Louisiana Senate approves bill expanding ‘hands-free' driving
The current law outlaws texting while driving, but HB 519, introduced by State Rep. Brian Glorioso, would also make it illegal to post or scroll through social media while driving.
The bill would also outlaw accessing, posting, or creating a video or photograph while behind the wheel.
The bill does make an exception for contacting law enforcement to report a crash, medical emergency, or to report a crime in progress.
The Louisiana House of Representatives approved the bill in May.
The bill now returns to the House for concurrence before making its way to the Governor.
Five arrested in Baton Rouge shooting that killed man on S. Harrell's Ferry Road
Hot Wheels custom T-Bird blends 1967 muscle with pop art firepower
Speaker Johnson: Trump 'not delighted' at Musk '180' on megabill
Baton Rouge restaurants with steak on the menu for Father's Day
Woman dies from brain-eating amoeba after using tap water to clear sinuses: CDC
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
12 hours ago
- USA Today
Boxer Gervonta Davis will not face domestic violence charges
Boxer Gervonta Davis will not face misdemeanor charges for battery-domestic violence because the alleged victim, Davis' former girlfriend, and the alleged witness, the woman's mother, failed to cooperate, according to the Miami State's Attorney Office. Davis, 30, was arrested July 11 and the charge stemmed from an alleged incident with his former girlfriend, who is the mother of his two children, on Father's Day, June 15, in Doral, Florida. "This case was dropped as the victim is declining to prosecute per her … attorney," Ed Griffith, Public Information Officer for the Miami State's Attorney Office, told USA TODAY Sports by email. "Her sentiments were directly confirmed by the Assistant State Attorney handling the prosecution. "The witness to the incident, who is the victim's mother, also failed to cooperate and failed, after being subpoenaed for a prefile conference on Thursday (Aug. 7). Followed up attempts to contact the witness via phone were unsuccessful. The incident itself was not observed by the police officer who had been called to the scene eliminating him as a possible witness to what had transpired." With the dropping of the criminal charge, the $10,000 bond required as a part of the pretrial release was dismissed, according to Griffith.
Forbes
13 hours ago
- Forbes
AT&T Data Breach Payout—Who's Eligible And How To Make A Claim
AT&T has suffered two significant data breaches over the last few years and as a result, millions of customers can now file a claim for a payout of up to $7,500. AFP via Getty Images AT&T has suffered two significant data breaches over the last few years and as a result, millions of customers can now file a claim for a payout of up to $7,500. It comes after AT&T agreed to a $177 million settlement earlier this year. The first of the two breaches in question came to light in March 2024, when the details of 7.6 million AT&T customers and 65 million former account holders were found on the 'dark web' — the underground version of the internet where cybercriminals operate. The actual breach took place five years earlier in 2019. The second, which AT&T admitted to in July 2024, saw nearly customers' data exposed via third party platform Snowflake in a 2022 incident. A federal judge in Texas has now given approval for two settlement funds, for $149 million and $28 million. AT&T denies the allegations and said it had agreed to the settlement to avoid costly litigation. So who is eligible, how much do you get and how do you make a claim? Forbes Google Issues New Update Warning To 3.5 Billion Chrome Users By Kate O'Flaherty You might have already received an email about the AT&T class action payout — in which case, you know you are eligible. It should come from the address attsettlement@ so check your junk mail too. The first class action payout is for the March 2024 data breach and is labelled AT&T 1 Settlement class, according to the newly-set up settlement website. You can apply if your data — including names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, dates of birth, account passcodes, billing account numbers and social security numbers— was included in the breach. Meanwhile AT&T 2 Settlement Class is for users whose information was involved in the 2022 incident. This includes phone numbers of current and former AT&T customers, as well as the numbers of those they interacted with, call durations and 'in a small number of cases, the cell site identification numbers associated with the interactions,' according to the website. Forbes What Is Tea, The Viral Women-Only App With 1 Million Downloads? By Kate O'Flaherty How much you can claim in the AT&T class action payout depends on which settlement you are applying for, but the individual payouts could be hefty. For Settlement 1, you have two options: A documented loss cash payment of up to $5,000 for losses that occurred in 2019 or later; or a tier cash payment, which is a pro rata share of the AT&T 1 net settlement fund cash. Just to complicate things more, there are two tiers for the latter payment. Tier 1, for AT&T 1 settlement class members who had their social security number exposed, includes a payment five times as large as tier 2, which is for people whose SSNs were not involved in the breach. For AT&T 2 settlement class, the documented loss cash payment is up to $2,500 per person for losses that occurred on or after April 14, 2024. Again, there is an option for a pro rata share of the AT&T 2 Net Settlement Fund cash. I contacted AT&T for a comment and will update this article if the firm responds. You will need to submit a claim form online by Nov. 18, or you can do so by mail to the address listed on the settlement website. You can, of course, apply for both payouts at a total of $7,500, but you will need to file each claim separately. Forbes iOS 18—Here's Why There's A New Black Dot On Your iPhone By Kate O'Flaherty Note that in both cases, you need to be able to prove you were affected by the AT&T data breach, including any losses you incurred as a result. A final approval hearing has been set for Dec. 3, after which the settlement payments will start to be sent out, so expect to see your money around the start of 2026. With payouts of up to $7,500 per person, the AT&T data breach settlement shows the real impact of people's data being exposed online. Yet for customers whose details were exposed, the genie is already out of the bottle. When it's sensitive information such as your social security number, the AT&T class action payout might not seem so large.
Indianapolis Star
a day ago
- Indianapolis Star
Family of man shot by IMPD in 2023 files lawsuit. Officer has since retired from department
His killing by an Indianapolis Metropolitan Police officer was a heavy topic of community discussion on officer-involved shootings. Two years later, his family has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the officer and the City of Indianapolis. Gary Harrell Sr., 49, was shot in the back and killed by then 28-year veteran IMPD Officer Douglas Correll on Aug. 3, 2023. A critical incident video shows Harrell running from the officer after a traffic stop with a firearm in hand, but he never points it at the officer, prompting community members and his family to question why Douglas would shoot. "We are tired, frustrated, and fed up with all this police brutality against us," Harrell's sister, Melissa "Missy" Williams, said during an October 2023 protest for Harrell. "This was my brother... It could have been one of your loved ones." Harrell's name was shared frequently in 2023 discussions about officer-involved shootings. The next man shot and killed by police that same month prompted a town hall meeting nearly 24 hours later. The Black Church Coalition called Harrell's shooting death an "egregious pattern" by the department, Indianapolis Metropolitan Police told IndyStar that Correll has since retired from the department. Harrell was the oldest of six kids, and in the lawsuit filed by his mother, it's alleged that Correll had previously been accused of using excessive force while working for the department. An 'egregious pattern': Group, family demand transparency after officer shoots, kills man Harrell's estate is seeking compensatory and punitive damages, including all reasonable and necessary medical and hospital, autopsy, and funeral expenses, and the loss of love and companionship from Harrell, along with administrative costs and attorney fees. The lawsuit was filed in July 2025, and the claims being brought forth are wrongful death, common law assault and battery, violation and deprivation of Harrell's civil rights and the Fourth Amendment's unreasonable seizure and excessive force use. Overall, the lawsuit alleges that the City of Indianapolis failed to 'properly monitor the use of excessive, unreasonable and unnecessary force by its officers,' since the city oversees the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department. "Officer Correll's actions during his interaction with Gary Harrell Sr. exhibited reckless and callous indifference to Gary Harrell Sr.'s constitutional rights," the document filed reads. It claims that IMPD tolerates and has failed to properly review, revise, implement, and enforce policies regarding investigations and handling use-of-force situations by officers. IndyStar reached out to the attorney for the lawsuit, who did not respond the time of this article's publication. 'Out of respect for the judicial process, we do not comment on pending litigation,' the department said about the case. In a 2018 lawsuit, Correll was accused of maliciously battering and crushing the spleen of an unarmed, non-resisting young man who had requested the assistance of police after he had been shot by an unknown assailant. Just before 2:15 a.m., on July 2, 2016, Indianapolis Metropolitan Police were called to a duplex in the 3900 block of Hillside Avenue. There, they encountered Joshua Harris, who had thought he'd been shot while outside. A police report for the incident states that Harris had not been shot. "He had, however, been physically assaulted by a suspect he refused to identify and arrested for resisting law enforcement after he physically impeded efforts to continue the investigation," it reads. The police report says that Harris was taken to Eskenazi Hospital for treatment of injuries he received in the initial assault. Harris's lawsuit states that when Correll and another officer arrived, Harris tried to explain what happened and show them his foot. The court document states that Correll walked straight past him and said, "Get the f--- out my face." When officers began to enter his home, Harris told them they didn't have permission. That's when Correll is accused of punching Harris twice in the face, causing him to fall to his knees. While trying to stand up, the lawsuit says Correll grabbed both of Harris's shoulders and kneed him in the abdomen. Harris would later be arrested for resisting law enforcement, but the case would be dismissed. In that case, the City of Indianapolis paid $380,000 to a trust fund for Harris on Dec. 30, 2019.
