
Republicans face new pressure to extend expiring Obamacare tax credits
'Thanks to the enhanced premium tax credits, we were able to keep affording insurance,' Capps told NBC News during a recent visit to Washington to raise awareness about the issue. 'It had almost doubled to the point of my mortgage at that time, so I was getting close to the point of having to make decisions as to whether I was going to pay my bills or have health insurance.'
Capps makes too much money to qualify for Medicaid. He falls outside the subsidy range originally set by Obamacare, also known as the Affordable Care Act. And his income hasn't been keeping up with the ever-rising cost of health care. 'Like a lot of Americans,' he said, 'I'm stuck in the middle.'
His fortunes changed when Congress capped premiums for a 'benchmark' plan to 8.5% of income.
'So thanks to that, I was able to continue treatment,' he said.
But there's a catch: That funding expires at the end of 2025, and the Democrats who passed it along party lines (first in early 2021, before extending it the following year) have since been swept out of power. The new Republican-led Congress has made clear it won't extend the money in the 'big, beautiful bill' it's using as a vehicle for President Donald Trump's domestic agenda.
Some in the GOP are open to a bipartisan deal to extend the funds. But it's far from clear Republican leaders will allow it, as many in the party want the funds to expire. Letting the money lapse would save the government tens of billions of dollars, but it would strip away coverage for about 5 million Americans, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
A new 7-figure ad campaign on ACA funds
A new coalition called Keep Americans Covered is seeking to dial up pressure on lawmakers to continue the funding, launching a new ad in a seven-figure campaign.
It features a woman named Jessica, a restaurant manager in Arizona whose daughter has a chronic illness. She says the ACA tax credits 'have been particularly helpful for our family' to help afford the coverage they need.
'We need Congress to take action now. It's vital for us,' she says in the ad. 'We need these health care tax credits passed today.'
The spot, first reported by NBC News, is set to run in Washington, D.C., and 12 states — including Louisiana and South Dakota, home to House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, respectively. The ad campaign will also run in other states like Maine, Alaska and North Carolina, which are represented by Senate Republicans who will be key to the fate of the funding. The coalition behind it includes AARP, organizations advocating for cancer patients and lobbying groups representing doctors, hospitals and insurers.
Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said he wants to strike a separate bipartisan deal with Democrats to extend the ACA tax credits.
'I think we should,' Tillis, who faces re-election in a purple state, said in an interview, warning that Republicans shouldn't settle for purely party-line votes. 'So we got — with the ACA subsidies and other things, we should start thinking about a stream of bipartisan bills that we can work on.'
But Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said the issue of the expiring funds proves that Obamacare costs more than the Democrats who enacted it claimed.
'There's been a facade out there about the entire program actually paying for itself, or having money to pay for it,' Rounds said. 'That's part of the reason why we've got such a deficit right now. So from my perspective, we will have to take a look at any of the expenditures right now for health care.'
Democrats seek to extend funds; GOP skeptical
Republicans have a complex relationship with the ACA, originally voting unanimously against it in 2010 and trying unsuccessfully for years to repeal it. They've abandoned that effort in recent years, succumbing to the law's growing popularity and mindful of the fact that their political fortunes are becoming more reliant on working-class voters in the Trump era. Still, the party has little interest in shoring up a signature Democratic achievement.
In a recent House Ways and Means Committee markup for the GOP bill, Democrats offered an amendment seeking to permanently extend the ACA money. Republicans rejected it on a party-line vote, 25-19. Notably, Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., who represents a swing district, didn't cast a vote.
House Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith, R-Mo., who voted to sink that amendment, has floated the idea of a bipartisan deal at the end of the year to extend tax provisions with broad support. When asked if he's open to including ACA tax credits in such a bill, his office declined to comment.
But Congress may not have the luxury of time. Insurers are set to finalize rates for 2026 plans in September. Open enrollment begins in early November, at which point the rates for next year will be locked in and can't change based on legislative action.
The top lobbying group for insurers warned that the impacts of inaction on the ACA funding could include premium hikes for consumers, in addition to coverage losses.
'Fifteen million Americans — including more than 4 million who rely on the health care tax credits — could lose their coverage, and millions more could face substantial premium hikes,' said a spokesperson for America's Health Insurance Plans.
If so, the higher premiums and coverage rescissions would hit during an election year, creating a political vulnerability at a time when Republicans will be fighting to hold their congressional majorities.
Capps said he agrees that the current health care system and its funding streams are imperfect. But for now, he's pleading with lawmakers not to let things get worse for people like him.
'We need to at least kick the can down the road until we can figure out a better system,' he said. 'Taking away from them in the meantime is not a solution. It's a death sentence for some.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Arnold Schwarzenegger wears expletive-laden shirt to troll Gavin Newsom over his redistricting plans
Former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger donned an expletive-laden shirt to troll incumbent Gavin Newsom over his plans to redraw districts in the state. The actor, 78, shared a picture of himself using a weight machine with the caption: 'I'm getting ready for the gerrymandering battle'. The Terminator star, who is a Republican, wore a black t shirt with the words: 'F*** the politicians. Terminate gerrymandering', with a red and blue fist across it. Gerrymandering is the term used to describe the manipulation of electoral boundaries to favor a party. Governor Newsom is looking to hold a special election in the state to seek approval to redraw districts in a bid to give Democrats five more US house seats. The plan would involve the replacement of the current nonpartisan redistricting commission, which is responsible for drawing boundaries and was formed with Schwarzenegger's support in 2008. Newsom's plans are a direct response to a similar Republican led motion in Texas, backed by Trump, as his party look to cling on to their slim House majority in the upcoming midterms. Newsom - a vocal adversary of Donald Trump - introduced his ' Election Rigging Response Act' to Golden State voters at a campaign style event earlier this week. The act, which will go before voters in November, would mean California would temporarily adopt new congressional districts through 2030 if other states - such as Texas - did the same. 'We're giving the people of this state the power to save democracy, not just in California, but all across the United States of America,' Newsom said. Democrats only need to flip three House seats to regain control of the chamber for the 2026 election. Newsom encouraged Californians and residents of other blue states to 'stand up' against the efforts being led by Texas, but are also being considered in other states. 'He's going to lose the midterms, he knows de facto his presidency ends in 17 months,' Newsom said. 'Why else would he try to rig the system?' In a letter penned to Trump on Monday, Newsom said: If you will not stand down, I will be forced to lead an effort to redraw the maps in California to offset the rigging of maps in red states.' Newsom offered a compromise to Trump by promising to call off redistricting efforts in California if GOP-led states do the same. 'But if the other states call off their redistricting efforts, we will happily do the same. And American democracy will be better for it.' If the Trump-backed plot is successful, the GOP is expected to gain at least five additional seats in the House of Representatives. 'We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats, Trump told CNBC on Tuesday. 'We have a really good governor, and we have good people in Texas. And I won Texas.' 'I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know, and we are entitled to five more seats.' If approved, a new California map would take effect only if a Republican state does its own redistricting. It would remain through the 2030 elections. After that, Democrats say, they would return mapmaking power to the independent commission voters approved in 2008. Trump has urged other Republican-run states to redraw maps, even sending Vice President JD Vance to Indiana to pressure officials there. In Missouri, according to a document obtained by The Associated Press, the state Senate received a $46,000 invoice to activate six redistricting software licenses and provide training for up to 10 staff members. Democratic state lawmakers fled from Texas to deny the GOP the quorum necessary to vote on legislation in the state capital. In response, Abbott last week The Texas governor also filed an emergency petition to the Texas Supreme Court, requesting the justices declare Democratic Minority Leader Gene Wu's seat vacant.


The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Republicans who backed Trump's anti-environment bill have accepted over $105m from big oil
The Republican lawmakers who voted for Donald Trump's anti-environment tax and spending bill have accepted more than $105m in political donations from the fossil fuel industry, a new analysis has found, raising concerns about their relationship with big oil. Signed into law last month, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act includes billions of dollars in giveaways to oil and gas companies and their executives, alongside provisions to scale back credits for clean vehicles, wind and solar which were enshrined by Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). All but two GOP House members voted to support the budget bill, as did all but three GOP senators. That includes many Republicans from districts who benefited most from the IRA's green credits, and those who spent months attempting to defend renewable energy tax credits from the budget bill's provisions, such as Representative Andrew Garbarino of New York and Senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and John Curtis of Utah. The new report from the environmental advocacy group Climate Power totalled up the funds the bill's backers have accepted from the fossil fuel industry over the course of their political careers, finding that House members accepted $54.4m and senators accepted $51.5m. 'These Republicans in Congress are caught red-handed taking massive donations from the oil and gas industry, and voting to give them billions and to destroy their competition from their own state's clean energy industries,' the analysis says. With House midterm elections scheduled for next year, Climate Power also looked at fossil fuel donations to the 15 House Republicans deemed most vulnerable to an electoral challenge, according to the Cook Political Report, which independently analyzes the political viability of elections and campaigns. All 15 backed the mega-bill, and together, they accepted more than $3m in donations from the fossil fuel industry, the authors found. Hailing from Colorado, Iowa, Arizona, New Jersey, California, Michigan and New York, the lawmakers on the list are from regions that have seen benefits from the IRA's credits for wind and solar energy, as well as battery manufacturing. The mega-bill puts more than 110,000 jobs from the three sectors at risk in the 15 lawmakers' districts, and is also expected to raise consumers' energy bills by up to $200 annually by 2030, according to the climate policy thinktank Energy Innovation. Some on the list had previously critiqued the bill: Congresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks of Iowa, who has accepted $229,179 in oil and gas contributions, pledged to support clean energy tax credits but backed the legislation anyway, while Colorado's Jeff Hurd, pledged to oppose the bill due to its cuts to Medicaid but ended up supporting it. 'These Republican members of Congress all represent moderate swing districts with close elections, where voters of both parties expect their representatives to look out for them, not to kill their jobs and raise their utility bills for the sake of out-of-state special interests,' said Pete Jones, a director at Climate Power. 'These members chose who to stand up for, and they picked their billionaire donors.' Big oil spent a stunning $445m throughout the last election cycle to influence Trump and Congress, Climate Power found in January. The industry also poured more than $19m into Trump's inaugural fund, accounting for nearly 8% of all donations it raised, a report found last month. 'We will be a rich nation again, and it is that liquid gold under our feet that will help to do it,' Trump said in his inaugural address. Since re-entering the White House, Trump has passed not only the anti-environmental One Big Beautiful Bill Act, but has also signed a slew of executive orders and policies aimed at cracking down on clean energy and boosting already-booming oil and gas.


Scottish Sun
6 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Trump and Putin locked in face to face talks on war in Ukraine after US leader flew B2 stealth bomber over tyrant's head
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) DONALD Trump had a B-2 stealth bomber fly over Vladimir Putin's head as they greeted each other in Alaska for showdown talks. The pair were last night locked in face-to-face negotiations after the astonishing show of force by the US President. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin shake hands in Alaska Credit: AFP 5 Putin shrugs to Trump as he arrives Credit: AP 5 Trump flew a B2 stealth bomber over Putin's head as they greeted each other in Alaska for showdown talks Credit: Getty 5 Trump greets the Russian president on the tarmac in Anchorage, Alaska Credit: AFP Meeting his Russian counterpart on the tarmac at a military base in Anchorage last night, the Americans lined up four £300million F-22 fighter jets on the ground for an historic handshake photo op. The two presidents then had a moment alone in Mr Trump's limo — nicknamed The Beast — ahead of closed-door talks about ending the war in Ukraine. It was the first time in almost a decade that Putin had set foot on US soil. He is an internationally-wanted war criminal for his bloody three-and-a-half year Ukraine invasion. The Russian leader grinned as he and Trump later posed for the world's media. Heckled by journalists over whether he was 'ready to stop killing civilians', the Kremlin tyrant smirked and pointed to the skies. At one point, Putin shouted back to journalists, but it is not clear what he said. Trump also dodged questions on how he could possibly trust Putin. He ducked a planned one-on-one meeting with the Russian leader, instead opting to meet alongside officials including his Secretary of State, Marco Rubio. The presidents were expected to host a joint press conference in the early hours of this morning, after the Kremlin expressed wishes for talks to last for up to six hours. Trump Putin meeting erupts into CHAOS as press bombard Putin with questions Ahead of the historic meet, both sides were flexing their muscles. The Russian jet which flew their delegation to Alaska served Chicken Kiev — the garlicky dish named after the Ukrainian capital. And the Americans served waffles on Air Force One — as Trump warned travelling journalists he would walk out of the talks if the pair did not make good ground on securing a ceasefire. Putin was forced to disembark in front of some of the most sophisticated US military kit — and was treated to a humiliating flypast of the US B-2 stealth bomber escorted by F-35 fighters. Hours earlier, Russia's top diplomat Sergei Lavrov swaggered into Alaska wearing a sweater emblazoned with 'CCCP' — Russian for USSR, the initials of the Soviet empire Putin wants to rebuild. The veteran Foreign Secretary was dressed unusually casually in jeans and gilet. Franak Viacorka, a Putin critic from Belarus, said the jumper was 'a clear nod to the Putin regime's imperial ambitions'. He said: 'They're stuck in the past and want to pull Ukraine and Belarus back with them, forgetting we are free nations that will never return to their 'brotherhood'.' The collapse of the USSR led to 15 nations, including Ukraine, gaining their independence. But Putin has called that collapse the greatest tragedy of the 20th Century. And he has made no secret of his goal to restore Russia's greatness by recapturing lands. Anton Gerashchenko, an ex-aide to Ukraine's interior ministry, said: 'The Russian delegation are trying to present the Alaska meeting as a remake of the summits of the superpowers.' They're stuck in the past and want to pull Ukraine and Belarus back with them, forgetting we are free nations that will never return to their 'brotherhood Franak Viačorka, a Putin critic from Belarus Trump said a land swap would 'be discussed' at yesterday's meeting. But he insisted: 'I've got to let Ukraine make that decision.' Speaking on Air Force One as he flew from Washington DC to Alaska, he said: 'I'm not here to negotiate for Ukraine, I'm here to get him at the table.' And he set the terms of the talks and his hopes of a ceasefire, saying: 'I wouldn't be thrilled if I didn't get it.' He told Fox News: 'I won't be happy if I walk away without some form of a ceasefire'. He also suggested a second meeting could happen, but only if current talks did not collapse. Trump was joined on Air Force One by CIA director John Ratcliffe, Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and his peace envoy Steve Witkoff, who met Putin last week. But former general Keith Kellogg, Trump's special envoy for Ukraine, did not appear to be on board. Trump said he was confident something good would come of the historic meeting. The two presidents have had many phone calls, but this is the first face-to-face meeting since 2019 when they met at a G20 summit. Trump claimed Russia wanted 'a piece' of America's wealth and he welcomed the fact Moscow's delegation included businessmen. He said: 'I notice he's bringing a lot of business people from Russia, and that's good. 'I like that, because they want to do business, but we're not doing business until we get the war settled.' The talks were due to include a working breakfast and 'five-on-five' negotiations. Delegates from both sides were set to be housed on University of Alaska's Anchorage campus as most of the city's hotels were booked out because it is peak tourism season. Russian journalists complained they were forced to sleep on camp cots in a sports arena. Kyiv said Russia had launched almost 100 missiles and drones overnight, of which 63 drones were shot down. And Ukraine struck a gunpowder factory, an oil refinery and a cargo ship on the Caspian Sea bringing in drone parts.