Last Chance Prime Day Deal: This Portable Projector Is My Secret Weapon for Camping, and It's $180 Off
CNET's key takeaways
Anker's Nebula Mars 3 Air is a compact portable projector with a reasonable $599 price (and it's frequently available for less).
Despite its size, it delivers a bright picture and loud audio for a portable projector. It can even double as a Bluetooth speaker.
Its size is great for backyard movie nights or car camping, but might be a little large for backpackers.
I recently took an epic road trip through a land of giants, and there's only one compact projector I would take with me to complete my camping experience.
Anker's Nebula Mars 3 Air made my nights at Kings Canyon National Park, home of the world's largest grove of sequoia trees, even more picturesque, without taking up too much space.
I review projectors for CNET, and I've also built a DIY campervan, so I know that a lot of the best portable projectors sacrifice too much for their size. Not this one. With the side of my van (which is conveniently white) doubling as a screen, I rewatched some episodes of Andor I'd downloaded from Disney Plus after the sun went down at the campsite, capping off a beautiful day in nature with the right mix of bright picture, loud audio and portability.
If you want to watch a movie with the family while camping, and crowding around an iPad doesn't cut it -- this is the way to go.
My experience with the Mars 3 Air
As far as performance goes, the Mars 3 Air does quite well for its size and price. In my lab, I measured a contrast ratio of 405:1, which isn't amazing, but it's better than most portable projectors. That means the image doesn't look washed out or flat. (You can see all my testing data in my guide to the best portable projectors.)
Sound-wise, the 3 Air's two 8-watt speakers play loudly, offering performance similar to many Bluetooth speakers, which is fitting since it can also double as a Bluetooth speaker.
The battery life is good as well. You should be able to get around 2.5 hours of playtime for video and 8 hours if you're using it as a Bluetooth speaker. Disappointingly, it can't recharge via USB, so you'll need to connect to AC power to charge it.
The side of my campervan makes for a decent impromptu projector screen.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
What makes the Mars 3 Air the best portable projector option for camping trips is how it does everything well without doing anything particularly poorly. It's also very easy to use.
It runs on a full version of Google TV, so it has access to all the typical streaming services. Many portable projectors only have some streaming apps, and if they do support some streaming apps, they might not support the full versions of the apps, which can make portable projectors harder to use.
Keep in mind that the easiest way to watch shows and movies on the Mars 3 Air is to make your phone a hotspot. If you don't have service where you are, like in many national parks, you need to download shows and movies ahead of time. This can only be done via a mobile device connected with HDMI, and sometimes not even then, depending on your phone. Something else you'll want to keep in mind: This projector doesn't show full frame with a USB-to-HDMI.
The specs
Native resolution: 1080p
Lumens spec: 400
Lamp life: LED
HDMI inputs: 1
USB port: 1
Audio output: Headphone output
Internet: 2.4/5GHz
Battery life: 2.5 hours
While you wouldn't want to backpack with it, the Mars 3 Air is compact and shorter than my Jetboil MiniMo camp stove.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
Best July Prime Day Deals 2025
CNET's team of shopping experts have explored thousands of deals on everything from TVs and outdoor furniture to phone accessories and everyday essentials so you can shop the best Prime Day deals in one place.
See Now
CNET's buying advice
The Mars 3 Air is the best all-around portable projector because it does most things well, some things really well and almost nothing wrong. It looks good, sounds good and doesn't take up a lot of space.
There are two other options I want to talk about that might be better in certain situations. The first is Anker's own Capsule Air. It's the size of a soda can, making it even more portable than the Mars 3 Air. It also has Google TV built in, is battery powered, can double as a Bluetooth speaker and (unlike the Mars 3 Air) it can charge via USB-C. That means you can have longer viewing sessions between charges as long as you have a battery bank. It's dimmer and can't play as loud as the Mars 3 Air, however.
The other option is the AAXA M8. It's also much smaller than the Mars 3 Air, and significantly brighter and cheaper. Overall, it looks quite good, though its colors are pretty strange. It also has extremely loud fans, and the streaming options are far more limited. If you want to create larger-than-TV-sized images on the go and don't mind screaming little fans while you're watching, the M8 might work better for you than the Mars 3 Air.
The Anker Mars 3 Air is the best overall, though, and it's the one I'll be taking with me on my next trip.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
GPT-5's System Prompt Just Leaked. Here's What We Learned
GPT-5's system prompt just leaked to Github, showing what OpenAI wants ChatGPT to say, do, remember … and not do. Unsurprisingly, GPT-5 isn't allowed to reproduce song lyrics or any other copyrighted material, even if asked. And GPT-5 is told to not remember personal facts that 'could feel creepy,' or directly assert a user's race, ethnicity, religion, or criminal records. I've asked OpenAI for a comment, and will update this post if the company responds. A system prompt is a hidden set of instructions that tells an AI engine how to behave: what to do, and what not to do. Users will ordinarily never see this prompt, but it will influence all of their interactions with a smart LLM-based AI engine. What we can see from GPT-5's hidden system prompt is that OpenAI is getting much more aggressive about ensuring it delivers up-t0-date information. The system prompt mandates that GPT-5 use the web whenever relevant information could be fresh, niche, or high-stakes, and it will score a query's 'recency need' from zero to five. That's clearly an attempt to get more accurate. My daughter recently complained that ChatGPT got basic details about F1's summer break and next races wrong. She was using GPT-4o at the time; GPT-5 should make fewer mistakes that are easy to fix with a simple web search. Accuracy should be higher too, from another instruction: to check multiple sources for sensitive or high-stakes topics, like financial advice, health information, or legal matters, where OpenAI has instructed GPT-5 to 'always carefully check multiple reputable sources.' There are also new built-in tools for GTP-5 to be a better personal assistant. That includes long-term memory about a user, which ChatGPT calls 'bio,' and scheduled reminders and searches that could be very useful when using AI to help you stay organized and prepared. There's also a canvas for documents or computer code, file search capability, image generation and editing, and more. The canvas appears to be something that, perhaps in the future, users could co-create documents and computer code hand-in-hand with the AI system. All of these should help GPT-5 not only be more helpful in the moment, but also remember more context and state. About that 'bio' tool: OpenAI doesn't want GPT-5 to remember too much potentially sensitive information about you. In addition to race, religion, and sexual identity, this is the sort of data that OpenAI does not want GPT-5 to store or remember: However, there is an exception to all of these rules: if you decide you want GPT-5 to remember something specific. 'The exception to all of the above instructions … is if the user explicitly requests that you save or forget information,' the system prompt states. 'In this case, you should always call the bio tool to respect their request.' In other words, GPT-5 will be as personal with you as you wish to be with it, which seems fair.
WIRED
31 minutes ago
- WIRED
A Special Diamond Is the Key to a Fully Open Source Quantum Sensor
Aug 9, 2025 2:40 PM Quantum sensors can be used in medical technologies, navigation systems, and more, but they're too expensive for most people. That's where the Uncut Gem open source project comes in. Photo-Illustration: Wired Staff/Quantum Village Quantum computing is either a distant dream or an imminent reality depending on who you ask. And while much of this year's Quantum Village at the Defcon security conference in Las Vegas is focused on emerging research and threat analysis, village cofounders Victoria Kumaran and Mark Carney are also working to make a currently available quantum technology more accessible to hackers and anyone else. In a main-stage Defcon talk on Saturday, the pair will present an open source and affordable quantum sensor that can serve a variety of uses, from medical technologies to GPS alternatives. And it's all powered by a special yet affordable diamond with particular atomic properties. The first generation design could be assembled for about $120 to $160 depending on suppliers and shipping times. The second version that Kumaran and Carney are presenting this weekend can be built for even less, and the pair says that they will release a third version this fall based on community testing and input that they hope will cost just $50 to build. Quantum sensors detect extremely slight variations in magnetic and electrical fields, enabling ultra-precise measurements. Atomic clocks that keep nearly perfect time, for example, are quantum sensors that have been in use for decades. For researchers and enthusiasts interested in learning more about quantum sensing, though, the barrier to entry has been quite high. So the Quantum Village's relatively affordable, open source 'Uncut Gem' project creates a real opportunity for more people to build their own quantum sensors and explore the technology. 'You can do things you wouldn't have been able to do before, like using quantum sensors to start building portable MRI-style devices that can be used in all different countries,' Kumaran told WIRED ahead of their presentation. 'These are diamonds with defects, synthetic diamonds that are the cheapest off-cuts you can get. I think there's something a bit poetic that synthetic diamonds have this utility.' Most of the components needed for the quantum sensor are simple off-the-shelf computing parts, but the diamond needs to be what's known as a 'nitrogen-vacancy diamond.' Its special molecular properties are thanks to the presence of nitrogen atoms that replace some carbon atoms in the diamond's atomic structure. In addition to potential medical applications, quantum sensors can be used in alternative navigation technologies that track electromagnetic wave interference. Such tools could be used as local alternatives to GPS in the case of global system failures or targeted jamming. US Space Force is currently testing what a release called the 'highest-performing quantum inertial sensor ever tested in space.' For the vast majority of people who don't have access to the world's highest performing quantum sensors, though, the Uncut Gem project represents an opportunity to democratize and expand quantum sensing technology. The project joins others in different fields of hacking that have been geared toward low-cost, accessible designs and components. Independent researcher Davide Gessa has been testing the Uncut Gem schematics and code. 'I'm in the final phase of casting the diamond with the electronics—I hope to finish the device in about two weeks,' Gessa told WIRED. 'I'm following the instructions from the official project, but I made some customizations, too. My hope is to exploit this device to do some quantum computing experiments and also use it for random number generation. All my edits will be open source, so everyone can replicate and improve it.' Uncut Gem prototype sensors have already been able to detect magnetic wave fluctuations in a chaotic conference hall as well as a heartbeat from a few feet away from a subject. Software is vital in quantum sensing, because even the most refined and high-quality hardware still picks up noise in the environment that needs to be reconciled and filtered to focus the sensor's output on the intended detection. 'The reason we're calling it the first fully open source is because, to the best I've found, other papers give you some schematics—and we've referenced those—but there's no one other place that you could go that has the PCB [printed circuit board], the source of diamonds, the designs, the schematics, the firmware, and also a repository of knowledge about how it works so you can get started,' Carney, of the Quantum Village, told WIRED. While quantum sensors, and certainly the Uncut Gem sensor, still have a long way to go before delivering the accuracy and ease-of-use of a Star Trek tricorder, Carney and Kumaran emphasize that the purpose of the project is simply to get actual quantum technology out to the world as quickly as possible. 'Open sourcing this is really important to us,' Carney says. 'Is it a good sensor? Excuse me, but fuck no. There are much better sensors. Could it be a better sensor? Absolutely, and that will happen if we can get people to take part in open source and iterate it.'
Forbes
35 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why Big Tech's AI Billions Are Being Rewarded Unevenly
On July 30, Microsoft's market cap briefly soared past $4 trillion after the company reported another earnings beat. CEO Satya Nadella credited Azure's AI-driven growth and surging demand for copilot, telling investors the company was 'well-positioned to lead in the new era of AI-infused productivity,' according to its Q4 earnings call transcript. A day later, Meta's stock surged more than 8% after it reported ad revenue growth of 17% year-over-year and outlined new AI-powered tools for advertisers, details also captured in the Q2 earnings call transcript. On the other side of the divide, the mood was far less exuberant for Amazon and Apple. Both beat Wall Street's earnings expectations, but their stock moves were muted — and in Amazon's case, 'shares slipped despite reporting $147 billion in revenue. Apple unveiled 'Apple Intelligence' for iPhones, iPads and Macs, but offered few specifics on rollout or monetization. The contrast wasn't about who spent the most on AI. It was about which companies could convincingly connect that spending to measurable business results. That shift — from hype to proof — is redefining how the market judges AI investments. And that split is getting much harder to ignore across the industry. The AI Accountability Era When I asked what the recent earnings call by these four tech behemoths meant for the AI industry, Shekhar Natarajan, CEO of Orchestro, described it in blunt terms, calling it the new reality. 'Microsoft and Meta won because they mastered the art of AI storytelling with receipts,' he told me. 'Microsoft essentially turned OpenAI into the world's most expensive enterprise sales tool — every Azure deal now comes with an AI fairy tale that CFOs actually believe. Meta took the opposite approach: they made AI so invisible that advertisers don't even realize they're paying premium rates for algorithmic wizardry.' In contrast, he said, Amazon and Apple are 'AI rich, narrative poor.' Amazon 'built the most sophisticated AI infrastructure on the planet and somehow made it sound boring,' while Apple 'spent billions making Siri slightly less embarrassing and called it revolutionary.' That, Natarajan argued, is no longer enough. 'We've entered what I call the 'AI accountability era' — where investors have figured out that 'synergies' and 'transformation' don't pay dividends, but revenue does. The market essentially said: 'Cool demo, where's the recurring subscription model?'' This shift is merciless for companies still leaning on AI as a catch-all talking point. 'The next 12–18 months will be a bloodbath for AI tourism — expect pivots from 'AI-powered everything' to 'AI-profitable something specific,'' Natarajan noted. What Investors Reward Now Guy Dassa, AI expert and investment partner at OurCrowd, agrees the earnings gap isn't about AI spend levels, but about visibility and execution. 'The market is no longer rewarding AI spending in a vacuum, it's rewarding clarity, execution, and monetization,' he explained. Microsoft tied its AI investments directly to Azure's revenue growth and to customer adoption of copilot across office and enterprise workflows. Meta demonstrated that AI-driven ad targeting and content recommendations are keeping users engaged and advertisers spending more. Amazon and Apple, Dassa said, were 'more opaque' — investors heard about model development and branding, but saw little in the way of measurable revenue attribution. 'Yes, we're entering a post-hype phase,' he added. 'The narrative is shifting from potential to performance. Investors are asking: Where is the revenue? Where is the efficiency gain? Where is the user growth? Companies can no longer get by with vague promises or flashy demos — they need to show productized AI, enterprise adoption, or embedded monetization.' According to IDC, companies are now generating an average of $3.50 in value for every $1 spent on AI, with more than 90% of initiatives delivering measurable returns within 18 months. In practical terms, Dassa explained, that means investor decks will focus less on model size and more on use case adoption, margin expansion and defensible infrastructure. 'AI is no longer a strategy; it's an execution layer,' he added. The New AI Differentiator If 2023 was about who had the biggest model, 2025 is about who can deploy one seamlessly at scale. 'Here's the dirty secret nobody talks about: Building great AI models is now table stakes,' said Natarajan. 'Every teenager with a GitHub account can fine-tune GPT. The real money is in the unglamorous stuff — who can serve a model in 50 milliseconds instead of 500, who can handle inference spikes without melting their data centers.' That's where infrastructure maturity becomes visible in market performance. Dassa noted that Microsoft's lead in enterprise AI is underpinned by Azure's GPU access, inference optimization and integration pipelines — capabilities it has been quietly scaling for years. Meta's advantage comes from running AI models across one of the most extensive proprietary stacks in tech, tuned for ad delivery at global scale. 'Meanwhile,' Dassa noted, 'companies without robust infrastructure or with unclear integration plans are struggling to convince investors they can translate models into money.' The analogy Natarajan draws is to the internet boom of the late 1990s. 'Everyone focused on websites while the real winners were building CDNs and payment processors,' he said. 'Today's AI infrastructure leaders are tomorrow's Cloudflares and Stripes.' AI Execution Needs People Capital spending alone won't win the next phase of AI adoption. Kieran Corbett, venture partner at Geek Ventures, put it plainly: 'CAPEX for CAPEX sake will no longer be tolerated by shareholders, tangible growth and execution is what will be rewarded by further capital. Where so much of this AI spend is now being spent on is the talent race to enable effective execution and this doesn't look like it'll slow down.' In other words, execution isn't just about GPUs and data centers. It's about whether a company can attract and retain the talent to turn its AI investments into differentiated products, integrated workflows and sticky revenue streams. That talent race is intensifying, particularly for engineers who can bridge the gap between research and deployment. And for public companies, the stakes are higher than just quarterly earnings calls. Miss the execution mark now, and it's not only market cap that suffers, but also the competitive positioning for the rest of the decade. Time To Build Real Stuff Microsoft and Meta didn't simply benefit from favorable market winds this quarter. They earned investor confidence by pairing clear AI narratives with visible revenue impact, backed by infrastructure and teams that can deliver at scale. Amazon and Apple may close that gap in future quarters, but Q2 sent a message the market won't soon forget: the AI free ride is over. As Natarajan put it, 'We funded your AI fantasy camp. Time to build an AI business.'
