logo
London climate week receives boost as Trump policies weigh on New York event

London climate week receives boost as Trump policies weigh on New York event

Straits Times27-06-2025
FILE PHOTO: Britain's Prince William, Prince of Wales walks with former Mayor of New York, Michael R. Bloomberg during the \"Leading with Impact\" event, as part of London Climate Action Week, at Bloomberg headquarters in London, Britain, June 24, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Jasso/Pool/File Photo
LONDON - London's climate week attracted record attendance, bolstered by the cloud hanging over its sister event in New York in September as the U.S. government turns its back on efforts to stop global warming and tightens entry requirements.
The annual London Climate Action Week (LCAW), which ends on Sunday, more than doubled in size compared to the 2024 edition, hosting 700-plus events and more than 45,000 attendees. That was helped by the UK's more robust stance on climate action and support for visitors from developing countries, two dozen business, political and civil society sources told Reuters.
"We have gone much bigger on LCAW this year - we are hosting several events and putting considerably more effort (in) than in the past. If we do send someone to New York, it will almost certainly just be an American citizen member of our team," said Alexis McGivern, Head of Stakeholder Engagement at Oxford Net Zero.
Under President Donald Trump, the United States has left a global deal to lower climate-damaging carbon emissions, cut development aid, rowed back on environmental standards and moved to slash support for green technologies.
By contrast, the British government was present across multiple events during LCAW, with energy secretary Ed Miliband saying he wanted Britain to be a "clean energy superpower" and to "get off the roller coaster of fossil fuel markets".
'YOU CAN TALK FRANKLY'
Given the U.S. pushback, Hindou Oumarou Ibrahim, a U.N. Indigenous Peoples representative and climate change expert, said London offered more freedom to discuss climate change, diversity and human rights.
"You can talk frankly with the government of the UK or any government here in London without being afraid of how you get treated, or targeted," she said.
Philanthropists and private investors, too, are able to speak more openly without being targeted politically, or risking damaging business interests, she said.
"This year the New York Climate Week is going to be very challenging," she said. "Not only to indigenous peoples, but even to governments. There are so many barriers that are making people say, let's act now in London."
Among steps taken in London was a push by governments for indigenous peoples' land rights to be better protected and a plan to encourage companies to buy more carbon credits.
Chief among the concerns about New York, particularly for civil society representatives, was whether they could even get in.
TRAVEL BANS
This month, the U.S. banned travellers from countries including Afghanistan, Congo Republic and Somalia - many exposed to rising extreme weather events and in need of the most help - and may yet add more.
Ibrahim, whose home country Chad is also on the list, said she would travel using her diplomatic passport but was uncertain if she would be allowed in - a concern flagged by half a dozen other LCAW attendees.
Helen Clarkson, CEO of Climate Group, which runs New York Climate Week, said she understood it would be harder for participants from certain countries to attend but that many businesses, governments and civil society were planning to come and were "super up for New York."
" is shaping up similar to other years," she said. "This is a critical moment before COP."
COP30 will take place in Brazil in November. REUTERS
Find out more about climate change and how it could affect you on the ST microsite here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Intel's US$25 billion rally sends valuation to dot-com levels
Intel's US$25 billion rally sends valuation to dot-com levels

Business Times

time11 minutes ago

  • Business Times

Intel's US$25 billion rally sends valuation to dot-com levels

[NEW YORK] After months of turbulence, Intel bulls are finally being rewarded for their patience. But the stock's sudden rebound comes with a worrying side-effect: a valuation so high its most recent precedent is from the dot-com era more than two decades ago. Shares of the struggling chipmaker have rallied 28 per cent this month, adding about US$24 billion in market value, on reports that the US government is in talks for a potential equity stake, as well as plans for a US$2 billion investment from Japan's SoftBank Group. The jump has Intel trading at 53 times profits projected over the next 12 months, the highest since early 2002, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. 'The stock looks incredibly expensive here,' said Wayne Kaufman, chief market analyst at Phoenix Financial Services. 'That kind of multiple is a bet that the government will push Intel so hard on customers that it becomes a winner.' The surge in Intel this month followed a slump in the wake of a disappointing earnings report on Jul 24 and criticism of Tan earlier by US President Donald Trump, who called for the CEO to step down, citing conflicts of interest. After meeting with Tan on Aug 11, Trump changed his tune, saying Tan's 'success and rise is an amazing story'. Since then, reports have circulated that the Trump administration is in discussions to take a stake of about 10 per cent in the company. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a CNBC interview on Tuesday (Aug 19) that the talks are aimed at converting US grants already made to Intel under the Chips and Science Act into non-voting equity. Of course, the US's plans regarding Intel have not been finalised and could still change. Intel declined to comment on Lutnick's remarks. For Paul Nolte, market strategist and senior wealth manager at Murphy & Sylvest Wealth Management, the potential government involvement could benefit Intel in the short term but may pose a risk in the long term. 'This strikes me as an easy road to get onto, but a hard one to get out of,' Nolte said. 'At the end of the day, this raises so many more questions than it answers.' Meanwhile, Intel's premium valuation is largely a reflection of just how much its profitability has collapsed in recent years. Intel is projected to generate more than US$1 billion in adjusted profit over the next four quarters, after losing about US$1.3 billion in the previous four, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. From 2018 to 2021, the company generated more than US$20 billion in annual profits on average. 'We have no idea what Intel can deliver in earnings growth since it is so behind on tech and because you can't cost-cut your way to growth,' said Nancy Tengler, chief executive officer of Laffer Tengler Investments. 'It's hard to have confidence in the estimates, which makes it difficult to assess the valuation. I think it's overvalued, but I also think the picture is so uncertain that it wouldn't be attractive at any price.' Wall Street largely echoes her caution. Fewer than 8 per cent of the analysts tracked by Bloomberg recommend buying the stock, while nearly 80 per cent have the equivalent of a neutral rating. In addition, at its Tuesday close of US$25.31, Intel trades notably above the average price target of about US$22, representing the weakest return potential among components of the Nasdaq 100 Index. Still, there is optimism that chief executive officer Tan Lip-Bu will be able to turn things around. Much of his focus has been on cost-cutting, which has improved Intel's outlook to return to profitability but raised concerns that the chipmaker may be bowing out of the race for technological leadership. Part of his effort has also been centred on a costly build out of its foundry operations undertaken by his predecessor, Pat Gelsinger. 'Clearly it's going to take a number of years for it to really start operating on a smooth basis,' said Gerrit Smit, lead portfolio manager of the Stonehage Fleming Global Best Ideas Equity fund. 'We have got trust in him, but we think he's got a long slog ahead.' BLOOMBERG

How Europe learned to speak so Trump would listen
How Europe learned to speak so Trump would listen

Straits Times

time41 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

How Europe learned to speak so Trump would listen

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox US President Donald Trump's persistent effort to bring a diplomatic end to the war has forged stronger bonds among European leaders. BERLIN – By mid-day Aug 15 in Europe, a question was bouncing among the government offices and vacation villas of the continent's most influential leaders. The Ukrainian president was headed to the White House for a crucial meeting with President Donald Trump. Mr Trump was allowing him to bring backup. But who should go? It was the sort of dilemma that once might have erupted into public disputes among Germany, France and Britain, the continent's largest powers. This time, it didn't. The leaders of those countries decided they would all accompany Mr Volodymyr Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, to Washington, for a summit with Mr Trump about peace talks with Russia. So would the leaders of Italy, Finland, the European Union and Nato. They flew in on separate planes. But with Mr Trump, they spoke in one voice. 'We were well prepared and well coordinated,' Mr Friedrich Merz, chancellor of Germany, told reporters after he and his counterparts met Mr Trump at the White House. 'We also represented the same viewpoints. I think that really pleased the American president.' Mr Trump's persistent and sometimes volatile effort to bring a diplomatic end to the war between Ukraine and Russia has forged stronger bonds among European leaders. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Proposals sought to develop Changi East Urban District next to T5 World Top officers hold Ukraine talks after Trump rules out sending US troops Singapore NDP 2026 to be held at National Stadium to accommodate more Singaporeans Singapore Girl, 14, among 3 injured after minibus falls into Bukit Panjang canal Singapore Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and ex-CFO gave input to 'play down' energy component of Tuaspring project Opinion The era of job dating? It's all about matching employers and talent Opinion Singapore's next phase of growth requires a refreshed blueprint Business SGX wants to woo private companies to list in Singapore, says its head of research It has strengthened the unity that emerged earlier this year amid Mr Trump's tariff threats and his wavering on what have been decades-long security guarantees that America has provided to Europe. Since Mr Trump's election, European leaders have raced to shore up their own defenses, wary of losing American support. Nato members, led by Germany, have pledged to increase their military spending significantly, to meet a target set by Mr Trump. Mr Merz, President Emmanuel Macron of France and Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain have signed new friendship treaties with one another and begun to build a set of shadow diplomatic institutions, including one for Ukraine, that advance European interests but do not include the United States. The last two weeks have forced them to coordinate even more closely, on the fly. After Mr Trump made the shock announcement that he would meet President Vladimir Putin of Russia in Alaska, Mr Merz quickly pulled together European allies for a video call with Mr Trump. The Europeans presented Mr Trump with a five-point strategy for him to take into the Alaska meeting – including the insistence that only Ukraine could negotiate any land swaps with Russia and that for serious peace talks to begin Russia must first agree to a ceasefire. Mr Trump signed on to it. But at the summit, he abandoned it – agreeing with Mr Putin's long-standing push to negotiate a peace deal while fighting continues, a position that advantages Russia, which is making gains on the battlefield. That reversal alarmed the European officials, even as they publicly stressed a few areas in which Mr Trump had seemingly won concessions, like the need for a robust multinational security guarantee for post-war Ukraine. After Mr Trump called to brief Mr Zelensky and then the European leaders on his way back from Alaska early on Aug 15, they scrambled again. They agreed on the large group to accompany Mr Zelensky, which was formalised by a White House invitation on the night of Aug 16, and hammered out a strategy for the meeting. Early on Aug 18, they huddled at the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington. Their script leaned heavily on flattery for Trump, which is by now standard practice among visiting dignitaries, and on declarations of unity with each other and with Mr Trump. 'Everybody around this table is in favor of peace,' Mr Macron said, as television cameras rolled, near the start of a large group meeting with the president. The Europeans avoided big disagreements with Mr Trump; the closest anyone came to a diplomatic row was when Mr Merz, on camera, repeated his belief that talks between Mr Zelensky and Mr Putin could only happen if a ceasefire was in place. Privately, Mr Merz pressed Mr Trump on at least forcing a ceasefire for the duration of any actual meeting between Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky. They also tugged on Mr Trump's heartstrings. Mr Zelensky presented a letter from his wife to Mrs Melania Trump, the first lady, echoing her public concerns over the fate of Ukrainian children abducted by Russian troops. Mr Zelensky and Dr Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Union, raised the topic again shortly before their meeting ended and Mr Trump left to call Mr Putin. European leaders expressed confidence that the approach had helped to break whatever spell Mr Putin appeared to have cast over Mr Trump in Alaska, and that Mr Trump had ended the day back in agreement with them over most points about the peace process. Mr Trump, in an interview with Fox News on Aug 19, sounded pleased with the Europeans who had visited him. 'They want to get back to leading their countries,' he said. 'They're consumed with this far more than we are.' He also took credit, in a way, for their united front. 'A year ago, they wouldn't have come,' he said. 'They wouldn't have even thought about it.' NYTIMES

Intel's $32 billion share rally sends valuation to dot-com era levels
Intel's $32 billion share rally sends valuation to dot-com era levels

Straits Times

time41 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Intel's $32 billion share rally sends valuation to dot-com era levels

Chicago - After months of turbulence, Intel bulls are finally being rewarded for their patience. But the stock's sudden rebound comes with a worrying side-effect: a valuation so high its most recent precedent is from the dot-com era more than two decades ago. Shares of the struggling chipmaker have rallied 28 per cent in August, adding about US$25 billion (S$32 billion) in market value, on reports that the US government is in talks for a potential equity stake, as well as plans for a US$2 billion investment from Japan's SoftBank Group. The jump has Intel trading at 53 times profits projected over the next 12 months, the highest since early 2002, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. 'The stock looks incredibly expensive here,' said Wayne Kaufman, chief market analyst at Phoenix Financial Services. 'That kind of multiple is a bet that the government will push Intel so hard on customers that it becomes a winner.' The surge in Intel in Aigust followed a slump in the wake of a disappointing earnings report on July 24 and criticism of its chief executive officer Tan Lip-Bu earlier by US President Donald Trump, who called for him to step down, citing conflicts of interest. After meeting with the CEO on Aug 11, Mr Trump changed his tune, saying Mr Tan's 'success and rise is an amazing story.' Since then, reports have circulated that the Trump administration is in discussions to take a stake of about 10 per cent in the company. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a CNBC interview on Aug 19 that the talks are aimed at converting US grants already made to Intel under the Chips and Science Act into non-voting equity. Of course, the US's plans regarding Intel haven't been finalised and could still change. Intel didn't respond to a request for comment. For Paul Nolte, market strategist and senior wealth manager at Murphy & Sylvest Wealth Management, the potential government involvement could benefit Intel in the short-term but may pose a risk in the long term. 'This strikes me as an easy road to get onto, but a hard one to get out of,' Mr Nolte said. 'At the end of the day, this raises so many more questions than it answers.' Meanwhile, Intel's premium valuation is largely a reflection of just how much its profitability has collapsed in recent years. Intel is projected to generate more than US$1 billion in adjusted profit over the next four quarters, after losing about US$1.3 billion in the previous four, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. From 2018 to 2021 the company generated more than US$20 billion in annual profits on average. Still, there is optimism that Mr Tan will be able to turn things around. Much of his focus has been on cost cutting, which has improved Intel's outlook to return to profitability but raised concerns the chipmaker may be bowing out of the race for technological leadership. Part of his effort has also been centered on a costly build out of its foundry operations undertaken by his predecessor, Pat Gelsinger. 'Clearly it's going to take a number of years for it to really start operating on a smooth basis,' said Gerrit Smit, lead portfolio manager of the Stonehage Fleming Global Best Ideas Equity fund. 'We've got trust in him, but we think he's got a long slog ahead.' BLOOMBERG

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store