LG to exit EV charger business amid weak demand, price pressure
The decision is part of a strategic realignment aimed at strengthening the company's focus on its heating, ventilation and air conditioning business, a key growth driver under its eco solutions division.
"Due to structural shifts in the business environment, including a protracted demand slowdown — referred to as the 'chasm' — and intensifying price competition, we have decided to wind down the EV charger business," said an LG Electronics official.
HiEV Charger, LG's wholly owned subsidiary responsible for the manufacturing of EV charging equipment, will begin liquidation procedures. LG said all employees involved in the EV charging business will be reassigned to other divisions within the company.
Despite winding down the business, LG said it will continue to provide maintenance and support services to existing clients without disruption.
LG had initially entered the EV charging market with high expectations, aiming to make it a key pillar of its business-to-business portfolio.
After starting preliminary research and development in 2018, the company acquired HiEV Charger, formerly AppleMango, in 2022 and launched charging infrastructure at E-mart stores and other domestic locations.
Chief Executive Officer Cho Joo-wan previously identified EV charging as one of LG's future growth engines, outlining a bold vision in 2023 to grow the segment into a trillion-won business by 2030 as part of LG's 100 trillion won ($70 billion) revenue goal.
At the beginning of last year, LG established a charger production base in Texas. The company partnered with ChargePoint, the No. 1 EV charging service provider in North America, in June, and has been operating six types of slow and fast EV chargers in both the domestic and North American markets.
LG had also set a goal of securing an 8 percent share of the US fast charger market by 2030, aiming to become a global top-tier company.
However, HiEV Charger marked two consecutive years of large deficits. It posted 10.6 billion won in revenue and an operating loss of 7.2 billion won last year. In 2023, the company posted 5.9 billion won in revenue with an operating loss of 7 billion won.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Tesla deepens CATL ties to reshape ESS rivalry in US
Unusual US-China link-up may challenge LG's early lead in American ESS market Tesla dropped a bombshell by recently sharing a video clip on X showing drone footage of its lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery cell manufacturing facility for energy storage systems in the US state of Nevada. The post read, 'Nearing completion' of its first-ever LFP cell production site in North America. While the electric vehicle giant is known for pioneering cylindrical lithium-ion battery cells for cars, Tesla's venture into LFP cells sends a warning signal to Korean battery manufacturers, as it potentially enables the Chinese battery giant CATL to indirectly enter the US market despite trade barriers against China. Rare US-China tie-up According to Bloomberg, Tesla — already using CATL's LFP cells in its 'Megapack' product for utility- and grid-level ESS, manufactured outside the US — will utilize equipment and battery design from CATL at its Nevada facility. 'Tesla's completion of its LFP cell factory will effectively be equivalent to an indirect entry of CATL into the US market,' said Park Cheol-wan, a car engineering professor at Seojeong University. 'Tesla sources LFP batteries for energy storage and electric vehicles from CATL and BYD, with BYD's long cells serving Europe and CATL's prismatic cells targeting Asia and North America,' Park added. 'With increased US sanctions on China under the Biden administration, Tesla planned to start local production at its Nevada factory. This strategy has shown unexpected foresight, especially in light of the tariffs imposed during Donald Trump's presidency.' Park noted that CATL's entry through Tesla differs from its 'de facto failed attempt' to build a joint battery manufacturing plant with Ford Motor Company, which involved licensing its battery technology. With Tesla having full control over the Nevada factory, CATL can still benefit financially from supplying equipment, thereby deepening its reach into an otherwise 'impenetrable' US market. Fresh threat to LG? Tesla and CATL's LFP battery production intensifies pressure on LG Energy Solution, which last month became the first among US-based players to begin mass production of LFP cells for ESS at its Michigan plant. An LG Energy Solution official noted that the company is now supplying long-cell-based LFP battery pack products to major US energy solution providers, including Terra-Gen and Delta Electronics. The combined annual supply volume to these two firms is projected to reach 12 gigawatt-hours, valued at approximately 3 trillion won ($2.2 billion). In 2022, LG Energy Solution also entered the ESS system integration sector, moving beyond battery supply to the construction and operation of large-scale ESS in North America. 'Although this move strengthens their market position, we'll need to wait and see whether they can maintain price competitiveness against Tesla, which is collaborating with the cost-efficient CATL,' Park said. While Tesla does not disclose its exact market share in the US ESS sector, it is known to be a dominant player in residential ESS and a key supplier for utility-scale storage. In 2024, the combined energy storage capacity of Tesla's Megapack and Powerwall products soared 114 percent year-on-year to 31.4 gigawatt-hours. The company projects at least 50 percent growth in this segment for 2025. No clear leader Industry watchers expect the LFP battery rivalry between LG Energy Solution and Tesla — backed by CATL — to expand into the US electric vehicle market. 'While Tesla has so far only revealed plans for ESS production at its Nevada plant, it seems only a matter of time before it begins manufacturing LFP cells for EVs as well, given that these products use the same battery design,' said a researcher at a major Korean battery company. Park also noted that Tesla's local production of LFP cells is likely to spur LG Energy Solution — which is set to begin large-scale LFP battery supplies to Renault Group from its plant in Poland — to explore new partnerships with legacy US automakers such as Ford Motor Company and General Motors. In the first quarter of this year, GM's brands — Chevrolet, Cadillac and GMC — ranked second in US EV sales with 31,886 units, following Tesla's 128,100 units, according to data from Cox Automotive. Ford came in third with 22,500 units sold.
Korea Herald
3 days ago
- Korea Herald
[Editorial] Korea's industrial drift
Samsung, LG's sharp earnings drop highlights deeper industrial weaknesses, rising trade risks Giants don't stumble quietly. The latest earnings from Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics, two pillars of South Korean manufacturing, signal not just a downturn but deeper structural cracks. Their second-quarter profits more than halved, falling far short of even the most conservative forecasts. While escalating US tariffs, rising logistics costs and fierce competition from China are the immediate culprits, the roots of this crisis stretch further, exposing an industrial model increasingly ill-suited to the global economy. The headline figures are stark. During the April-June period, Samsung's operating profit tumbled 56 percent from a year earlier, with LG's down nearly 47 percent. The damage extends beyond consumer electronics. Semiconductors, long the crown jewel of Korean industry, are now struggling, weighed down by softening demand and intensifying trade headwinds. US President Donald Trump has issued a clear warning: A 25 percent tariff on Korean imports will take effect in August unless Seoul makes sweeping concessions. Yet Korean exporters were already faltering before these new duties came into play. To see this downturn as merely a reaction to tariffs, however, would miss the larger story. South Korea's competitive erosion has been gathering momentum for years. Its share in global markets for semiconductors, automobiles, steel and shipbuilding has steadily slipped. Meanwhile, China's industrial ascent has been relentless, powered by vast state subsidies and an intense focus on scale, speed and technological edge. Korean firms, by comparison, remain tied to an outdated dependence on low-cost production and assembly exports. Despite rising research and development budgets, true breakthroughs have been scarce. The semiconductor sector underscores the gravity of this challenge. While Samsung and SK hynix contend with excess inventories and tepid demand, US-based chipmaker Nvidia has surged ahead, propelled by dominance in artificial intelligence chips. This week, its valuation surpassed $4 trillion — a symbolic marker of technological supremacy. Korean chipmakers, by contrast, face regulatory delays and sluggish infrastructure rollouts. Hold-ups in commercializing advanced memory technologies, such as high-bandwidth memory products, have only widened the gap. Meanwhile, China's semiconductor firms are accelerating their advance. Players such as YMTC and SMIC are closing in, backed by generous government subsidies and aggressive capital spending. In some cases, they are investing five times more relative to revenues than their Korean rivals. All of this is unfolding against a backdrop of escalating trade pressure from Washington. The latest US tariff regime is designed to extract concessions from allies, regardless of existing trade agreements. For Korean exporters, the risks are immediate, particularly in key sectors such as automobiles, steel and consumer electronics. What, then, is required? In the near term, Seoul must negotiate with clarity and precision, defending core export sectors while avoiding concessions that would further erode industrial competitiveness. This may involve politically sensitive trade-offs, including energy imports or enhanced defense cooperation. Yet in the longer term, the more important task is structural reform. Without a fundamental overhaul of its industrial model, South Korea will keep losing ground. That means accelerating investment in next-generation technologies like AI chips and electric vehicles, while dismantling regulatory barriers that stifle growth. Labor policies, including rigid limits on working hours in high-tech industries, must also be addressed. There is no margin for delay. Industry experts warn that the next five years represent a critical window for Korea's semiconductor industry. If missed, the consequences could be irreversible. South Korea needs a cohesive strategy that blends targeted state support, corporate agility and a clear-eyed assessment of global realities. Its leading firms must reinvent their business models and respond decisively to the twin pressures of trade disputes and technological disruption before the window closes.
Korea Herald
4 days ago
- Korea Herald
Innometry unveils X-ray defense tech at Korea defense fair
Innometry, a South Korean firm specializing in X-ray inspections for EV batteries, said Thursday that it has showcased its nondestructive inspection technologies at the 2025 Korea Defense Component & Equipment Fair, taking place from Wednesday to Friday at Changwon Exhibition and Convention Center. The exhibition highlights Korea's defense components and its cutting-edge technologies, displaying key parts, materials and equipment essential for weapons systems and future battlefield environments. At its booth, Innometry presented its X-ray inspection systems, along with detectors and artillery samples. The company also revealed high-precision computed tomography scan images of bullets and casings, including defect images of various calibers and detailed scans of 7.62-millimeter ammunition. Innometry's X-ray technology can detect internal defects in secondary batteries without destruction, preventing fires from electric vehicles. Its technology also enables precise inspections of battery packs, firearms, ammunition and explosive devices in the defense sector, enhancing safety by detecting cracks, weld defects or foreign substances. It can be used to inspect military vehicle components and electronic circuits. 'We are actively engaging with more than 100 companies at the exhibition to explore future business opportunities,' said Innometry CEO Lee Gap-soo. 'We anticipate a recovery in battery orders from key domestic clients, with earnings expected to improve starting in the second quarter. We also see steady progress across new sectors such as defense, semiconductors and electronics.'
