
Hakamata's sister asks for review of Japan's retrial system
The sister of Iwao Hakamata, a former boxer who was acquitted of murder charges after spending decades on death row, is seeking an overhaul of Japan's retrial system to prevent similar miscarriages of justice.
Hideko Hakamata, 92, sister of Iwao, 89, who was acquitted last year in a retrial, called for an urgent revision of the law to legal and prosectural officials at a meeting on May 30.
The Legislative Council subcommittee, an advisory body to the justice minister, is considering a review of the retrial system. It held the meeting to hear from Hideko, along with Iwao's lawyer and others.
'As a human being, would you consider the fact that Iwao worked so hard for 47 years and seven months?' Hideko asked the subcommittee members.
Iwao was arrested and indicted in 1966 for the murder of four members of the family of the managing director of a miso manufacturing company in Shizuoka Prefecture.
In 1980, the Supreme Court upheld his death sentence for robbery and murder. The following year, he began his legal fight for a new trial.
In 2010, during the second retrial request, color photographs of 'five articles of blooodstained clothing' were included in the disclosed evidence. The photographs subsequently became a major point of contention showing the evidence was likely fabricated at the start of his retrial and acquittal.
At this point, however, 29 years had elapsed since the first request for a retrial.
'If (the photographs) had been disclosed sooner, Iwao's suffering would have been shortened,' Hideko said. 'There should be no such thing as hiding what evidence exists. And moreover, it is a matter of a human life.'
The Code of Criminal Procedure, which sets forth the procedures for criminal trials, has 509 articles, but only 19 of these relate to retrials.
There are no rules on the disclosure of evidence and problems with 'retrial disparity,' which depend on the attitude of the judge in charge of the case, have been pointed out.
In Iwao's case, it took 42 years from the first request for a retrial to the decision to initiate a retrial.
One of the reasons for the lengthy proceedings was the lack of procedural rules, such as the designation of a date for the retrial.
Hideko spoke for Iwao, whose mental illness from his long years of incarceration have made it difficult for him to communicate with her.
'For a long time, it was a struggle against an invisible power," she told the subcommittee. '(We) didn't know who (we) were fighting or for how long. My brother was arrested at the age of 30 and his whole life was ruined. What was the government doing during this time?'
She added: 'There is no doubt that the law is inadequate. If what Iwao has struggled with for so long can at least be useful in the form of a revision of the law, I couldn't be happier.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Asahi Shimbun
2 days ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Hakamata's sister asks for review of Japan's retrial system
The sister of Iwao Hakamata, a former boxer who was acquitted of murder charges after spending decades on death row, is seeking an overhaul of Japan's retrial system to prevent similar miscarriages of justice. Hideko Hakamata, 92, sister of Iwao, 89, who was acquitted last year in a retrial, called for an urgent revision of the law to legal and prosectural officials at a meeting on May 30. The Legislative Council subcommittee, an advisory body to the justice minister, is considering a review of the retrial system. It held the meeting to hear from Hideko, along with Iwao's lawyer and others. 'As a human being, would you consider the fact that Iwao worked so hard for 47 years and seven months?' Hideko asked the subcommittee members. Iwao was arrested and indicted in 1966 for the murder of four members of the family of the managing director of a miso manufacturing company in Shizuoka Prefecture. In 1980, the Supreme Court upheld his death sentence for robbery and murder. The following year, he began his legal fight for a new trial. In 2010, during the second retrial request, color photographs of 'five articles of blooodstained clothing' were included in the disclosed evidence. The photographs subsequently became a major point of contention showing the evidence was likely fabricated at the start of his retrial and acquittal. At this point, however, 29 years had elapsed since the first request for a retrial. 'If (the photographs) had been disclosed sooner, Iwao's suffering would have been shortened,' Hideko said. 'There should be no such thing as hiding what evidence exists. And moreover, it is a matter of a human life.' The Code of Criminal Procedure, which sets forth the procedures for criminal trials, has 509 articles, but only 19 of these relate to retrials. There are no rules on the disclosure of evidence and problems with 'retrial disparity,' which depend on the attitude of the judge in charge of the case, have been pointed out. In Iwao's case, it took 42 years from the first request for a retrial to the decision to initiate a retrial. One of the reasons for the lengthy proceedings was the lack of procedural rules, such as the designation of a date for the retrial. Hideko spoke for Iwao, whose mental illness from his long years of incarceration have made it difficult for him to communicate with her. 'For a long time, it was a struggle against an invisible power," she told the subcommittee. '(We) didn't know who (we) were fighting or for how long. My brother was arrested at the age of 30 and his whole life was ruined. What was the government doing during this time?' She added: 'There is no doubt that the law is inadequate. If what Iwao has struggled with for so long can at least be useful in the form of a revision of the law, I couldn't be happier.'


The Mainichi
5 days ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: Can Japan protect privacy under law ordering digital data provision?
TOKYO -- Japan has enacted revisions to the Code of Criminal Procedure and other legislation aimed at digitizing criminal justice procedures, yet concerns remain that citizens' privacy may be unjustly infringed upon in the name of criminal investigations. With the enactment of the revisions, search and seizure warrants can now be requested and issued online, enhancing the efficiency of investigations. A new system also allows investigative authorities to order the provision of electronic data with a court warrant. Online "seizure" is now possible, and failure to comply with such orders may result in penalties. It is anticipated that providers and cloud service operators will be asked to provide information including communication histories and server access records. There could also conceivably be cases in which acquaintances of investigation targets are required to submit their exchanges via communication apps. During the Diet deliberations, a key issue raised was the risk of collecting more personal information than necessary, as businesses or other parties fearing criminal liability may provide information not directly related to a crime. There are no rules requiring authorities to notify targets of investigations when information provision orders are issued to businesses or other parties. Regulations have also been established, with penalties, to keep the provision of information confidential. Both measures are intended to prevent the destruction of evidence. However, there is a risk of people's privacy being infringed on without their knowledge. Even if improper data collection is later revealed, investigative authorities are not obligated to delete the information. There are additional potential restrictions on the rights of investigation targets. If information stored on smartphones or computers is protected with a password, investigative authorities cannot force a person to reveal it. But under the new system, they can order the person to unlock the password and provide the information, with penalties for noncompliance. It has been pointed out that this may conflict with the constitutional guarantee that people shall not be compelled to testify against themselves. Courts play a crucial role in preventing the arbitrary collection of information. Strict scrutiny is required to ensure that such orders are limited to the scope necessary for investigations. In the European Union, where the protection of personal information is stringent, an independent supervisory body has been established to ensure unnecessary data is deleted by criminal justice authorities. Japan should consider adopting a similar approach.


Yomiuri Shimbun
23-05-2025
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Thailand's Ex-Prime Minister Yingluck Ordered to Pay for Losses from a Rice Subsidy Program
AP file photo Former Thailand's Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra talks to reporters as she arrives at the Supreme Court for last day of the hearing in Bangkok, Thailand, July 21, 2017. BANGKOK (AP) — A Thai court on Thursday ordered exiled former Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra to pay more than 10 billion baht ($304 million) to compensate for losses incurred by a money-losing rice farming subsidy program that her administration had implemented more than a decade ago. The Supreme Administrative Court partially reversed a 2021 court ruling that cleared her. It found her guilty of severe negligence in relation to rice sales to other countries and said she failed to act on many government agencies' warnings of possible corruption. She was ordered to pay half of the damages estimated at more than 20 billion baht ($608 million). The court annulled a 2016 order by the Finance Ministry for her to pay 35.7 billion baht ($1.1 billion) in compensation, saying Yingluck was not proven directly responsible for the alleged corruption. The rice subsidy program was a flagship policy that helped Yingluck's Pheu Thai Party win the 2011 general election. Under the program, the government paid farmers about 50% more than they would have received on the global market, with the intention of driving up prices by warehousing the grain. But other rice-producing countries captured the international rice market by selling at competitive prices. Thailand as a result lost its position as the world's leading rice exporter and large amounts of rice sat unsold in government warehouses. After the ruling, Yingluck posted on her Facebook page that she had no intention to cause damages and was being held responsible 'for a debt I did not cause.' Her lawyer Norrawit Larlaeng said her legal team plans to request a retrial. He said that the government had already sold the leftover rice from the subsidy program for around 200 billion baht ($6.08 billion), which covers all damages estimated by the Finance Ministry. Yingluck, the first female prime minister of Thailand, came to power in 2011, five years after her brother, former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, was toppled in a coup and fled abroad. Yingluck also was forced out by a military coup in 2014, and fled the country in 2017, ahead of a court verdict. She's been living in exile since then. Thaksin, a highly popular but divisive political figure, returned home in 2023 before being granted clemency in a corruption trial because of his age and health. Thailand's current Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra is Thaksin's daughter. Last year, Yingluck was cleared by a court on unrelated charges of mishandling funds for a government project in 2013. In December 2023, the court also cleared her of abuse of power in connection with a personnel transfer she had overseen.