Letters: I like politicians who stick to their beliefs and challenge authority
I did not stand for a second term in Auckland Council because the tone was combative and the mayor of that time did not build a team. No subsequent mayors have done so.
By contrast, when Mike Lee led Auckland Regional Council, he did build a team of disparate politicians. We never caucused separately. During his leadership, the ARC brought the Auckland rail network into the modern age, kept the ports in public ownership, purchased three regional parks and acquired land for a 24 hectare park on the waterfront.
Since amalgamation, in 15 years, not a single new regional park has been purchased by Auckland Council and the waterfront park has not been developed. The loss of the ARC's Metropolitan Urban Limit has allowed costly sprawl in all directions.
It is an unfortunate development that Mayor Brown is seeking to control more of the councillors. Robust debate is essential to good decision making. Compliance encourages authoritarianism. Auckland deserves better.
Sandra Coney, Auckland.
Road user charges
Chris Bishop enjoyed using his 'electricity' painless billing analogy.
Just imagine creating 'time of use' billing.
Drive cheaper off-peak, dearer on peak - effectively an incentivised congestion tax.
The future is using AI chips to control the roads. There could be road sensors that detect the impact of your vehicle and in real time charge your RUC bill.
Overloading your car will be just like weighing your travel bags at the airport.
Initially, the PR man will pull the RUC from under your feet so slowly it will feel just like having the wool pulled over your eyes. Before you realise it you're addicted to cheaper off-peak driving. You could even buy off-peak travel cheaper in advance. Road planning genius.
Steve Russell, Hillcrest.
Road tolls to follow?
So road charges on petrol and EVs will be dropped in favour of electronic devices which will measure vehicle user usage, presumably from number plate recognition and charged accordingly.
I fail to see the difference and surely [this] must be a clear example of the Government giving with the right hand and taking with the left. To make matters worse, low-paid workers - which make up most of the workforce and do most of the commuting to work five to six days a week and are least able to afford it will - be the most punished.
And that is not to mention the huge cost of setting up the gadgetry and paperwork involved in collecting the road user fee, which amounts to road user charges in another disguise with road tolls soon to follow.
Gary Hollis, Mellons Bay.
Mind-numbing entertainment
Besides the numbing overload of commercials, I'm also saddened to see the current poor fare offered by TVNZ 1.
Other than 1News, it consists of mostly reality shows, quiz shows and a sprinkling of soap operas.
Where are the thought-provoking documentaries, dramas, comedies and news features that once were a feature? It looks like cost-cutting and a race to the populist bottom now rule the roost.
Mind-numbing entertainment driven by growing commercialisation of our last state-owned television station. It's hardly any different now from the other commercial television channels.
Can't one television channel at least be funded to put out high quality programming for the benefit of society?
Jeff Hayward, Central Auckland.
It's the economy, stupid.
Matthew Hooton's weekly article in Herald has once again exercised my literary juices.
He is right to point out that the most important problem facing us is the economy. I, like many, believed that if a National-led coalition won the last election, it would be the biggest hospital pass in the history of New Zealand politics. And so indeed has it turned out to be.
Then Hooton spent the remaining and major portion of his article attacking the Government's work on race relations and also the stance taken by Hobson's Pledge.
The race relations issue was another hospital pass which has become a very hot potato and is also a major problem in an ever increasing cosmopolitan NZ.
Sometimes I am not certain whether I am reading Matthew Hooton or Simon Wilson or indeed Simon Hooton or Matthew Wilson.
All of the above gentlemen would be best advised to pretend they are in Government and inform us of precisely what they would do to solve the multitude of problems we face, rather than continually sniping at the incumbents.
Steve Clerk, Meadowbank.
Pendulum policy swings
The main problem the NZ Government has suffered from for decades is the extreme pendulum policy swing that takes place each political electoral change.
For any future hope for NZ economy to improve and thrive, all politicians need to work in collaboration and ensure that this pendulum always stops midway -with no extreme right or left economic policies of business wealth versus social welfare benefits.
How can we come to a balance as a country with everyone contributing their fair share of meaningful work, savings, taxes, leisure, learning, healthy practices and rest time and with our politicians legislating to create a level playing field for all?
We used to have it until social welfare imploded and money and greed became the new religion.
Marie Kaire, Whangārei.
Auction obsession
I have often wondered why New Zealanders are so obsessed with selling houses at auction. Is this approach truly in the best interests of sellers and buyers, or is it largely driven by real estate agents looking to maximise their commissions?
In most leading Western democracies, properties are typically listed with an asking price based on market value, allowing for more transparent and measured negotiations. Wouldn't it make more sense for New Zealand to adopt a similar model, establishing fair value before setting a sale price?
Auctions, in contrast, seem to create a hyper-inflated sense of urgency and competition. I am convinced they often have an unnecessarily inflationary effect on the housing market and are especially detrimental to first home buyers trying to enter an already challenging market.
It's time we asked whether the current system truly serves the public good, or just the industry facilitating it.
Randal Lockie, Rothesay Bay.
A quick word
The proposal for road user charges based on miles travelled will be good for those pensioners who only go to bingo and the pub once a week in their car. It will bring them some financial relief; unless of course the savings get swallowed up in some other tax dreamed up by an eventual socialist government.
John Ford, Taradale.
Te Reo Māori and NZ sign language are enshrined in law as official languages of this country - whereas English has been the default language of government, commerce, education and general society since colonial dominance was established. Doesn't this emphasise the ridiculousness of this Government's dedicated effort to diminish the place of an actual official language on our key identity document to favour our unofficial language that they happen to culturally prefer?
Malcolm Paterson, Te Atatū.
Given Labour's obvious disinterest in the proposed new school qualification, can one safely assume there will be no criticisms of the reforms?
Ian Doube, Rotorua.
What a nonsense to say that New Zealand is running out of gas. The Methanex plant in Taranaki is owned by Canadians. It uses 60% of our gas production and exports 95% of its production to Asia. Is that the best use of our gas? Could it be eliminated if necessary. While Ballance uses 20% of our gas production to make urea, that is only a mixed blessing for modern farming. If our gas is really limited, let us have a real debate about priorities for its use. Not Methanex or Ballance I would think.
Danna Glendining, Taupō.
If Shane Jones were to watch David Attenborough's film Ocean, he would understand better how to work with the ocean and allow it to replenish and give back, not just take from it. It should be compulsory viewing in Parliaments around the world. Perhaps ours could lead the way.
Simone McKegg, Grey Lynn.
What is the point of controlling inflation by exploding unemployment benefits?
Bruce Tubb, Devonport.
Labour's response to an offer of cross party collaboration on the review of NCEA: Not Achieved.
Mike Wagg, Freemans Bay.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
a day ago
- Newsroom
‘Insulted' Wayne Brown and council tell Govt to stick its local government reform
'The cheek,' exclaimed Mayor Wayne Brown, as he led criticism of a Government bill that tells councils what they should focus on and how they should behave. 'The temerity.' Brown is not only angry at Wellington trying to force councils nationwide to act the same, he's irritated ministers don't recognise how distinct Auckland Council is from the rest, and boiling over at an attempt to impose a state-declared code of conduct. He's threatening to write a code of conduct and send it to Parliament to bring MPs' behaviour under control. Auckland councillors voted by a large, voice majority on Thursday to tell the coalition in a submission to Parliament that it cannot support the Local Government (Systems Improvement) Amendment Bill and doesn't need Beehive politicians telling Auckland what to do. The Government has given councils and others just four weeks to submit on the bill, despite it recasting local government's main focus, setting out 'core' services and eliminating 'four wellbeings' such as cultural, community and environmental priorities. It argues the rules are needed to make councils provide better core services of roads, rubbish and water and stop spending on nice-to-haves, thus limiting the chance of rates increases. Councils nationwide argue the real driver of high rates is the cost of infrastructure they are being forced to shoulder. As well as the 'core services' edict, the bill contains a range of changes including removing a requirement for six-yearly service delivery reviews, adding new principles on openness of information for elected councillors, and requiring councils to report on use of contractors. In Auckland, the strength of the pushback, from almost all political persuasions around the council table at a policy and planning committee meeting, was compelling. For the mayor and the policy committee chairman Richard Hills, who have worked hard to find ways of cooperation with Wellington, the bill has caused disappointment and frustration. There was much criticism of a coalition of political parties that had promised devolution and deregulation ending up attempting to regulate local government and take away its decision-making and flexibility. The committee passed a motion, inspired by the mayor's strong rejection of the bill, that read: 'The policy and planning committee oppose this bill as it does not adequately acknowledge that Auckland Council has special legislation that applies to Auckland Council and any new legislation that affects Auckland Council to this degree should be negotiated with us in partnership.' The partnership wording plays back to the Government its own reputed desire to have Auckland Council support its initiatives in housing, infrastructure and planning reforms – and in an upcoming City Regional Deal. Two councillors abstained, citing concerns about the current lack of definitions for the 'four wellbeings' in the Local Government Act and council policies. One, Maurice Williamson, backed the overall motion opposing the bill but voted against officials' proposed submissions on specific aspects. Retiring councillor Chris Darby renamed the proposed law the 'Local Government (Especially Auckland and its People) Neutering Bill because it neuters this council and its communities'. He said it was an insult it had got this far without proper consideration of the international city of Auckland and had been put together by 'Johnny-come-latelys that are so badly informed.' He defended the 'four wellbeings' as dynamic considerations that guided him in decision-making. 'There's a lot in this bill that is kicking mud in the face of not just this council but the people of Auckland.' Manukau councillor Lotu Fuli said the move was 'real overreach. We've said all term long we don't want Wellington to be running Auckland and this is an attempt to do that.' She argued 'core' council business was people and communities. 'It's what makes us human, our music, our dogs we keep at home … and therefore they are core to what we should do.' Wayne Brown took particular umbrage at Auckland's special status, with 30 percent of the population and its own special statute, being ignored by the one-size-fits-all approach to constrain councils nationwide. Worse, ministers had not consulted Auckland Council before introducing the bill in July with a deadline for public submissions by August 27. 'We are a product of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act and we are not like the others. 'For instance the standardised code of conduct: The problems of Gore are not the problems of Auckland. 'The very fact that a Government whose standard of behaviour inside their own thing is appalling should have the temerity to tell us about standards of behaviour is a bit rich,' Brown said. 'This is a third of New Zealand. We don't really need any of this actually. We'll decide what wellbeings for Aucklanders are. 'The whole point is that we are different… the cheek of them to suggest that we are going to do something by the 27th of August for a third of New Zealand without even coming to talk to us is a good enough reason for us to oppose the whole bloody thing.' He said right at the start of its submission Auckland Council should say: 'Where are you? How dare you post us a letter and tells us we've got to behave. It's insulting. I'm quite prepared to put in there that we'll form a group here for a code of conduct for their behaviour and send it down to them and see how they like it.' Another retiring councillor, Manurewa's Angela Dalton, said the bill was a 'one-size-fits-all. This is just so far away from localism it isn't funny.' She was mystified how central government came to think removing the 'four wellbeings' would lead to rate decreases or constraints on rate increases. 'There seems to be a view there's some mamby pamby stuff going on and we're all sitting around hugging each other.' Many things the council did were forced on it by other legislation. 'We have a role to be leaders for our city and our people. If that means giving a damn then we will give a damn. Because if we don't, central government won't be there. They're actually proving that at the moment. They are not there for our people. 'I just want to see the evidence, the data and the analysis that says the four wellbeings is costing us more.' Measures in the bill such as removing a requirement for councils to consider tikanga Māori in appointing council company directors were 'just appalling.' Dalton said she'd love to throw the bill back at the Government and say 'you've got to be kidding.' 'For a Government that is right into people being in control of their own destiny and removing regulation and rules, look what they're doing to the councils: 'This is what you will do and we are going to take this power off you.'' Councillor Julie Fairey said of the Government's moves: 'It's not supposed to be a parent-child relationship … It should not be the case we have this parent coming in over the top all the time.' Recalling repeated rejections of Auckland's advocacy for a bed night levy to fund development and destination functions, her message to Wellington was: 'If you are worried about rates, let central government give us some power to raise funds in some other ways.' Committee chair Hills noted all the accountability demands on councils that didn't apply to central government like having to consult for six months on annual budgets. 'And we have to provide a balanced budget every year, by statute. They don't have to do that. We do.' He defended the consideration of the four wellbeings as having highlighted and helped address issues like homelessness and public safety. 'It's annoying to have to get told how bad we are,' he said. 'I hope the Government can come back to us and look at a different model.' The council will submit against the overall bill, opposing specific measures on the grounds of unclear policy rationale, unclear definitions and risks that alternative paths to improve efficiency might be negated.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
RMA Reforms To Deliver Jobs And Growth
Minister for RMA Reform The Government's second RMA Amendment Bill has passed into law, bringing in sweeping changes to many of the handbrakes on New Zealanders' lives, helping to drive economic growth, and laying the groundwork for job creation,' RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop says. 'The Resource Management Act (RMA) has been holding New Zealand back for decades. It has let successive governments and councils say 'no' to progress, 'no' to development, and 'no' to building the houses, infrastructure, clean energy and other important projects that New Zealanders need to get ahead,' Mr Bishop says. 'Our full replacement for the RMA will be introduced to Parliament this year, be passed into law next year, and be in effect by 2027- but in the meantime, through this Amendment Bill, we're making it quicker and simpler to consent renewable energy, boost housing supply, and reduce red tape for the primary sector. 'The Bill contains five broad packages of changes which will remove roadblocks and cut red tape holding back progress for: Infrastructure and renewable energy Housing, including a streamlined process for removing heritage protections Farming and the primary sector Emergency and natural hazards package Resource Management system improvements 'We also added a new provision which requires Auckland Council to allow even greater housing and development around key stations benefitting from City Rail Link investment, to ensure Aucklanders reap the full benefits of this transformational investment into the city. 'We added changes to ensure a more cost-effective transition between the current RMA and the upcoming new planning system by putting a stop to councils making RMA plan or policy statement changes until the new system is in place in 2027. There will be some exemptions for important work that aligns with Government priorities, or for activities such as managing natural hazards. 'Alongside this change, we added a new a new regulation making power that will allow the responsible Minister to recommend changes or even removal of parts of council RMA plans and policy statements that are proven to be holding back economic growth, development, or job creation. 'This week we also took urgent action to prevent what could have amounted to a 'stop work' notice for thousands of New Zealand farmers, by further amending the Bill to broaden what water discharges can be allowed as a permitted activity. 'And, to the great excitement of countless Wellingtonians, we added a provision that removes heritage protections from the unsafe and derelict Gordon Wilson Flats in Wellington, clearing the way for the flats to be demolished so that new student accommodation can be built.' 'This legislation is part of our wider three-phase RMA reform programme. In Phase One, before Christmas last year, we repealed the previous government's overly complex RMA changes. 'Phase Two is now well underway, with our Fast-track one-stop shop up and running, the biggest package of national direction changes in New Zealand's history being worked through with decisions due before the end of this year, and this second Amendment Bill delivering meaningful improvements. 'Phase Three will see the complete replacement of the RMA with two new laws that better reflect the importance of private property rights. The new planning system legislation will be introduced to Parliament before the end of this year, pass into law next year, and be in effect by 2027.' The Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill will be enacted the day after it receives royal assent, which is expected in the coming days. Fact sheet for a summary of changes to be enacted through the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill here.
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Mayoral hopeful Kerrin Leoni attacks Wayne Brown's financial record
Auckland councillor and mayoral candidate Kerrin Leoni Photo: Supplied / NZ Herald The main challenger for the Auckland mayoralty has launched a broadside at Wayne Brown, saying he failed to fix the city, as he promised. Auckland councillor and mayoral candidate Kerrin Leoni faced the media for the first time on Thursday morning since releasing her fiscal policy plan . "Three years ago, Wayne Brown swaggered into Auckland, saying that he was going to fix Auckland. "The feedback we're getting is that there has been no fix for Auckland. We've got the same issues happening right across the city, our debt has increased by $1 billion, our rates have gone up by over 20 percent, and Aucklanders are really unhappy with what they're getting at the moment from council." She accused the mayor of not managing council finances well. "Our most significant asset, the Auckland Airport shares is gone, it has been sold, and it's never coming back. "He sold our biggest asset, but has still had to raise rates and increase our debt. I don't think his management of funds has been the best, and we could do a lot better." She said the council's lease on the Ports of Auckland could be under threat if Brown was re-elected. As part of her fiscal plan, Leoni proposed that a 75 percent council majority be met or a public referendum be held before the council sold any of its strategic assets. "We want to ensure we're not selling any more strategic assets in the future. "The Ports of Auckland could still be on the table if Wayne Brown gets back in. There's no legal document regarding the sale of the ports in the future that stops him from doing that. "The North Harbour Stadium is another strategic asset that could be sold under his leadership in the next term. He has talked about that in the past." She conceded that her policy to cut spending on consultants by 40 percent was a goal, and that it might be closer to 30 percent in reality. Auckland mayor Wayne Brown Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi In a statement to RNZ, mayor Brown pushed back on Leoni's economic plan, questioning her credibility. "Her announcement can't be taken seriously. "She directly voted against plans to reduce spending in the current term. She has not bought solutions to the council table. She has not established any credibility on these issues. "It is concerning that she wants a 'fiscal policy', which is set by central government rather than a council financial plan. If she wants to challenge those settings, she is standing for the wrong office." Leoni also pledged to cap rates rises to below or at the inflation rate from the second year of her term if elected. When asked by RNZ if he would match this, Brown said he would continue to keep rates as low as possible. "Her promise doesn't match her voting record on council. Mine does. I have kept rates as low as possible through reducing wasteful spending, driving down costs, and improving asset performance. That's my renewed pledge." In response to the mayor's comments, Leoni said all Auckland councillors had voted to reduce spending. "In terms of solutions, one clear solution we voted on to save money for Aucklanders was the $50 cap for public transport in the city."
