
Column: Library funding faces uncertain future under President Donald Trump's orders
Indeed, many hadn't ever manned a picket line, but there they were, crowding around the busy intersection of Grand Avenue and Hunt Club Road in Gurnee, which is not exactly a hotbed of revolutionary fervor. The rally was one of several held in Lake County, across the U.S. and around the world on April 5.
Those assembled were voicing opposition to many of the wild moves coming from the White House in the early days of Trump's second term: Aristocratic tariffs pasted on our trading partners; declining retirement savings; stripping heroic deeds of Black and Latino veterans from government museums and Websites; fears about the future of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid; the loss of federal workers at crucial agencies; curtailing free speech.
One of the cuts the Trump administration is eyeing is the elimination of the Institute of Museum & Library Services. IMLS, an independent government agency with a budget of around $295 million –.0046% of the federal budget — is the key source of federal support for the nation's libraries, museums and educational institutions.
As of March 31, all staff at IMLS were placed on 90-day administrative leaves. The potential elimination of IMLS, which is up for reauthorization by Congress in September, will impact every library, including many in Lake County. Grant awards in 2024 included a $240,000 grant for the Chicago History Museum.
It's ironic that the plans to gut the agency came just before National Library Week, which is marked through April 12 this year. Observed since 1958, the week highlights the value that libraries, or if you prefer learning resource centers, play in American lives and communities.
Paradoxically, the IMLS was established in 1996 by a Republican-led Congress and has a mission to, 'advance, support, and empower America's museums, libraries, and related organizations through grantmaking, research, and policy development.'
Imagine what Waukegan's favorite literary son Ray Bradbury would have become if not for the Carnegie Library in the city's downtown. He was a frequent visitor at the edifice at Sheridan Road and Washington Street, gleaning much of his writing flair from the shelves of hardbounds the library offered him as a youngster. Despite modernization and the advent of electronic materials, there are future Ray Bradburys currently wandering the stacks of their neighborhood libraries.
Certainly, everyone supports responsible government spending and the reduction of duplicative and unnecessary bureaucracy. However, librarians and patrons across the U.S. see the IMLS as a model federal agency that delivers exceptional value to more than 1.2 billion in-person patron visits annually, according to one estimate.
'President Trump's executive order to eliminate the IMLS might save a tiny fraction of the federal budget, but the costs to our communities would be enormous,' Ryan Livergood, executive director of the Warren-Newport Library in Gurnee, said in a statement. 'IMLS funding is targeted where it's needed most, especially in underserved communities. Libraries have an amazing track record of maximizing taxpayer dollars.'
Livergood notes that without IMLS funding, rural libraries may lose their ability to provide internet services to communities with no other options; smaller libraries won't be able to afford digital collections like e-books and audiobooks; and library staffers will lose their jobs, further reducing services.
'Libraries are the institutions in our community that keep our democracy running,' he said. 'The time to support them is now, before we lose an investment that pays dividends far beyond its modest cost.
'You would be hard-pressed to find a government agency that makes taxpayer dollars go further than your local library,' Livergood added, 'and libraries accomplish all this with far less funding than other government entities. Taking more funds away from them isn't just unfair, it's shortsighted.'
The American Library Association feels the same. In a statement, the group condemned, 'eliminating the only federal agency dedicated to funding library services. The Trump administration's executive order is cutting off at the knees the most beloved and trusted of American institutions and the staff and services they offer.'
Trump, however, is adamant that he wants the agency dismantled, 'to the maximum extent of the law.' Since taking office, the president has ordered nearly a dozen agencies, including the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, the U.S. Agency for International Development and the U.S. Institute of Peace, shuttered or their operations drastically curtailed, according to The Associated Press.
Belt-tightening at the federal level certainly is long overdue. Yet targeting something as basic as library funding seems draconian at best.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
a few seconds ago
- Forbes
Unauthorized Immigrant Population Reached Record 14 Million In 2023, Expected To Drop In 2025
The population of unauthorized immigrants in the United States hit a record high of in 2023 after two years of unprecedented growth, new Pew Research Center data showed Thursday, with immigrants from Mexico representing their smallest-ever share of the population that year and Florida gaining more unauthorized immigrants than any other state. A Mexican migration official checks the papers of asylum seekers in Tijuana, Mexico, on June 5, 2024. AFP via Getty Images The Pew data showed that the population of unauthorized immigrants—which includes people who overstayed their legal status or violated the terms of their residency—hit a record 14 million in 2023 and likely continued to grow in 2024, though only incomplete data is available for that year. Pew estimates growth slowed considerably in the last half of 2024 after the Biden administration stopped or paused several immigration programs—like accepting asylum applications at the border—and that the population has likely started to decline in 2025 due to changes made under President Donald Trump. The number of unauthorized immigrants grew sharply from 2021 to 2023—from 10.5 million to 14 million—and most were born in countries other than Mexico. The unauthorized immigrant population from other countries spiked from 6.4 million in 2021 to 9.7 million in 2023, while Mexican immigrants grew from just 4.1 million to 4.3 million in the same time. Mexicans represented a majority of unauthorized immigrants in the U.S. through 2016 but their share in 2023 (30%) was by far the smallest on record and, after Mexico, the countries with the largest unauthorized immigrant populations in the U.S. in 2023 were Guatemala (850,000), El Salvador (850,000), Honduras (775,000) and India (680,000). The dispersal of unauthorized immigrants has also started to shift slightly—California, Texas, Florida, New York and New Jersey remain the states with the largest populations, in that order, but the gap between California and Texas has shrunk from 1.2 million in 2007 to about 200,000 today. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts : We're launching text message alerts so you'll always know the biggest stories shaping the day's headlines. Text 'Alerts' to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here . 7.5 million. That's how many U.S. households included unauthorized immigrants in 2023, a record high, with almost 70% of households considered 'mixed status,' meaning that they also contained U.S.-born residents or lawful immigrants. About 4.6 million children under 18 born in the U.S. lived with an unauthorized immigrant parent in 2023, 600,000 more than in 2021. Trump campaigned on a platform that promised tighter immigration policies and the largest mass deportation operation in American history. Since his election, his administration has terminated the legal protections for roughly 60,000 people from Nicaragua, Honduras and Nepal, deployed thousands of service members to apprehend people illegally crossing the border and implemented new restrictions on asylum seekers, among other policy changes. The Immigrations and Customs Enforcement office has amped up raids and deportations and, by the first week of August, deportations had reached nearly 1,500 people per day, the New York Times reported. The president has said he wants to deport 1 million people per year, and the national daily arrest rate of immigrants has doubled in 38 states in 2025 compared to 2024, according to the Times. Two weeks ago, Trump said he'd ordered the Department of Commerce to change how it conducts the decennial census by not counting "People who are in our Country illegally.' The census has always counted both citizens and non-citizens, whether they are in the country legally or not. Trump's attempt to change how immigrants were counted during his first term, but was swiftly met with court action, including from the the American Civil Liberties Union and several immigrants' rights groups. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled against him. What To Watch For How Trump's policies impact the immigrant population. Pew says the unauthorized immigrant population has likely declined this year, maybe by as much as 1 million people, but estimates it "almost surely remains higher than in July 2023." Further Reading Forbes Trump Says Census Will No Longer Count Undocumented Immigrants By Mary Whitfill Roeloffs Forbes 62% Of Americans Disapprove Of Trump's Immigration Policies, New Survey Shows By Mary Whitfill Roeloffs Forbes Immigration Data Show Steep Decline In Arriving International Students By Stuart Anderson


Politico
a few seconds ago
- Politico
Playbook PM: Texas nears approval on new maps
Presented by THE CATCH-UP ANYBODY HAVE A MAP? Texas' redistricting rodeo is hurtling toward the final buzzer today with Republicans in the Texas Senate set to greenlight the White House-backed redistricting plan that would create five new GOP congressional seats, after the state House rubber-stamped the effort yesterday.. This morning, members of the Texas Senate's Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting voted 5-3 to send the proposed maps for a final vote in the chamber. The state Senate is set to convene at 8 p.m. Eastern to take up the proposal and send it to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's desk. Though the new maps have been fated to pass in the deep-red state, it's not all a wash for state Democrats. The group used their highly publicized two-week quorum break to spotlight the rare mid-decade redraw as a partisan power grab by Republicans. And though Abbott has promised legal punishments for the lawmakers who bucked against the special legislative session, Democrats have also threatened to challenge the new maps in court. And the map debate has spread out beyond the Lone Star State: INSIDE 1600 PENN: The White House's redistricting push is serving as a major test of President Donald Trump's grip on the Republican Party and whether his well-honed negotiating skills translate beyond the beltway, POLITICO's Lisa Kashinsky, Daniel Desrochers and Holly Otterbein report. 'The more-stick-than-carrot approach has delivered Trump major wins in Washington by helping him barrel through initial GOP resistance,' and now 'that machine is whirring into gear again.' HOOSIER DADDY: So far, the Hoosier State is proving to be the most significant challenge to Trump's pressure campaign, with Republicans 'resisting a more intensive — and public — push' to redraw state lines, our colleagues write. Though Republican Gov. Mike Braun remains undecided on whether to call a special session, the administration 'shows no signs of letting up' and is 'planning to court more than four dozen Indiana Republicans' at the White House next week. GOING TO CALIFORNIA: Golden State Democrats are gearing up to push their own redistricting effort forward today to counter Texas Republicans, creating five new seats for their party. State lawmakers gathered today to consider a referendum that would allow a special election on Gov. Gavin Newsom's proposed maps and two related bills. But the Democrat-centric redistricting effort faces a less certain future in the Golden State, which requires that voters — not lawmakers — decide to overturn the current district lines. SHOWING UP IN THE SHOW-ME STATE: Missouri Republican Party Vice Chair Jennifer Bukowsky said proposed maps drawn in D.C. have been floating around among lawmakers and she 'expects a special session when district lines are decided by national Republicans,' The Missouri Independent's Rudi Keller reports. 'Republican members of the Missouri House have been told there will be two caucus meetings scheduled to coincide with the annual veto session, which starts Sept. 10,' with one meeting likely focused on redistricting. Trump is already counting Missouri in the win column. The president signaled on Truth Social this morning that Missouri Republicans are moving ahead with their redistricting gambit. 'The Great State of Missouri is now IN. I'm not surprised,' Trump wrote. 'I won it, all 3 times, in a landslide. We're going to win the Midterms in Missouri again, bigger and better than ever before!' Good Thursday afternoon. Thanks for reading Playbook PM. Have thoughts on the White House's redistricting campaign? Drop me a line at birvine@ 9 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW 1. RUSSIA-UKRAINE LATEST: Russia overnight launched over 500 drones and 40 missiles in an aerial attack on Ukraine — marking one of the heaviest bombardments in recent weeks. Part of the attack focused on the U.S.-founded electronics manufacturer near the Ukrainian border, per Reuters' Dan Peleschuk and Anastasiia Malenko. 'One person was killed and 22 were wounded, most of them in the attack that damaged storage facilities at the electronics manufacturer in Ukraine's far-Western Zakarpattia region.' The Russian attack comes just days after Trump led a series of diplomatic meetings in an effort to negotiate a ceasefire. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy noted the attack on the American-owned business 'is very telling' of Russia's motives, urging Western allies to respond in a post on X. 'The Russians carried out this attack as if nothing has changed at all, as if there are no global efforts to stop this war. This requires a response,' Zelenskyy wrote. 'There is still no signal from Moscow that they truly intend to engage in substantive negotiations and end this war. Pressure is needed. Strong sanctions, strong tariffs.' The view from the Kremlin: Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told reporters today that Russian President Vladimir Putin 'has repeatedly said' he's prepared to meet with Zelenskyy, but stressed 'all issues that require consideration at the highest level will be well worked out' beforehand, Reuters reports. Lavrov also added that questions must be resolved about Zelenskyy's authority to officially sign a peace deal. 2. IMMIGRATION FILES: The Ugandan government has reached a temporary deal with the U.S. to take in so-called third-country deportees, per WaPo's Victoria Craw and Rael Ombuor. Ugandan Foreign Ministry's permanent secretary, Bagiire Vincent Waiswa posted on X that the country will accept: 'Third Country Nationals who may not be granted asylum in the United States but are reluctant to or may have concerns about returning to their countries of origin.' It's unclear how many migrants will be accepted or when the deal will take effect. The announcement comes after a Ugandan senior official denied to Reuters reporting from CBS on Tuesday that the country had struck a deal, citing internal documents. And the huddled masses shift: A Pew Research Center analysis of Census data found that between January and June, the foreign-born population in the U.S. declined by nearly 1.5 million — the 'experts predict looming negative economic and demographic consequences for the United States if the trend persists,' NYT's Miriam Jordan reports. 3. NO PLACE LIKE HOME (RULE): Trump is planning to join law enforcement and National Guard troops on patrol tonight, 'the latest in a series of high-profile photo ops by the administration to broadcast the strength of its crackdown on the nation's capital,' POLITICO's Irie Sentner writes. 'I'm going to be going out tonight … with the police and with the military of course,' Trump told conservative radio host Todd Starnes this morning. A White House official said more details would 'be forthcoming.' The next phase: Trump may be eyeing another layer to his takeover of Washington and bypass the city's traditional process to transform the local judicial system, POLITICO's Daniel Barnes reports. Under D.C.'s Home Rule Act, 'the president is restricted to choosing from a roster of potential [D.C. judicial] candidates recommended by a seven-member panel known as the Judicial Nomination Commission.' But last week Trump 'indicated that senior Justice Department officials had already given him judicial recommendations for Washington's local courts, potentially bypassing the panel's selections.' Do you hear the people sing?: Washington is no stranger to large protests. But as Michael Schaffer writes in his latest Capital City column for POLITICO Mag, 'the nation's capital has been weirdly quiet' in response to Trump's police crackdown — and no one can seem to agree on why: 'Some cited the season … Others cited exhaustion and even fear,' while '[p]eople involved in planning protests against the takeover chalk some of it up to tactical choices.' 4. MAYBE THIS TIME: A New York appeals court tossed out New York AG's Letitia James' $500 million civil fraud case against the president's family business today — but the court declined to overturn James' case against Trump himself, POLITICO's Erica Orden reports. The verdict leaves the door open for Trump to 'seek to appeal the verdict to New York's highest court. And the three separate opinions issued Thursday by the appeals court revealed disagreement within the five-judge panel that one judge described as 'profound.'' What they said: 'While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,' Judge Peter Moulton wrote. 5. ANOTHER HUNDRED PEOPLE: 'Trump's hometown train station renovation could be first fruits of South Korean trade deal,' by Just The News' Steven Richards and John Solomon: 'The South Korean government and its leading industry association have expressed interest in making significant investments in a complete renovation of New York City's Pennsylvania Station … The Korean government is prepared to invest $15 billion in the [a renovation] project and become the group's partner in constructing the new station and a new sports arena to replace Madison Square Garden.' 6. HOW TO SUCCEED IN BUSINESS: Tiffany Trump's husband, businessman Michael Boulos, and his family have reaped some dubious financial gains from marrying into the Trump dynasty, according to a new NYT investigation. Boulos was said to have overcharged his future brother-in-law, Jared Kushner, $2.5 million dollars for a yacht while his family's brokerage firm 'worked to conceal the true price from him.' Meanwhile, Boulos' cousin also negotiated with a Saudi businessman to get him access to Trump during his wedding: 'Everyone involved denies wrongdoing, and both deals went bad. … But Mr. Boulos received about $300,000 from the yacht sale, his cousin says, and $100,000 from the Saudi businessman.' 7. NEW YORK, NEW YORK: The former top aide to NYC Mayor Eric Adams is now facing four separate counts of bribery from the Manhattan DA's office, POLITICO's Jeff Coltin reports. Adam's former chief adviser, Ingrid Lewis-Martin, allegedly 'overrode other City officials' expertise and decision making to ensure that certain required actions were accomplished for the benefit of her co-conspirators,' according to a summary of the indictments. 'Jesse Hamilton, a deputy commissioner at the Department of Citywide Administrative Services, is being charged with Lewis-Martin in one case where the pair is accused of promoting a real estate developer's projects in exchange for more than $5,000 worth of home renovations.' 8. OLD FRIENDS: The Texas AG's office may be getting a new sheriff in town. After weeks of rumors, four-term Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) officially launched an attorney general campaign today, The Texan's Brad Johnson reports. Roy, a former staffer for Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and House Freedom Caucus member, is aiming to replace AG Ken Paxton — who remains locked in a heated GOP primary against Sen. John Cornyn. Roy has had a rocky relationship with Paxton for years, calling for him to step down in 2020 during a federal investigation and subsequent impeachment effort. Roy's reputation as a fiery conservative could certainly help him as he joins a busy field that already includes GOP state Sens. Mayes Middleton and Joan Huffman, and former DOJ appointee Aaron Reitz. '[R]epresentatives should not be permanent,' Roy said in a release. 'And my experience watching Texans unite in response to the devastating Hill Country floods made clear that I want to come home. I want to take my experience in Congress, as a federal prosecutor, and as First Assistant Attorney General to fight for Texas from Texas.' Watch his launch video 9. ME AND THE SKY: Reps. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) and Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) are launching an official investigation into Paramount's $7 billion merger with fellow media conglomerate Skydance, The Hill's Dominick Mastrangelo scoops. The pair sent a 'letter to Paramount leadership on Wednesday demanding documents, communications and detailed answers' on the merger and noted concerns about 'troubling' statements from Trump regarding a possible financial agreement. 'Paramount has denied any such agreement with Trump exists and insisted its settlement with the president only includes a $16 million payment to his foundation, which was announced as the deal was struck.' TALK OF THE TOWN SPOTTED: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Jeanine Pirro having lunch at The Hamilton yesterday. Pic Matt and Ginger Gaetz welcomed a son, Luckey Louis Gaetz. AND THE AWARD GOES TO — The Congressional Management Foundation announced winners of the 2025 Democracy Awards, including multiple categories honoring one Republican and one Democratic congressional office as well as chiefs of staff. Honorees for excellence in congressional management include Rep. Richard Hudson (R-N.C.) and Nikki Budzinski's (D-Ill.) offices. Honorees for chief of staff of the year include J.T. Jezierski of Sen. Shelley Moore Capito's ( office, Tricia Russell of Sen. Chris Van Hollen's (D-Md.) office, Chris Crawford of Rep. Buddy Carter's (R-Ga.) office and Mitchell Rivard of Rep. Jason Crow's (D-Colo.) office. Winners will be formally recognized at the 2025 Democracy Awards Ceremony on Sept. 18. See the full list of awardees Send Playbookers tips to playbook@ or text us on Signal here. Playbook couldn't happen without our editor Zack Stanton, deputy editor Garrett Ross and Playbook Podcast producer Callan Tansill-Suddath


Vox
a few seconds ago
- Vox
Stephen Miller is undercutting Trump's war on democracy
is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he covers ideology and challenges to democracy, both at home and abroad. His book on democracy,, was published 0n July 16. You can purchase it here. In the public imagination, Stephen Miller is the dark heart of the Trump administration — a pulsing mass of anti-immigrant hatred behind its most aggressively authoritarian moves. But what if there's a different story to be told — that Stephen Miller's obsession with deportations isn't helping President Donald Trump secure control over the country, but actively undermining it? Take Trump's militarization of Washington, DC, as an example. The move is puzzling, in that it's authoritarian in principle but ineffective in execution. While seemingly designed to expand Trump's ability to control the American public, the on-the-ground deployments are doing nothing to repress protest — in fact, they're assuredly generating far more resistance than they're suppressing. So what's going on? The best answer I've found is a recent piece from Dara Lind, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council (and Vox alum). Looking granularly at the details of the operations in DC, Lind found they heavily focused on immigration enforcement — things like forcing DC police to cooperate with ICE and setting up checkpoints to try and trap people they think look like migrants. 'Every day since the federal takeover, DC residents have posted videos of federal agents — often with a mix of uniforms or no official badges at all — in patrols, staffing checkpoints, or going after people. And the people they've been going after have largely been (apparent) immigrants,' Lind writes. (Her findings are supported by recent on-the-ground reporting from the Wall Street Journal.) This is, I think, a viciously cruel policy (not to mention a waste of federal resources). But it is also a very ineffective policy when it comes to consolidating authoritarian control. Undocumented migrants do not vote, but the administration's ceaseless efforts to deport them en masse is galvanizing street protests and tanking GOP support among Latino voters. This is Miller's influence on policy made manifest: obsessed with deportations, he has done everything he can to turn the federal government into a deportation machine. And it's actually hurting the overall Trumpist cause. Stephen Miller is doing authoritarianism wrong I wrote a book about how democracies become autocracies. One of my central findings is that, for would-be autocrats, it is exceptionally important to maintain democratic appearances. If you are too openly authoritarian before consolidating enough power, you're likely to galvanize a potent wave of popular resistance. The paradigmatic recent example is South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol's attempted power grab in December. Instead of subtly chipping away at Korean democracy, Yoon simply declared martial law overnight and tried to arrest opposition leaders. The result was an immediate street uprising and a parliamentary vote nullifying the martial law declaration. Yoon was impeached and is currently on trial for insurrection, a crime punishable by life imprisonment or death. The paradigmatic counter-case is Hungary under Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. After winning power in 2010, Orbán and his Fidesz party made a blizzard of confusing changes to Hungarian law designed to make elections less competitive and bring the courts to heel. They then spent years expanding their power, using financial and regulatory pressures to take control over the press and civil society. Today, the electoral deck is so stacked in the ruling party's favor that even a wildly popular opposition leader may not be able to win the 2026 elections. Yoon and Orbán represent poles we can use to evaluate the Trump administration's authoritarian effectiveness. The more Trump acts like Yoon, attempting to nakedly assert the powers of a police-state ruler in a democracy, the more likely he is to generate meaningful pushback. The more he acts like Orbán, hiding behind a legalistic veneer, the more insidious the threat becomes. By this metric, the most dangerous developments of the Trump administration have been his attacks on universities, his successful shakedown of CBS, his push to get Republican states to do pre-midterm gerrymandering, and the Supreme Court's willingness to bless his mass firings of federal employees (at least temporarily). All of those developments tangibly affect American democracy. Each chips away at a key institution — civil society, the free press, fair elections, and limits on executive power — that prevent authoritarian consolidation. Each moves Trump meaningfully closer toward building an Orbán-style regime (even if the United States is still pretty far off from the terminus). But the militarized immigration crackdown championed by Miller doesn't advance that goal in any meaningful way. It combines the optics of authoritarianism — sending masked, unidentified armed men into the streets of American cities — with a lack of actual repressive capacity. Look, for example, at this recent video of DC residents (in my old neighborhood) chasing off unidentified federal agents. The feds are armed and masked, but the protesters are totally fearless. Why? Because unlike an outright authoritarian state, where demonstrators are repressed with deadly force, Trump's guys aren't authorized to fire indiscriminately on crowds. Their show of force is just that — a show. And people on the ground, in DC and LA before it, are calling their bluff. Miller's crackdown is good at two things: deporting undocumented people and terrorizing the communities they live in. I find this abhorrent: he is hurting innocent people, and the US writ large, for no good reason. But the fact that Miller's policy is morally terrible does not mean it is contributing to Trump's broader authoritarian project. In fact, its naked cruelty and thuggishness are the best reasons to think it's counterproductive. Back in November 2019, Stephen Miller said in a meeting that deporting immigrants was his reason for living. 'This is all I care about,' he said, per the New Yorker. 'I don't have a family. I don't have anything else. This is my life.' That same month, Miller got engaged to his now-wife Katie. The level of monomania on display there, an obsession with immigration so total that it erased his own fiancée, has been even more vividly on display in this administration — where he has personally redirected ICE officers responsible for disrupting organized crime to arresting random construction workers at Home Depot. I don't think Miller is thinking carefully about whether his deportation campaign is contributing to Trump's authoritarian consolidation of power. I think he just wants to deport people, and the consequences be damned. Mostly, those consequences are horrific. But if there's any silver lining, it's this: Miller is helping awaken millions of Americans to the true nature of their current government.