Stratford councillors vote for two-authority plan for county
The controlling Liberal Democrat group was joined by Green Party members in supporting plans for two unitary councils.All bar one Conservative and both independent members chose to not to vote either way, saying this was mainly on the basis arguments were not fully formed.Meanwhile, one Conservative councillor voted against the two-council idea.Residents will now be asked for their views before the authority sends its final submission to the government in November.
'Issues with both choices'
Council leader councillor Susan Juned has previously said Warwickshire's authorities had a "clear preference" for two new unitary councils, rather than one.A Deloitte report commissioned by all five district and borough councils suggested a county-wide unitary would achieve greater financial savings.But it added two councils would be the best option against all other criteria, including governance, public service delivery, local identity, and stronger community engagement.In the meeting on Monday, Lib Dem councillor Victoria Alcock spoke against the idea of one large authority and said: "Having somebody faceless coming into a large area, residents will suffer and in quite a big way."Conservative councillor Ian Shenton expressed concerns about both proposals.He said: "This will be an issue whatever route is taken. Even with two unitaries, there is no guarantee, for instance, that the council will be based here in Stratford-upon-Avon."
This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations.
Follow BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
a minute ago
- Spectator
Cabinet ministers urge Starmer to recognise Palestine
Parliament may have risen for recess but that doesn't mean that Sir Keir Starmer is getting much of a break. It transpires that the Prime Minister is facing growing calls to immediately recognise Palestine as a state with a number of Cabinet minister understood to be piling pressure on the PM alongside dozens of his backbenchers. On Tuesday, just before MPs left Westminster for summer recess, Health Secretary Wes Streeting urged Sir Keir to recognise Palestine 'while there's still a state of Palestine left to recognise'. He went on: I deplore Israel's attacks on healthcare workers as well as other innocent civilians trying to access healthcare or vital aid. These actions go well beyond legitimate self-defence and undermine the prospects for peace. I sincerely hope that the international community can come together, as the foreign secretary has been driving towards, to make sure that we see an end of this war but also that we recognise the state of Palestine while there is a state of Palestine left to recognise. Streeting isn't the only member of the Cabinet understood to have pushed the issue in meetings. As reported by the Guardian, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood and Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn have also brought it up. The Health Secretary's intervention follows that of nearly 60 Labour MPs, who sent a letter to Foreign Secretary David Lammy at the start of the month after Israeli defence minister Israel Katz proposed plans to force Gaza's into a camp in Rafah. While Israeli human rights lawyer Michael Sfard described the move was 'about population transfer to the southern tip of Gaza in preparation for deportation outside the strip', the MP group wrote: 'Though an accurate description, we believe there is a clearer one. The ethnic cleansing of Gaza.' Of course, it's not just Labour politicians who have been vocal on the Middle East. As Mr S wrote in May, more than a dozen senior Tory MPs and peers broke ranks to write to Starmer to urge the PM to immediately recognise Palestine as a state. The seven MPs and six House of Lords grandees have signed a letter that insists 'recognising Palestine would affirm our nation's commitment to upholding the principles of justice, self-determination and equal rights'. The letter was signed by several Tory moderates – including MPs Kit Malthouse, Simon Hoare and father of the house Sir Edward Leigh alongside peers such as Nicholas Soames and Hugo Swire. Mr S was rather interested to note that there were some more surprising signatories, however, with right-wing Conservative MP Sir John Hayes backing the call. Starmer hadn't changed the UK's stance after the Tory group or the Labour backbenchers reached out – but will he be swayed by his own Cabinet ministers? Stay tuned…
Daily Mirror
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP errors mean thousands of PIP claimants could be owed more than £5,000
The DWP has made a string of serious administrative errors which have seen PIP claimants wrongly denied vital support or underpaid - and now thousands could be owed over £5,000 Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) blunder could mean thousands of Personal Independence Payment claimants are due more than £5,000 each. A series of administrative errors has left many disabled people either without crucial support or underpaid, with mistakes dating back years. Some claims were incorrectly dismissed from people lacking a National Insurance number, even though it's not a requirement for PIP eligibility. Over the past year alone, the DWP has reviewed 455 such cases, paying out £500,000 in arrears, reports Birmingham Live. Ayla Ozmen, policy director at anti-poverty charity Z2K, cautioned that benefits underpayment errors could inflict "significant financial hardship" on disabled people. "We are calling on the DWP to do everything it can to ensure that these errors are corrected as soon as possible," Ozmen stated. "We are calling on the DWP to do everything it can to ensure that these errors are corrected as soon as possible," Ozmen said. Former Liberal Democrat DWP minister Sir Steve Webb has suggested that the review of social support-related PIP cases "could perhaps have been processed more promptly". He also remarked that addressing all benefits underpayment issues was "the right thing to do". And Ozmen stressed the importance of ministers engaging with disabled people on reforms, stating it was "vital" to avoid "instead of making a bad system even worse". A DWP spokesperson assured that the department is "fully committed to identifying claimants that are owed money and providing the financial support to which they are entitled as quickly as possible". They said the views of disabled people would be central "at the heart of a ministerial review of PIP, to ensure the benefit is fit and fair for the future".
The National
28 minutes ago
- The National
Greens Holyrood candidate confirms late bid for party leadership
Dominic Ashmole has entered the contest after being selected as a South Scotland regional candidate for the upcoming Scottish Parliament election, according to The Herald. He joins MSPs Gillian Mackay, Ross Greer and Lorna Slater in fighting for the two co-leader posts. The 58-year-old research and development manager placed third on the South Scotland list behind the party's Laura Moodie and former Hamilton by-election candidate Anne McGuinness. He said his goal was to challenge the party to speak more plainly about the difficult times he believes are ahead, and to demand 'emergency action' at Holyrood and in wider society in response to 'the collapse of climate and nature'. READ MORE: Scottish Greens election 'clusterf***' as key member quits in candidate row 'Some people might assume that only MSPs can stand for this role," he said. "But the Scottish Greens have the luxury of two co-leaders, and this can be turned to our advantage. "With my colleague focused on delivering Green policies at Holyrood, I can work directly with the public, with civic society and with our excellent Green councillors, to help accelerate and scale up the change we so urgently need. 'We have a problem with hope. Everyone craves it – voters perhaps demand it. But 'hope' has also become a cynical rallying cry for vested interests and the super-rich." He went on: 'Tragically, the future is not in fact full of hope. 2.5 degrees of heating is expected by 2040, with 4 degrees probable before 2100 – and scientists warn we'll soon cross multiple 'tipping points' that endanger continued life on Earth. "As Greens, we are rightly proud of our achievements in both local and national government. But the brutal truth is that the situation demands bigger and faster change. Rather than selling 'hope', we should be issuing a call to arms. Let's mobilise civic society to mount a grassroots emergency response, and to empower a bolder politics.' Ashmole contested Conservative MP David Mundell's Westminster's constituency, Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale & Tweeddale, in 2024. He placed sixth with 3.4% of the vote share. (Image: Christian Gamauf) The list of Green Holyrood candidates sparked controversy earlier this week when MSP Maggie Chapman (above) was not included as a lead candidate in the North East region. Instead, she has been replaced by activist Guy Ingerson, who previously lodged a bullying complaint against Chapman. The National previously reported that the complaint alleged that the MSP contacted Ingerson's place of work in October 2024 to suggest that he was "untrustworthy and should be 'watched'". On Tuesday it was revealeda key member had quit their role after an internal row erupted over the candidate list. Kate Joester resigned from her position as internal elections officer on Monday night. Internal messages seen by The National showed members raising concerns about the selection process for some of the lists, with some members demanding a recount. The National understands concerns were also raised around the selection contest between Harvie and Ellie Gomersall – who placed second on the Glasgow list –particularly around the transferring of votes to Gomersall from candidates who were knocked out in previous voting rounds. READ MORE: Daily Express front page piles pressure on Labour to act on Gaza The party had sought to reassure members on Monday evening, as a spokesperson was quoted saying in the media that the party's internal elections officer (IEO) "has confirmed that the process and the methodology used are compliant with our selections procedure, and the lists published are correct". However, shortly after that comment was published, Joester announced she had quit the role and claimed she had no part in the statement. "To clarify regarding the statement in the press on members' concerns about counting irregularities; this did not come from me as Internal Elections Officer, and I am no longer in that post as of this evening", she told members. Joester then shared with members that she resigned from the role because "I hadn't done a good enough job", adding that she had made an error in "not spotting the anomaly in the results spreadsheets when they were initially sent to me". However, she clarified that she did "not know whether there is a problem with the results".
