Sinaloa cartel hacker turned Mexico City cameras against FBI, leading to killings, DOJ says
The 2018 incident was disclosed in the Justice Department Inspector General's audit of the FBI's efforts to "Mitigate the Effects of Ubiquitous Technical Surveillance."
The report said the FBI was working on the case of Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, the former leader of the infamous cartel who was extradited to the United States in 2017, when someone tipped the FBI that the drug-trafficking organization hired a hacker "who offered a menu of services related to exploiting mobile phones and other electronic devices."
The hacker was able to identify an FBI assistant legal attaché (ALAT) at the U.S. Embassy in Mexico City and was able to use the attaché's phone number "to obtain calls made and received, as well as geolocation data."
"According to the FBI, in addition to compromising the ALAT's phone, the hacker also accessed Mexico City's camera system, used the cameras to follow the ALAT through the city, and identified people the ALAT met with," the report states. "According to the case agent, the cartel used that information to intimidate and/or kill potential sources or cooperating witnesses."
The hacker and victims were not identified in the report. Fox News Digital has reached out to the U.S. Embassy in Mexico City, the State Department, the FBI and Justice Department.
The report noted that advances in technology have "made it easier than ever for less-sophisticated nations and criminal enterprises to identify and exploit vulnerabilities" created by UTS, a term used to describe the widespread collection and storage od data and analysis often from everyday technologies like smartphones, computers and even vehicles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
23 minutes ago
- New York Times
Republican Bid to Help Trump Move Past Epstein Falls Flat
When House Republican leaders rushed to leave Washington for a long August break, they seemed desperate to quell the anger among their supporters about the Trump administration's backtracking on a promise to release files related to its investigation of the accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. But halfway through a five-week congressional recess, the clamor shows little sign of quieting. While Republicans had hoped that legal rulings might insulate them from having to confront the issue, the courts have yet to intervene. Back in their districts, lawmakers have continued to face questions about the Epstein investigation from their constituents. And the Justice Department, which ignored a Friday deadline from Senate Democrats and faces another on Tuesday to comply with a bipartisan subpoena to provide the materials to Congress, has yet to release anything. At the same time, Democrats, in some cases with the help of Republicans, have laid a series of procedural traps that will make it all but impossible for the G.O.P. to avoid confronting the Epstein issue again when Congress reconvenes in September. 'We're going to keep the pressure up — 100 percent,' Senator Ruben Gallego, Democrat of Arizona, said at an event in Iowa this month. 'As often as we can, until we know exactly what happened, why it happened.' Even with Congress in recess, the issue continues to generate attention in Washington. On Monday, William P. Barr, who was President Trump's attorney general when Mr. Epstein died, testified in a closed-door deposition for the House Oversight Committee. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Infamous Mexican drug lord to plead guilty after being brought to US
Ismael Mario Zambada García, the former drug lord and top leader of the Sinaloa Cartel known as El Mayo, will plead guilty to federal drug charges brought by the United States Attorney's Office in Brooklyn, according to an entry on the court docket. El Mayo is due in court next week for a conference that, according to the docket, is now a "change of plea" hearing. Federal prosecutors said earlier this month they would not seek the death penalty for Zambada, who helped build the Sinaloa Cartel from a regional group to a major smuggler of cocaine, heroin and other illicit drugs into U.S., authorities have said. MORE: 'El Mayo' in plea talks in Brooklyn federal drug case, prosecutor says He was charged with 17 counts related to drug trafficking, firearms offenses and money laundering. It was not immediately clear to what charge or charges he would plead guilty. Zambada was arrested in Texas last summer after arriving in a private plane with one of Joaquin Guzmán's sons, Joaquín Guzmán López. Joaquín Guzmán López remains in custody in the U.S. and pleaded not guilty to drug trafficking charges last year. Another of El Chapo's sons, Ovidio Guzman Lopez, pleaded guilty to two counts of drug conspiracy and two counts of knowingly engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise last month, according to the Justice Department. As part of the plea, he is also set to forfeit $80 million. Ovidio Guzman Lopez admitted, through the plea, that he and his three brothers took over control of the Sinaloa Cartel after the dramatic arrest of their father, El Chapo, in 2016. He was arrested in January 2023 and extradited to the U.S. later that year. MORE: Top Sinaloa cartel leaders, including son of El Chapo, taken into US custody: DOJ El Chapo's other two sons -- Ivan Archivaldo Guzman Salazar and Jesus Alfredo Guzman Salazar -- have been charged in the U.S. but are not in custody. There are $10 million awards from the U.S. government for each man's arrest and conviction. Violence has surged in Sinaloa since the arrest of Zambada last year. There were about four times as many murders in the first half of 2025 as there were in the first six months of 2024, Reuters reported last month. ABC News' Meredith Deliso contributed to this report.
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
Law and Order: Sandwich Crimes Unit
' WASHINGTON—The Justice Department worker accused of throwing a Subway sandwich at a federal agent was re-arrested by an armed team of at least a half-dozen US Marshals in a dramatic Wednesday night raid, new video shows. Sean Charles Dunn, 37, was cuffed a second time inside his apartment about a mile northwest of the White House—after being slapped with a felony assault charge. Footage of the raid was posted by the White House on X Thursday evening with the caption: 'Nighttime Routine: Operation Make D.C. Safe Again Edition.'' — The New York Post, August 15 Police headquarters, Washington, D.C., present day. A dusty, small office. A trainee walks in carrying a cake with CONGRATULATIONS! 25 YEARS WITHOUT A SANDWICH-BASED CRIME written on it in large frosted letters. Senior Detective J, Junior Detective F, and Sergeant P are sitting around. Everyone claps. Trainee: Who wants to blow it out? A panicked junior detective, K, rushes in. Detective K: Turn on the TV. They turn on the TV. On the screen, footage of a DOJ employee tossing a hoagie at a federal law-enforcement officer and running off. The trainee drops the cake. Detective J: No! Detective K: What in tarnation were those officers doing there? Don't they know the first thing about sandwich-crime prevention? Trainee: It doesn't look like it hit very hard. Seemed soggy. Lady Sleuth: No. They'll count it. Remember the hot-dog incident in '73? Detective F: But a hot dog isn't a sandwich! Detective J: The record keepers didn't agree. Trainee: We should have fired the record keepers! Detective J: (Slamming his fist on the table) That's not how we DO things in the sandwich division. Doesn't matter if we get bad press, like a subpar panini. We don't cut corners, unless the sandwich in question is a round-type sandwich. Detective F: Some are. Officer J: You think 25 years without sandwich crime just HAPPENS? Trainee: No. Officer J: We worked for this. It hasn't been easy. When I got started on this beat, you couldn't walk down the street in Washington without having a grilled cheese shoved in your face, if you were lucky. Egg salad, if you weren't. Detective F: Not all the sandwiches were harmless. Some were clubs. People were too frightened of sandwiches to build a Subway in Georgetown. Officer K: I still have a scar from when I took a meatball sub to the chin in '96 and, afterward, got into an unrelated knife fight. Officer J: I started here after transferring from the bread-crimes division in France. I spent decades hunting down a man who stole bread one time. My name is Javert, but that's not important. His name was Jean Valjean. I also resented him because I had just the one name and he had two. Trainee: That seems excessive. Officer Javert: I think so too! One name is enough for anyone. Officer Javert: Right. It was. It turned out what he needed was rehabilitation and a second chance, not me chasing him across France, singing. But we learned from it! We realized if we were proactive rather than reactive, if we got involved in the communities we served, we could figure out what was going on and stop it. Detective F: Most sandwich crimes are crimes of opportunity. People who aren't carrying sandwiches don't tend to commit sandwich crimes. They do other types of crime. We took that statistic to the chief and said, 'You're sure you want us to go all in on eliminating sandwich crime? Not regular crime? Consider all the murders we could prevent if we just handed sandwiches to people who were about to do other crimes.' And they said, 'No, solve sandwich crime.' Detective F: Lunchables are a gateway. Officer Javert: Teaching little kids to assemble their own sandwiches, as though it were play! We tackled all of that. We started from the bread up, tackling the root causes, and then the additional causes that were layered on top, and then any sauce that was on top of that. Officer K: I remember when Mark Warner made what he claimed was a tuna melt. And everyone said, 'Call the sandwich-crimes unit!' Trainee: That was what started me down this path, sir. I saw it, and I knew it was an abomination, and I wanted to stop it. Officer Javert: The point is, people trust us. We aren't just police officers. We know the community we serve. We know how to deescalate. We look for non-carceral solutions. We ask: why would someone want to throw a sandwich? How can we fix that? We know who has beef and if that beef is corned. Detective F: That didn't happen overnight. We learned what to do: control the mayonnaise supply. And what to avoid: goofy, authoritarian displays of force. Officer K: Because no one has the urge. Trainee: And that's because of all your tireless work. Detective F: Or a caprese. Officer Javert: —with troops! It's not right! (s tares at the TV and sighs) And they just—they ruined it all! They're not stopping crime, regular or sandwich! They're just making good people anxious to walk through their own neighborhoods. I'm so angry I could throw a good-size flatbread! Detective F: (Gasps in horror) NO! You've been a mentor! Officer Javert: With soft bread! A limp one, with the tomato already falling off! Just up into the air, not at any one in particular. bOfficer K: Listen to yourself! Six heavily armed federal law-enforcement officers knock down the door, handcuff Javert, and start to haul him off. Federal enforcement: Sandwich crime is a federal crime. They drag him away, sirens blaring.
