Springfield City Council approves funding deal to raise Jefferson Ave. Footbridge
SPRINGFIELD, Mo. — The Springfield City Council has accepted a $2 million funding agreement with the BNSF Railway Company to raise the height of the Jefferson Avenue Footbridge.
As part of the agreement, BNSF will contribute funds towards raising the footbridge by around three to four feet. The plan was made so that BSNF can to replace rails and conduct track maintenance under the bridge while protecting the historic footbridge.
Construction to raise the bridge will take place as part of the upcoming Jefferson Avenue Footbridge Rehabilitation Project, says the City of Springfield. The project is planned to begin this spring and is currently projected to be completed in early 2026.
Springfield begins project to repair several roadways
The city will host a construction kick-off meeting for the project in the early spring so community members can learn more about the rehabilitation plan and upcoming construction.
More information and updates on the Jefferson Bridge rehabilitation can be found on the City of Springfield website.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
After Hitting All-Time Highs This Year, Is Berkshire Hathaway a Buy Today?
Berkshire Hathaway is run by none other than Warren Buffett, arguably the greatest investor of our time. Berkshire's stock has outperformed the S&P 500 this year and hit all-time highs. Investors seem to like the company's diversity of businesses and its management, and view the stock as a flight to safety. 10 stocks we like better than Berkshire Hathaway › Once the Trump administration began to implement sweeping tariffs against major trading partners of the U.S. in April, investors, sensing a significant disruption in the market, ditched U.S. risk assets and ran for cover. They piled into cash, gold, and assets they believed could provide a port in the storm. One of those happened to be Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A)(NYSE: BRK.B), one of the largest conglomerates in the world, run by arguably the world's best investor, Warren Buffett. Berkshire's stock was up nearly 10% (as of June 4), compared to the broader benchmark S&P 500's roughly 2% gain. Berkshire's stock also hit all-time highs earlier this year. Is the stock still a buy today? Aside from Buffett and his strong team of investing lieutenants and managers, one thing investors seem to like about Berkshire is the diversity of businesses under the large conglomerate's umbrella. Berkshire not only operates a massive stock portfolio, but also a large insurance business as the owner of Geico. The company also owns a slate of energy assets, the Burlington North Santa Fe Railroad, and a mortgage business, among others. It might be difficult for some of these sectors to operate alone, but together they provide diversity and have turned Berkshire into a juggernaut that generated over $89.5 billion of earnings in 2024. It also had $47.4 billion of operating earnings, which Buffett believes is a better metric for the company because it strips out volatile unrealized capital gains and losses. Another reason investors view Berkshire as a flight to safety is because of the company's massive cash hoard. Combined, Berkshire's cash, cash equivalents, short-term U.S. Treasury investments, and investments in fixed-maturity securities totaled an incredible $357 billion. Berkshire now reportedly owns about 5% of the short-term Treasury bill market. The massive pile of cash gives Berkshire a huge margin of safety -- and also a war chest, should opportunities arise in the market that Berkshire finds compelling. Now, after a strong run, it's always important to look at a stock's valuation. One way investors like to value Berkshire is on a price-to-tangible book value (TBV) basis, which is a frequent way investors value bank and insurance stocks. As you can see above, Berkshire's stock recently traded slightly under two times TBV. That's down from highs the stock reached earlier this year, but also above the company's five-year average. While Berkshire's stock does look a bit expensive right now, I still think long-term-oriented investors will be served well by owning it. For one, Buffett and his team have built Berkshire to last, meaning it can perform well through the entirety of the economic cycle, including the tougher parts. Berkshire's equities portfolio has exposure to growth stocks like tech and artificial intelligence, but management are also clearly big believers in oil and gas, which they may view as a finite resource. Not only does the company own and operate energy businesses, but Berkshire has major stakes in large domestic oil and gas producers like Occidental Petroleum and Chevron. These stocks should perform well if the price of oil, which trades in the low $60s per barrel, eventually rises. Investors may be concerned over the fact that Buffett, who is 94 years old, is preparing to retire at the end of 2025 after over six decades on the job. No one will ever be able to replace the Oracle of Omaha, but incoming CEO Greg Abel is more than capable. Without the Buffett brand, I think Berkshire may also try to entice investors by returning more capital to shareholders through stock repurchases and perhaps even a dividend, which Berkshire has never paid before. So even with the departure of Buffett, who will stay on as chair of the company's board of directors, it's not all doom and gloom. There is still much more for investors to look forward to. Before you buy stock in Berkshire Hathaway, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Berkshire Hathaway wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Bram Berkowitz has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway and Chevron. The Motley Fool recommends Occidental Petroleum. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. After Hitting All-Time Highs This Year, Is Berkshire Hathaway a Buy Today? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Hearing set June 12 in CARD Clinic seizure; sheriff's sale set for July 2
Jun. 6—A federal judge in Missoula will hear arguments next week dealing with BNSF's attempts to seize the assets of Libby's CARD Clinic. The hearing is scheduled for 9:30 a.m. Thursday, May 12, in the Russell Smith Federal Courthouse. Judge Dana L. Christensen will hear the case. Also, Lincoln County Sheriff Darren Short signed a notice Thursday, June 5, giving notice to a sheriff's sale July 2 to the highest bidder to satisfy the judgment for the plaintiff, BNSF, with interest and costs. While the date is subject to change pending an order from the court, the sale is currently set for 10 a.m. Wednesday, July 2. According to Montana code, the sheriff's office has 120 days from the day it received the writ to conduct the sale. The sale will include the real property as well as office equipment, furnishings, and other machinery, fixtures and equipment. For more information, contact the sheriff's office at 406-293-4112, ext. 1232. The non-profit clinic, which has served thousands of patients afflicted with asbestosis and other deadly ailments, has been closed since May 7 when the Lincoln County Sheriff's Office served a Writ of Execution on the Center for Asbestos Related Disease, Inc. to satisfy a $3.1 million judgment. A writ of execution is a court order directing a sheriff to seize and sell property to satisfy a judgment. The judgment stems from a lawsuit won in 2023 by Texas-based BNSF, owned by billionaire Warren Buffett, that accused the clinic of filing hundreds of fraudulent claims over several years. Federal jurors ruled two years ago that the clinic made or presented false claims 337 times, including 91 violations after November 2015. CARD filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in August 2023, allowing it to continue operations. But the United States intervened in the bankruptcy proceeding and determined that the judgment should not be paid, so the bankruptcy was settled and dismissed in spring 2024. In September 2024, CARD lost an appeal to a jury's 2023 judgment. In the meantime, CARD officials recently found another location to serve its patients. It is located at 118 West 3rd Street. It will be open the same hours as the clinic, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Wednesday. "We are still receiving grant money and we have a mission to fulfill so we're pleased we can still offer some services," McNew said. "Patients are welcome to stop in and we'll work to answer their questions." McNew said they are able to answer emails from patients and send test results to patients. She also hopes that they will be able to continue outreach education. Another hope is that the new location will have working phones next week. McNew said since the seizure of the clinic, BNSF has taken at least $100,000 from the clinic's operating account. In a May 9 court filing, Billings-based Assistant U.S. Attorneys Mark Smith and Lynsey Ross filed a motion in Lincoln County District Court to quash the court's writ on the CARD Clinic. In the motion, the attorneys said it contacted BNSF attorney Cole Anderson and requested the company withdraw the application. But the company declined and objected to the motion. "In 2023, a Montana jury found that the CARD clinic had submitted false asbestos claims costing taxpayers millions of dollars. The judge determined the amount of damages to be repaid, and the process for recovery is set by law," said Kendall Sloan, BNSF Director of External Communicatons. According to a declaration by CARD Executive Director Tracy McNew filed with the motion to quash, she reported that all CARD employees were compelled to vacate the clinic May 7 following the seizure and the sheriff's office replaced all of the locks. Thursday, May 8, following a request, certain CARD employees were allowed to enter the clinic to access the CARD Quickbooks accounting program. McNew said sheriff's office officers monitored CARD employees activities and once they were done using the accounting program, they left the office and haven't returned. In a May 20 filing in federal court in Missoula, CARD's attorney, James A. Patten of Patten, Peterman, Bekkedahl and Green, a Billings firm, sought to join the federal motion to quash the writ and sought a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order. CARD argues that the railway's writ violates bankruptcy proceedings and applicable law. It is seeking the injunction and restraining order to prevent further harm upon CARD and the wrongful interference with the clinic due to its status as a federal grant recipient. In 2011, CARD was chosen by the U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry for a four-year grant for a screening program for environmental health hazards, including asbestosis, pleural thickening and pleural plaques, caused by exposure to hazardous substances at Libby's Superfund sites. The federal grants continued with the most recent reward in September 2024. It will run through August 2029. The argument also includes the harm the clinic will suffer because it cannot screen patients, provide education, monitor diagnosed patients and provide follow up of testing results and respond to patient requests. In another declaration by McNew, she said the clinic had to cancel about 50 appointments per week since the May 7 closure. It also said the clinic's pulmonary function testing equipment, the only of its kind in Lincoln County, has sat unused as a result of BNSF's seizure. "CARD has on several occasions identified patients in need of emergency care and/or serious treatment for previously undiagnosed malignancies as part of our routine screenings," McNew wrote. BNSF replied to the clinic's filings in a 53-page document filed May 30 in federal court. Among its arguments, railway attorneys Knight Nicastro MacKay maintain because the federal government didn't intervene in the original lawsuit, it doesn't have a right to stop BNSF from recovering money from the judgment. "The Government begins by claiming that litigation in which the United States is a party is reserved to the officers of the Department of Justice, under the direction of the Attorney General, citing U.S. statute. But BNSF attorneys say federal attorneys left out a relevant portion of the statue which directly applies. It reads, "Except as otherwise authorized by law, the conduct of litigation in which the United States, an agency, or officer thereof is a party, or is interested, and securing evidence therefor, is reserved to officers of the Department of Justice, under the direction of the Attorney General." They also say because CARD has mixed its grant income with non-grant income that it must prove its bank accounts and property represent only grant money. During the 2023 trial, a number of donations from plaintiff attorneys were revealed. From 2012 to 2017, the clinic received $81,000 from attorneys and $30,000 for a mortality study. Dr. Brad Black, CARD's former medical director, testified to $116,000 in donations from Montana plaintiff attorneys. The list didn't include two $10,0000 donations from a national plaintiffs' law firm or a $24,381.94 donation for the clinic's new parking lot. BNSF also believes CARD has received its most significant non-grant income in the form of Medicare payments for treating its patients. "This is the equivalent of personal income for CARD and the amount of this income what property it was used to buy is still unknown to BNSF," the attorneys argued. Railway attorneys also said they do not intend to use grant funds to satisfy the judgment or ask to liquidate CARD assets pending the federal court's review of whether grant funds were mixed with non-grant funds to secure the assets. Gold miners discovered vermiculite in Libby in 1881. In the 1920s, the Zonolite Company formed and began mining the vermiculite. In 1963, W.R. Grace bought the Zonolite mining operations. The mine closed in 1990. In 2002, the Environmental Protection Agency placed the site on the Superfund program's National Priorities List and cleanup work continues to this day. Fibers from the asbestos tied to vermiculite mining that began in the 1920s can embed in lung tissue and cause fatal lung disease. No one knows how many people in the region have died from the effects of asbestosis, mesothelioma or other cancers linked to exposure to asbestos-containing vermiculite mined, processed and shipped from Lincoln County and Libby. BNSF's involvement relates to asbestos-contaminated vermiculite in the rail yard that a 2024 federal jury said was a considerable factor in the negligent deaths of former Libby residents Thomas Wells and Joyce Walder. Both Wells and Walder lived near the railyard and were both diagnosed with mesothelioma and died in 2020. Hundreds of people died and more than 3,000 were sickened from asbestos exposure in the Libby area, according to researchers and health officials. BNSF faces accusations of negligence and wrongful death for failing to control clouds of contaminated dust that used to swirl from the rail yard and settle across Libby's neighborhoods. The vermiculite was shipped by rail from Libby for use as insulation in homes and businesses across the U.S.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Predicting the unpredictable for intermodal
Intermodal analyst Larry Gross says that normally he'd be able to draw on his 45 years of transportation experience to make predictions about freight volume in the months ahead. 'Theoretically, it would mean that I would be bringing some long-term insight to the situation that we find ourselves in today: You know, a sense that, well, the last time that this happened, here's how it went,' Gross said Tuesday during an Intermodal Association of North America webcast. But the past does not offer a road map for how intermodal traffic might perform while a trade war is raging. 'There is no 'last time' for some of what we're seeing right now,' Gross said. 'It's really a unique situation.' Shippers pulled forward their imports, particularly from China, in an attempt to beat tariff deadlines, which sent international container volume higher beginning late last year. Then when the Trump administration imposed 145% tariffs on Chinese goods in April, trade all but dried up, creating an air pocket of container volume bound for the says he was surprised it took as long as five to six weeks for the air pocket decline to hit U.S. railroads. 'We've only really seen it now for the past two or three weeks,' he said of BNSF and Union Pacific (NYSE: UNP) intermodal volumes. Now, with tariffs on Chinese goods reduced to 30% from May 12 through the middle of August, Gross is expecting a mini-surge in volume to begin in the middle of this month. 'It's not going to be … a huge volume, because even though 30% is a lot lower than 145%, it's still pretty significant,' Gross said of tariffs on Chinese goods. The hold on reciprocal tariffs, which vary by country and will remain in effect until at least July 9, means importers of goods made elsewhere also may try to rush containers to the U.S., he says. What happens to volume after these summer tariff-related deadlines depends on the next steps in trade talks. But it's trade with China, Gross says, that will have the biggest impact on U.S. intermodal makes up roughly half of all U.S. rail traffic. And North American volumes this year are running well ahead of 2024 levels as well as the 10-year average. U.S. intermodal volume is up 7% this year through May 24, while North American volume is up 5.8%, according to Association of American Railroads data. Overall, 41.3% of U.S. containerized imports come from China, Gross says, citing S&P Global PIERS data for 2024. Chinese imports make up 57.5% of containers handled by U.S. West Coast ports but just 25.6% of boxes that land at U.S. East Coast ports and 34.7% at Gulf Coast ports. 'To the extent that we have a trade war with China, the West Coast is going to feel it much more acutely than the East Coast,' Gross said. Making matters worse for the West Coast: Asian trade is flowing back to normal routings involving East Coast ports for two reasons. First, shipments were diverted to the West Coast last year amid labor uncertainty and a brief strike at East and Gulf Coast ports. Second, some shipments shifted to the West Coast to avoid danger on their normal route via the Red Sea, which was under threat by Houthi rebels in Yemen. This means that both international and domestic intermodal volume from Southern California will face headwinds after the mini-surge, Gross says. Some 15% of domestic container shipments out of Southern California carry goods that were transloaded from international containers, he estimates. This is bad news for BNSF and UP, which originate intermodal loads from West Coast ports. But it's not necessarily good news for Eastern carriers CSX (NASDAQ: CSX) or Norfolk Southern (NYSE: NSC) because the intermodal share of imports is much lower at the East Coast ports they serve. It's unclear when trade disputes will be ironed out, Gross says, but he doesn't expect agreements to fall into place quickly. And that, he says, will mean lingering uncertainty for businesses and consumers alike. 'Uncertainty is the enemy of growth,' Gross said. Slowing growth, plus the potential for tariff-fueled inflation, could ultimately produce stagflation that will reduce consumer demand, he says. 'It certainly wouldn't surprise me to see a downturn in the second quarter and third quarter of this year,' Gross he expects domestic intermodal to eke out slight year-over-year gains for 2025 – if intermodal can continue to slowly regain market share from trucking. International volume, Gross says, likely will be flat to down this year. 'I certainly view more downside risk in that forecast than upside potential,' he said. The post Predicting the unpredictable for intermodal appeared first on FreightWaves. Sign in to access your portfolio
