S&P lowers issue rating on Ukraine's GDP-linked debt to 'D' from 'CC'
June 3 (Reuters) - S&P Global revised its issue rating on Ukraine's GDP-linked securities to "D" from "CC" on Tuesday, saying it missed the $665 million payment to holders of its GDP warrants due on June 2.
The Ukraine government said on Friday it would not make the payment, based on 2023 economic performance, but would continue to seek a restructuring of the instrument.
Ukraine created the instruments - fixed income securities indexed to economic growth - to sweeten its 2015 debt restructuring, but they had not been part of last year's broader restructuring due to their complex structure.
"We do not expect the payment within the securities' contractual grace period of 10 business days, given the government's moratorium on payments on this bond unless it is restructured," ratings agency S&P said.
In S&P's view, the Ukraine government's ability and medium-term incentives to meet its financial commitments in local currency (LC) are somewhat higher than those relating to foreign currency debt.
"A default on these LC obligations would amplify banking sector distress, increasing the likelihood that the government would have to provide the banks with financial support and limiting the benefits of debt relief," it added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour is doing almost everything badly, say voters in poll showing huge public dissatisfaction with Starmer over immigration, the economy and the NHS
The public think Labour is handling almost every major issue poorly, according to bleak new polling. A survey of more than 8,000 Britons has shown that most think the Government is doing badly on all but two of 15 important policies. The YouGov research found that people are particularly scathing about the way Sir Keir Starmer 's administration is tackling three crucial areas. 'Undoubtedly, the public do mostly think the government are handling many key issues badly, with this particularly noticeable on the three issues that have consistently topped our most important issues tracker since the election: the NHS, immigration and the economy,' the pollster said. Three-quarters think immigration is being handled badly, with a majority (52 per cent) saying ministers are doing 'very badly', while only one in seven (14 per cent) give Labour positive marks. Seven in ten say the economy and NHS are being handled badly, in surveys carried out since May, compared with just one in five who support ministers' efforts. In addition, more than six in ten say the Government is doing a bad job on welfare (69 per cent), housing (66), crime (64) and inflation (62). The only faintly positive result concerns Labour's handling of terrorism, where 37 per cent say the Government is doing well and 34 per cent disagree. And on defence the public are split which 34 per cent disapproving of ministers' approach and 41 per cent backing it. However YouGov pointed out that 'the last Conservative government was also seen as doing better than average on these two issues, particularly terrorism, suggesting credit may not be due to Labour for managing these issues uniquely well'. It comes after Sir Keir plumbed new depths of unpopularity in YouGov's ratings tracker, with even half of Labour's own voters now holding an unfavourable view of him. In detailed findings that may particularly alarm No 10, the survey found that women have a particularly negative view of the Government. Only 16 per cent of women questioned said ministers were handling health well, compared with 26 per cent of men. 'Although the 20-point gender difference on the handling of the NHS is exceptionally large, the pattern is not unusual, with the government's net handling score lower among women on all but one issue polled (transport),' YouGov said. It comes amid claims five million pensioners face paying extra tax to claw back their winter fuel allowance. A complicated solution being mooted to defuse fury at Labour slashing the benefit - worth up to £300 - would see it handed to all the older generation this season. However, around half - with annual incomes over £37,000 - would repay the money later through higher tax bills. The idea has been condemned by unions amid fears bereaved families could be hit with unexpected demands for cash. Labour insiders have voiced alarm at the 'optics' of trying to recoup the allowance from the estates of those who died after getting it. Introducing a tough means test on winter fuel allowance was one of the first announcements Rachel Reeves made after entering No11, and has been blamed for triggering the dramatic slump in Labour's popularity. Only those on the lowest incomes, receiving pensioner credit, have been entitled to the handout. Keir Starmer dramatically announced a U-turn last month, without saying what exactly was being proposed or when it would take effect.
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Military chiefs warn of potential two-front war against Russia & China
British military chiefs fear a 'nightmare scenario' of fighting major wars against Russia and China at the same time, and are preparing for the West's enemies to launch coordinated campaigns. General Sir Patrick Sanders, the former head of the British army, revealed that the Ministry of Defence has drawn up plans for how to respond to wars breaking out simultaneously on two fronts. He said such crisis could erupt within two years, and told The Times' podcast The General and The Journalist how such a scenario could play out. 'We could end up with the axis powers - Russia and China, supported potentially by Iran and North Korea - collaborating to create a war on two fronts,' he said. 'It would start with a large-scale confrontation in the Indo-Pacific, like a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, which draws off what remains of US forces in Europe. An opportunistic Russia would then move against some part of a NATO territory where they know they can actually win by achieving local dominance, like the Baltics or somewhere in the high north like Svalbard. Having quickly seized limited objectives, limited territory, they sit back behind a nuclear umbrella and they dare NATO to act. Now that's incredibly high stakes, but the payoff for Putin would be very, very high.' Sanders (pictured), who left his post as chief of the general staff 11 months ago, said his former colleagues were 'really worried' about the prospect and were actively thinking it through and 'wargaming' ways to deal with it. If Russia invaded the territory of a NATO member state and the military alliance failed to act against its aggression, 'it effectively means the end of Nato', Sanders said. He additionally warned that the only way to deter aggression from Britain and NATO's adversaries was to rapidly rearm. His comments come as US defence chief Pete Hegseth (pictured) today pushed NATO to agree a deal on increasing military spending that could satisfy President Donald Trump. The US leader has demanded that alliance members boost defence budgets to five percent of their GDP at the June 24-25 meeting in the Netherlands. NATO chief Mark Rutte has put forward a compromise agreement for 3.5 percent of GDP on core military spending by 2032, and 1.5 percent on broader security-related areas such as infrastructure. Several diplomats say Rutte looks on track to secure the deal for the summit in The Hague as NATO grapples with the threat from Russia after more than three years of war in Ukraine. But a few allies remain hesitant about committing to such levels of spending, including UK PM Sir Keir Starmer, who refused to promise that Britain will raise defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP by 2034. However military leaders calling for more defence investment have warned such a rise could be too little too late. China's President Xi Jinping considers 2027 to be the date his military is capable of invading Taiwan, with Hegseth warning this week that the threat posed by Beijing is 'imminent'. Meanwhile Germany's defence chief starkly warned last week that NATO should be prepared for a possible attack by Russia within the next four years. General Carsten Breuer told the BBC that Russia poses a 'very serious threat' to the Western defence bloc, the likes of which he has never seen in his 40-year military career.' Breuer pointed to the massive increase in Vladimir Putin's armoury and ammunitions stock, including a massive output of 1,500 main battle tanks every year as well as the four million rounds of 152mm artillery munition produced in 2024 alone. He said that not all of these additional military equipment was going to Ukraine, which signalled a possible building up of capabilities that could be used against the NATO bloc, adding that Baltic states were at a particularly high risk of being attacked. 'There's an intent and there's a build up of the stocks' for a possible future attack on NATO's Baltic state members. 'This is what the analysts are assessing - in 2029. So we have to be ready by 2029... If you ask me now, is this a guarantee that's not earlier than 2029? I would say no, it's not. So we must be able to fight tonight,' he said. Breuer (pictured) said that the Suwalki Gap, a region that borders Lithuania, Poland, Russia and Belarus, was particularly vulnerable to Russian military activity. 'The Baltic States are really exposed to the Russians, right? And once you are there, you really feel this... in the talks we are having over there,' he said. Starmer on Monday vowed to make the UK 'battle-ready' while committing to building 12 new nuclear-powered submarines and at least six new munitions factories as part of the government's Strategic Defence Review. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz last week declared that Berlin will finance the production of long-range missiles in Ukraine, shortly after pushing a €500 billion defence and infrastructure spending bill through parliament. He is due to meet President Trump in Washington today as he works to keep the US on board with Western diplomatic and military support for Ukraine. Merz will hope that his pledge to sharply increase Germany's NATO defence spending will please Trump, and that he can find common ground on confronting Russia after the US president voiced growing frustration with Putin following a frosty call between the two leaders yesterday.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Airlines left with fewer flight routes as global conflict zones expand
Airlines are facing increased operational and financial burdens due to the rise in global conflict zones, including threats from missiles and airspace closures. Airspace closures around Russia, Ukraine, the Middle East, and parts of Africa are forcing airlines into expensive, last-minute re-routings. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict and drone activity near Russian airports have led to commercial flights sharing airspace with potential hazards, raising safety concerns. The downing of an Azerbaijan Airlines flight in Kazakhstan and a cargo plane in Sudan highlights the worst-case scenario of aircraft being hit by weaponry, prompting calls for better information sharing between governments. IATA emphasises the need for urgent global coordination to address conflict zone risks, as airlines navigate a patchwork of government notices and security advice, with flight crews retaining the right to refuse flights over unsafe airspace.
