D-day for Judge President Selby Mbenenge, who faces the inquisition of a lifetime
July 7 at 9.30am, Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge will finally testify at the mammoth Judicial Conduct Tribunal investigating allegations against him of sexual harassment.
The complaint, lodged with the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) by court secretary Andiswa Mengo in January 2023, has hovered over the judge president like a sword of Damocles.
Mbenenge took special leave (he was not suspended as is customary) as a result of the controversy.
The judge president, according to Judges Matter, 'is highly regarded as a senior lawyer' and credited with transforming the division, unifying the disparate seats. He also attracted some of 'the finest legal minds to serve as judges of that court'.
This case, as tribunal evidence leader, advocate Salomé Scheepers highlighted at the start, is historic. It is also the first major case of sexual harassment to reach the formal complaints process of the Judicial Service Commission.
Judges Matter noted that 'the gravity of these proceedings [is] increased by Mbenenge's status in the judiciary: he is the second-most senior judge president in the country and is the sixth-most senior judge in judicial leadership.
'If found guilty, he might just be the third judge to face judicial impeachment in the history of South Africa'.
Last week, several witnesses testified in favour of Mbenenge, including court secretaries and a Unicode expert on the technical architecture of emojis.
These pollarded (basic) childlike digital icons became a centrepiece of the inquiry, with several 'experts' testifying on the multiple meanings that could be attached to an eggplant or a blushing peach.
The central issue — which has been somewhat obscured by the dust kicked up by Mbenenge's formidable legal team, advocates Muzi Sikhakahne and Griffiths Madonsela — remains power relations in the workplace.
Mbenenge has not denied sending crude, suggestive and explicit WhatsApp messages to Mengo and has insisted their contact was consensual.
No contest
On Friday, in an attempt to counter evidence by renowned Gender-Based Violence and sexual harassment expert, Dr Lisa Vetten, Mbenenge's legal team wheeled in a court stenographer.
Unathu Sokoni, who began working for the courts in Springbok as a stenographer, and who moved to the Makhanda High Court, was called by Madonsela.
But it turned out all Sokoni could offer was a WhatsApp conversation between the accuser, Mengo, and herself and that this was to be admitted as 'expert evidence' – possibly as a woman.
'Lisa Vetten came here in this tribunal and gave evidence to the effect that the complainant was subjugated because of the power positions of her, as a child secretary, and because the judge president was a judge and a father', complained Madonsela.
Sokoni's conversation with Mbenenge's accuser would prove this not to be the case, he argued vehemently.
The tribunal heard earlier in the week from another court secretary, Zintle Nkqayi, who testified for the judge president, that he had often referred to female staff as 'my big girls' and had a penchant for commenting on their appearance.
Ironically, advocate Muzi Sikhahane had earlier accused Vetten of 'infantilising' Mengo by suggesting she did not have the capacity to ward off Mbenenge's persistent approaches.
The tribunal has heard that Mbenenge would not take 'no' for an answer.
Mengo's legal representative, Nasreen Rajab-Budlender, informed the inquiry that Sokoni was not 'an expert in power relations' and added that Mbenenge's legal team had been given ample time to find their own expert.
'They chose not to do so. The evidence Ms Sokoni seeks to give is irrelevant to the matter'.
Ngoepe agreed that 'the panel is correct that Sokoni's evidence should be regarded as inadmissible'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
2 days ago
- The South African
The Judicial Service Commission announces candidate shortlist
On 25 July 2025, the Judicial Service Commission announced the candidates that have been shortlisted for vacancies across various courts in South Africa. They will interview the selected candidates between 6 to 17 October 2025. The Constitutional Court, Supreme Court of Appeal, Land Court, Labour Court and multiple divisions of the High Court currently have open positions. 'The Constitutional Court advertised two vacancies. Six candidates have applied but only five of them are eligible to be shortlisted,' said the office of the JSC. According to the JSC, because they only had five qualifying candidates, the commission decided to re-advertise the positions. 'The advert was published on 18 July 2025, with a closing date of 6 August 2025,' they said. The commission further explained that the new applications will be narrowed down and will be sent as recommendations to the president. Despite the extension, the Constitutional Court applicants will also be interviewed in October. According to the JSC, the following candidates have been shortlisted to be interviewed in October for openings in the Supreme Court of Appeal: Judge Thandi Victoria Norman Judge Bashier Vally Judge Leonie Windell Judge Gerald Hercules Bloem Judge Busisiwe Shareen Masipa Judge Pitso Ephraim Molitsoane Although there are three vacancies open at the Johannesburg Labour Court, only one candidate, Suzanna Harvey, has made the cut. Nevertheless, law bodies and members of the public who wish to comment on the shortlisted candidates have been urged by the JSC to write to the commission's Secretariat. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
18-07-2025
- IOL News
Tribunal rules Judge Parker lied about Hlophe assault, calls it gross misconduct
Western Cape Judge Parker found guilty of contradictions and ethical breaches Image: Supplied The Judicial Conduct Tribunal has found Judge Mushtak Parker guilty of dishonesty and gross misconduct after it emerged that he provided contradictory statements regarding an alleged assault by former Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe. The tribunal, chaired by retired Judge President Bernard Ngoepe, delivered a damning verdict, stating that Parker's actions violated the standards expected of a judicial officer. The tribunal examined two complaints against Judge Parker, both centered on allegations of misconduct involving dishonesty. The first complaint, lodged on March 23, 2020, by ten Western Cape High Court judges, accused Parker of lying under oath about being physically assaulted by Hlophe in his chambers on February 25, 2019. Parker initially deposed an affidavit claiming he had been shoved and assaulted by Hlophe, an account supported by affidavits from other judges. However, in a subsequent affidavit a year later, Parker retracted his earlier version, asserting that no assault had occurred. This flip-flop, supported by testimonies from colleagues, was deemed by the tribunal to be 'mutually exclusive' and indicative of gross misconduct. In his judgement, Judge Ngoepe stated, 'The respondent acted dishonestly in giving two contradictory and mutually exclusive versions about the incident that happened in his Chambers between himself and former Judge President Hlophe. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading 'And by giving these two contradictory and mutually exclusive versions, the respondent rendered himself guilty of gross misconduct, as envisaged in section 177(1)(a) of the Constitution.' Earlier in February, the key witness, Judge Derek Wille, recounted how Parker, visibly distressed, confided in him about the alleged assault and dictated an initial affidavit. Wille also testified that Parker showed him a broken key, which Parker claimed was caused during the assault. Further testimonies revealed that Parker had relayed details of the incident to several colleagues, some of whom expressed concern over his emotional state. Adding complexity to the case, Parker's colleagues noted that his accounts of the altercation with Hlophe were inconsistent and sometimes openly contradictory. In some instances, Parker maintained that he was assaulted; in others, he seemed to question whether an assault had taken place. The second complaint, brought by the Cape Bar Council, accused Parker of failing to disclose a significant trust account deficit during his application for permanent appointment as a judge. It was revealed that Parker's law firm had a long-standing R8 million shortfall due to misappropriation of trust funds, which he omitted in his application to the Judicial Service Commission (JSC). Judge Ngoepe said that Parker's failure to disclose such material information constituted 'gross misconduct,' breaching ethical standards expected of judicial officers and attorneys. In delivering the verdict, Judge Ngoepe ruled against Parker, citing the weight of evidence indicating dishonesty and misconduct. 'Given the body of evidence before us, the tribunal finds that Judge Parker's contradictory statements about the incident with Hlophe are unacceptable and constitute gross misconduct,' he declared. IOL Politics
The Citizen
18-07-2025
- The Citizen
Chief Justice Mandisa Maya impersonated on social media
This is not the first time someone tried to impersonate Maya. Someone has been impersonating Chief Justice Mandisa Maya on several major social media platforms. The Office of the Chief Justice said it has become aware of fake social media accounts falsely claiming to be that of Maya. 'We wish to categorically state that Chief Justice Maya does not have any personal or official social media accounts on platforms such as Facebook, Twitter/X, or TikTok'. Warning It warned that impersonating a judicial offence is a criminal offense. 'It is not advisable to engage with any social media accounts/profiles claiming to be that of Chief Justice Maya' The office urged South Africans that if they receive any communication purported to be from the Chief Justice, the authenticity of which seems questionable, the legitimacy thereof may be confirmed by contacting Maya's office. ALSO READ: Meta complies, shuts down Instagram accounts and WhatsApp channels posting sexual content of SA school children Not the first time This is not the first time someone has tried to impersonate Maya. In March last year, Maya's office said an individual had sent a WhatsApp message to an official requesting contact numbers of Judges. 'The mobile number from which the message came is 072 324 9318 and is registered on the WhatsApp application as belonging to 'Chief Justice MM Maya'. The public is warned not to fall prey to this impersonator and needs to be aware that impersonating a Judicial Officer is a criminal offence.' Police The Office of the Chief Justice said the matter was reported to the South African Police Services (Saps). 'Members of the public and media are requested to contact the OCJ to verify the authenticity of any communication, directive, article, or social media post that purports to be that of a Judge.' Deputy Chief Justice Meanwhile, Gauteng Judge President Dunstan Mlambo is likely to be the next Deputy Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court of South Africa. This follows the Judicial Service Commission's (JSC) decision earlier this month to recommend Mlambo for the position. The recommendation comes after a public interview process, which started in Sandton for the position following President Cyril Ramaphosa's nomination of four candidates for the post after consulting the JSC and the leaders of political parties represented in the National Assembly (NA). ALSO READ: Ramaphosa nominates Mandisa Maya as SA's next Chief Justice
