"Hamas Causes Crisis, And We Get The Blame": Israel's UN Ambassador On Gaza
Israel's Ambassador to the United Nations, Danny Danon, has strongly criticised the UN for what he described as hypocrisy toward Israel, saying Hamas is responsible for the ongoing crisis in Gaza, The Jerusalem Post reported.
In an interview with The Jerusalem Post, Danon said, "Hamas causes the crisis, and we get the blame." He added, "We're not ignoring the suffering in Gaza -- but the blame lies with Hamas, not Israel."
According to The Jerusalem Post, Danon said international pressure on Israel in recent weeks stems less from genuine humanitarian concern and more from "a calculated propaganda campaign orchestrated by Hamas and its allies." He stated, "People see the images, they hear the outcry -- but they don't check the facts. That's why we're fighting not only on the battlefield, but in the arena of perception."
Danon firmly rejected the claim that Gaza is currently facing famine, citing international benchmarks. "Look at the quantities of food entering through Kerem Shalom, through humanitarian convoys, through aid centers -- there is a constant flow of food," he said, according to The Jerusalem Post. "But Hamas hijacks aid, disrupts distribution, and prevents civilians from accessing relief -- and then blames Israel."
He further added that the deeper issue lies in Hamas's absence from international diplomacy. "They're not in the Security Council, not at the General Assembly. We are. So all the pressure goes to us -- even though we're not the problem, we're the target," The Jerusalem Post quoted him as saying.
When asked about UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres's recent criticism of Israel's handling of humanitarian access, Danon said, "It's hypocrisy. From day one, the UN tried to undermine the Israeli National Relief Fund that was set up to provide direct aid to Gaza. They don't want Israel to succeed -- they want control. Even if that means fewer Palestinians get fed," The Jerusalem Post reported.
Danon also criticised the UN Security Council for failing to demand the release of hostages held by Hamas. "How can they have the audacity to talk about a ceasefire without demanding the release of those held in Hamas's terror tunnels?" he said. "How can you claim to stand for international law while ignoring the hostages as they languish in conditions that defy human comprehension?" he added, referring to a statement by released hostage Eli Sharabi to the council, in which Sharabi asked, "Where was the UN during my 491 days in captivity?"
Describing the UN's silence as a "moral collapse of the highest order," Danon also criticised the Red Cross, saying, "For 530 days, the Red Cross has continued to act according to Hamas's playbook," The Jerusalem Post reported.
Addressing the topic of renewed IDF military operations in Gaza, Danon stated, "There is one absolute certainty in this situation: the war will not end until the hostages are freed." He added, "This war does not end with hostages left underground."
"The choice is simple," he concluded. "If you want a ceasefire, then pressure Hamas to release the hostages immediately."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
18 minutes ago
- The Wire
'Israel Guilty of Genocide; A Place I Will Not Want to Call Home': Gershon Baskin
Video Karan Thapar 'They have created a reality in Gaza in which human beings cannot live. That is genocide. And that is what Israel is doing in Gaza.' Palestinians mourn during the funeral of people who were killed while trying to reach aid trucks entering northern Gaza through the Zikim crossing with Israel, at Shifa Hospital, in Gaza City, Saturday, July 26, 2025. Photo: AP/PTI Gershon Baskin, the Middle East Director of the International Communities Organization, who is one of the acknowledged and highly regarded voices of conscience in Israel, says: 'If it hasn't become one as yet, Israel is definitely on the fast road to becoming a pariah state'. He says Israelis increasingly feel less welcome wherever they travel. In a 25-minute interview to Karan Thapar for The Wire, to talk about his recent cri de coeur where he writes 'Israel is rapidly becoming a foreign land to me … a place that I will not want to call home, a place that I cannot call home', Baskin readily admitted and accepted that Israel is guilty of genocide. 'If you read the convention on genocide there's no question that what Israel is doing in Gaza is genocide. We're erasing a civilization. Ninety percent of the people in Gaza have no homes to go back to. They've been destroyed. Israel is now levelling half of Gaza. There are no schools, no universities, no public buildings, no libraries. Mosques are being erased. Churches were hit. Roads, infrastructure, water, electricity. They have created a reality in Gaza in which human beings cannot live. That is genocide. And that is what Israel is doing in Gaza.' The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
18 minutes ago
- Business Standard
New York to Tokyo: Japan proposes capital for UN office relocation
Tokyo Governor Yuriko Koike has proposed relocating certain functions of the United Nations (UN) to Japan's capital, citing safety, security, and the cost advantages of operating in Tokyo due to the weak yen, according to several Japanese media outlets. Koike met with UN Secretary-General António Guterres at the organisation's headquarters in New York on July 24, where she expressed Tokyo's readiness to support a broader UN presence. The meeting was part of Koike's official visit to the United States. Speaking to reporters after the meeting, she said, 'Life in Tokyo is advantageous in terms of safety and security, and thanks to the weak yen.' Japan currently hosts several UN bodies, such as the United Nations University and an office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. Trump admin policies driving cost-cutting and relocation Koike's comments come at a time when the UN is undertaking cost-cutting measures under pressure from the administration of US President Donald Trump. Rising expenses in New York have prompted the relocation of parts of the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) to Nairobi, Kenya, where operational costs are lower. Donald Trump withdraws US from major UN programmes Meanwhile, the United States, under President Trump, has been withdrawing its involvement from several UN programmes. In January, shortly after taking office for his second term, Trump announced the US' withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO). On February 4, Trump signed an executive order pulling the US out of the UN Human Rights Council and cutting funding to the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), citing anti-Israel bias and institutional failure. Last week, he announced the US' formal withdrawal from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (Unesco), effective end-2026. The latest withdrawal was criticised by Unesco Director-General Audrey Azoulay, who stated it contradicts the principles of multilateralism and may impact the agency's partnerships in the US. Several United Nations offices, including UN headquarters, and affiliated agencies operate in the United States, primarily centred in New York City, but also Washington, DC, and other locations. Koike cites weak yen and Tokyo's readiness for UN office relocation Although Koike did not present a specific proposal during the meeting, she had previously suggested transferring functions of UN agencies, including the UN Security Council, the World Health Organisation (WHO), and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), during a session at the Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly in June. Guterres responded that the UN has received similar cooperation offers from other parts of the world. Japan has recently made other moves to enhance its global engagement, including a proposal to host an Asian branch of the International Criminal Court in 2023. Koike's push for Tokyo comes as the UN marks its 80th anniversary this year.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
18 minutes ago
- Business Standard
What to expect at UN meeting on Israel-Palestinian two-state solution?
The UN General Assembly is bringing high-level officials together this week to promote a two-state solution to the decades-old Israel-Palestinian conflict that would place their peoples side by side, living in peace in independent nations. Israel and its close ally the United States are boycotting the two-day meeting, which starts Monday and will be co-chaired by the foreign ministers of France and Saudi Arabia. Israel's right-wing government opposes a two-state solution, and the United States has called the meeting counterproductive to its efforts to end the war in Gaza. France and Saudi Arabia want the meeting to put a spotlight on the two-state solution, which they view as the only viable road map to peace, and to start addressing the steps to get there. The meeting was postponed from late June and downgraded from a four-day meeting of world leaders amid surging tensions in the Middle East, including Israel's 12-day war against Iran and the war in Gaza. It was absolutely necessary to restart a political process, the two-state solution process, that is today threatened, more threatened than it has ever been," French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said Sunday on CBS News' Face the Nation." Here's what's useful to know about the upcoming gathering. Why a two-state solution? The idea of dividing the Holy Land goes back decades. When the British mandate over Palestine ended, the UN partition plan in 1947 envisioned dividing the territory into Jewish and Arab states. Israel accepted the plan, but upon Israel's declaration of independence the following year, its Arab neighbors declared war and the plan was never implemented. Under a 1949 armistice, Jordan held control over the West Bank and east Jerusalem and Egypt over Gaza. Israel captured the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza in the 1967 Mideast war. The Palestinians seek those lands for a future independent state alongside Israel, and this idea of a two-state solution based on Israel's pre-1967 boundaries has been the basis of peace talks dating back to the 1990s. The two-state solution has wide international support. The logic behind it is that the population of Israel along with east Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza is divided equally between Jews and Palestinians. The establishment of an independent Palestine would leave Israel as a democratic country with a solid Jewish majority and grant the Palestinians their dream of self-determination. Why hold a conference now? France and Saudi Arabia have said they want to put a spotlight on the two-state solution as the only viable path to peace in the Middle East and they want to see a road map with specific steps, first ending the war in Gaza. The co-chairs said in a document sent to U.N. members in May that the primary goal of the meeting is to identify actions by all relevant actors to implement the two-state solution and to urgently mobilize the necessary efforts and resources to achieve this aim, through concrete and time-bound commitments. Saudi diplomat Manal Radwan, who led the country's delegation to the preparatory conference, said the meeting must chart a course for action, not reflection. It must be anchored in a credible and irreversible political plan that addresses the root cause of the conflict and offers a real path to peace, dignity and mutual security, she said. French President Emmanuel Macron has pushed for a broader movement toward a two-state solution in parallel with a recognition of Israel's right to defend itself. He announced late Thursday that France will recognize the state of Palestine officially at the annual gathering of world leaders at the U.N. General Assembly in late September. About 145 countries have recognized the state of Palestine. But Macron's announcement, ahead of Monday's meeting and amid increasing global anger over desperately hungry people in Gaza starting to die from starvation, makes France the most important Western power to do so. What is Israel's view? Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejects the two-state solution on both nationalistic and security grounds. Netanyahu's religious and nationalist base views the West Bank as the biblical and historical homeland of the Jewish people, while Israeli Jews overwhelmingly consider Jerusalem their eternal capital. The city's eastern side is home to Judaism's holiest site, along with major Christian and Muslim holy places. Hard-line Israelis like Netanyahu believe the Palestinians don't want peace, citing the second Palestinian uprising of the early 2000s, and more recently the Hamas takeover of Gaza two years after Israel withdrew from the territory in 2005. The Hamas takeover led to five wars, including the current and ongoing 21-month conflict. At the same time, Israel also opposes a one-state solution in which Jews could lose their majority. Netanyahu's preference seems to be the status quo, where Israel maintains overall control and Israelis have fuller rights than Palestinians, Israel deepens its control by expanding settlements, and the Palestinian Authority has limited autonomy in pockets of the West Bank. Netanyahu condemned Macron's announcement of Palestinian recognition, saying it rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy, just as Gaza became." What is the Palestinian view? The Palestinians, who label the current arrangement apartheid, accuse Israel of undermining repeated peace initiatives by deepening settlement construction in the West Bank and threatening annexation. That would harm the prospect of a contiguous Palestinian state and their prospects for independence. Ahmed Majdalani, a member of the PLO Executive Committee and close associate of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, said the meeting will serve as preparation for a presidential summit expected in September. It will take place either in France or at the U.N. on the sidelines of the high-level meeting, U.N. diplomats said. Majdalani said the Palestinians have several goals, first a serious international political process leading to the establishment of a Palestinian state. The Palestinians also want additional international recognition of their state by major countries including Britain. But expect that to happen in September, not at Monday's meeting, Majdalani said. And he said they want economic and financial support for the Palestinian Authority and international support for the reconstruction and recovery of the Gaza Strip. What will happen and won't happen at the meeting? All 193 UN member nations have been invited to attend the meeting and a French diplomat said about 40 ministers are expected. The United States and Israel are the only countries who are boycotting. The co-chairs have circulated an outcome document which could be adopted, and there could be some announcements of intentions to recognize a Palestinian state. But with Israel and the United States boycotting, there is no prospect of a breakthrough and the resumption of long-stalled negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians on an end to their conflict. Secretary-General Antnio Guterres urged participants after the meeting was announced to keep the two-state solution alive. And he said the international community must not only support a solution where independent states of Palestine and Israel live side-by-side in peace but materialize the conditions to make it happen.
