logo
Abused and abandoned immigrant youth on special visas fear the future after Trump changes

Abused and abandoned immigrant youth on special visas fear the future after Trump changes

NBC News16-07-2025
Rodrigo Sandoval, 17, just graduated from high school in South Carolina. He gets excited when he talks about what he'd like to do — he's interested in business administration, graphic design or joining the Navy — but his face becomes solemn when he talks about the future.
'I've noticed a lot of changes, especially in the Hispanic community. We live in constant fear of being deported, arrested and all that,' said Sandoval, who came to the U.S. at age 12, fleeing El Salvador due to gang violence that threatened his and his family's life.
One of his earliest memories is when he was 5.
'It's one of my traumas because they put a gun to my head. All I remember is crying out of fear,' said Sandoval, who is a beneficiary of the Special Immigrant Juvenile Status classification.
The SIJS classification, created by Congress in 1990 as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act, protects immigrant minors who have been victims of abuse, abandonment or neglect in their countries and gives them a path to permanent residency in the U.S. They must be under 21 or under 18 in some states, including South Carolina, where Sandoval lives.
Last month, the Trump administration ended a measure in place since 2022 that automatically issued the young immigrants work permits and protection from deportation as they waited for their green card applications, which can take years.
'Once they're approved for special immigrant juvenile status, they're put on a waiting list, which is currently very, very long. We typically tell clients it'll probably take more than four or five years,' Jennifer Bade, an immigration attorney based in Boston said in an interview with Noticias Telemundo.
Now after changes under the Trump administration, work permit and Social Security applications must be processed separately, complicating the process for many young people because, in many cases, granting the applications depends on visa availability.
'It's very strange that they're in that category because SIJS is about humanitarian protection for young immigrants. There shouldn't be visa limits for these young people,' said Rachel Davidson, director of the End SIJS Backlog Coalition, a nonprofit organization that advises SIJS recipients and proposes solutions to tackle the backlog in their green card applications.
Verónica Tobar Thronson, a professor at Michigan State University's School of Law, said many of these young immigrants may not be able to get work permits or renew current ones. 'If they don't have a work permit or an ID, they can't travel, they can't enter a federal building, they can't apply for a Social Security number — they also don't qualify for student loans if they enroll in college, and in some states, they can't apply for assistance with medical or social services because they don't qualify for anything at all.'
In information sent to Noticias Telemundo, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services stated that foreign nationals from Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras currently make up the majority of SIJS applicants, 'and collectively represent more than 70% of all SIJS applications,' although they did not specify the total number.
USCIS stated to Noticias Telemundo that while it's not rescinding protection from deportation from those who already have it, it has the 'right to rescind the grant of deferred action and revoke the related employment authorization at any time, at its discretion.'
A long wait for green card status
More than 107,000 young SIJS beneficiaries from 151 countries were on the waiting list to apply for a green card as of March 2023, according to data collected by groups such as the End SIJS Backlog Coalition and Tulane Law School's Immigrant Rights Clinic.
Of the approximately 280,000 SIJS applications approved in the last 12 fiscal years, 'more than 139,000 have been filed or approved for adjustment of status," according to USCIS.
The current processing time for applications for the program (the SIJ I-360 form) is less than five months, according to USCIS. However, the annual visa cap creates a bottleneck because, regardless of the speed of SIJS processing, the number of visas issued remains the same.
Both Rodrigo Sandoval and his 20-year-old sister, Alexandra, have already been approved for SIJS but are on the waiting list to apply for permanent residency. Both Alexandra's and her brother Rodrigo's work permits expire in 2026, and according to their lawyer, they still have three to five years to wait before adjusting their status.
Though they currently have protections under SIJS, Alexandra is still worried about what could happen. "If the police stop us and ask for our documents, it's all over because we risk being deported.'
Hiromi Gómez, a 17-year-old student with SIJS, said it took her nine years to get to apply for a green card, "and I still haven't received it." She worries about more recent young immigrants who will have a harder time securing protections due to recent changes.
Exploring options
Khristina Siletskaya is a South Carolina-based immigration attorney who, among other things, handles cases involving SIJS beneficiaries, including the Sandoval siblings. The Ukrainian-born attorney said that despite changes in U.S. immigration policies, 'all hope is not lost.'
'This new change that everyone is talking about eliminated the automatic granting of deferred action (from deportation). However, the United States continues to approve cases of special immigrant juvenile status; that continues to operate normally,' the lawyer explained.
Siletskaya and other experts emphasize that the recent changes are a return to the past, because the automatic granting of deferred action and work permits was implemented in May 2022 but did not exist before. Attorneys for young people with SIJS are exploring other legal avenues to assist them in their search for protection.
'Does this mean young people can't get Social Security? First, you can try the Department of Social Services. Often, you may be able to get Social Security, but it will indicate that you're not eligible for work purposes,' Siletskaya said. 'So young people could at least get emergency Medicaid, but that will depend on each state.'
Regarding work permits, the attorney said there are ways to try to obtain one. The first is to apply for one separately and ask USCIS to grant it. Siletskaya said she has several cases where they've initiated this process, but warns that she has not yet received a response in those cases.
Another option explored by attorneys is to obtain a work permit based on parole, since a young person with SIJS is often granted parole as they work to adjust their status and obtain a green card.
Following the recent changes to SIJS, a group of 19 lawmakers led by Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., sent a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem expressing concern about the changes. The letter said it "leaves abused and abandoned youth in legal limbo while heightening their vulnerability to exploitation.'
In the letter, the members of Congress said they had received reports 'of an increase in the number of detentions and deportations of SIJS beneficiaries.'
Cortez Masto and other Democrats introduced the Vulnerable Immigrant Youth Protection Act in Congress, seeking to change visa categories for SIJS beneficiaries and prevent delays in adjusting their status, among other things. But the lack of Republican lawmakers supporting it could hamper its passage.
The bill is still in its early stages of discussion in the Senate, according to Cortez Masto's office, and members of Congress have not yet received an official response to the letter sent to Noem.
'Not give up'
Both Siletskaya and other attorneys consulted by Noticias Telemundo recommend that young people with SIJS avoid taking risks and remain cautious.
"Don't get into trouble. If you don't have a driver's license, let your friends drive. Stay discreet, respect the law, stay out of situations where you might be exposed, and wait until you receive your green card,' she said.
Despite immigration changes and other challenges, Rodrigo Sandoval said he wanted to make the most of every minute of his work permit, which expires next year. That's why he has two jobs: He's a barber and also works on construction sites to help his family.
'My message to people is to keep fighting and keep dreaming big. I don't think there are limits because we as Hispanics are fighters. And this comes from other generations,' he said, getting emotional. 'The truth is, what we have to do is not give up.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sean 'Diddy' Combs' lawyer denies knowledge of Trump pardon
Sean 'Diddy' Combs' lawyer denies knowledge of Trump pardon

Metro

time28 minutes ago

  • Metro

Sean 'Diddy' Combs' lawyer denies knowledge of Trump pardon

Last month, it was reported that President Donald Trump was 'seriously considering' pardoning Sean 'Diddy' Combs after he was found guilty of two charges of transportation to engage in prostitution in a highly publicised trial. However, the music mogul's lawyer has now rebutted any knowledge of such a thing. In early July, following three days of jury deliberations, Combs, 55, was handed a guilty verdict for two of the five charges he faced in his racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking trial. He was found not guilty of the most serious offences. Having been denied bail, the rapper remains in custody pending sentencing, which is scheduled for October. Recently, it was claimed by a member of Combs' legal team that they had contacted the Trump administration for a potential pardon. Consequently, a petition was signed by thousands of people, demanding that the pardon not happen. Speaking to CNN, lawyer Nicole Westmoreland said: 'It's my understanding that we've reached out (to the White House) and had conversations in reference to a pardon.' While no further details were divulged, Westmoreland added said her client is 'a very hopeful person', adding: 'I believe that he remains hopeful.' A pardon exempts a convicted person from serving their sentence. It represents legal forgiveness, restoring a person's rights, such as being able to vote or run for public office. So far, in his role as the 47th president of the United States, Trump, 79, has pardoned over 1,500 individuals. However, another of Combs' lawyers has now said he doesn't believe the musician will be added to the list. Combs' lead attorney, Marc Agnifilo, told CBS News that he has no knowledge of the alleged pardon, saying: 'I have nothing to do with a possible pardon.' 'I have had conversations with nobody. I have not spoken to the president. I have not spoken to anybody who speaks to the president about Sean Combs. I have not,' he added. Agnifilo also clarified that a possible pardon has not been discussed with Combs either, except for informing him of what's been reported in the press. 'He says, 'Go tell him (Trump) that I need a pardon. Go tell him I deserve a pardon.' That's what he said.' To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video While a senior official in the president's administration declined to comment on the matter to CBS, they said that any decision reached would be announced directly by Trump. The Republican leader has previously spoken about Combs publicly, stating that he would 'certainly look at the facts' regarding a pardon for the American producer. 'I know people are thinking about it,' he told a press conference in May. 'People have been very close to asking.' He added: 'I would certainly look at the facts. If I think somebody is mistreated, whether they like me or don't like me, it wouldn't have any impact on me.' However, last week, Trump commented further, saying Combs, who pleaded not guilty to all his charges, was 'half-innocent'. He also said it was 'more likely a no' that he would be pardoned. Trump, who also served as the 45th president from 2017 to 2021, was once on good terms with Combs, having been called a 'friend' by the former Apprentice host. In 2015, shortly after Trump launched his first campaign, Combs also declared him 'a friend of mine', with Trump having previously attended several of Combs' VIP parties and events in New York. Expanding on their so-called relationship, the president said in May that they hadn't seen each other or spoken 'in years'. 'He used to really like me a lot, but I think when I ran for politics, that relationship busted up. I read some little bit nasty statements in the paper all of a sudden.' Trump doubled down once again on August 1, telling Newsmax host Rob Finnerty: 'I got along with him great, and [he] seemed like a nice guy. I didn't know him well. 'But when I ran for office, he was very hostile. It's hard, you know? We're human beings. And we don't like to have things cloud our judgment, right? 'But when you knew someone and you were fine, and then you run for office, and he made some terrible statements. So I don't know … it makes it more difficult to do.' The remarks Trump was referring to are likely those from 2017 when Combs told the Daily Beast: 'I think that, to be honest, we don't really give a f**k about Trump, because [Black people are] in the same f***ed-up position. So that's not what we're on.' In 2020, he added to radio host Charlamagne tha God that 'white men like Trump need to be banished' because their 'way of thinking is real dangerous'. 'This man literally threatened the lives of us and our families about going to vote … The number one priority is to get Trump out of office,' he commented. More Trending Currently, Combs, who was arrested in September last year, is facing up to 20 years behind bars, but a much shorter sentence is expected. Instead, it has been estimated that he could serve two to five years, taking into account his time already served. Combs' attorneys have requested bail a number of times already, including on the day of his verdict. All have been denied. Judge Arun Subramanian will ultimately decide his fate when he returns to court on October 3. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Kelly Clarkson's ex Brandon Blackstock's daughter announced her pregnancy weeks before his death MORE: Sharon Osbourne shares Ozzy's final heartbreaking words about his fans MORE: Stranger Things star announces engagement to longtime partner after secret proposal

What Putin wants from talks with Trump
What Putin wants from talks with Trump

New Statesman​

time29 minutes ago

  • New Statesman​

What Putin wants from talks with Trump

Photo by Alamy For several months now, Donald Trump has been promising to get tough on Vladimir Putin, warning, repeatedly, that his patience is running out. 'Vladimir, STOP!' Trump commanded in a Truth Social post on 24 April after the latest barrage of Russian missile and drone attacks on Kyiv, to no discernible effect. 'We're gonna find out whether or not [Putin is] tapping us along,' the US president vowed on 28 May, 'And if he is, we'll respond a little bit differently.' By July, he had dispensed with the niceties. 'We get a lot of bullshit thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,' Trump told reporters at the start of a cabinet meeting on 8 July. 'He's very nice to us all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.' Trump duly set a 50-day deadline for Putin to mend his ways. Then, when it became clear that Russia was, in fact, only escalating its assault on Ukraine, he shortened the timeline to '10 or 12 days' during his meeting with Keir Starmer in Scotland on 28 July. As he returned home on Air Force One the following day, he clarified that the final deadline for Putin to agree a ceasefire would be '10 days from today.' And yet, 24 hours before that deadline was due to expire, with no indication that Russia is any closer to halting its attacks, the Kremlin announced that Putin and Trump had agreed to meet, perhaps as early as next week. The Russians claimed it was the Americans who had requested the meeting. Washington said it was Moscow's idea. Putin suggested they could meet in the United Arab Emirates. 'I think we'll decide, but this would be a perfectly suitable place,' he said on 7 July. The White House then injected fresh confusion into the situation by insisting that Trump would only meet Putin if he also agreed to meet Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelensky. The Russian leader responded that this was 'possible' but only if 'certain conditions' were created first, and 'unfortunately, we are still far from that.' Or to put that more plainly: no – or at least not until after many more months of prevarication and delay. (The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, later said that Trump was 'open' to meeting Putin even if he did not agree to meet Zelensky.) If Trump and Putin do meet, without any meaningful concessions from the Russian leader in advance, then this will rightly be celebrated as a diplomatic victory in the Kremlin. At a minimum, Putin will have won yet another reprieve from the prospect of imminent US action, as well as an end to the diplomatic isolation that had been imposed by the West. No US presidents – and vanishingly few European leaders – have agreed to sit down with Putin since the start of his full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. As the Russian opposition activist and former chess champion Garry Kasparov wrote on social media in response to reports of the planned meeting: 'It's a process of normalising and elevating [Putin], offering him concessions and lifelines that only embolden him to further aggression.' The Russian leader also has reason to believe that he can, perhaps, extract even more from his US counterpart. In their past interactions, Trump has proved to be highly susceptible to flattery, openly admiring of Putin, and inclined to take his word over, say, the clear conclusions of his own intelligence agencies. During their infamous summit in Helsinki in 2018, Trump defended Putin against allegations of Russian-meddling in the 2016 US presidential election during a joint press conference, telling reporters, 'I don't see any reason why it would be [Russia],' as Putin smirked alongside him. He presumably likes his chances of emerging with a renewed declaration of friendship – and promises to do great business deals in the future – if he can get a few hours alone in a room with Trump. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Putin will similarly be well aware that Trump's abiding concern over the past few months seems to be how he has been treated by the Russian leader. It is not the fundamental injustice of Russia's assault on Ukraine – or the troubling precedent this sets for other autocrats weighing their own wars of aggression – that appears to offend Trump, so much as the sense that Putin has been feeding him 'bullshit' and 'tapping' him along, dangling the prospect of peace talks during their 'lovely' phone conversations, and then bombing Ukrainian civilians later that night. Trump has made clear since last year's election campaign that his main interest in the conflict is ending it, and perhaps winning a Nobel Peace Prize in the process, not in securing a viable future for Ukraine as a sovereign state and pushing back against the threat to European security. He has derided Zelensky as a 'dictator' while declining to use the same term for Putin, publicly humiliated the Ukrainian president in the Oval Office, and dismissed the conflict during a meeting with Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte last month as 'a Biden War.' 'There are no winners here,' he insisted on 15 July, 'This is a loser.' He did not exactly sound like a leader who is intent on ensuring a fair settlement for Ukraine and backing Zelensky, as Biden repeatedly promised, for 'as long as it takes.' Putin's objectives in this war have always gone far beyond merely seizing territory in Ukraine. He wants to ensure the country's subjugation, the capitulation of its elected leaders, the imposition of strict limits on its armed forces, and the end of any possibility that Ukraine might, one day, be admitted to Nato. In his wildest dreams, perhaps he also imagines that he can redraw the post-Cold War security architecture of Europe and roll back what he views as Nato's treacherous eastward expansion. With Trump so clearly signalling his lack of interest in the fundamental principles at stake in this conflict, Putin may well be keen to assess the prospects for a settlement on his terms. Failing that, he will at least have bought more time to pursue these objectives on the battlefield. This is not the first time Trump has blundered into a high-profile summit with a US adversary, apparently convinced that the talks themselves were a form of victory and that he alone could secure a resolution that had eluded decades of American diplomacy. In 2018, he became the first sitting US president to meet a North Korean leader when he shook hands with Kim Jong Un in Singapore, a feat that neither the young dictator's father or his grandfather had managed to achieve. The nascent bromance abruptly ended during their second meeting in Hanoi the following year when it became clear to Trump, as any analyst of North Korea could have told him, that Kim was not seriously interesting in giving up his nuclear arsenal after all. Instead, by the end of Trump's first term, Kim's weapons programme was only more advanced. Like Kim, Putin has long wanted this meeting. He has been hinting since Trump's return to office in January that they should sit down together and 'talk calmly about all areas that are of interest to both the US and Russia.' Perhaps Trump has learned from his past experience that there are limits to what his personal charisma and supposed dealmaking prowess can achieve, but it seems more likely that he believes that this time, this summit, this great new deal, will prove to be the charm, and perhaps, finally, the key to that Nobel prize. No wonder Putin seems so convinced he can keep tapping him along. [See also: North Korea's guide to going nuclear] Related

Trump's attempts to distance himself from the Epstein files are failing
Trump's attempts to distance himself from the Epstein files are failing

The Guardian

time29 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump's attempts to distance himself from the Epstein files are failing

One of Trump's preternatural abilities is his apparent animal instinct to lie on the spot whenever he senses he might be cornered. His initial Pavlovian training by his mob lawyer Roy Cohn and subsequent experience in more than 4,000 lawsuits and countless scandals seem to have ingrained in him that lying, the more outrageous the better, buys him time, plays to his credulous followers as insouciant defiance, and wears down his accusers. When Trump's distractions failed to distract from the Jeffrey Epstein files, he offered a story without missing a beat to distance himself from any taint. In his tale, he was traduced by Epstein. Trump was taken advantage of, violated, despoiled. There could be no guilt by association; Trump was a victim, too. Perhaps, after claiming to no effect that Barack Obama, Joe Biden and the former FBI director James Comey had fabricated the files, he felt that he had at last found ground where he could gain some traction. Trump always designates a scapegoat, but neither Tren de Agua nor Hunter Biden would fit with Epstein. All along, Trump has missed the easiest and most obvious scapegoat. Why not blame Epstein for Epstein? Trump just needed to invent a story. He began by blurting on 28 July: 'But for years, I wouldn't talk to Jeffrey Epstein. I wouldn't talk because he did something that was inappropriate. He hired help, and I said, 'Don't ever do that again.' He stole people that worked for me. I said, 'Don't ever do that again.' He did it again. And I threw him out of the place – persona non grata. I threw him out, and that was it. I'm glad I did, if you want to know the truth.' After establishing the premise of his story, he added more detail the next day. 'People that work in the spa – I have a great spa, one of the best spas in the world at Mar-a-Lago – and people were taken out of the spa, hired by him. In other words, gone. And other people would come and complain, 'This guy is taking people from the spa.' I didn't know that. He took people that worked for me. And I told him, 'Don't do it any more.' And he did it. I said, 'Stay the hell out of here.'' A reporter followed up to ask if any of those employees were young women, an opportunity for further Trump story enhancement. 'The answer is yes, they were in the spa,' Trump said. 'I told him, I said, 'Listen, we don't want you taking our people, whether it was spa or not spa' … And he was fine. And then not too long after that, he did it again.' Then Trump was asked if one of those young women was Virginia Giuffre, who was exploited by Epstein beginning at age 16 in 2000 until she escaped his clutches in 2002, eventually filing lawsuits against him that helped break the case open. 'I think she worked at the spa,' Trump replied. 'I think that was one of the people, yeah. He stole her.' He added, 'And by the way, she had no complaints about us, as you know – none whatsoever.' Trump's self-defensive remarks were an accumulation of lies and distortions, each one at risk of tumbling on the next. Unfortunately, it was contradicted by the factual timeline. And his comments about Giuffre, the tragically abused child who bore witness, for whom he offered not a word of sympathy, depicting her as stolen property, offended the Giuffre family, who came forward to denounce his heartlessness. 'It was shocking to hear President Trump invoke our sister and say that he was aware that Virginia had been 'stolen' from Mar-a-Lago,' read the family's statement. This was not the public relations success that Trump had hoped for to lay the Epstein scandal to rest. Trump suggested in his story that Giuffre was only one of the 'people' Epstein had poached from him. In his telling, he first warned Epstein before he 'stole' Giuffre. In fact, it was Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend and accomplice, who recruited Giuffre and participated in her sexual abuse. There is no record of others than Giuffre recruited from the Mar-a-Lago spa. Trump's story of multiple 'people' and his warning to Epstein are baseless. Still, the ever reliable White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt stated: 'The fact remains that President Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his club for being a creep to his female employees.' Trump went on Newsmax to praise her, the press secretary, as if she were the winner of a modeling contest: 'She's become a star. It's that face, it's that brain, it's those lips, the way they move, they move like she's a machine gun.' It was true Trump had not spoken 'for years' to Epstein. But there his truthfulness ended. Three years after Trump claimed he had cut his ties to Epstein for stealing Giuffre, in 2003, Trump sent him a risqué poem celebrating his 50th birthday inside his drawing of a naked woman, signing his name to represent pubic hair, according to the Wall Street Journal. 'We have certain things in common, Jeffrey … A pal is a wonderful thing … and may every day be a wonderful secret.' According to the Washington Post, their relationship ruptured not in 2000 as Trump claimed, but in 2004 over a real estate rivalry to purchase a Palm Beach estate. Trump, whose casinos went bankrupt that year, somehow found the cash to outbid Epstein. Four years later, Trump sold the estate to a Russian oligarch closely tied to Vladimir Putin for double the price, at $95m. 'Don't say Russian,' Trump told a reporter from the Palm Beach Post. He urged the reporter just to write 'foreign'. Trump and Epstein socialized together for years with 'young women', some underage, and often with models, including a party for 'calendar girls' at Mar-a-Lago in 1992, where the two were the only other guests, and Trump's alleged groping of the model Stacey Williams in Trump Tower with Epstein present in 1993. Trump denies these allegations. 'Epstein enjoyed hanging out backstage at beauty pageants and fashion shows with his Palm Beach and New York neighbor and friend Donald Trump, former models said,' the Miami Herald reported. Trump himself owned three beauty pageants. He described going backstage on the Howard Stern radio talk show in 2005: 'You know they're standing there with no clothes … And you see these incredible looking women. And so I sort of get away with things like that.' Trump created Trump Model Management, also known as T Models, in 1999. T Models recruited girls as young as 14 to the US on tourist visas with lavish promises of fame and fortune, and once they arrived paid them minimally. 'It is like modern-day slavery,' said one of the models, Rachel Blais. 'Honestly, they are the most crooked agency I've ever worked for, and I've worked for quite a few.' Epstein wanted a modeling agency of his own. He admired Trump's T Models and sought to replicate it. He invested in one based in Paris operated by Jean-Luc Brunel, a model agency head who was also accused of sex trafficking. Courtney Powell Soerensen, a model, told the Miami Herald: 'Epstein had to have his slimy peons and Brunel was the ideal person to do the job.' Brunel had been the subject of a 60 Minutes exposé as an alleged sexual abuser of models in 1988. In New York, in the 1990s, Brunel lived in Trump Tower. 'The modeling agency was the perfect vehicle for Epstein to get more victims,' Giuffre said. Heather Braden, a model, told the Miami Herald she saw Brunel, Epstein and Trump at parties together frequently in the early 1990s. Brunel was charged with rape in 2021 and died by apparent suicide in a French prison in 2022, about two years after Epstein's apparent suicide. Trump had never before told his self-exonerating story about how he had broken with Epstein over Giuffre. But he had spoken publicly about his relationship with Epstein in 2002, when he rejoiced in their friendship to New York magazine: 'Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it – Jeffrey enjoys his social life.' Little remarked upon in the citation of this quote was that Trump's response to the writer appears intended to offer a more positive and vivid picture of Epstein, at least in Trump's eyes, than the reclusive and serious image Epstein was trying to promote. Trump's description was preceded in the article by this set-up: 'Epstein likes to tell people that he's a loner, a man who's never touched alcohol or drugs, and one whose nightlife is far from energetic. And yet if you talk to Donald Trump, a different Epstein emerges.' Trump, always seeking to elevate himself, preened in talking about Epstein as following his example as a Casanova. Now he continues to stonewall the public over the Epstein files. Days after Maxwell was interviewed by the deputy attorney general Todd Blanche in her Florida prison, she was granted transfer to a minimal security penitentiary in Texas. Her move heightens the intrigue surrounding her deposition, which the administration is keeping secret despite calls by Democratic senators for its release. By invoking Giuffre, Trump has activated her family. They were enraged by the favor suddenly granted to Maxwell and wonder whether it is part of a deal. 'President Trump has sent a clear message today: pedophiles deserve preferential treatment and their victims do not matter,' read their statement. 'This move smacks of a cover-up. The victims deserve better.' Trump's ill-conceived story about Giuffre has undermined rather than bolstered him in maintaining control of the storyline. Sidney Blumenthal is a Guardian US columnist

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store