 billion by 2032 at a CAGR of 10.3% from 2024 to 2032 (per Fortune Business Insights). Another Development by TMO Thermo Fisher recently announced the FDA approval for Oncomine Dx Express Test on the Ion Torrent Genexus Dx Integrated Sequencer as an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) assay for use as a companion diagnostic (CDx) for Dizal's ZEGFROVY (sunvozertinib) and in tumor profiling. Offerings by TMO's Competitors In the oncology space, Thermo Fisher faces competition from some prominent MedTech players. These companies are also making notable developments in their respective businesses. An expanding NGS oncology portfolio is helping Illumina ILMN drive the revolution in cancer genomics. The company's market-leading TruSight Oncology assay, TSO 500, continues to see increased utilization and broader adoption. In February, the company announced a new single-cell offering for CRISPR research with applications in oncology, immunology and drug target discovery. In 2024, the FDA approved its in vitro diagnostic (IVD) TSO Comprehensive test and its first two companion diagnostic (CDx) indications to rapidly match patients to targeted therapies. This year, Illumina is set to roll out TSO 500 v2, a new version that includes hundreds of genes across all variant classes and immuno-oncology biomarkers in a single assay from one sample, to facilitate therapy selection research. A rapidly expanding liquid biopsy and NGS-based testing portfolio is positioning Guardant Health GH as a leader in precision oncology. The company's flagship Guardant360 test has been recently enhanced with the Guardant Infinity platform, enabling a single blood draw to provide comprehensive tumor profiling, confirm the absence of actionable mutations and determine ER/PR/HER2 status. Regulatory milestones include approvals for Guardant360 CDx as a companion diagnostic in the United States, Japan and Singapore, covering multiple cancer targets such as EGFR and HER2 mutations. Its pipeline also includes the FDA-approved Shield blood test for colorectal cancer screening, offering a non-invasive alternative to colonoscopy. Exact Sciences' EXAS flagship screening product, the Cologuard test, is a non-invasive, stool-based DNA (sDNA) screening test that utilizes a multitarget approach to detect DNA and hemoglobin biomarkers associated with colorectal cancer and pre-cancer. The company's precision oncology portfolio also offers the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from chemotherapy, as well as those who may receive no clinical benefit from chemotherapy. Its Oncotype DX Colon Recurrence Score test is a multi-gene test for predicting recurrence risk in patients with stage II and stage III A/B colon cancer to enable an individualized approach to treatment planning. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) : Free Stock Analysis Report Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) : Free Stock Analysis Report Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) : Free Stock Analysis Report Guardant Health, Inc. (GH) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Do I need to wear sunscreen indoors? An expert weighs in
Here's what to know about whether you need to use SPF at home, work, or in the car when sun's streaming through the windows. When the sun's out, most of us know the drill: sunglasses on, SPF applied, and try not to burn. But what about when you're indoors? You might have heard claims that we should be wearing sunscreen every single day – even if we're just working from the sofa or sitting in an office. The logic is that UVA rays – linked to premature ageing and some skin cancers – can pass through glass and still reach your skin. But is this true? Some experts aren't convinced, arguing that the amount of UV you get inside is tiny compared with what you're exposed to outdoors. We asked a professor of photobiology to shed light on whether your indoor SPF habit is helping – or just adding another step to your skincare routine. The SPF-indoors debate Much of the advice about wearing sunscreen inside comes from the fact that UVA rays can pass through glass. There are two main types of ultraviolet radiation from the sun that affect our skin: UVA and UVB. UVA has a longer wavelength, can penetrate through glass, and is present at a consistent level throughout daylight hours. It penetrates deeper into the skin and is linked to skin ageing and, over time, some skin cancers. UVB has a shorter wavelength, is blocked by glass, and is strongest in summer and around midday. It's the main cause of sunburn and plays a key role in vitamin D production. But, Brian Diffey, a professor of photobiology and member of the British Association of Dermatologists, says the amount of daylight your skin gets indoors is affected by a number of variables. These include the season, weather, window size and orientation, the reflectiveness of walls and floors, and outside obstructions like buildings or trees that block direct sunlight. He adds that some dermatologists may give broad guidance about wearing sunscreen indoors because they want to keep people aware of the risks of skin damage and cancer, which is vital, but they're not specialists in the physics of light indoors. "Dermatologists are experts in the diagnosis and treatment of skin disease… you wouldn't expect them to know about the physics of sunlight and the transmission through different materials, and how the geometry of a building affects the light levels inside," he tells Yahoo UK. Do we need to wear sunscreen indoors? According to Professor Diffey, for most people, "there is no need to put sunscreen on indoors." "Light levels indoors are orders of magnitude less than they are outdoors," he says, explaining that in his research, he found spending 10 hours in a well-lit indoor space is roughly equivalent, in terms of UVA exposure, to just 10 minutes outside at midday in summer. He encourages people to think about the amount of sky you can see. "When you're outdoors, the whole sky is visible, and that's where much of the UV comes from," he explains. "Indoors, most of this is blocked by roofs, walls and other buildings." If sunlight does stream directly through a window at home or in the office, Professor Diffey says most people will use common sense and move away or close the blinds because of the glare. "If you've got the window shut, you're going to get no UVB and you're going to get very little UVA, unless you're sitting right next to the window," he adds. The exceptions to SPF indoors While Professor Diffey says most people don't need to use sunscreen indoors, he says there are some groups who may benefit. These include: People with skin diseases that make them very sensitive to light People on drugs like isotretinoin (which thins the skin), or on immunosuppressive therapy Some people in certain jobs, like horticulturalists working in greenhouses He stresses this doesn't mean stopping sunscreen altogether, but rather using it where there's a genuine UV risk – not indoors, where levels are minimal. Can you burn in a car? In cars, Professor Diffey says your skin is 'only seeing a small part of the sky because you've got the roof of the car which blocks it.' He adds that UV becomes more hazardous the higher the sun is in the sky – but when the sun is at its highest point (generally between 11am and 3pm), it's blocked by the car roof. "You only get trouble with sunlight in a car in early morning and late evening if you're driving east or west," he continues. "When the sun is troublesome in the middle of the day, it's unlikely you'll get any direct sunlight coming in the car. And so measurements that I and other people have done show typically, inside a car, you might get about 2% on your skin of what you get outside a car." However, if you have your windows open, you may need sunscreen. "If you're driving along and the sun is coming in through the side window and you've got your window open with your arm exposed, driving for several hours, then you can certainly get a sunburn," he says. When do you really need sunscreen? "Obviously, when you're going to be in strong sunshine for an extended period," you need to use sun lotion, says Professor Diffey. Sunsreen is proven to protect against sunburn – its main purpose – and may help reduce premature ageing and skin cancer risk, so we still need to use it to stay safe in the sun. In the UK, that generally means daily use during the sunnier months, especially if you're spending time outdoors. In winter, when UV levels are much lower, everyday SPF is less essential. Many weather apps, including the Met Office and BBC Weather apps, provide localised UV indexes. 'You don't need to use sunscreen when the UV levels are low, which they are indoors, or in the UK winter," he adds. Read more about suncream: The 4 most important things to check on your sunscreen, according to a dermatologist (Yahoo Life UK, 5-min read) The best sunscreen of 2025 – and the two to avoid (Yahoo Life UK, 5-min read) The 8 best sunscreens for kids and adults – and the correct SPF to use for your age (Yahoo Life UK, 7-min read)
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Peeing In A Pool Is Gross, But Is It Really All That Bad? Here's What Science Says.
You know you shouldn't pee in the pool, but you probably do it anyway. But at what cost? Do you even know? There are no hard-and-fast numbers on how often people pee in the pool, but at least one survey got 40% of American adults to admit to peeing in the pool. It doesn't seem like they're exaggerating: Older research published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology Letters analyzed water samples from 31 pools and hot tubs and discovered that a 220,000-gallon pool contained about 20 gallons of pee. Related: With that, the odds of you swimming in pee this summer are high. While peeing in the pool is gross, is it really all that bad? What can happen if you or someone around you does this just once? In the name of science, we tapped a toxicologist, infectious disease physician and microbiologist to break it all down. Related: What happens when you pee in a pool? A few things. The big issue is the interaction of urine with the chemicals in the pool. 'When human urine combines with chemicals that are present in chlorinated swimming pools, potentially harmful compounds called disinfection byproducts, or DBPs, can form,' said Dr. Kelly Johnson-Arbor, a toxicologist at MedStar Health. Urine naturally contains nitrogen-containing compounds like urea, ammonia and creatinine, Johnson-Arbor explained. 'These nitrogen-rich compounds can react with chlorine or other disinfectants found in swimming pools to form DBPs that can cause harmful health effects.' Chlorine specifically forms something called chloramines when it binds to human waste products (like pee) in the pool, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. These chloramines can build up in the water and off-gas into the air. This isn't just a urine thing. 'Chlorine interacts with many kinds of organic matter,' said Thomas Melendy, associate professor of microbiology and immunology, and biochemistry in the Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at the University at Buffalo in New York. 'The reason it's put in pools is to act as an antibacterial and antiviral. It helps to keep the pool clean and noninfectious.' How big of a deal is it? It depends on how you look at it. 'From an infectious disease point of view, peeing in a well-chlorinated pool doesn't really present a problem. That's not to be confused with pooping in the pool, which does,' said Dr. Thomas Russo, professor and chief of infectious disease at the University at Buffalo. While urine isn't sterile, most people don't carry major pathogens in their pee that chlorine can't handle, Russo said. But chloramines can be an issue, according to Melendy. 'Any time chlorine interacts with organic matter, it makes chloramines,' he said. 'The more chloramines that are produced, the higher the risk of skin, eye and lung irritation.' (This can be a bigger problem in people with underlying respiratory issues such as asthma, he said.) Related: If ventilation in an area isn't great, chloramines that off-gas from the water will settle on the water's surface, where they can cause symptoms, according to the CDC. One of those chloramines is trichloramine, a volatile chemical that evaporates easily into the air and causes that signature 'chlorine' smell in swimming pools, Johnson-Arbor said. The more organic matter in the pool, the more chloramines are produced, Melendy said. (That includes pee, along with sweat and poop particles.) This also inactivates the chlorine, he points out. 'The more organic matter you introduce to the pool, the less effective chlorine is at being an antibacterial because it gets used up,' Melendy said. What if you pee in a saltwater pool? The impact is likely the same, Johnson-Arbor said. 'Saltwater pools use electrochemically generated chlorine instead of liquid chlorine for disinfection,' Johnson-Arbor said. (Electrochemically generated chlorine happens after an electric current is passed through a concentrated salt solution.) 'Since this process still generates chlorine, any nitrogen-containing matter that is present in a saltwater pool can still combine with the chlorine to generate DBPs,' Johnson-Arbor said. What if only one person pees in the pool? If you really have to go and there's no bathroom nearby, it's fair to wonder how much of an issue it will be if just one person pees in the pool. 'It's a matter of concentration,' Melendy said. 'There's so much chlorine and water in the pool. If just one person pees in a very large pool, it's unlikely to create a significant irritant.' (However, he points out that sensitivity varies from person to person.) Related: 'If it's one person in a really small pool, it might have a significant impact,' Melendy said. 'Conversely, if it's a big pool and a lot of people are doing it, it's going to produce lots of chloramine gases. This is a nuanced thing.' Johnson-Arbor also pointed out that this isn't just a urine issue. Sweat and poop particles inevitably slip off your skin and into the water, too. 'In addition, if individuals do not shower before entering pools, their loose hairs and skin cells can transfer from their bodies into the pool, further contributing to development of DBPs,' Johnson-Arbor said. Ultimately, doctors recommend taking a pass on peeing in the pool. 'Public health perspective aside, it's just bad behavior,' Russo said. Related... Doctors Are Getting Bombarded With 'Photo Dumps' Of Patients' Poop Pics — Here's Why Does Your Poop Sink? Here's What It Could Say About Your Health. So THAT'S Why You Always Need To Pee When You Get Close To Home
