In the shadow of a tainted election, Maduro asks Venezuelans to vote again
In the last vote, Maduro claimed victory despite a count that showed he had lost by a decisive margin. He then released a reign of terror on protesters, hundreds of whom are still locked up. This time, the election is for members of the Legislature, known as the National Assembly, and for governors in the country's 23 states.
No independent monitors will be present, and inside Venezuela, many have said they believe that the results will once again be manufactured. Maduro is holding the election, analysts say, to project a veneer, however thin, of democracy.
'It serves only to give new life to the status quo,' said Benigno Alarcón, the director of the Center for Political and Government Studies at the Andrés Bello Catholic University in Caracas, Venezuela.
And yet there are opposition candidates participating.
The vote has reopened a rift among opposition activists, who had mostly united last year around the candidacy of Edmundo González, a former ambassador who won more than 60% of the presidential vote, according to a ballot count reviewed by the Carter Center, an independent monitoring group.
González's most important supporter was María Corina Machado, a charismatic figure who had become the movement's undisputed leader but whom the government had barred from running.
Now opposition figures and voters are divided over participation.
On one side, Machado is calling on Venezuelans to abstain as a means of protest, claiming the vote is a 'trap' designed to legitimize the government of an autocrat. On the other, a cluster of other activists are not only running for office but calling on Venezuelans to head to the ballot box -- also as a means of protest.
Maduro might not allow Venezuelans to choose who governs them, they argue. But the vote can be used as a political weapon all the same, signaling to leaders that people want them out.
The goal is that people see that opposition leaders are active -- that they are campaigning, that an alternative is possible, that they are laying the groundwork for future democratic action.
'We can't just cede the path and let them say they won without resistance,' said Juan Requesens, 36, who emerged as a leader of anti-Maduro protests in 2014, then spent two years in prison and more time under house arrest before being released in 2023.
Before the election, the government lifted bans on political participation for a few opposition activists, including Henrique Capriles, a former governor and two-time presidential candidate. It is a tactic the Maduro government has used before -- permitting some activists to run, while banning others -- as a means to divide the opposition.
On Friday, government agents detained Juan Pablo Guanipa, a prominent politician and ally of Machado's.
Tarek William Saab, the country's chief prosecutor, argued that Guanipa was part of a criminal group that sought to unleash violence to prevent Sunday's vote, and said he had been detained along with 70 other people, including foreigners.
The government often makes such claims about opponents.
There are already roughly 900 political prisoners detained in the country, according to a watchdog group, Foro Penal.
The debate over taking part in Sunday's vote echoes a similar fight that played out in 2018 among opposition figures, most of whom ultimately abstained from that year's presidential vote, allowing Maduro to easily declare victory.
Machado has been sharing images online of banners hung by communities across the country, each declaring that they 'already voted' -- on July 28, the date of the presidential election that González won. She declined to speak for this article.
'Empty the streets' on Sunday, she said in a recent message to supporters. 'Let it be clear who has the power: you.'
Requesens, a former legislator, is now running for governor of Miranda, next to the capital of Caracas, and the country's second-most populous state. Few expect that he will be permitted to win.
He has been ousted from his party, Justice First, for participating in the vote.
He set out with a small team on a recent day, campaigning on foot in the worn-down streets of Miranda.
He greeted merchants and chatted with passersby, distributing flyers with his image. Some recognized him immediately from the news; others, confused, said they were not aware of any upcoming vote.
Several people asked not to be photographed near the candidate, saying they feared the government would use the images to punish them.
'People ask me, 'Are you scared?'' Requesens told a group of activists. 'I tell them, 'Dude, I'm scared to death. I don't want them to get me again. But I'm still leaving my house to give it all I have, because that's what I have to do. That's the only option left for me.''
There are also ongoing divisions in the opposition over the Trump administration's approach to Venezuela.
President Donald Trump, reverting in many ways to a strategy he used in his first term, has tried to squeeze Maduro economically, revoking a license for the U.S. oil company Chevron to work in Venezuela, among other policies.
He has also taken a hard-line on Venezuelan migrants, accusing many without evidence of being part of a gang, Tren de Aragua, and deporting hundreds to a prison in El Salvador.
Machado has supported the Trump administration's economic approach. And she has repeated the Trump administration's claim that Tren de Aragua is controlled by Maduro, an assertion that U.S. intelligence agencies have rejected, according to internal documents.
Among the opposition candidates participating in Sunday's vote is Capriles, 52, the former presidential candidate, who is reemerging on the political scene after years on the sidelines.
He is running for a seat in the Legislature.
'What Maduro doesn't want is for us to express ourselves,' he said in an interview. 'I believe the way to keep July 28, 2024, alive is by participating.'
Capriles called Trump's support of ongoing sanctions in Venezuela a 'big mistake' that would impoverish more Venezuelans and lead to more migration.
González, who vote counts show won last year's vote, is living in exile in Spain.
Machado remains popular but, aside from brief public appearances, has been living in hiding, under threat of arrest, since the July election.
A study conducted by the Center for Political and Government Studies found that half of respondents still consider her the leader of the opposition, said Alarcón, the center's director.
The same study showed that abstention might be the winner of Sunday's election: Just 20% of respondents showed significant interest in participating. Alarcón said that this would be among the lowest participation rate in an election in recent decades.
As Capriles campaigned this month in Miranda state, a retired teacher named Morela Aponte, 65, watched from the sidewalk.
'Many people would like to shout 'traitor' at him,' she said, expressing her disappointment at his decision to run and her support for Machado, 'but they restrain themselves out of politeness.'
She would not be casting a ballot, she added.
'The government wants to portray normalcy internationally, but that's a lie. Democracy in Venezuela was lost 25 years ago' -- when Maduro's movement took power, she added.
Others disagreed with that decision.
Alexander Azuaje was selling sweet pastries as Requesens campaigned recently.
He took a flyer without hesitation.
Azuaje, 27, explained that in 2018, he had been imprisoned for two months for participating in protests. After his release, he moved to Colombia to try to escape Venezuela's economic crisis. But he could barely make money and came back in 2023.
He had voted for González, but he felt that Machado had disappeared following the vote, he said, and he was ready for new leadership.
He didn't want more violence or political confrontation, he added, only stability.
'What I want is to earn at least $130 or $150 a week,' he said. 'To be able to support my children and my wife. But in the meantime, I'm voting. Because if we don't vote, we have nothing left.'
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Copyright 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New poll exposes trouble for rivals in heated NYC mayoral race as one candidate takes commanding lead
New York City Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani maintains a hefty lead in the race, according to a recent Siena poll of registered voters. Mamdani is polling at 44%, and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who's running as an independent, is at 25%. Republican Curtis Sliwa is at 12%, and incumbent Mayor Eric Adams is at 7%. "While City Democrats favor Mamdani over Cuomo 53-32%, with single digits for the other two, more than two-thirds of City Republicans support Sliwa. City independent voters are more closely divided, with 30% supporting Mamdani and 20% supporting Adams," Siena pollster Steven Greenberg said in a press release on Tuesday. Cuomo Opponents Slam His Re-entry Into Nyc Mayor Race, Say City Wants To Move On From Ex Governor "City voters under 35 are overwhelmingly supporting Mamdani, as are a plurality of voters 35-54, however, voters 55 and older back Cuomo over Mamdani, 38-32%," he added. "Mamdani, included in the Siena poll for the first time, has a 46-32% favorability rating with New York City voters and a negative 28-37% favorability rating among voters statewide," Greenberg continued. Read On The Fox News App However, the pollster said that Cuomo, who resigned as governor and then lost the Democratic primary to Mamdani, is facing serious favorability issues. "Cuomo has an underwater favorability rating with City voters, 37-54%, and an even worse 29-61% favorability rating with statewide voters, the worst ever favorability rating for Cuomo in a Siena poll. In fact, among Democrats statewide, Cuomo's favorability rating is 36-56%, down from 51-39% in March," he said. Cuomo, Adams Trade Shots Over Who Should Drop Out In Race Against Mamdani For Nyc Mayor Adams, who opted to pursue the race as an independent, is also facing favorability woes, according to the poll. The mayor was indicted by the Department of Justice last year on bribery, conspiracy and campaign finance charges, but the case was later dropped. Adams has presented himself as a pro-law enforcement alternative to Mamdani, especially after the 345 Park Avenue office shooting last month. "Adams is also underwater with voters in the City, 30-58%, statewide 22-51%, and among Democrats statewide 22-59%," Greenberg said. "Sliwa has a 26-30% statewide favorability rating, and 30-42% in the City." The recent poll comes as the nation's eyes remain on the race, as Mamdani's win was seen as an upset against Cuomo, and the Democratic nominee has pushed several far-left policies. Currently, Mamdani is doing an anti-Trump tour across the city. "There is no borough that will be free from Trump's cruelty," Mamdani said on Monday. "We will feel the pain of this legislation, whether we are in Manhattan, Brooklyn, the Bronx, Queens or Staten Island, and we will shine a light this week and every week on the costs of this vision that is coming out of Washington, D.C." Mamdani's Primary Win Exposes Democrat Divide As Top Leaders Withhold Endorsements Although some Democrats have held back on publicly supporting Mamdani, others, such as Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-NY., have been campaigning for him. Cuomo, Adams, and Sliwa have taken aim at Mamdani on a variety of issues, including policing and rent control. Cuomo is even pitching "Zohran's Law" after it came out that Mamdani lives in a rent-stabilized apartment. "Rent-stabilized apartments when they're vacant should only be rented to people who need affordable housing, not people like Zohran Mamdani," Cuomo told reporters in a video posted on social media on Sunday. "We must remember that Andrew Cuomo has spent more time talking about my apartment than asking why so many New Yorkers are being forced out of theirs. He has spent more time criticizing me than he has in criticizing the legislation that Donald Trump has passed," Mamdani fired back on Tuesday. The election is on Nov. 4, which makes it one of the few major off-year article source: New poll exposes trouble for rivals in heated NYC mayoral race as one candidate takes commanding lead Solve the daily Crossword


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Scores Major Legal Win in Accessing Sensitive Data of Millions
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A divided federal appeals court has ruled that the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) can access sensitive personal data held by several federal agencies, rejecting claims that the move violates privacy protections. In a 2-1 decision issued on Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit vacated a lower court's preliminary injunction that had blocked DOGE-related personnel from obtaining administrator-level access to information at the Treasury Department, the Office of Personnel Management and the Department of Education. The ruling remands the case for further proceedings. Newsweek has contacted DOGE for comment via email outside regular office hours. The Justice Department declined to comment following the ruling. Why It Matters A divided federal appeals court ruling in favor of DOGE could significantly shift the balance between privacy protections and executive authority. The decision to grant embedded cross-agency teams broad, administrator-level access to sensitive personal data—including Social Security numbers, tax records and health information—strengthens the president's ability to direct internal modernization efforts across the federal bureaucracy. It also sets a potential precedent that could make it harder for unions, advocacy groups and individuals to challenge similar data-access policies in the future, narrowing judicial oversight when efficiency initiatives intersect with privacy concerns. Anti-DOGE protesters outside the Theodore Roosevelt Federal Building headquarters of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management in Washington, D.C., on February 5. Anti-DOGE protesters outside the Theodore Roosevelt Federal Building headquarters of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management in Washington, D.C., on February 5. Alex Wong/Getty What To Know The case stems from an executive order that President Donald Trump signed on January 20, which created DOGE to modernize "Federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity." The order directed agency heads to establish internal DOGE teams and provide "full and prompt access" to unclassified systems and records. Initially headed by Elon Musk, DOGE has been a controversial element of Trump's second term, overseeing spending and staffing cuts across agencies and facing multiple lawsuits. As a special government employee, Musk could serve in the role for only 130 days, and his tenure as the head of DOGE ended in May shortly before a public disagreement with the president. In February, U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman granted a temporary restraining order and later a preliminary injunction limiting DOGE affiliates' access to certain data. The appeals court stayed that injunction in April pending appeal. The plaintiffs—a coalition that includes the American Federation of Teachers, several other labor unions and individual recipients of government benefits—had argued that granting DOGE affiliates such access violated the federal Privacy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). They said the data involved could include Social Security numbers, citizenship information, tax records, health histories and other personal identifiers. Judge Julius Richardson, joined by Judge G. Steven Agee, concluded that the plaintiffs had not shown a likelihood of success on the merits sufficient to justify preliminary relief. Writing for the majority, Richardson said, "The Privacy Act does not prohibit sharing information with those whose jobs give them good reason to access it." He also compared DOGE's broad modernization mandate to that of a consultant who must first survey systems to determine necessary improvements. The opinion also questioned whether the plaintiffs had standing to sue, noting that they had not alleged their specific records had been accessed, and whether the actions at issue constituted "final agency action" under the APA. The court further observed that the Privacy Act's civil remedies might preclude APA-based claims for equitable relief. Richardson's opinion cited a June U.S. Supreme Court order in a separate case that allowed DOGE access to Social Security Administration data while litigation continued. "This case and that one are exceedingly similar," Richardson wrote, adding that the precedent informed the court's equitable discretion. In dissent, Judge Robert King argued that the district court acted "quickly—but extremely carefully" in blocking DOGE's access given the scope and sensitivity of the data. King warned that the executive order had granted "unfettered, unprecedented, and apparently unnecessary access" to personal information for millions of Americans and criticized the majority for adopting what he described as a "heightened standard" for likelihood of success. The unions involved, which include the National Federation of Federal Employees and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. What People Are Saying Aman George, senior counsel at Democracy Forward, commenting on a different federal court ruling that declined to block DOGE's access to health and labor data, said in a news release on June 27: "While today's decision is disappointing, the court made clear it shares our deep concerns. We are committed to continuing this case and holding the administration accountable for exposing millions of Americans' private records to politically motivated operatives with no legal authority to access them." Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, sharply criticized the Supreme Court's June decision, writing in dissent: "In essence, the 'urgency' underlying the government's stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes." What Happens Next The appeals court's decision does not end the litigation. The case returns to the district court for further proceedings on the plaintiffs' underlying claims. The outcome represents a significant legal victory for the administration's DOGE initiative, reinforcing earlier high-court signals that agency-embedded DOGE teams may access certain records to perform modernization work. Still, the broader legal battle over the scope of such access—and its compatibility with privacy protections—remains unresolved.


Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
The one issue where ‘26 Dems all agree
CHORUS OF COMPETITORS — The major Democratic candidates for governor have all quickly lined up behind their party in supporting efforts to redraw California's congressional districts mid-decade to counter Texas Republicans' attempts to do the same. Former Biden administration cabinet member Xavier Becerra told POLITICO that 'Politically, we must do it.' Toni Atkins, the former legislative leader, told Playbook that 'California has always led the way — and now we must because the fate of our democracy and the country's future depend on us stopping this Republican power grab.' A visible standout … The one notable exception has been billionaire mall magnate Rick Caruso, who has not entered the field but has been floated as a possible moderate Democratic candidate. Through a spokesperson, he declined to comment on whether he supported California's power play. BIG PICTURE: The near uniform response from others in the 2026 field has not afforded any of them a chance to stand out, much less a viral soundbite chewing out the president and Texas Republicans. But it has allowed them to stay in their party's good graces and cast themselves as leaders of the resistance as they seek a fundraising surge following former Vice President Kamala Harris' decision not to run. Key incentive … When former Rep. Katie Porter came out in support of California Democrats' redistricting play, she almost explicitly explained why Democratic candidates for governor stand to benefit from backing their party's redraw. It's a chance to bash President Donald Trump to anti-Trump voters. 'This is what I hear from Californians all the time as I'm running for governor: They want a fighter. They want someone who's going to stand up to Donald Trump and stand up to the Republican shenanigans,' Porter said on CNN last week. 'I think that Trump and Texas — Texas Republicans — are leaving us no choice. They are tinkering with the rules of our democracy.' Billionaire entrepreneur Stephen J. Cloobeck has taken his redistricting arguments in a similar anti-Trump direction, distributing a campaign ad comparing Trump's untrue claims that he won the 2020 election to his support for Texas redistricting. 'Cheaters gonna cheat. That's what he's doing in Texas,' a narrator says over clips of Trump speaking, 'changing the rules so that he can't lose.' Changing course … Even Democratic candidates including former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who backed the creation of California's independent redistricting commission, have called for the commission's map to be tossed out early. Villaraigosa in an interview said he wouldn't support the California Legislature unilaterally redrawing the state's lines, but he got on board once Democrats settled on putting the map that would be used before voters. 'We have to stand up to these efforts to rig an election,' Villaraigosa told Playbook, while railing against the GOP and president's agenda. 'We have to stand up because Californians are being disproportionately targeted here, on health care, on taxes, on tariffs, on education, and these raids.' Or as state Superintendent Tony Thurmond framed the state's process in a video address: 'California is fighting fire with fire, but because we're California, we're doing it in an open, transparent and responsible way.' Family ties … By falling into line, the candidates are also doing their party a solid. They may not be able to secure enough Democratic delegates to get a statewide party endorsement in the primary — especially if the field remains so sprawling — but maintaining relationships with Democratic insiders who have a more direct stake in redistricting could help with courting donors and endorsements. 'I won't stand by and watch a Texas takeover that ultimately gives Congress the green light to strip away more of our civil rights and harm Californians with even deeper program cuts,' former state Controller Betty Yee said in a statement supporting California's response. The Republican response … Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco and conservative media personality Steve Hilton have also gone the way of their national party, stridently opposing California's redistricting gambit. Hilton issued a threat to sue the state over it, calling the maneuver 'a blatant, unconstitutional and illegal power grab designed to cement one‑party rule.' The redistricting play has given Bianco and Hilton a prime chance to rail against partisan line drawing not just now but through the 2026 election, knowing that if one of them makes it to the run-off, they'll likely be running against someone who supported Democrats' gerrymander. 'Dictator Gavin Newsom believes he has to destroy democracy in order to 'save it,'' Bianco said on social media, offering a flavor of the attacks he could launch at Democratic opponents on the issue. 'We're going to fight back, just like we did when he unlawfully banned people from going to church and opening their small businesses.' GOOD MORNING. Happy Wednesday. Thanks for waking up with Playbook. Like what you're reading? Sign up to get California Playbook in your inbox, and forward it to a friend. You can also text us at 916-562-0685 — save it as 'CA Playbook' in your contacts. Or drop us a line at dgardiner@ and bjones@ or on X — @DustinGardiner and @jonesblakej. WHERE'S GAVIN? Nothing official announced. BIG NEWS: On Wednesday, Aug. 27, POLITICO is hosting its inaugural California policy summit. At The California Agenda, some of the state's most prominent political figures including Sen. Alex Padilla, Katie Porter and Xavier Becerra will share the stage with influential voices in tech, energy, housing and other areas to chart the path forward for a state at the forefront of critical policy debates. The live and streamed event is free, but advanced registration is required. Request an invite here. MORE ON REDISTRICTING DIFFERENT TIMES — Common Cause, a good government watchdog that had previously been opposed to mid-cycle redistricting, is changing course. As POLITICO's Aaron Pellish reports, the group released a new policy statement Tuesday, stating that it will not condemn California's redistricting effort — which it called a 'counterbalancing measure' to Trump's push to draw several new Republican-leaning seats in Texas and around the country. In the statement, Common Cause said it will not endorse partisan gerrymandering in any case but is deciding now to not condemn actions taken by states like California given the context of Trump's efforts to 'lock in unaccountable power and silence voters.' 'We will not endorse partisan gerrymandering even when its motive is to offset more extreme gerrymandering by a different party,' Common Cause said. 'But a blanket condemnation in this moment would amount to a call for unilateral political disarmament in the face of authoritarian efforts to undermine fair representation and people-powered democracy.' EDUCATION UCLA'S PARTIAL REPRIEVE — A federal judge ordered the Trump administration Tuesday to restore some of the funding it cut from UCLA in late July, handing a partial victory to the UC system as it faces a $1 billion settlement demand from the White House over alleged antisemitism on campus. As POLITICO's Eric He reports, it was not immediately clear how much money would be returned to the campus. Judge Rita F. Lin of the Northern District Court of California had already sided with the UC in June when she barred the National Science Foundation from terminating additional grants to UC researchers. In her ruling Tuesday, Lin said the foundation had violated that order by cutting off funding. NEWSOM V. HARVARD — Newsom on Tuesday called for Harvard President Alan Garber to resign following a report from The New York Times that the university is nearing a potential $500 million settlement with the Trump administration. 'Looks like Harvard has chosen to surrender,' Newsom posted on X. 'An absolute failure of leadership that will have demonstrable impacts to higher education across our country. He should be ashamed.' Newsom had blasted the Trump administration's demand of $1 billion from UCLA — a move that applied pressure to the public UC system not to capitulate as Ivy League institutions have after jousting with the president. He also said the state would sue. The governor personally, and through staff, communicated with members of the UC Board of Regents, UC Office of the President and UCLA regarding the Trump administration's settlement demands, according to Newsom's office. 'The governor sees this as an undemocratic assault on a vital public institution and he's not giving an inch,' said spokesperson Bob Salladay. 'There is no wiggle room here for him — he's all in with this fight.' SILICON VALLEY MAHAN'S MOD MAJORITY — San Jose Councilmember Anthony Tordillos was sworn into office Tuesday — delivering Mayor Matt Mahan a solid bloc of moderate Democrats to help implement his policy agenda at City Hall. Mahan, who backed Tordillos in a June special election, has irked Bay Area progressives and labor unions in recent years with his headline-grabbing moves, including a plan to tie the raises of some city employees to performance metrics and his vocal support for a ballot measure to increase prison sentences for drug- and theft-related offenses. But Tordillos' win provides Mahan with a firewall against his critics on the left. The new councilmember defeated a progressive, labor-backed candidate, Gabby Chavez-Lopez, by double digits in an expensive runoff contest. Mahan, in a recent interview with Playbook, seemed to bask in the outcome: 'Culturally, (Tordillos) and I are part of what … is going to be a majority bloc that focuses on what measurably improves outcomes, versus previous ideological commitments.' He added, 'Two-thirds of the electorate is not for the hyper-ideological progressive' approach to city government. CLIMATE AND ENERGY DEAL OR NO DEAL — The Trump administration is taking away California's backstop Trump-proofing tactics to protect its climate regulations: its voluntary deals with industry. On Tuesday, the FTC announced an agreement with four heavy-duty truck manufacturers and their trade association, declaring California's agreement with them 'unenforceable.' Read more in last night's edition of California Climate. TOP TALKERS LA CORRUPTION CASE — Prosecutors filed additional charges against Los Angeles City Councilmember Curren Price this week, the LA Times reports. Price had already been charged with 10 felony counts, including grand theft and perjury over allegations that he voted to approve projects that would financially benefit his wife, Del Richardson. Her consulting firm allegedly received more $150,000 in payments from developers before he voted on their projects. Price has denied any wrongdoing. Michael Schafler, Price's attorney, called the charges 'nothing more than an attempt to pile on to a weak case.' Price told the Times that 'there is no evidence whatsoever that Councilmember Price was aware of the alleged conflicts when he voted for the agenda items.' FEINSTEIN'S TREASURES — Dozens of items from the estate of the late Sen. Dianne Feinstein and her husband, the late financier Richard Blum, are going up for auction later this week. The collection included antique European furniture, opulent jewelry, historic artifacts, rare paintings and Persian and Tibetan rugs that once decorated the couple's former mansion on Billionaires' Row in San Francisco. Highlights of the collection, as SF Gate reports: 'a photograph of Feinstein posing with Queen Elizabeth II"; 'a German carved chest circa 1740 (valued from $800 to $1,200)"; and 'a Louis XV-style writing desk (valued from $500 to $700).' The most expensive item is a diamond and platinum solitaire ring valued from $40,000 to $60,000. AROUND THE STATE — Police departments eager to fill vacant jobs are increasingly hiring officers who were previously fired or dismissed from other agencies. (San Francisco Chronicle) — Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, who Trump recently suggested will have his show canceled next, revealed he recently secured Italian citizenship. (CNN) — Treacherous rip currents are pummeling beaches in San Diego County, with swells reaching 6 to 7 feet in some locations. (The San Diego Union-Tribune) — Trump's big spending bill includes a surprise boost for affordable housing developers in California: an increase to the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit. (CalMatters) PLAYBOOKERS SPOTTED: CARUSO MAKING ROUNDS — LA mega developer Rick Caruso, who's weighing a run for governor, was in Sacramento for a dinner and meetings — including a chat with POLITICO's Christopher Cadelago. Earlier in the day, he met at his home with Piers Morgan. STORK ALERT — J. Baylor Myers, VP of corporate development at BitGo and a former top aide to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin in the first Trump administration, and Dakota Myers, a paralegal in San Francisco, on Aug. 4 welcomed John Baylor Myers Jr, who came in at 8 pounds and 13 ounces. Pic … Another pic PEOPLE MOVES — Ivy Brittain is now regional director, state government affairs at the Plastics Industry Association. She was previously legislative affairs director at the Northern California Water Association. — Seamus Garrity is joining Mercury Public Affairs as a managing director. He will continue to work between LA and Sacramento and was previously a partner at Lighthouse Public Affairs. BIRTHDAYS — Margot Roosevelt … Chris Dhanaraj ... Emily Myerson … former Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen … BELATED B-DAY WISHES — (was Sunday): Ajita Talwalker Menon at Calbright College WANT A SHOUT-OUT FEATURED? — Send us a birthday, career move or another special occasion to include in POLITICO's California Playbook. You can now submit a shout-out using this Google form.