Oil Climbs on Report That Israel Is Preparing to Strike Iran
(Bloomberg) — Oil jumped on a report from CNN that US intelligence suggests Israel is making preparations to strike Iranian nuclear facilities.
West Texas Intermediate futures surged as much as 3.5% to $64.19 a barrel. It isn't clear that Israeli leaders have made a final decision on whether to carry out the strikes, CNN said, citing unnamed officials.
Oil prices have been volatile since last week on mixed headlines about the fate of Iran-US talks, which could pave the way for more barrels to return to a market that's expected to be oversupplied later in the year. An attack by Israel would hinder any progress in those negotiations and add to volatility in the Middle East, which supplies about a third of the world's oil.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
'There's a difference between proxy battles and symbolic strikes versus an unmitigated attack, which is what latest reports, if true, appear to potentially flag,' said Vishnu Varathan, head of macro for Asia ex-Japan for Mizuho Bank Ltd. Other conflicts between Israel and others 'had a sense of greater restraint on both sides, especially given the involvement of, and coordination with, regional players alongside the US and Europe.'
Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on Tuesday said he didn't think the latest effort to negotiate with the US would lead to a result. WTI prices could tumble as low as $40 a barrel if sanctions on the Islamic Republic's oil exports are lifted, according to Bloomberg Intelligence.
To get Bloomberg's Energy Daily newsletter in your inbox, click here.
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
(Bloomberg) — Oil jumped on a report from CNN that US intelligence suggests Israel is making preparations to strike Iranian nuclear facilities.
West Texas Intermediate futures surged as much as 3.5% to $64.19 a barrel. It isn't clear that Israeli leaders have made a final decision on whether to carry out the strikes, CNN said, citing unnamed officials.
Oil prices have been volatile since last week on mixed headlines about the fate of Iran-US talks, which could pave the way for more barrels to return to a market that's expected to be oversupplied later in the year. An attack by Israel would hinder any progress in those negotiations and add to volatility in the Middle East, which supplies about a third of the world's oil.
'There's a difference between proxy battles and symbolic strikes versus an unmitigated attack, which is what latest reports, if true, appear to potentially flag,' said Vishnu Varathan, head of macro for Asia ex-Japan for Mizuho Bank Ltd. Other conflicts between Israel and others 'had a sense of greater restraint on both sides, especially given the involvement of, and coordination with, regional players alongside the US and Europe.'
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on Tuesday said he didn't think the latest effort to negotiate with the US would lead to a result. WTI prices could tumble as low as $40 a barrel if sanctions on the Islamic Republic's oil exports are lifted, according to Bloomberg Intelligence.
To get Bloomberg's Energy Daily newsletter in your inbox, click here.
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Toronto-area police forces keep presence at places of worship after attack in Boulder, Colo.
Toronto-area police forces are keeping a presence at places of worship following an attack in Boulder, Colo. Toronto police said they were aware of the attack Sunday in Boulder, which saw eight injured after a man with a makeshift flame-thrower attacked a group of people at an outdoor mall who were calling for the immediate release of Israeli hostages in Gaza. 'We continue to maintain a heightened and visible presence' at places of worship, schools and community centres across the city, police said in a post on X Sunday night. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Gta Toronto police ramping up presence around synagogues in wake of Jewish museum shooting in D.C. Though police say there are currently no 'credible threats' in Toronto, increased patrols will Following the deaths of two Israeli embassy staffers in Washington, D.C., on May 22, Toronto police announced, along with other local police forces, that they would be stepping up their presence around schools, community centres and all places of worship. Police also increased their presence at the annual 'Walk with Israel' on May 25 as they were 'aware of plans by some individuals to interfere with the event.' York Regional Police also said in a post Monday that they will 'maintain a heightened presence' at places of worship and faith-based community locations in the area 'out of an abundance of caution.' 'Our thoughts are with all those affected by this tragic event. The safety and well-being of our community remains our top priority,' they said. Peel police posted to X saying that they will continue to have increased presence at places of worship and cultural centres, adding that there are no known threats at this time. Ontario Hate crimes in Toronto were up 19 per cent in 2024, but decreasing this year: police TORONTO - Toronto police say reported hate crimes increased by 19 per cent in 2024, but have… In May, Toronto police release their annual hate crime report, which showed that hate crimes in the city went up by 19 per cent in 2024. The most frequent targets were the Jewish, LGBTQ+, Black and Muslim communities. The report suggests that hate crimes are down 47 per cent compared to May last year. With files from The Associated Press, The Canadian Press and Elissa Mendes
Globe and Mail
3 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Iran set to reject U.S. nuclear proposal over uranium enrichment demand, report says
Iran is poised to reject a U.S. proposal to end a decades-old nuclear dispute, an Iranian diplomat said on Monday, dismissing it as a 'non-starter' that fails to address Tehran's interests or soften Washington's stance on uranium enrichment. 'Iran is drafting a negative response to the U.S. proposal, which could be interpreted as a rejection of the U.S. offer,' the senior diplomat, who is close to Iran's negotiating team, told Reuters. The U.S. proposal for a new nuclear deal was presented to Iran on Saturday by Omani Foreign Minister Sayyid Badr Albusaidi, who was on a short visit to Tehran and has been mediating talks between Tehran and Washington. After five rounds of discussions between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi and President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, several obstacles remain. Iran says it could survive if U.S. nuclear talks end without a deal Among them are Iran's rejection of a U.S. demand that it commit to scrapping uranium enrichment and its refusal to ship abroad its entire existing stockpile of highly enriched uranium - possible raw material for nuclear bombs. Tehran says it wants to master nuclear technology for peaceful purposes and has long denied accusations by Western powers that it is seeking to develop nuclear weapons. 'In this proposal, the U.S. stance on enrichment on Iranian soil remains unchanged, and there is no clear explanation regarding the lifting of sanctions,' said the diplomat, who declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. Araqchi said Tehran would formally respond to the proposal soon. The White House encouraged Iran to accept the deal. 'President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb. Special Envoy Witkoff has sent a detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime, and it's in their best interest to accept it,' White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. 'Out of respect for the ongoing deal, the Administration will not comment on details of the proposal to the media.' Tehran demands the immediate removal of all U.S.-imposed curbs that impair its oil-based economy. But the U.S. says nuclear-related sanctions should be removed in phases. Dozens of institutions vital to Iran's economy, including its central bank and national oil company, have been blacklisted since 2018 for, according to Washington, 'supporting terrorism or weapons proliferation.' Trump's revival of 'maximum pressure' against Tehran since his return to the White House in January has included tightening sanctions and threatening to bomb Iran if the negotiations yield no deal. During his first term in 2018, Trump ditched Tehran's 2015 nuclear pact with six powers and reimposed sanctions that have crippled Iran's economy. Iran responded by escalating enrichment far beyond the pact's limits. Under the deal, Iran had until 2018 curbed its sensitive nuclear work in return for relief from U.S., EU and U.N. economic sanctions. The diplomat said the assessment of 'Iran's nuclear negotiations committee', under the supervision of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was that the U.S. proposal was 'completely one-sided' and could not serve Tehran's interests. Therefore, the diplomat said, Tehran considers this proposal a 'non-starter' and believes it unilaterally attempts to impose a 'bad deal' on Iran through excessive demands. The stakes are high for both sides. Trump wants to curtail Tehran's potential to produce a nuclear weapon that could trigger a regional nuclear arms race and perhaps threaten Israel. Iran's clerical establishment, for its part, wants to be rid of the devastating sanctions. Iran says it is ready to accept some limits on enrichment, but needs watertight guarantees that Washington would not renege on a future nuclear accord. Two Iranian officials told Reuters last week that Iran could pause uranium enrichment if the U.S. released frozen Iranian funds and recognised Tehran's right to refine uranium for civilian use under a 'political deal' that could lead to a broader nuclear accord. Iran's arch-foe Israel, which sees Iran's nuclear programme as an existential threat, has repeatedly threatened to bomb the Islamic Republic's nuclear facilities to prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Araqchi, in a joint news conference with his Egyptian counterpart in Cairo, said: 'I do not think Israel will commit such a mistake as to attack Iran.' Tehran's regional influence has meanwhile been diminished by military setbacks suffered by its forces and those of its allies in the Shi'ite-dominated 'Axis of Resistance', which include Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis in Yemen, and Iraqi militias. In April, Saudi Arabia's defence minister delivered a blunt message to Iranian officials to take Trump's offer of a new deal seriously as a way to avoid the risk of war with Israel. (Additional reporting by Daphne Psaledakis and Jeff Mason in WashingtonWriting by Parisa Hafezi, Editing by William Maclean and Rod Nickel)
Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump appears to undercut US proposal to Iran, declaring he won't allow any uranium enrichment
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Monday appeared to undercut a proposal that was offered by his special envoy to Iran, saying he will insist that Tehran fully dismantle its nuclear enrichment program as part of any deal to ease crushing sanctions. Trump and Steve Witkoff, who is leading the negotiations for the U.S., have repeatedly offered inconsistent public messages about whether Iran would be allowed to retain the capacity to enrich uranium to lower levels for civilian purposes. The Trump administration maintains that it will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. The negotiations have been framed by Trump as both countries' best chance to avoid direct military conflict over Iran's nuclear program. Tehran, which denies seeking a nuclear weapon, has insisted that it will not agree to any deal that fully scraps its enrichment program. 'Under our potential Agreement — WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!' Trump wrote on social media. The White House didn't elaborate on the post. Trump's post comes after media reports that Witkoff's latest proposal to Tehran would allow Iran to retain low levels of enrichment for civilian uses like nuclear medicine and commercial power if it agrees to shut down its heavily protected underground sites for a period of time. The U.S. and Iran have engaged in several rounds of direct nuclear talks for the first time in years. Senior officials — including Witkoff and Trump himself — have said within the last few weeks that Iran would not be able to keep enriching uranium at any level. The proposal, reported by Axios and confirmed by two U.S. officials, called for the creation of a regional consortium to handle uranium enrichment for civilian uses — a plan first studied more than a decade ago in negotiations that led to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Trump was sharply critical of that agreement — which also allowed set limits on uranium enrichment but permitted Iran to maintain such a capacity — and withdrew the U.S. from it in 2017 during his first term. The officials spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to discuss private diplomatic negotiations. The International Atomic Energy Agency found that Iran has further increased its stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels since its last update in February, according to a confidential report released by the U.N. nuclear watchdog on Saturday. Iran has maintained that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only, but Iranian officials have increasingly suggested that Tehran could pursue an atomic bomb. 'President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement before Trump's post. 'Special Envoy Witkoff has sent a detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime, and it's in their best interest to accept it. Out of respect for the ongoing deal, the Administration will not comment on details of the proposal to the media.' The proposal that Trump appeared to undercut on Monday evening included significant concessions by the administration certain to anger Israel along with pro-Israel lawmakers in the United States. Several of the main points were essentially the same or very similar to conditions outlined in the 2015 nuclear deal. Early iterations of that agreement negotiated by the Obama administration also suggested the possibility of a regional consortium that would put Iranian uranium enrichment above a certain level under the control of Iran and its neighbors. The idea was scrapped, however, because of Gulf Arab nations' objections and Iranian suspicions of the ultimate aims of the consortium. People who were involved in the 18-month negotiations for the 2015 deal reacted immediately to reports that the Trump administration might allow Iran to continue with an enrichment program at any level, particularly after senior officials repeatedly said Iran would not be able to retain such programs. 'This proposal poses a moment of truth for critics of previous Iran nuclear negotiations/agreements (and) those who have called for a no-enrichment, full-dismantlement deal,' Dan Shapiro, Obama's former ambassador to Israel, wrote on X. 'Will they hold Trump to the same standard?'
