A Belgrade landmark bombed by Nato could get Trump makeover
One of the first sights that greets arrivals to the centre of Serbia's capital Belgrade are government buildings in an advance state of collapse. Nato planes bombed them back in 1999 – and they remain in much the same condition.
The message they deliver to visitors could be "welcome to Serbia, our recent history has been tumultuous and complicated – and we still haven't quite finished processing it".
Like a smile with a row of broken teeth, the Defence Ministry buildings are still standing. But they clearly took a serious hit when Nato intervened to stop Serbia's then military campaign in Kosovo.
As a member of the Western military alliance, the US was implicated in the bombing.
Given that history, last year it came as something of a jolt for Serbians when the government struck a deal with a company called Affinity Global to redevelop the site into a $500m (£370m) luxury hotel and apartment tower complex.
Not just because the business concerned is American, but due to the fact its founder is Jared Kushner, best-known as Donald Trump's son-in-law. And because the planned development is due to be called Trump Tower Belgrade.
While these has now been a major twist in the tale that puts the scheme in some doubt, the Serbian government's decision to strike the deal wasn't too surprising.
Before he became US president in 2016, Donald Trump himself expressed interest in building a hotel on the site.
The move also fits a government pattern - as alleged by the Serbian opposition - of allowing foreign investors to profit from public property.
They cite, as a prime example, the Belgrade Waterfront residential and retail project, constructed by Emirati developers on land owned by Serbia's railways.
Where there used to be rusting rolling stock and derelict sidings, there is now a swish shopping centre, smart restaurants and the oddly bulbous, 42-storey Belgrade Tower. It is not to everyone's taste.
That, however, was a brownfield site, rather than a city centre landmark. The Defence Ministry complex is an entirely different proposition – not least because it acts as a memorial to the casualties of the 1999 bombing campaign.
It is also a highly visual reminder of why the vast majority of Serbians remain opposed to Nato, and feel sympathetic towards Russia.
In that context, granting a US developer a 99-year lease on the site, reportedly for no upfront cost, is a bold move.
But Serbia's president, Aleksandar Vucic, is unapologetic. "It's important to overcome the burden from 1999," he tells the BBC.
"We are ready to build better relations with the US – I think that is terribly important for this country."
That view garners a degree of sympathy from Belgrade's international business community.
Foreign direct investment inflows have more than tripled over the past decade. But GDP per capita remains low compared to EU member states. It stands at just one third of the bloc's average.
To keep those figures moving in the right direction, attracting new investors is vital. And while the financial details of the Ministry of Defence development have not been revealed, the New York Times has reported that the Serbian government will get 22% of future profits.
"For a small and specific market – ex-Yugoslavia, outside the EU – all publicity is good publicity," says James Thornley, a former senior partner at KPMG Serbia, who is now a partner at financial consultants KP Advisory in Belgrade.
"If you have major international players coming in, it's a pull, it's a draw. You're getting the name and opportunity out there."
Mr Thornley has lived in Serbia for 25 years and is fully aware of the sensitivities surrounding the Defence Ministry complex. But he believes that views would change once people saw the benefits of the development.
"That site is an eyesore and should be resolved," he says. "Nothing's happened for 26 years, let's get it sorted out."
But not everyone involved with international investment in Serbia is so enthusiastic.
Andrew Peirson was the managing director of global real estate giant CBRE in Southeast Europe, and now holds the same role at iO Partners, which focuses entirely on the region.
He admits that the shattered state of the Defence Ministry complex is "not good for the city's image", and that the deal to develop the site is "probably good news, because it shows the country can attract big investments".
But he has serious qualms about how the government struck the deal with Affinity Global. Mr Peirson says that there was no open tendering process that would have allowed other firms to bid for the site.
"With state-owned land, you should be able to prove you're getting market value for the site. The way you usually do that is to run a proper tender process," says Mr Peirson.
"If it had been in UK, Germany, Hungary or even Romania or Bulgaria, there would have been a process; it would have gone through the open market. Developers that were looking to enter Serbia, or already active, would have been given the chance to buy it themselves."
Back in 2023 Vucic said he met with Kushner and had an "excellent conversation" with Jared Kushner regarding the "potential for large and long-term investments."
And Donald Trump Jr has since made follow up visits to Belgrade after Affinity Global announced that a Trump International Hotel would form part of the development. The role of Trump Jr and the family business is thought to be limited to the hotel.
Questions have been raised about the Trumps making commercial deals while Donald Trump is in the White House but his press secretary has rejected any suggestion he is profiting from the presidency.
Mr Peirson is concerned that the nature of the Ministry of Defence building deal may irk businesses which have already committed to Serbia.
"If I'm an investor already putting tens or hundreds of millions into the country, I would feel sad that I hadn't been given the chance," he says.
Both Affinity Global and the Serbian government did not respond to requests for comments about how the deal over the site was agreed, and whether or not there was an open tendering process.
Ros Atkins on... Trump's deals in the Gulf
Then there is the question of whether a commercial development should be taking place at all. The site, even in its current state, remains architecturally and historically significant.
The buildings were originally constructed to welcome visitors to the capital of Tito's Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Architect Nikola Dobrovic created two structures on either side of Nemanjina Street which, viewed together, took the form of a gate.
The design also echoes the contours of Sutjeska Gorge, the site of the Yugoslav Partisans' pivotal victory over Nazi forces in 1943. And in 2005, it was granted protected status under Serbia's cultural heritage laws.
"No serious city builds a modern future by demolishing its historical centres and cultural monuments," says Estela Radonjic Zivkov, the former deputy director of Serbia's Republic Institute for the Protection of Monuments.
"For Serbia to progress, it must first respect its own laws and cultural heritage," she insists. "According to Serbian law, it is not possible to revoke the protection of this site."
But just when it seemed the site's fate was sealed, Serbian organised crime prosecutors delivered a twist worthy of a Hollywood thriller.
On 14 May, police arrested the official who had given the green light for the lifting of the Defence Ministry complex's protected status.
Prosecutors said Goran Vasic, the acting director of the Republic Institute for the Protection of Cultural Monuments, had admitted to fabricating an expert opinion which had been used to justify the change of status. He faces charges of abuse of office and forgery of official documents.
This admission has been seized on by those opposed to the project as evidence Kushner got preferential treatment. The Serbian government denies this.
Where this leaves the Affinity Global project – Trump International Hotel and all – is not entirely clear.
Repeated efforts to arrange an interview with the company have been unsuccessful, though it did issue a statement insisting that Mr Vasic had "no connection to our firm", adding that it would "review this matter and determine next steps".
Vucic, meanwhile, denies there is any problem with the development. During a meeting of European leaders in Tirana, he said "there was not any kind of forgery".
Still, it seems the Defence Ministry's shattered visage will remain unchanged for a while at least. And thanks to the Trump connection, it will offer even more of a talking point for first-time visitors to Belgrade.
Winemakers finding Trump's tariffs hard to swallow
Did Trump really strike Gulf deals worth $2tn?
The world's most dangerous country for trade unionists
Is the US finally on track to build a high-speed rail network?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
9 minutes ago
- USA Today
The average American's Social Security benefit just reached its highest level ever
The average American's Social Security benefit just reached its highest level ever Show Caption Hide Caption Social Security uncertainty and policy changes are driving more people to file With a significant rise in Social Security applications, retirees face financial decisions influenced by legislation and economic concerns in today's climate. Scripps News Every month, the Social Security Administration (SSA) releases a report called the Monthly Statistical Snapshot, which includes information about the number of Social Security beneficiaries and how much money the average person receives. In the most recent month reported (May), the average Social Security benefit paid to a retired worker reached an all-time high of $2,002.39. This is the first time the average has exceeded $2,000 per month and is a significant increase from the average retired worker's benefit of $1,917 a year ago. There are a few important things to unpack here. For one thing, benefits for retired workers are only one type of Social Security benefit. Out of the 69.6 million Social Security beneficiaries in the United States, nearly 17 million get other types of benefits, such as survivors' benefits, spousal benefits and disability benefits. Furthermore, this is a 4.5% increase in the average benefit since the end of 2024, significantly more than the 2.5% cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA, that was enacted for 2025. So, where did the extra increase come from? Finally, keep in mind that this is just an average. Many Social Security recipients receive significantly more or less than the average. Now, let's take a closer look at all of these things. The average Social Security benefit right now As mentioned, benefits for retired workers are just one part of Social Security. There are several other types of benefits, all of which have their own averages. Here's the latest data for several other common benefit categories: Why has the average Social Security benefit increased so much? As mentioned, the average retired worker's benefit has increased by 4.5% in May 2025 compared with the same month in 2024. Of course, the 2.5% Social Security cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA, has a lot to do with it. But it doesn't explain the entire increase all by itself. A big driving factor is the Social Security Fairness Act, which increased benefits for several million people (mainly former government employees) whose benefits had been reduced by the Windfall Elimination Provision and other rules. Much of the headlines about this legislation have to do with the one-time retroactive payments being made, but beneficiaries in this group also saw substantial increases in their monthly payments. In fact, the average beneficiary affected saw their monthly check increase by $360. How can you get more than the average? Of course, the $2,002 monthly average benefit is just that – an average. There are some retirees who get significantly less, and some that get significantly more. In fact, the highest possible monthly Social Security benefit for someone turning 70 in 2025 is $5,108. If you haven't yet claimed Social Security, there might be some things you can do to set yourself up for an above average monthly benefit. And the first step is knowing how the Social Security formula works. You can read our full Social Security benefits formula description for all the details, but in general, there are two main factors that influence your retirement benefit. Your work record – The SSA will adjust every year of your lifetime earnings for inflation and consider the 35 highest-earning years when calculating your benefit. So, it could be worth working an extra year or two if you're able, especially if you're in the highest-earning part of your career or if you don't have 35 years of work. – The SSA will adjust every year of your lifetime earnings for inflation and consider the 35 highest-earning years when calculating your benefit. So, it could be worth working an extra year or two if you're able, especially if you're in the highest-earning part of your career or if you don't have 35 years of work. Your claiming age – Americans who qualify can start collecting Social Security at any point between the ages of 62 and 70, but the earlier you apply, the lower your benefit will be. You don't have to wait until 70 – even a few months can make a meaningful difference. Keep in mind that any time you choose to wait will make your benefit permanently higher, which is particularly important because Social Security is the only inflation-protected income source most retirees have. As a final thought, it's a smart idea to log into the SSA's web portal (or create an account if you haven't already), where you can view an estimate of the retirement benefit that you're on track to receive based on your actual work record. That way, you'll know where you stand and if it's in your best interest to adjust your retirement strategy accordingly. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets"could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies. View the "Social Security secrets" »

Miami Herald
11 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Tony Robbins sends strong message to Americans on 401(k)s, IRAs
As life expectancy increases, many American workers are rethinking their approach to saving and investing for retirement. Finance expert and motivational speaker Tony Robbins acknowledges this reality and emphasizes a key strategy involving 401(k) plans and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) to make the prospect of longer lives something to celebrate rather than fear. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Relying solely on Social Security for financial security in retirement is not a wise course of action - especially considering how extended lifespans are lengthening the amount of time people spend on this planet beyond their working careers. According to Robbins, an average retirement lasted near 12 years, half a century ago. Today, it is common for it to stretch beyond 20 years. Related: Jean Chatzky sends strong message to Americans on Social Security Importantly, the Center for Retirement Research (CRR) has found that about half of U.S. households risk falling short on funds needed to sustain their current standard of living in retirement. Robbins encourages Americans to assess their 401(k) and IRA options early in their careers and make informed financial choices that can support a stable future. He offers some key thoughts on this subject for the many workers trying to find a way to sort it all out. Getty Robbins advises workers to take full advantage of any 401(k) contribution matching offered by their employers, as it's essentially free money that can significantly boost retirement savings. For those with the option to choose a Roth 401(k) - which allows people to pay taxes up front so they can withdraw funds tax-free in retirement - he strongly recommends doing so. His reasoning is simple: Robbins believes one's taxes are likely to be higher during retirement. If that assumption holds true, then it would be smarter to pay them at today's lower rates rather than later. More on retirement: Jean Chatzky shares major statement about Social SecurityShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has blunt words on 401(k) plansDave Ramsey strongly cautions U.S. workers on Social Security Making proactive decisions about investing in defined contribution (DC) plans - such as 401(k)s - is especially important given the long-term impact of financial hardships Americans have experienced going back to the financial crisis of 2008. "Households' retirement preparedness in all income groups was heavily affected by the Great Recession," the CRR found. "The middle and the highest thirds saw significant improvement from 2010-2019 due to rebounding housing and equity prices. In contrast, households in the bottom third saw virtually no improvement as they are less likely to own a house and participate in DC plans, and have few financial assets." Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary warns Americans on Social Security problem In his book, "Money: Master the Game," Robbins wrote that he frequently receives questions about whether setting up a Roth IRA is a smart move for retirement planning. His stance is clear - it's a resounding yes. A Roth IRA, much like a Roth 401(k), requires individuals to pay taxes on their contributions up front. The benefit? Again, once retirement arrives, withdrawals come free of tax burdens, offering financial flexibility in later years. In 2025, contribution limits for Roth IRAs are set at $7,000 for those under 50 years old. Those aged 50 and above can make an additional $1,000 catch-up contribution to bolster their retirement savings. However, income eligibility plays a role in determining how much one can contribute. To contribute the full amount, an individual's modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) must be below $150,000. For married couples filing jointly, the threshold is $236,000. Robbins emphasizes that taking advantage of these accounts is a strategic move, helping investors secure their financial future while making tax-efficient decisions. As mentioned above, with lifespans growing longer, preparing for retirement with the right tools - especially tax-advantaged accounts such as Roth IRAs - can turn financial uncertainty into a well-planned, secure future. Those who are eligible should strongly consider leveraging these opportunities as they strive to build a rewarding retirement. Related: Dave Ramsey warns Americans on Social Security The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


CNN
14 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump didn't want Israel to strike Iran. They did it anyway
In the hours before Israeli warplanes carried out an attack on Iran early Friday, raising fresh fears of all-out war in the region, President Donald Trump made clear it was an outcome he hoped to avoid. 'I don't want them going in because, I mean, that would blow it,' he said, referring to his diplomatic efforts to curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions. The fact Israel went in anyway – without any US involvement, and against the president's publicly stated wishes – now thrusts Trump into one of the biggest tests of his young presidency. By his own telling, the strikes risk scuttling his attempts at diplomacy with Tehran, even as his top envoy was preparing to depart for Oman for another round of talks this weekend. It casts a pall over his already tense relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with whom he has sharply disagreed for months and whom he urged as recently as this week to hold off on a strike. And it presents him another global conflict without any easy resolution, this one with tens of thousands of US troops potentially caught in the regional crossfire. Trump will now find himself caught between competing crosscurrents from within his own party. Many Republicans were quick to offer their support to Israel on Thursday, including Sen. Lindsey Graham – a longtime Iran hawk – who wrote on X: 'Game on.' Yet Trump has never quite adopted that strain of his party's foreign policy, particularly in his second term. His administration is stacked with officials, starting with his vice president, who take a deeply skeptical view of US military involvement abroad without express American interests on the line. Trump offered no signals in the immediate aftermath of the attacks that he was prepared to use American military assets to help defend Israel from expected Iranian reprisal, as his predecessor Joe Biden did when Israel and Iran exchanged fire last year. Without American assistance, Israel's air defenses could be unable to withstand a major Iranian onslaught. The focus of public messaging from the US administration was instead on protecting American personnel in the Middle East, and warning Iran not to drag the US into the fray. Still, for all the complicated dynamics for Trump to now sort through, the attack hardly came as a surprise to the president and his team. Even as he was speaking from the East Room on Thursday, the president and his aides were aware the strikes were likely coming soon, sources said, despite Trump's repeated attempts at urging Netanyahu to hold off. As the strikes were getting underway, Trump was appearing on the South Lawn at a congressional picnic. He returned to the West Wing afterward to huddle with top officials, according to a White House official and other sources. Afterward, a terse statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio sought to put distance between the US and any role in the attack. 'Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,' read the statement, which was distributed by the White House. 'Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense. President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners,' Rubio continue. 'Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel.' Devoid of even boilerplate language offering support for Israel and its defense, the statement made clear: this would be Israel's conflict, not Trump's.