logo
A Timeline of Prince Harry's Lawsuits, Security Challenge, and Feud with His Father King Charles

A Timeline of Prince Harry's Lawsuits, Security Challenge, and Feud with His Father King Charles

Yahoo11-05-2025

Prince Harry's family woes have been years in the making.
Since 2019, the Duke of Sussex has been locked in numerous legal battles after he first filed three lawsuits against Rupert Murdoch's News Group, the Mirror Group and Associated Newspapers over alleged phone hacking that occurred when he was a teen.
In September 2020, he also filed a lawsuit challenging the royal committee's decision to strip the royal and his family of taxpayer-funded security after he and wife Meghan Markle stepped back from senior royal duties in January of the same year. (Harry and Meghan share two children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet.)
Though Harry has been successful in his phone hacking cases, he was dealt a legal blow in May 2025 when the High Court dismissed his security claim.
Harry has also claimed his father, King Charles, could step in and help him and his family obtain security that would allow them to visit the U.K. any time he wants, putting the onus on his father and furthering the rifts between the two.
In May 2025, following the dismissed security claim, Harry admitted that he would like to repair the strained relationship he has with his family. 'I would love reconciliation with my family. There's no point in continuing to fight anymore,' Harry told BBC News on May 2. 'Life is precious. I don't know how much longer my father has.'
Shortly after, King Charles issued a call for unity ahead of VE Day. The royal family members 'are much looking forward to all the week's VE Day events,' a Buckingham Palace rep shared on May 4. 'They will unite with the rest of the nation and those across the Commonwealth and wider world in celebrating, commemorating and giving thanks to the wartime generation whose selfless devotion, duty and service should stand as an enduring example to us all — and must never be forgotten.'
As the royal family continues to be fractured, here is a look at Harry's security fight, his legal challenges and his ongoing feud with his father, King Charles.
Prince Harry's Many Legal Cases Explained: Phone Hacking, Police Protection and More
The feud between Prince Harry and King Charles goes back at least to 2016, when Harry began dating Meghan Markle, now the Duchess of Sussex. Harry confirmed his relationship with the actress in November 2016, while simultaneously speaking out against media coverage of Meghan — he likened the treatment she received from the press to what his mother, the late Princess Diana, also experienced. Harry and Meghan eventually married in May 2018.
In an interview with CBS in March 2021, Harry said that racism was a big part of the reason why he and Meghan stepped back from royal life. 'One of the people at that dinner said to me, 'Please don't do this with the media. They will destroy your life.' This person is friends with a lot of the editors,' Harry shared. 'And I said, 'So just to elaborate, what do you mean by that?' Obviously, I knew. He said, 'You need to understand that the U.K. is very bigoted,'' Harry explained. 'If the source of information is inherently corrupt or racist or bias, then that filters out to the rest of society.'
During the Sunday, March 7, interview, Meghan, 39, spoke in length on the topic, revealing that when she was pregnant with Archie, now 22 months old, there were 'concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he's born' within the palace.
Harry also wrote about racism within the family in his 2023 book Spare. 'My Mother Country. Doing this? To her? To us? Really?' he asked, revealing that a HuffPost article calling his silence 'unforgivable' prompted him to release a statement.
Prince Harry filed lawsuits against Murdoch's News Group, the Mirror Group and Associated Newspapers, alleging that the news groups resorted to hacking and deception to obtain stories about his teen years as well as about his romantic relationships.
Things really kicked off after the Duke and Duchess of Sussex stepped back from senior royal duties in January 2020, nearly nine months after the birth of their son, Prince Archie. The decision splintered the royal family, and Prince Harry and Meghan left the U.K. — first to Canada, where the government funded their protection until they ultimately relocated to Montecito, California.
'The Duke and Duchess of Sussex choosing to relocate to Canada on a part-time basis presented our government with a unique and unprecedented set of circumstances,' a statement from Public Safety Canada to Us on February 27, 2020, read. 'The RCMP has been engaged with officials in the U.K. from the very beginning regarding security considerations. As the duke and duchess are currently recognized as Internationally Protected Persons, Canada has an obligation to provide security assistance on an as-needed basis.'
A month later, a U.K. committee in charge of royal security determined Harry and his family would no longer receive the same degree of taxpayer-funded protection they were entitled to as full-time members of the family.
Harry filed a lawsuit in the U.K. following the committee's decision to strip him and his family of their security detail. Part of the issue appears to be that some members of the family who are not full-time royals still have state-funded security. 'He remains willing to cover the cost of security, as not to impose on the British taxpayer. As is widely known, others who have left public office and have an inherent threat risk receive police protection at no cost to them,' a note penned for Harry explained. 'The goal for Prince Harry has been simple — to ensure the safety of himself and his family while in the U.K. so his children can know his country.'
In January 2022, Harry applied for judicial review of a previous decision that prevented him from personally paying for police protection for himself and his family when visiting the U.K.
'Prince Harry inherited a security risk at birth, for life. He remains sixth in line to the throne, served two tours of combat duty in Afghanistan, and in recent years his family has been subjected to well-documented neo-Nazi and extremist threats,' a spokesperson for the Duke of Sussex shared at the time. 'While his role within the Institution has changed, his profile as a member of the royal family has not. Nor has the threat to him and his family.'
Queen Elizabeth II died in September 2022, ushering in the reign of Harry's father, King Charles, who has long advocated for a stripped down version of the royal family. At this point Harry and Meghan had welcomed their daughter, Princess Lilibet.
The Queen's death was difficult for the family to come to terms with. The Duke of Sussex, 37, is especially upset that he didn't arrive in Scotland until after his grandmother had already died on September 8. 'Harry is guilt-stricken — full of sorrow and regret about not saying goodbye to the queen,' an insider told Us. 'They met up a couple of times during the Platinum Jubilee, but he by no means expected it to be the last time he saw her.'
Harry also was not allowed to wear his military uniform to the Queen's funeral, despite having served in the British military and being awarded three honorary military titles, Captain General Royal Marines, Honorary Air Commandant of RAF Honington and Commodore-in-Chief of Small Ships and Diving (those titles were stripped when he and Meghan Markle stepped down).
'[Prince Harry] will wear a morning suit throughout events honoring his grandmother. His decade of military service is not determined by the uniform he wears and we respectfully ask that focus remain on the life and legacy of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II,' a spokesperson noted at the time.
Prince Harry returned to the U.K. in June 2023 to testify in his phone hacking case against the Mirror Group, making him the first royal to take the stand in a legal matter in over 100 years. Harry's 55-page witness statement was released June 6. In the document, the prince blamed tabloid coverage about him for the demise of his relationship with ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy, whom he dated off and on from 2004 to 2011. 'Ultimately, these factors led her to make the decision that a Royal life was not for her, which was incredibly upsetting for me at the time,' he wrote.
Prince Harry won his lawsuit against the Mirror Group on December 15, 2023. 'This case is not just about hacking. It is about a systemic practice of unlawful and appalling behavior, followed by clever-ups and destruction of evidence, the shocking scale of which can only be revealed through these proceedings,' Harry said in a statement after the ruling, per People. 'The journey to justice can be a slow and painful one and since bringing my claim almost five years ago defamatory stories and intimidating tactics have been deployed against me and at my family's expense.'
'My commitment to seeing this case through is based on my belief in our need — and collective right — to a free and honest press,' he continued. 'And one which is properly accountable when necessary. That is what we need in Britain and across the globe. Anything else is poisoning the well for a profession we all depend on.'
Buckingham Palace announced King Charles' cancer diagnosis in February 2024. Prince Harry traveled to the U.K. shortly after the news went public to see his father, departing on February 8.
Prince Harry commented on his father's diagnosis that month. 'I love my family,' Harry, 39, said during a February 16 appearance on Good Morning America. 'The fact that I was able to get on a plane and go and see him and spend any time with him, I'm grateful for that.'
The first blow against Harry's security claim was levied on February 28, 2024, when the High Court issued a dismissal.
Months later, Harry filed an appeal in the ongoing security claim.
Harry scored another legal victory in January 2025, when Murdoch's News Group settled their lawsuit and issued a full apology for intruding in his private life. 'NGN offers a full and unequivocal apology to the Duke of Sussex for the serious intrusion by The Sun between 1996 and 2011 into his private life, including incidents of unlawful activities carried out by private investigators working for The Sun,' News Group wrote.
'NGN also offers a full and unequivocal apology to the Duke of Sussex for the phone hacking, surveillance and misuse of private information by journalists and private investigators instructed by them at the News of the World,' the statement continued.
'NGN further apologizes to the Duke for the impact on him of the extensive coverage and serious intrusion into his private life as well as the private life of Diana, Princess of Wales, his late mother, in particular during his younger years. We acknowledge and apologize for the distress caused to the Duke, and the damage inflicted on relationships, friendships and family, and have agreed to pay him substantial damages. The media organization also acknowledged, without any admission of illegality, that NGN's response to the 2006 arrests and subsequent actions were regrettable.
'NGN also offers a full and unequivocal apology to Lord Watson for the unwarranted intrusion carried out into his private life during his time in Government by the News of the World during the period 2009- 2011,' the statement read.'This includes him being placed under surveillance in 2009 by journalists at the News of the World and those instructed by them. NGN also acknowledges and apologizes for the adverse impact this had on Lord Watson's family and has agreed to pay him substantial damages.'
Prince Harry lost his appeal to receive taxpayer-funded security on May 2. Buckingham Palace, which represents King Charles, issued a short statement on the ruling the same day. 'All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion,' the statement read.
In an interview with the BBC in May 2025, Prince Harry said he hopes to patch things up with his family. 'I would love reconciliation with my family, there's no point in continuing to fight anymore. Life is precious, I don't know how much longer my father has, he won't speak to me because of this security stuff,' he explained.
'I can't see a world in which I would be bringing my wife and children back to the U.K. at this point. They're going to miss everything, I love my country, I always have done despite what some people in that country have done,' Harry also said. 'I miss the U.K., of course I do. I think it's really quite sad that I won't be able to show my children my homeland.'
However, Harry also said he believes his father could do more to solve the security problem. 'Ultimately, this whole thing could be resolved through him," he said. "Not necessarily by intervening, but my stepping side, allowing the experts to do what is necessary and to carry out an RNB.'
King Charles released a statement about 'unity' following Harry's BBC interview.
The royal family members 'are much looking forward to all the week's VE Day events,' a Buckingham Palace rep shared on May 4. 'They will unite with the rest of the nation and those across the Commonwealth and wider world in celebrating, commemorating and giving thanks to the wartime generation whose selfless devotion, duty and service should stand as an enduring example to us all — and must never be forgotten.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HGV driver caught rolling cigarette while on M5
HGV driver caught rolling cigarette while on M5

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

HGV driver caught rolling cigarette while on M5

A HGV driver who rolled a cigarette with no hands on the wheel was among 58 motorists caught in a police crackdown last month. Gloucestershire Police used an unmarked lorry to catch unsafe driving behaviour on the M5, leading to court summons and traffic offence reports. The HGV driver was stopped by officers after being filmed between junctions 8 and 14. Sgt Matt Firth said cutting the number of people killed or seriously injured on the county's roads "continues to be a priority" for the force. More news stories for Gloucestershire Listen to the latest news for Gloucestershire National Highways has three unmarked HGV cabs which it loans out to police forces across the country as part of Operation Tramline. The driver of a tow truck was pulled over and received a ban as officers found it had no brakes and an insecure load. Officers also pulled over two drivers towing vehicles while in the third lane of the motorway, which is not permitted according to the Highway Code. Drivers were also stopped for offences such as not wearing a seatbelt and using a mobile phone behind the wheel. Sgt Matt Firth from the force's roads policing unit said: "We will continue to run these operations to detect and deter those who choose to drive in this manner, remembering that any of us or our loved ones could be impacted by such behaviours whilst using the county's roads." Follow BBC Gloucestershire on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to us on email or via WhatsApp on 0800 313 4630. Children 'dodge cars' as car park remains closed Major motorway project 'unlocks' thousands of homes Police crackdown on dangerous parking as trial begins Gloucestershire Constabulary

The Midlands bus route where passengers run gauntlet of yobs in broad daylight
The Midlands bus route where passengers run gauntlet of yobs in broad daylight

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The Midlands bus route where passengers run gauntlet of yobs in broad daylight

Passengers riding a bus through a West Midlands borough are facing ongoing issues of yob behaviour. The No.29 bus running between Walsall and Bloxwich, via Harden and Blakenall Heath, has been the target practice of yobs for more than a year. Stone throwing has been an issue that has seen the bus route diverted, causing disruption for transport users. READ MORE: Reason why man was chased through Midlands town centre at 7pm Get breaking news on BirminghamLive WhatsApp, click the link to join BirminghamLive took a ride on the No 29 bus, which is operated by National Express, in February last year following a recent bout of anti-social-behaviour (ASB). Alongside the No 29 bus, other local services such as the No 19 operated by Chaserider, and Nos 23 and 25 operated by Walsall Community Transport, had been impacted. 13 arrests after police attend road where 'illegal workers were being collected' Reason why man was chased through Midlands town centre at 7pm Cocaine kingpin told investigators he was male escort before £20m empire rumbled However the issue is continuing, with yobs police forced to patrol the area around Coal Pool Lane yesterday following multiple reports of ASB and criminal damage. Blakenall Police posted on X (formerly Twitter): "Patrols in the area of Coalpool Lane, Walsall will continue throughout the afternoon and evening in response to multiple reports of ASB and criminal damage towards @nationalexpress bus service 29. "Reports of stones and bricks being thrown at the buses."

UK judge warns of risk to justice after lawyers cited fake AI-generated cases in court
UK judge warns of risk to justice after lawyers cited fake AI-generated cases in court

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

UK judge warns of risk to justice after lawyers cited fake AI-generated cases in court

LONDON (AP) — Lawyers have cited fake cases generated by artificial intelligence in court proceedings in England, a judge has said — warning that attorneys could be prosecuted if they don't check the accuracy of their research. High Court justice Victoria Sharp said the misuse of AI has 'serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system.' In the latest example of how judicial systems around the world are grappling with how to handle the increasing presence of artificial intelligence in court, Sharp and fellow judge Jeremy Johnson chastised lawyers in two recent cases in a ruling on Friday. They were asked to rule after lower court judges raised concerns about 'suspected use by lawyers of generative artificial intelligence tools to produce written legal arguments or witness statements which are not then checked,' leading to false information being put before the court. In a ruling written by Sharp, the judges said that in a 90 million pound ($120 million) lawsuit over an alleged breach of a financing agreement involving the Qatar National Bank, a lawyer cited 18 cases that did not exist. The client in the case, Hamad Al-Haroun, apologized for unintentionally misleading the court with false information produced by publicly available AI tools, and said he was responsible, rather than his solicitor Abid Hussain. But Sharp said it was 'extraordinary that the lawyer was relying on the client for the accuracy of their legal research, rather than the other way around.' In the other incident, a lawyer cited five fake cases in a tenant's housing claim against the London Borough of Haringey. Barrister Sarah Forey denied using AI, but Sharp said she had 'not provided to the court a coherent explanation for what happened.' The judges referred the lawyers in both cases to their professional regulators, but did not take more serious action. Sharp said providing false material as if it were genuine could be considered contempt of court or, in the 'most egregious cases,' perverting the course of justice, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. She said in the judgment that AI is a 'powerful technology' and a 'useful tool' for the law. 'Artificial intelligence is a tool that carries with it risks as well as opportunities,' the judge said. 'Its use must take place therefore with an appropriate degree of oversight, and within a regulatory framework that ensures compliance with well-established professional and ethical standards if public confidence in the administration of justice is to be maintained.' Jill Lawless, The Associated Press Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store