Wales could lose 'half a billion' in welfare reforms
The UK government's disability welfare reforms could cut the incomes of people in Wales by £466m by 2029-30 according to new analysis.
Data analytics company Policy in Practice told Walescast that almost 190,000 people are likely to be affected - 6% of the population.
Brian Evans from Swansea, who receives support for multiple health problems, said the uncertainty meant he was constantly anxious with "the worry of what's going to happen to me".
The Department for Work and Pensions said it would not compromise on protecting people "who need our support", and that reforms "will mean the social security system will always be there for those who will never be able to work".
Benefits crackdown unveiled with aim to save £5bn a year by 2030
People 'terrified' by benefit reforms - Labour politician
Wales losing billions in unclaimed benefits - report
Mr Evans, 62, receives the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) for which eligibility will be tightened under the reforms.
PIP was designed to cover the extra costs of being disabled, and Mr Evans uses it to run his mobility car, which he fears losing.
"I haven't got a television because I can't afford one, everything's being spent," he said.
"So if things are cut back any further I really don't know how I'll manage."
When the changes were proposed in March, First Minister Eluned Morgan asked the UK government for an assessment of their impact on Wales specifically.
The Department for Work and Pensions has published an impact assessment for England and Wales.
The analysis by Policy in Practice, which has been working with the Welsh government and local authorities in Wales to encourage people to claim the benefits they are eligible for, breaks down the impact of the reforms on each region.
Blaenau Gwent, Merthyr Tydfil and Neath Port Talbot were the worst affected areas per head of population.
Sam Fathers, of Policy in Practice, told Walescast that for some people the reforms could mean "knocking 60% of their income out in one hit" and cutting thousands of pounds per year among people on some of the lowest incomes in the UK.
But he urged people not to panic because the proposals were currently at the consultation stage.
The number of working-age people claiming health-related benefits in the UK has increased by 45% since 2019-20.
The UK government proposed the reforms to save £5bn a year by 2020-30, though the number of claims is still expected to grow.
Ministers have said the plans would offer a £1bn package of extra support for people to return to the workplace, with a "try before you buy" approach enabling people to try a job without automatically losing benefits.
"Anything that will get people back into work is welcome," said Mr Fathers, but he added that even "the very best campaigns around employability with disabled people have got about 5% more people into work".
He said Policy in Practice had modelled the impact of getting up to 10% of claimants back into work and even in that scenario Wales would see "an increase in the levels of poverty".
Labour Member of the Senedd, Mick Antoniw, called for the UK government to work with the Welsh government to reform the welfare system.
"Some of these things aren't thought out," he said. "What we don't have is a clear anti-poverty agenda that is the driving force of policy change."
"A Labour government is there to resolve poverty and help people into work," said Antoniw.
"There are a lot of good things that are happening, I just think that the messaging has been the wrong way round and the driving force has probably been the wrong way round."
The Department for Work and Pensions said: "The majority of people who are currently getting PIP will continue to receive it.
"We will never compromise on protecting people who need our support, and our reforms will mean the social security system will always be there for those who will never be able to work, and their income is protected.
"We have also announced a review of the PIP assessment, and we will be working with disabled people and key organisations representing them - including in Wales - to consider how best to do this."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Welsh councils face £5.25m power station pay-out
There are serious questions to answer over why a legal row over a defunct power station has left a group of ten Welsh councils footing a bill in the millions, a senior Tory has said. Earlier this year a High Court judge declared that a contract to demolish Aberthaw Power Station for the Cardiff Capital Region was awarded unlawfully. At a Senedd committee the chair of the consortium, Mary Ann Brocklesby, said the region will pay a settlement of £5.25m to a rival company that lost out. Andrew RT Davies, Conservative MS for South Wales East, said it was "frankly unacceptable". Brocklesby told the Senedd's economy committee, which Davies chairs, that an independent review handled by accountancy firm Deloitte is underway. The region's director Kellie Beirne assured Members of the Senedd (MSs) the region will take steps to ensure it does not happen again. Ms Beirne admitted it had caused "a lot of pain and anguish for many, many people". Under the region's plans the site, which hosted a coal fired power station until 2019, will be used to support the production of renewable and green energy projects. The region says the legal settlement has been funded from "commercial returns on interests" generated, and that no further public money is required for it. Is this old power station about to turn green? Power station set to close, risking 170 jobs End of Welsh coal era at Aberthaw A company set up by the city region - a consortium of a number of local authorities including Cardiff and the Vale of Glamorgan - awarded a contract for the demolition of the power station last year to a company called Erith in 2023. Cardiff council - which had run the procurement - admitted liability in court after lawyers for a rival company, Brown and Mason Limited, challenged the contract. According to a court document, High Court judge Justice Jefford declared that the procurement "was unlawful" and that the claimant would have otherwise been awarded the contract. Brocklesby, who is also Labour leader of Monmouthshire council, told the economy committee "the amount of the settlement... was £5.25m". "I'm not able to say much more at this point, because we are undergoing an independent review, which we commissioned as political leaders," she said. Ms Beirne added that the region was "taking this extremely seriously - we recognise the gravity of it." She indicated the body was in touch with Audit Wales "throughout this process". The director added: "When that review concludes and we have findings, we'll be able to be much more open about what happened and take steps to ensure that this can't happen again." Brocklesby added that the figure was "final", but said there were "legal processes that we need to go through". Andrew RT Davies, who chairs the committee, questioned the pair on how the region was securing "hundreds of millions" needed to seek the project through. He asked how the body was "giving confidence to the private sector, and the independent sector more generally, to come in as partners in light of what's gone on". Brocklesby said the future of Aberthaw "does actually look very bright, and we're not feeling any effects from the impact of this highly regrettable procurement issue". Challenged on that point by Davies, she added: "I wouldn't be so foolish as to say that there is no risk to reputation or to Aberthaw. What I am saying is that we are mitigating it in various ways". Bernie said that "maybe bigger figures" than "hundreds of millions" could be needed for Aberthaw. £38.6m is being invested on acquiring, clear and remediating the site. Davies said: "Taxpayers will pick up this £5.25million bill thanks to the Labour-run Cardiff Capital Region's bungled handling of this contract. "This is frankly unacceptable, as this cash should be going towards improving our public services. "CCR's Labour leadership have serious questions to answer." A statement from the region said: "A legal challenge was made following a procurement exercise for the demolition contract relating to the Aberthaw Power Station, which was awarded in July 2023. "A mediated settlement with the claimant has now been reached and an independent review of the procurement arrangements is underway. "The settlement has been fully funded from commercial returns on interest generated on balances held, with no impact on core programme budgets or any requirement for further public funding. "In line with Cardiff Capital Region's commitment to transparency and accountability, the independent review will examine the procurement process in full in order to ensure that all issues are identified and acted upon. "While the independent review is being conducted and until that process is concluded, we are unable to comment further. "This matter does not affect the wider work of Cardiff Capital Region or the progress of the Aberthaw project. The redevelopment of the site into a flagship green energy park is progressing at pace."
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former workers sue chicken plant over Covid outbreak
Former workers at a poultry factory who claim they caught coronavirus in a mass outbreak at the plant can continue legal action against their former employers. Public Health Wales said there were over 200 confirmed Covid-19 cases linked to the 2 Sisters plant in Llangefni, on Anglesey, in June 2020. The group are suing 2 Sisters Food Group, alleging they contracted Covid-19 as a result of a breach of duty, breach of contract and negligence. Their case was thrown out last year but they have now won a High Court appeal, allowing the case to continue. Lawyers for 2 Sisters previously argued the claimants could not prove how they caught the virus and if it was connected to the factory. 200 Covid-19 cases at Welsh meat plant outbreak End of an era as 700 jobs go at chicken factory The 2 Sisters factory closed down permanently in March 2023, with the loss of over 700 jobs, after the company said the site was old and needed too much investment to bring it up to standard. During the height of the pandemic in 2020, its site was one of several food processing factories in Wales that experienced outbreaks of Covid-19. At the time, Health Minister Vaughan Gething said officials were looking at the level of risk in the food industry. Mark Edwards, Glynne Roberts, Nia Williams and Brian Perry worked on the chicken production line and claim they worked "shoulder to shoulder" and all fell ill with the virus that month. As part of their claim, they say Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) at work regulations had not been properly followed. The company accepts the staff worked in close proximity with each other, but denies they were "shoulder to shoulder". The firm said it implemented enhanced hygiene measures at the factory which was temporarily closed on 18 June 2020. At the start of their legal action, the former employees had not obtained expert medical evidence to support the claim. Their lawyers said occupational health experts and virologists would be asked to give their opinion before the case went to trial. They also said the company should disclose evidence about the outbreak before they could ask for expert opinion to back up the claim. Lawyers for 2 Sisters argued the claimants could not prove when or how they had caught the virus and if it had any connection to the factory. In January 2024 they asked for the case to be struck out at the county court in Caernarfon on the basis that Mr Edwards and the others could not prove the cause of their illness and that their claim was doomed to fail. In July, Judge Wendy Owen ruled there was no real prospect of the claim succeeding without medical evidence and no other compelling reason why the case should go to trial. The judge said the issue of causation and medical opinion was a crucial element which should have already been investigated before proceedings were commenced, and gave a summary judgement against the former workers. But permission to appeal the case was granted in December 2024 and a hearing before a High Court judge in Cardiff was held in April. In a judgement handed down at the end of May, High Court judge Sir Peter Lane said the summary judgment process was "somewhat draconian in nature" and courts should avoid conducting what has come to be described as a "mini trial" of a case. Sir Peter said Judge Owen "fell into error" in effectively conducting a "mini trial" without the benefit of the evidence that would have been available had the case been allowed to proceed to trial. He found that in a claim where the costs of an expert are likely to be significant, when set against the likely value of the claims, it is "plainly proportionate" for the former workers to have proceeded with the claim in this way. Allowing the appeal, he said the claimants may face "an uphill task" but Judge Owen could not be satisfied the claimants had no real prospect of succeeding. The date for the next hearing is yet to be decided. Long NHS waits to end by 2026, says health board Couple take legal action over newborn baby's death Young people with long Covid 'battle' for NHS care
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
3 reasons why Starmer could U-turn on controversial benefits cuts to PIP
An upcoming vote in the House of Commons on government proposals to cut £5bn from the benefits bill has sparked a rift in the Labour Party. The Labour leader is reportedly facing a growing backbench rebellion over the government's welfare reforms announced in March, with some reports suggesting as many as 100 backbench Labour MPs have signed a letter saying they can not support the proposals as they stand. Some of the party's MPs have been publicly critical. Imran Hussain said 41,000 disabled people in his Bradford East constituency would be affected and that many were 'rightly horrified' by the policy. Neil Duncan-Jordan, the MP for Poole, is one of those to have signed the letter, branding the reforms wrong". I have signed this letter calling for the government to rethink its stance on disability benefits because I think the current plans are need to be listening to people's concerns and I hope things will begin to change. — Neil Duncan-Jordan MP (@NeilForPoole) May 8, 2025 Ahead of the vote (which is expected to take place some time in June) the anger has reportedly led the prime minister to consider softening the proposed reforms – specifically changes to the eligibility rules surrounding the benefits payments to disabled people. Yahoo News takes a look at what's going on. The government has proposed a raft of benefits cuts, predominantly affecting those who are disabled or have a long-term health condition. One of those cuts is to personal independence payments (PIP), a benefit for people in and out of work that helps with the additional costs of living with a disability. The government wants to limit who is eligible by changing the assessment criteria from 2026. It means at least 800,000 disabled people could lose out on payments, according to figures published by the department of work and pensions. The health component of universal credit (UC) is also to be frozen until 2030, with the amount cut in half for new claimants from April 2026. Under-22s who are disabled or have a long-term illness will also no longer be able to claim a health top-up of universal credit from April 2026, with the money saved set to be reinvested by the government into training young people. In total, the cuts will leave 2.25 million households losing out on £500 per year, according to the government's own impact assessment. Some of the government's welfare reforms are open to consultation, with the public being asked to submit their thoughts until 30 June 2025. However, critics have said that only the less serious reforms — like scrapping the work capability assessment for those applying for the health component of universal credit — are open to discussion. In recent weeks, reports have indicated ministers are considering softening the cut. According to the Financial Times, one of the rumoured changes includes making the proposed changes to eligibility for PIP less strict, which could mean 195,000 fewer disabled people are affected by the reforms. Claimants could also get a longer 'transitional period' — from when they are informed their benefits are cut to their benefits stopping — so they have more time to plan for the loss in income, the Times reported. The rumoured changes reportedly hopes to get frustrated MPs onside, who have taken moral objections with the scale and severity of the cuts, the disproportionate impact for voters in the Labour heartlands, as well as the increasingly positive polling for Reform. Several Labour MPs have taken issue with the cuts, voicing their concerns that Labour has historically supported and championed a robust welfare system. According to the Times, 170 backbenchers warned that they may not support the reforms that make it harder to claim PIP as well as cutting incapacity benefits to increase incentives to work. Added to this, it warned that the scale of the cuts had not been seen since George Osborne's austerity reforms, which the party voted staunchly against. Forty-two MPs — including Nadia Whittome, Diane Abbott and Stella Creasy — wrote to the Cabinet earlier this month saying that the reforms were "impossible to support" and called for "a change in direction". The letter reads: 'The planned cuts of more than £7bn represent the biggest attack on the welfare state since George Osborne ushered in the years of austerity and over three million of our poorest and most disadvantaged will be affected. "Without a change in direction, the green paper will be impossible to support.' Another private letter, signed by 100 MPs, said they could not support the government in the disability vote, the Guardian reported. MPs don't just have the party whip to answer to — they are also held to account by their constituents. While the scale of the PIP cuts are clearly far-reaching, the map indicates that the 10 areas most affected by the government's PIP cuts are in Labour heartlands. In fact, out of top 20 areas where claimants are set to miss out on PIP, 19 voted for Labour in the general election — with Clacton voting for Nigel Farage's Reform UK party. In fact, many of the areas are emerging Labour/Reform UK battlegrounds. And, in the wake of Labour's chastening local election results in May, some have pointed the finger at the government's welfare cuts as one of the key drivers of discontent among the party's traditional voting base. 3. Reform are out-positioning Labour on welfare At a national level, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has pledged to reverse the winter fuel cut and scrap the two-child benefit cap if the party came to power in a naked attempt to target Labour's perceived weakness in the area of welfare. And while the government has signalled a partial U-turn on the winter fuel payment, it continues to dodge calls from campaigners and MPs to ditch the cap. Overall, the most recent YouGov poll seems to indicate the public are also losing faith in Labour on welfare issues, with 69% saying the government is handling welfare issues badly. A DWP spokesperson said: "We are determined to create a welfare system that supports people into work and out of poverty. 'At the heart of the government's reforms is £1bn scheme to help the long-term sick or disabled find good, secure jobs. 'Our Plan for Change will change people's lives for the better. That is why we have raised the national living wage, increased benefits, and given additional help to the poorest households.'
