logo
UAMS scientist awarded $1.9 million to study air pollution, breast cancer

UAMS scientist awarded $1.9 million to study air pollution, breast cancer

Yahoo07-03-2025

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (KNWA/KFTA) — A researcher at the Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences received a $1.9 million grant from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences to study the role of environmental exposures in the development of early onset breast cancer in Arkansas women.
According to a press release, Ping-Ching Hsu, Ph.D., is the first UAMS researcher to receive federal funding for a large, population-based study on environmental exposure and cancer in rural Arkansas communities. Hsu is an associate professor of Environmental Health Sciences in the UAMS Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health and a member of the Cancer Institute's Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences Research Group.
The release says the five-year NIEHS grant will advance Hsu's study of 26,000 Arkansas women, who have been study participants in the UAMS Arkansas Rural Community Health Study since 2007.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences faces potential funding cuts
According to the release, ARCH is a large group of women ages 18 to 95 from every county in Arkansas that began as Spit for the Cure.
The release says Hsu has already found that ARCH has high proportions of women younger than 50 who were healthy when they enrolled and later developed breast cancer.
'We already know that among women in the cohort who joined that had breast cancer, 45.6% of them have early-onset breast cancer; among those who were healthy when they joined and now have breast cancer, 20% of them have early-onset breast cancer, which is very high,' said Hsu. 'We have identified 709 mother-daughter pairs in the cohort — about 1,400 women — and we plan to follow them up, especially those who live close to communities that have high environmental exposures.'
Hsu will use data from the EPA National Air Toxins Assessment, U.S. Geological Survey, and the Arkansas Cancer Registry.
The release says the grant will pay for follow-up and outreach to as many as 850 participants among the mother-daughter pairs for additional data with the potential to examine individual levels of heavy metals.
According to the release, Hsu published the results of an initial study of ARCH in the Journal 'Environmental Pollution' and found several significant associations between air pollutants and breast cancer risk.
'We need to raise awareness about the health risks of environmental exposure,' said Hsu. 'Arkansas is feeding everyone in the nation, and we suffer from the exposure.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

That loud boom over the Southeast? It was likely a fireball
That loud boom over the Southeast? It was likely a fireball

Axios

timea day ago

  • Axios

That loud boom over the Southeast? It was likely a fireball

Thursday's loud, rolling rumble — and, for some, a sudden flash and white streak in the sky — might have been a fireball from a meteor passing over metro Atlanta. Why it matters: More than 100 people from Georgia and parts of South Carolina and Florida reported to the American Meteor Society a potential fireball around 12:30pm. Driving the news: Mike Hankey, operations manager at the American Meteor Society (AMS), told Axios that metro Atlantans likely experienced a "daytime fireball" that caused a sonic boom. "This is usually indicative of a meteorite dropping a fireball, but not always," Hankey said. AMS is NASA's Center for Near Earth Object Studies' recommended organization for reporting fireballs. Catch up quick: Around 12:30pm on Thursday, people using social media across metro Atlanta reported what felt and sounded like a repeat of May's earthquake in Tennessee, felt as far south as Middle Georgia. However, the U.S. Geological Survey's earthquake monitor showed no nearby seismic activity. Yes, but: According to atmospheric scientist Matthew Cappucci, what appeared to be a meteor passed over Atlanta's east side, exploded and possibly scattered fragments in South Carolina. WSB-TV chief meteorologist Brad Nitz posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, that the spectacle was probably "rock, dust, or debris from a comet's trail that enters the [Earth's] atmosphere." "The friction creates heat and we can see it burn up in the sky." Stunning stat: Meteor events occur probably once a week, Hankey said. But meteor events on Thursday's scale are rare, likely happening 10 to 20 times a year globally. "For the U.S., we might get three to five like this each year." The intrigue: Roughly 10 meteorites are recovered every year, but most go unfound. By the numbers: People have found 28 "unique and classified" meteorites in Georgia, according to Hankey.

Map Shows States With Highest Use Of Harmful Pesticides
Map Shows States With Highest Use Of Harmful Pesticides

Newsweek

timea day ago

  • Newsweek

Map Shows States With Highest Use Of Harmful Pesticides

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Midwestern and Southern states use much higher rates of the potentially harmful pesticide 2,4-D, according to U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) data. A map by USGS, based on the latest data, collected in 2019, shows that use is most prevalent across Iowa, Missouri, Kansas, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, with other states also using the herbicide in certain areas. 2,4-D was found to be "possibly carcinogenic to humans" in a 2015 report by International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in the World Health Organization (WHO), although the report states there was "inadequate evidence" at the time to determine the extent of its harm. But there are justified concerns about potential harm, depending on exposure levels to 2,4-D. Newsweek has contacted the Department of Agriculture (USDA) via email for comment. Why It Matters 2,4-D has been used as a pesticide since the 1940s, and gained notoriety as one of the components of Agent Orange, the defoliant used by U.S. forces during the Vietnam War to destroy forestry and crops. While the other component of Agent Orange, 2,4,5-T, contained high levels of dioxin which was found to cause cancer and other health problems, dioxins are reportedly not found at detectable levels in 2,4-D products sold and used in the United States, USDA said. However, there is still some concern about the safety of its use, particularly as it has been used more widely in the last decade. A map to show the use of 2,4-D pesticides in different US states. A map to show the use of 2,4-D pesticides in different US states. Uncredited/U.S. Geological Survey What To Know 2,4-D is used to kill broadleaf weeds in various places, from lawns to fruit and vegetable crops, according to USDA. "The Midwest, Great Plains, and Northwestern U.S. have the highest 2,4-D usage, largely because these regions are the primary producers of corn, soybeans, wheat, and other field crops that are commonly treated with 2,4-D," Gurumurthy Ramachandran, director of the Johns Hopkins Education and Research Center for Occupational Safety and Health, told Newsweek. The increase in its use has been primarily due to the "rise of glyphosate-resistant weeds," Ramachandran said. Glyphosate, a once dominant herbicide, has become less effective as many weed species have developed resistance to it. To combat these resistant weeds, farmers have turned to alternative herbicides like 2,4-D, given its effective and low-cost control of broadleaf weeds. However, while USDA reported that "2,4-D generally has low toxicity for humans," others may disagree. The herbicide has been linked to significant health concerns, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), endocrine disruption, a decrease in fertility and increase in birth defects, according to the nonprofit organization Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). The IARC report detailed that there was "strong evidence that 2,4-D induces oxidative stress, a mechanism that can operate in humans, and moderate evidence that 2,4-D causes immunosuppression, based on in vivo and in vitro studies." "However, epidemiological studies did not find strong or consistent increases in risk of NHL or other cancers in relation to 2,4-D exposure," it added. The IARC also told Newsweek that the classification does not indicate the level of risk associated with a given level or circumstance of exposure. "The cancer risk associated with substances or agents assigned the same classification may be very different, depending on factors such as the type and extent of exposure and the degree of the effect of the agent at a given level of exposure," the organization said. The issue is that pesticides "can remain on or in food, and chronic dietary exposure has been linked to increased risks of metabolic syndrome, cancers, and other health problems," Ramachandran said. They can also "contaminate water, air, and soil, potentially affecting people living near treated fields or those exposed through drift and runoff," he added. This means that's its important for Americans to "wash all fruits and vegetables thoroughly before consumption; consider choosing organic produce to reduce dietary pesticide exposure, especially for children and pregnant women; and avoid entering fields or areas recently treated with pesticides and follow posted warnings," Ramachandran said. What People Are Saying Cynthia Curl, a professor in the School of Public and Population Health at Boise State University, Idaho, told Newsweek: "I think we need to be judicious in our use of these agricultural tools, understanding that exposures to these chemicals have been associated with adverse health effects. We should be supporting federal programs like the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the United States Department of Agriculture, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration that fund research, outreach and education to evaluate pesticide safety and support interventions to reduce pesticide exposures to workers, people living in agricultural communities and the general public." David F. Goldsmith, an occupational and environmental epidemiologist at Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, D.C, told Newsweek: "I am concerned if farmers or farmworkers are not using effective safety gear and thus may be excessively exposed via inhalation or skin contact. I am also concerned that 2,4-D may contaminate drinking water sources. Although, I believe that there is a direct risk for people who buy produce from fields that have had 2,4-D used on them." He added: "The public needs to be informed and vigilant about the use of herbicides, keeping them away from children, schools and using protective equipment such as gloves, face masks, and goggles. For farm workers, many of whom do not speak English, the information on the Material Safety Data Sheet needs to be translated and the farm managers who are sending them out into the fields need to ensure they have personal protective equipment, that they wear long sleeves and gloves." Gerald LeBlanc, a professor in the Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, told Newsweek: "I am not concerned that 2,4-D may cause cancer in humans. IARC has classified 2,4-D as a Group 2B carcinogen, which means that it is possibly carcinogenic to humans. In my estimation, 2,4-D might cause cancer in humans, but only at unrealistically high exposure levels." He added: "It's essential to recognize that toxicity is just one side of the coin when assessing chemical risk. The other side is exposure. Pesticide applicators are exposed to much higher levels than consumers of the agricultural products. Therefore, pesticide applicators may be at risk while the pesticide may pose no risk to consumers. The EPA sets limits on the amount of pesticides that can be found on agricultural products. As long as these limits are not exceeded, the pesticides are considered to be safe for human consumption. This is the case for 2,4-D, where residues associated with crops are typically well below levels that pose a risk of harm to consumers." What's Next Before the extent of the health impacts of 2,4-D are made clear, more research is needed and various governmental agencies are continuing to review the herbicide's safety. It's also important to note, the USGS map is based on 2019 data, the latest data collected by the agency, so the prevalence and use of the pesticide may have changed in more recent years. More recently, farmers have been finding "new replacements" for the pesticide, Diana S. Aga, a professor of chemistry at University at Buffalo, New York, and fellow of the American Chemical Society, told Newsweek. The USGS also told Newsweek that final annual pesticide-use estimates, for approximately 400 compounds, from 2018 to 2022 will be published later this year. "The pesticide use data releases are currently undergoing peer review, and we anticipate these products will be published around September 2025," they said.

Fossil Discovery in Colorado Reveals New Details About Dinosaur Mating
Fossil Discovery in Colorado Reveals New Details About Dinosaur Mating

Newsweek

timea day ago

  • Newsweek

Fossil Discovery in Colorado Reveals New Details About Dinosaur Mating

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The world's largest-known dinosaur mating display area may have been found hiding in plain site at Colorado's Dinosaur Ridge site. Once a tidal flat, this region would have been periodically flooded millions of years ago. Past studies had already identified a few "lekking" spots here—areas where dinosaurs are thought to have performed elaborate courtship displays, similar to those seen in modern birds like sage grouse or manakins. However, high-resolution drone imagery captured by the U.S. Geological Survey in 2019 and 2024 allowed researchers to re-analyze a little-studied area at the ridge's base. They found something far more significant than seen before: a sprawling area covered in dozens of scrape marks, suggesting the entire site may have once been a massive dinosaur lek—essentially a prehistoric mating dance floor. Three allosauruses—dinosaurs that lived in Colorado millions of years ago—kick up dust Three allosauruses—dinosaurs that lived in Colorado millions of years ago—kick up dust Daniel Eskridge/iStock / Getty Images Plus` Dinosaur Courtship, Written in Stone The tracks identified belong to a type of fossil trace known as Ostendichnus, created by bipedal, non-avian theropod dinosaurs roughly 100 million years ago during the Cretaceous period. These dinosaurs—likely between 2.5 and 5 meters long—dug into the sand with their claws, dragging and kicking to leave long, trough-like or bowl-shaped marks. These markings came in different shapes—some long and narrow, others more circular or bowl-shaped—suggesting a mix of behaviors: not just dancing, but also potentially nest-building or testing the ground for suitable nesting sites. Some patterns even appear to show "dragging" or "claw raking" styles, adding to the evidence that different dinosaur species or individuals may have returned seasonally to display in their own unique ways. No Footsteps Allowed—Even for Scientists Dinosaur Ridge is protected, so scientists can't walk directly on the delicate rock surfaces. That's where the drone technology came in. Aerial views provided detailed, non-invasive data that allowed researchers to study the scrapes' orientation, depth and patterns without physically stepping on them. From this, the researchers were able to determine which way dinosaurs were facing when they left the traces in the ground. A Prehistoric Social Scene Researchers compared the Dinosaur Ridge findings with other known lekking sites in western Colorado and Alberta, Canada. All showed similar scrape patterns and behaviors. The dense clustering of scrapes with no evidence of food or water nearby supports the idea that these sites were purely for social and mating purposes—what modern biologists call "classical leks." Though no direct fossil evidence confirms female presence or actual mating, the arrangement and repetition of these displays over time strongly suggest that certain dinosaurs gathered in specific places—year after year—to compete for mates, much like some modern bird species. Rewriting Dinosaur Behavior Until recently, paleontologists debated whether these scrapes represented feeding, territorial marking or nesting attempts. But with new data from multiple layers of sediment and the sheer number of similar patterns across different sites, the "dinosaur dance floor" theory is gaining ground. Ultimately, this discovery at Dinosaur Ridge doesn't just add to the fossil record—it offers a rare and intimate glimpse into the social and reproductive lives of dinosaurs, connecting their behavior to that of their closest living relatives: birds. Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about dinosaurs? Let us know via science@ Reference Buntin, R. C. C., Moklestad, T., Matthews, N. A., Breithaupt, B., Murphey, P. C., Kapinos, I., & Noffke, N. (2025). A new theropod dinosaur lek in the Cretaceous Dakota Sandstone (Dinosaur Ridge, Colorado, USA). Cretaceous Research, 176.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store